California Sheriff Seizes Half Million Ballots in Voter Fraud Investigation

Democrats Rattled After California Sheriff Seizes 650,000 Ballots in Election Integrity Crackdown​

23 Mar 2025 ~~ By Ben Kew

Riverside County Sheriff and California gubernatorial candidate Chad Bianco has seized more than 650,000 ballots from last November’s election as part of an investigation into potential discrepancies in the county’s vote count.
The probe follows allegations from the Riverside Election Integrity Team that the county’s tally may have been inflated by more than 45,000 votes.
“This investigation is simple: Physically count the ballots and compare that result with the total votes recorded,” Bianco said at a Friday press conference.
He said the review will determine whether the results are accurate.
There is no acceptable error, small or large, in our elections,” he said.
The investigation covers ballots tied to Proposition 50, which passed in Riverside County with 56 percent of the vote, a margin of more than 82,000 ballots.
Riverside County Registrar of Voters Art Tinoco said the alleged discrepancy stems from a misunderstanding of incomplete data.
~Snip~

~Snip~
“[The sheriff] has delayed, stonewalled, and otherwise refused to work with us in good faith,” Bonta said.
“Let me be clear: this is unacceptable,” Bonta wrote in a letter to Bianco earlier this month.
”Your decision to seize ballots and begin counting them based on vague, unsubstantiated allegations sets a dangerous precedent and will only sow distrust in our elections.”
~Snip~
Bianco said a Riverside County Superior Court judge has ordered the appointment of a special master to oversee the ballot count.

The investigation comes as Bianco, a Republican candidate for governor, continues to gain traction in the race. A recent poll showed him among the leading candidates in the field.




Commentary:
If discrepancies are found in this county, (and we know there are), we can also presume it’s not just in just this one county, thus the entire proposition needs to be invalidated.
Prepare for it to be dismissed for "lack of standing" the moment anything comes before a Biden/Obama judge. That's their favorite way to enforce "move along, nothing to see here."


Oh, you know there are discrepancies, because... because... wait, Trump told you. The biggest ******* liar in the country told you something and it must be true because....

**** me.

And get this. The dude is running for governor. Wow, he's not doing this for publicity at all....

And who trusts his counting? Take the votes, make some disappear, then claim the results are different. Or add your own.

Is anyone else able to verify he's doing the right thing?

This is just a Trump inspired CIRCUS!
 
Last edited:
  • Fact
Reactions: cnm
In a lengthy February presentation to the Riverside County Board of Supervisors, Registrar of Voters Art Tinoco disputed that figure, saying it was based on a misunderstanding of raw data that had not been fully processed.

The actual discrepancy, Tinoco said, was 103 votes, a variance of 0.016%.
 
The save act is simply one BIG DISENFRANCHISEMENT of citizen voters....

....College students, married women, people who travel for work, live overseas, and the military.....all have new hurdles to jump over..
This mindset speculates that extra steps is a 1:1 correlation with disenfranchisement. No one is arguing there are extra steps or “hurdles”. Again, this is the same argument used for simply presenting a state-issued ID for voting. Look at the states that require voter ID like Texas. What are the numbers of people or case where voting was attempted but they were disenfranchised for not having ID?

The side screaming loudest against extra steps for validation and authentication in elections is also the same side having to bribe homeless with cash, liquor, cigarettes to register to vote or go and actually vote.
 
We know for a fact that the California congressional delegation doesn't even remotely resemble the actual Democrat/ Republican split in voters. If it did, the GOP would have close to 40% of the seats, not just the 9 they do hold. Nearly the same for New York State's delegation.
 
We know for a fact that the California congressional delegation doesn't even remotely resemble the actual Democrat/ Republican split in voters. If it did, the GOP would have close to 40% of the seats, not just the 9 they do hold. Nearly the same for New York State's delegation.
But electoral corruption is approved by the USSC in the US.
 
Back
Top Bottom