MarcATL
Diamond Member
- Aug 12, 2009
- 43,911
- 23,073
- 2,605
What was the context he used it in?Youāre using it out of context and you know itā¦
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What was the context he used it in?Youāre using it out of context and you know itā¦
What was the context he used it in?
All administrations seems to have issues that warrant criticism and even accusations of 'crimes'. Sometimes justified as in the case of Nixon, Clinton, Obama et al. Sometimes not. Bush 43 did well in some things but in much was pretty mediocre and/or inefficient/ineffective and he governed far too left for my comfort. His immigration, education, environmental policies and such only a leftist could love.I hope you're right but with Bush Junior, Cheny, and Rumsfeld getting away with their crimes I am skeptical that the Biden gaggle will get what they deserve.
Yes. A representative republic, the first in history, was intended to be a government of, by, and for the people, i.e. serve and do what the people want as much as reasonable under the law. That has largely been corrupted by a) self serving professional politicians replacing most public servants and b) by a deep state determined to turn us into a Marxist totalitarian state.Hey stupid, America is a Representative Republic, not a democracy.
But you live under a fascist, so WTF would you know.
I don't get bogged down with "left" and "right". I support what I think is best and I don't give a fiddler's hangnail if it is "right" or "left".All administrations seems to have issues that warrant criticism and even accusations of 'crimes'. Sometimes justified as in the case of Nixon, Clinton, Obama et al. Sometimes not. Bush 43 did well in some things but in much was pretty mediocre and/or inefficient/ineffective and he governed far too left for my comfort. His immigration, education, environmental policies and such only a leftist could love.
Trump #45 most likely had the fewest of those legitimately criticizable issues than most despite Pelosi, Schiff et al trying to manufacture crimes out of completely legal and acceptable actions. (They came up empty on all despite endless investigations and weaponization of the FBI.)
But the Supreme Court settled the issue of whether mistakes, ill advised or bad decisions or policy by a President operating within the scope and authority of his position can be considered crimes. They can't. If that was the case pretty much every President would spend most of his time in hearings and courts because some would object to whatever decision or policy and call it illegal. Bush, Obama, Trump, Biden, for instance, would probably die in prison.
But those who literally broke the law in malicious actions toward political opponents should definitely be called to account for that. Kash Patel is on the record that one of his missions will be exactly that. If anybody can clean out the nest of vipers the FBI has mostly become, he can. And I believe Pam Bondi is committed to restoring ethics and effectiveness of the DOJ to go after criminals and not political opponents. If those true criminals are politicians/bureaucrats in the federal government, so be it.
And the leftists will blame it on Trump and accuse him of taking revenge. That will be another of their blatant lies of course, but it can't be helped. Somebody has to say enough is enough and stop it or we truly will be among the most corrupt countries in the world. Will the perpetrators go to jail? I am not really expecting that. But if they are publicly exposed and ejected from positions of power, that will be sufficient.
As an American I want my country back as the shining city on a hill the Founders intended that it be.
It will be up to The Honorable K$H Patel to investigate those who broke the law with their treasonous seditious acts.FOR THE RECORD:
I challenge any and/or every leftist/Democrat/woke person/hopelessly TDS afflicted to show me a single video or audio clip of Trump saying he intends to get revenge on his political opponents, no matter how bad they were. Never happened. Never will. He has never said that no matter how much you dishonestly spin what he actually has said.
Don't give me memes. Don't give me quotes of what others say he has said. And don't give me edited video or audio that leaves out the full context and intent of what he is saying. Plucking one line out of a conversation and leaving out all the conversation that qualifies that one line is dishonesty of the worst sort.
Let's see some integrity from the left. If you are going to accuse Trump, show your evidence.
I don't get bogged down with "left" and "right".
Precisely.They're meaningless terms.
Labels can be useful though when describing the agenda of various groups. Saves a lot of time.I don't get bogged down with "left" and "right". I support what I think is best and I don't give a fiddler's hangnail if it is "right" or "left".
yes and he explained it, on Meet the Press. Did you listen?Did Trump not say those words?
yet you can't post what he actually said, so it's on you to present a receipt to further your position as fact.Deny what he said, but it does not change what he says.![]()
No. The 'system' has been corrupt, malicious, and illegal re Trump. And there should be a comeuppance for that even though he himself will almost certainly not instigate that.The system work for defendant Trump, just as it should have.
Yeah, no need to lie about the use of the word. Again, you demofks still don't understand the use of it. You live under the guidance and pressure of demofk elites. I don't, I can be honest, now you, you suck at this. You're just a lying cuck without any integrity. What a life to lead. I love my integrity, I demand of myself to live by it.jc456 admits he said it. It's a non-issue.