Now Liberals Are Killing Living Babies, Legally ?

[Baron Von Murderpaws]

I didn't make a "claim", fool. Buy a dictionary.

You created the post without any links. It is your claim.

 

[hjmick]

And they don't actually provide the language of the legislation? Shocking....

Nor do they include the name of the bill or the number designation...

 

[hjmick]

Threads like this is what we get when fools research only as far as their fucking inbox. They see something that confirms their bias and just fucking run with it, truth and facts be damned...

Fact Check-California reproductive health bill leads to misinterpretation online

A newspaper article suggesting a proposed California reproductive health bill would legalize the maternal killing of newborn babies, a claim that quickly spread on social media where users claimed the bill would legalize infanticide, misinterpreted the bill, experts told...

www.reuters.com

 

[protectionist]

You created the post without any links. It is your claim.

So you can't tell the difference between a claim, and a question (HA HA)

Go back to the OP. You see a symbol that looks like this > ?

And a sentence before it, like this > "Anybody know anything more about this ?"

That means it's a question. Got it now ?

 

[protectionist]

Nor do they include the name of the bill or the number designation...

True. That's why the title of the OP ends with QUESTION mark- as does the first paragraph.

So, again if you have any factual information, let's hear it.

 

[protectionist]

Threads like this is what we get when fools research only as far as their fucking inbox. They see something that confirms their bias and just fucking run with it, truth and facts be damned...

Fact Check-California reproductive health bill leads to misinterpretation online

A newspaper article suggesting a proposed California reproductive health bill would legalize the maternal killing of newborn babies, a claim that quickly spread on social media where users claimed the bill would legalize infanticide, misinterpreted the bill, experts told...

www.reuters.com

You are the FOOL. I have no "bias" (strike 1), have "confirmed" nothing (strike 2), and have "run with" nothing whatsoever (strike 3) .

As for the"facts" you mention, that's what the OP is asking for, as is obvious to those of us who don't need a remedial course in reading comprehension, and who know what a question mark is.

Back to the 3rd grade for you, dunce.

 

[White 6]

And if Hellbilly wants to say it's "Fake news" we're open to hear what he bases that on.

At this point, I'm open to factual information (not blind guesses)

It is not up to "Hellbilly" to be responsible for proving it is fake news, as you The OP Of The Thread provided no link to show it was a real new story at all, to begin with.
Thread locked