Not surprisingly, Obama nailed it.

[berg80]

AI Overview

As of late 2025 and early 2026, President Donald Trump has stated that Ukraine and Russia are "closer than ever" to a peace deal following meetings with Volodymyr Zelenskyy and discussions with Vladimir Putin. While claiming significant progress, Trump has acknowledged that substantial "thorny issues" remain, and negotiators are still working on a final agreement.

Has a familiar ring, doesn't it?

Trump says U.S. and Iran are ‘in negotiations right now,’ Tehran is ‘talking sense’​

Trump says U.S. and Iran are 'in negotiations right now,' Tehran is 'talking sense'

"Operation Epic Fury continues unabated" to achieve President Donald Trump's military objectives, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said.

www.cnbc.com

 

[Marener]

Why did the US even need to be in the deal? Why couldn't France or Canada keep the deal together without the US?

Is this a serious question?

 

[berg80]

Is this a serious question?

It's definitely a stupid question.

 

[knuckles]

Not surprisingly, Obama nailed it.​

The only nails Obama handled were the ones going into the lid of our coffin.

 

[Stryder50]

Obama enabled Iran to be as much of a threat and sponsor of terrorism by proxies as they are now, or as much as they were at the beginning of this thing, anyway.
He gave them money to do it, even.

Obama, a Muslim helping Jihadists.

 

[Hellokitty]

Mostly because Dotard reimposed economic sanctions against Iran removing Iran's incentive to maintain compliance with the agreement.

And yet Iran still got nukes...Iran was working with Russia regarding the war in Ukraine. had the deal been in place would or should Iran working with Russia have triggered sanctions against Iran?

Also the deal was only good for 10 years, so what was the incentive for Iran to maintain the deal, when like you acknowledge they got nukes with the TRUMP sanctions.

 

[IM2]

Obama enabled Iran to be as much of a threat and sponsor of terrorism by proxies as they are now, or as much as they were at the beginning of this thing, anyway.
He gave them money to do it, even.

Wrong.

 

[IM2]

And yet Iran still got nukes...Iran was working with Russia regarding the war in Ukraine. had the deal been in place would or should Iran working with Russia have triggered sanctions against Iran?

Also the deal was only good for 10 years, so what was the incentive for Iran to maintain the deal, when like you acknowledge they got nukes with the TRUMP sanctions.

Iran never had nukes.

 

[IM2]

Not surprisingly, Obama nailed it.​

The only nails Obama handled were the ones going into the lid of our coffin.

No, that's what Trump is doing. But racists wil be racists.

 

[BS Filter]

Mostly because Dotard reimposed economic sanctions against Iran removing Iran's incentive to maintain compliance with the agreement.

Explain how sanctions motivated Iran to pursue nukes.

 

[IM2]

Iran had to be notified in advance of an inspection making them worthless. Obama was a total fool

BS.

 

[Hellokitty]

Iran never had nukes.

So what was the point of the Obama Iran deal?

 

[berg80]

And yet Iran still got nukes...Iran was working with Russia regarding the war in Ukraine. had the deal been in place would or should Iran working with Russia have triggered sanctions against Iran?

Also the deal was only good for 10 years, so what was the incentive for Iran to maintain the deal, when like you acknowledge they got nukes with the TRUMP sanctions.

That's a lie.

Also a lie.

Claim 17: The deal, if implemented, will expire after 10 or 15 years and allow Iran to build a nuclear weapon at that time.​

The Facts:​

According to the comprehensive agreement, for at least 15 years, Iran will only enrich uranium up to 3.67 percent (uranium enriched at 20% or lower is considered low enriched uranium (LEU); uranium enriched above 90% is weapons grade.)

This does not, however, mean that on day one of year 16, Iran will have enough weapons-grade uranium to build a bomb. Yes, after 15 years Iran could begin enriching uranium beyond 3.67 percent. But without this deal, Iran could head for a bomb tomorrow.

Some aspects of the agreement will last 25 years, including the monitoring of Iran’s uranium mines and supply chain. Other aspects, such as the implementation of robust IAEA safeguards and access to investigate suspicious sites for illicit nuclear activity, are permanent. Regardless of what specific restrictions are lifted, Iran is still prohibited from pursuing nuclear weapons. Any activity that is clearly not intended for “peaceful use” (i.e. highly enriching uranium) will raise red flags and trigger a response from the international community.

Ultimately, the deal rolls back Iran’s nuclear program for more than a decade, pushing Iran’s “breakout time” (time it would take to enrich enough nuclear material for 1 nuclear weapon) from a few months to at least one year. It also gives IAEA inspectors greater insight for monitoring Iran’s nuclear program well into the future.

