No-excuse mail-in voting makes election fraud as easy as pie and invites one-party rule

[johnwk]

johnwk and roshawn, the mail in balloting is secure because your ilk cannot prove it is not secure. That's how it is.

In case you missed it, your squeeze, Wanda, did get caught and took the Fifth.

Wanda Geter-Pataky takes the Fifth in Bridgeport election lawsuit

Bridgeport city employee Wanda Geter-Pataky, center, works with her lawyer, John R. Gulash, right, to know which questions to answer so as not to incriminate herself during her testimony in Bridgeport Democratic Primary Mayoral candidate John Gomes’ challenge of absentee ballots in Superior Court in Bridgeport, Conn., Friday, Oct. 13, 2023. Geter-Pataky was shown video clips of herself placing quantities of absentee ballots into election drop boxes. At left is Judge William Clark. (Brian A. Pounds/Hearst Connecticut Media via AP, Pool)

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

So in other words, like your fellow grifters and traitors...it was rigged because the Black dude won.

Thanks...

What black dude?

 

[johnwk]

What black dude?

I think the poster was referring to this:

 

[Blaster]

With all the liberal judges ruling for Democrats we are already under one party rule.

 

[dblack]

This paranoia and distrust will undo is. Trump did that.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

In case you missed it, your squeeze, Wanda, did get caught and took the Fifth.

Wanda Geter-Pataky takes the Fifth in Bridgeport election lawsuit




View attachment 867240

Bridgeport city employee Wanda Geter-Pataky, center, works with her lawyer, John R. Gulash, right, to know which questions to answer so as not to incriminate herself during her testimony in Bridgeport Democratic Primary Mayoral candidate John Gomes’ challenge of absentee ballots in Superior Court in Bridgeport, Conn., Friday, Oct. 13, 2023. Geter-Pataky was shown video clips of herself placing quantities of absentee ballots into election drop boxes. At left is Judge William Clark. (Brian A. Pounds/Hearst Connecticut Media via AP, Pool)

Good. This is how it is done. One case out of hundreds of millions of such ballots over the decade or more.

Find something of worth, for heaven's sake.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

With all the liberal judges ruling for Democrats we are already under one party rule.

No, we are not, because you have the judge out in Amarillo and Eileen Cannon and hundreds of others, plus a very conservative SCOTUS. Stop yer whinin.'

 

[Blaster]

No, we are not, because you have the judge out in Amarillo and Eileen Cannon and hundreds of others, plus a very conservative SCOTUS. Stop yer whinin.'

The fact is most federal judges are liberal.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

The fact is most federal judges are liberal.

Prove that, silly one.

 

[Blaster]

Prove that, silly one.

Don't be so lazy and look it up yourself.

 

[Blaster]

Biden has appointed more federal judges than any president since JFK at this point in his tenure

Joe Biden’s federal judicial appointees so far include a record number of women and racial and ethnic minorities.

www.pewresearch.org

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Don't be so lazy and look it up yourself.

I don't have to, you do, and your wrong. You cannot prove differently.

OK, you tried, but failed. Keep trying.

 

[leftwinger]

Does anyone have a case about systemic widespread mail-in ballots that caused an election to go one way or another?

do you live in a cave on a remote island?

 

[leftwinger]

Their hate for freedom and Democracy

SHUP loon. We all saw 2020, 2022. Its all been posted.

we’ve all seen the mail in West coast go against the people since the mid-80s you crooked ignorant OX.

 

[johnwk]

Good. This is how it is done. One case out of hundreds of millions of such ballots over the decade or more.

Find something of worth, for heaven's sake.

One case? There you go again, making shit up!

Macomb County nursing home worker charged with voter fraud – Macomb Daily

Voter Fraud: Harvesting Granny - The American Spectator | USA News and Politics

Texas nursing home worker charged with 134 counts of election fraud – HotAir

Protect Elderly Votes Project Aims to Thwart ‘Vote Harvesting’ Fraud (dailysignal.com)

7 Elections Reversed After Ballot Harvesting Scandals (dailysignal.com)

Political insider explains voter fraud with mail-in ballots (nypost.com)

Two Northeastern States Crackdown on Mail-In Ballot Election Fraud

Two Democrats Charged With Election Fraud

Aside from that Only a few fraudulent votes are needed to decide an election.


More than 43,000 people went to the polls in Louisiana. A candidate won by 1 vote
.
11 Elections Decided by One Vote (Or Fewer)
.
103 state legislative races were decided by fewer than 100 votes last year

Why are you so determined to defend no-excuse mail-in voting when it has proven to be a major source of vote stealing and election fraud?

JWK

The scary truth about allowing no-excuse mail-in voting in one state is, when acts of corruption infect an electoral process in one jurisdiction “they transcend mere local concern and extend a contaminating influence into the national domain.” Justice DOUGLAS in United States v. Classic (1941)”.

 

[August West]

Hahahahahaha .....all it takes is Democrat control of the largest counties and they can swing a state easily.....like they did in PA, GA, AZ, etc.

Pa. found 5 fraudulent voters and 4 of those were MAGA voters. Yes, Democrats are the majority in the big cities where people actually work.

 

[August West]

You do know that abusing a word doesn't make that word actually work?

