HikerGuy83
Diamond Member
- Dec 26, 2021
- 21,590
- 17,035
- 2,288
Where is that term "Separation of church and state" found?Separation of church and state is the law of the land. SCOTUS hasn’t changed that.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Where is that term "Separation of church and state" found?Separation of church and state is the law of the land. SCOTUS hasn’t changed that.
It’s not.Where is that term "Separation of church and state" found?
Don't answer for her.It’s not.
Libs need protection from any good conduct inspiration because good conduct is too hard and unfair
Bullshit! However you phrase it, the principle is valid.Except it’s a made up phrase
This isn’t the 1830s.Explain why states had state sponsored religions up through the 1830's that were NEVER CHALLENGED.
Sure the phrase is valid, it's just not in anyway a legal requirement in the United States under our US ConstituitonBullshit! However you phrase it, the principle is valid.
What’s your point? The principle stands.Where is that term "Separation of church and state" found?
Ok. It’s always been an extrapolation of “state may neither force nor prohibit”Don't answer for her.
She needs to learn for herself.
It was a phrase that Jefferson used in a letter to the Danbury Baptists.
That's it.
A left wing SCOTUS judge once used it (referencing the letter) as justification for some abortion of a ruling he put out.
Of course it’s valid. No amount of MAGA doublethink changes that fact.Sure the phrase is valid, it's just not in anyway a legal requirement in the United States under our US Constituiton
Dodging we see from constitutional law to valid theory/principalBullshit! However you phrase it, the principle is valid.
Do you feel all valid phrases are constitutional law?Of course it’s valid. No amount of MAGA doublethink changes that fact.
That's exactly what they are doing.They aren’t gerrymandering
Open your fking eyes.They are undoing racial gerrymandering.
This is just sheer stupidity. Black folks would never vote for her and your coward ass knows it. Who has been keeping black Republicans from winning elections, you have ONE black senator and 3 black congressmen, next year you will have no congressmen. So tell us who is stopping black Republicans from winning?Which pisses you off since you can’t segregate blacks anymore and keep blacks from winning elections.
I mean, so what? It's a valid position to have...great....it's just not in anyway shape or form, some sort of legal concept. It's like saying the Chicago Bulls have the best program in NBA history...sure it's valid opinion to have....so what?Of course it’s valid. No amount of MAGA doublethink changes that fact.
You have to prove what I said isn’t valid. I have case law on my side; you have bubkus.Dodging we see from constitutional law to valid theory/principal
Actually no they aren't....once agian, you show your ignorance of the cases in Court. The Courts said the maps were racially gerrymandered, they are undoing thatThat's exactly what they are doing.
Open your fking eyes.
This is just sheer stupidity. Black folks would never vote for her and your coward ass knows it. Who has been keeping black Republicans from winning elections, you have ONE black senator and 3 black congressmen, next year you will have no congressmen. So tell us who is stopping black Republicans from winning?
Trump has 1 token in his cabinet, why is that?
those are the syllables left over during "TDS" withdrawlYour ilk, yes.
Neither is there a mandate by the framers.There never was a separation of church and state.
Bullshit! The former is a valid legal position; the latter is merely an opinion.I mean, so what? It's a valid position to have...great....it's just not in anyway shape or form, some sort of legal concept. It's like saying the Chicago Bulls have the best program in NBA history...sure it's valid opinion to have....so what?
It would look the same thing as if they didn't put one up at allWhat if Govt put up a display that there is no God?
Where in the law can you find that? It's not in any sort of Constitution....maybe provide us with the federal code section that states it....I'll waitBullshit! The former is a valid legal position; the latter is merely an opinion.