Iran Nuclear Deal: Debunking the Myths - Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation

A factsheet to address the claims made by the opposition to the Iran deal.

armscontrolcenter.org

 

[BlindBoo]

How exactly did Iran proliferate nuclear weapons technology they dont have?

https://fpa.org/did-iran-ever-actually-violate-the-nonproliferation-treaty-does-it-matter/

The situation is even less straightforward than it appears. While it may not have acted fully in the spirit of nonproliferation, Iran maintains that it never actually violated the nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty (NPT). First, it is necessary to note that the actual restrictions of the NPT are few. The basic requirements are: (1) that non-nuclear-weapons states (NNWS) agree not to acquire nuclear weapons, (2) that they do not divert nuclear material from civilian nuclear programs (if they have them) for unauthorized, military purposes, and (3) that they allow the IAEA to verify that no such diversion is taking place.

 

[BlindBoo]

So what was the point of the Obama Iran deal?

It was a peaceful solution to prevent a nuclear-armed Iran and/or potential regional conflict. One not based on trust but through a verification process.

 

[The Duke]

So what was the point of the Obama Iran deal?

Feely goods. That's about all it did. It didn't even slow Iran's weapon development down.

 

[BackAgain]

After trump's ill-fated, reckless decision to withdraw from the JCPOA, eventually causing this war, he said he would negotiate a better deal. He failed. With the US imposing heavy economic sanctions on Iran, the offer of lifting sanctions being what brought it to the negotiating table in the first place, it announced it would withdraw from the agreement on May 8, 2019. Exactly 1 year after Don essentially killed it.

A timeline of tensions over Iran's nuclear program as talks with U.S. approach

Iran and the United States are due to hold new talks in Geneva on Thursday over Tehran's nuclear program.

www.pbs.org

In response, Obama made a prediction.

Trump says U.S. pulling out of ‘rotten’ nuclear deal​

The move makes good on Trump’s insistence that the deal was too generous, allowing Iran to keep a mostly dormant nuclear program that Trump said could quickly produce a nuclear bomb once the deal’s provisions expire in the middle of the next decade.

But it further strains relations with key European allies, who have spent months urging Trump to sustain the agreement. It also came over the opposition of China and Russia, which were also parties to the 2015 deal.

And it drew an unusual public rebuke from former President Barack Obama himself, who invoked the specter of military conflict.

“Without the [Iran deal], the United States could eventually be left with a losing choice between a nuclear-armed Iran or another war in the Middle East,” Obama said in a lengthy statement.

Many former Obama administration officials suspect that Trump’s decision was, in part personal — that he was motivated by a desire to gut Obama’s foreign policy legacy. Obama aides, including former Secretary of State John Kerry, spent years pushing sanctions and hundreds of hours painstakingly negotiating the deal over some 18 months, and Trump’s decision left some of them dejected.

Iranian President Hassan Rouhani, meanwhile, said he had ordered his foreign minister to begin negotiating with other countries to salvage the deal, according to The Associated Press. He added that if those talks fail, Iran will once against enrich uranium “more than before … in the next weeks.”

But Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu — a vociferous critic of the deal who calls Iran an existential threat to his country — praised Trump’s “bold decision.”

https://www.politico.com/story/2018/05/08/iran-responds-trump-nuclear-deal-573252

Naturally, trump apologists have made all manner of factually incorrect allegations about the agreement made in 2015 designed to stop Iran from developing a nuclear weapon. They amount to nothing more than a parroting of trump's lies about the adequacy of the JCPOA. Ultimately, Obama's comments following the withdrawal have proven to be prescient. So too Hillary's comments about trump's lack of fitness to lead the nation. If only we had listened.

Trump’s decision was spot on. Obumbler’s decisions were beyond reckless and dangerous. They were insane.

Hope that clears things up for bug, the insipid troll.

 

[Nostra]

Iran never had nukes.

Thank you, President Donald J Trump!



.

 

[Nostra]

BS.

Nope. The truth.

Once again you expose your ignorance, Simp.

 

[Stryder50]

And yet Iran still got nukes...Iran was working with Russia regarding the war in Ukraine. had the deal been in place would or should Iran working with Russia have triggered sanctions against Iran?

Also the deal was only good for 10 years, so what was the incentive for Iran to maintain the deal, when like you acknowledge they got nukes with the TRUMP sanctions.

Iran was/is also getting aid and support from China and North Korea.