They can spell Marxist and woke so they go with that. Ramasalami had an article in the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette where he must have said "woke" a dozen times.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Goober is using ballotpedia and mediafloss for sources.

Grow up.

Use real cases.

August West's proves no systemic voting problems exist.

 

[johnwk]

Pa. found 5 fraudulent voters and 4 of those were MAGA voters. Yes, Democrats are the majority in the big cities where people actually work.

Speaking of Pennsylvania, the following is not surprising, but very interesting:

'Thousands of mail ballots not counted': PA gov fixing issue that disenfranchised 17K voters

Additionally see:

Court ruling on undated ballots brings confusion as Pa. counties certify November election results


Also see:

After years of uncertainty around undated ballots, Pa. announces changes to the ballot envelopes to reduce voter errors

Frome the article:


"Rejected mail ballots make up a small percentage of votes — only about 3% of the 597,000 total mail ballots cast in the 2023 primary — but mean that thousands of citizens’ choices aren’t counted due to small errors. And small numbers of votes have decided the outcome of several Pennsylvania elections in recent years. "

Of course, there are no “changes” to be made in Pennsylvania which would confirm, when counting no-excuse mail-in ballots, that the one who filled out a mailed-in ballot and made the choices thereon and sent it in, is the qualified and legitimate voter, to whom that ballot was supposedly supplied.

And this is the Achilles’ heel with mail-in ballots. As reported in the 2005 Carter-Baker bipartisan Commission on Federal Election Reform, “absentee ballots” (i.e. mail-in ballots) remain the largest source of potential voter fraud”.

.

JWK

The scary truth about allowing no-excuse mail-in voting in one state is, when acts of corruption infect an electoral process in one jurisdiction “they transcend mere local concern and extend a contaminating influence into the national domain.” Justice DOUGLAS in United States v. Classic (1941)”.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Before delving into the subject, let us recall how our beloved media during Georgia’s 2020 election focused on, and ran with stories 24/7 about suitcases filled with mysterious ballots being introduced during vote counting night, and a water pipe break delaying vote counting, not to mention election workers and observers being told to leave for the night, so nefarious activities could begin with mail-in ballot counting.

Remember how those “shiny object” stories and others were continually repeated by our big media, mesmerizing the public, stirring them into a frenzy, and instigating American citizens who were skeptical at the time about the trustworthiness of Georgia’s election process, into arguing with each other? Well, never once did that same media give a whisper about the real vote stealing gimmick hiding in plain sight . . . tens of thousands of “mailed in” ballots, not one of which being counted, was, or would be, scrutinized to verify it was actually filled out, and the choices made thereon, were by a qualified voter who allegedly was issued the ballot.

And this is the Achilles' heel with mail-in ballots. As reported in the 2005 Carter-Baker bipartisan Commission on Federal Election Reform, “absentee ballots” (i.e. mail-in ballots) remain the largest source of potential voter fraud”.

Keep in mind that corruption and vote stealing in our election process can be divided into two basic categories ___ when civilian individuals game the system and cheat, which is not that severe of a threat, and where public officials, who are directly involved in an election process, and are able to use their office of public trust to take an active role in devious activities to manipulate the outcome of an election’s results. And this is the greater threat of the two categories, and can easily undermine our systems way for peaceful change, which is our election process.

The troubling truth is, mail-in ballots, and especially no-excuse mail-in ballots - which outrageously throws open the door allowing universal, unrestricted mail-in voting - makes election fraud by nefarious folks in government, as easy as pie. And this is so because, there is no practical way when counting mailed in votes, to satisfactorily confirm that the one who filled out a mailed-in ballot and made the choices thereon and sent it in, is the qualified and legitimate voter to whom that ballot was supposedly supplied.

Currently, there are only 12 states that make an attempt, and I emphasize “attempt”, to verify a voter of a mailed-in ballot is the qualified voter of that ballot, and actually filled out that ballot and made the choices thereon. Those States are: Alabama, Alaska, Louisiana, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Oklahoma, North Carolina, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Virginia, and Wisconsin.

So, with respect to a glaring inability to verify the legitimacy of a mailed-in ballot, should we not wonder why universal no-excuse mail in voting is suddenly the crave of a number of suspicious political groups, and why the allowance of no-excuse mail in voting is being forced upon the people of a number of Democrat controlled states, and without the peoples’ approval or consent?


Can the inability to verify the legitimacy of mailed-in ballots allow folks in government, especially those inclined to cheat and have various types of personal catalogued information on in-state residents at their fingertips, use that information to create illegitimate mail-in ballots which can determine the outcome of an election?

If this no-excuse mail-in voting is not stopped in its tracks, and reversed, America's way for peaceful change through free and fair elections will have been sabotaged and conquered by those types who now govern in other countries with an iron fist and the barrel of a gun, i.e., in Cuba, China, Russia, etc., where there is one-party authoritarian rule!

JWK

The troubling truth about allowing no-excuse mail-in voting in one state is, when acts of corruption infect an electoral process in one jurisdiction “they transcend mere local concern and extend a contaminating influence into the national domain.” Justice DOUGLAS in United States v. Classic (1941)”.

The thread premise is a lie.

The right’s war on democracy continues.