OAN anchor assisted Giuliani in the fake elector certificates in several states

JimH52

Diamond Member
Oct 14, 2007
46,793
24,809
2,645
US

The DOJ needs to squeeze these people until they give the true leader of the coup attempt up...and guess what that was?
 

The DOJ needs to squeeze these people until they give the true leader of the coup attempt up...and guess what that was?
Not happening.
 
Throw the book at his ass...!!!!

movies-the-heat.gif
 

The DOJ needs to squeeze these people until they give the true leader of the coup attempt up...and guess what that was?
The DOJ needs to squeeze these people until they give the true leader of the coup attempt up...and guess what that was?

 
More lies from the loony left and the usual suspects, the gullible useful idiot squad is here clucking about the "fake" elector slates.

Submitting alternate elector slates has been done several times by BOTH parties... AND an alternate slate of electors was CERTIFIED in the 1960 presidential election.

The liars/idiots above are either fools or think you are fools.

Pick your poison...

 

The DOJ needs to squeeze these people until they give the true leader of the coup attempt up...and guess what that was?

Well they could have all downloaded the standard State Elector form at insurrectionsrus.com\legalstuff\elector_certification.pdf for just $9.99!
 

The DOJ needs to squeeze these people until they give the true leader of the coup attempt up...and guess what that was?
Why didn't you link directly to The Daily Beast?

Liars gonna lie...

 
More lies from the loony left and the usual suspects, the gullible useful idiot squad is here clucking about the "fake" elector slates.

Submitting alternate elector slates has been done several times by BOTH parties... AND an alternate slate of electors was CERTIFIED in the 1960 presidential election.

The liars/idiots above are either fools or think you are fools.

Pick your poison...


Both were sent because the recount in the state was still ongoing, not because of a multi state conspiracy to subvert the election results as was the case in 2020.
 
Both were sent because the recount in the state was still ongoing, not because of a multi state conspiracy to subvert the election results as was the case in 2020.
Translation...it is not only legal but an ACCEPTED PRACTICE to send two slates of electors from states where the outcome is contested.

Thank you for agreeing to exactly what I said.

Your OPINION may be that there was no cause to contest the results...but that is an opinion.

The FACT is that the results of these state elections WAS contested as per past precedent and therefore the Republican slate was not fake, counterfeit, or fraudulent in any way and that framing is tantamount to bald faced lying.

Agreed?
 

The DOJ needs to squeeze these people until they give the true leader of the coup attempt up...and guess what that was?
That's sounds like conspiracy to commit fraud. Does ink dye guy still have his bar card, because that's a way to lose it.

Edit: what happened to this guy? He was a named partner with Bracewell, one of the top five firms in the US.
 
Name one time it occurred outside of Hawaii in 1960.
Who the fuck cares?

Name one time outside of the 2020 election there was universal mail in voting?

If you can't, does that affect the legitimacy?

Don't be stupid. There is a precedent for more than one slate of electors.

You can make the argument that you believe it's a dirty trick, or underhanded or whatever...but there is no doubt there was precedent.
 
Which is dangerous.
Then we should get rid of MSNBC as well.

The times I watched OANN it was so dry and boring I couldn't stick with it for long... and I never watch the opinion shows anywhere...a total waste of time to either watch a political circle jerk or two opposing political activists shout talking points over each other.
 
Who the fuck cares?

Name one time outside of the 2020 election there was universal mail in voting?

If you can't, does that affect the legitimacy?

Don't be stupid. There is a precedent for more than one slate of electors.

You can make the argument that you believe it's a dirty trick, or underhanded or whatever...but there is no doubt there was precedent.
I mean, you said it’s been done several times. Were you lying?


Submitting alternate elector slates has been done several times by BOTH parties... AND an alternate slate of electors was CERTIFIED in the 1960 presidential election.
 

Forum List

Back
Top