That's just drivel, bee-otch!Palistanians are just being delusional, legally or otherwise, of course.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
That's just drivel, bee-otch!Palistanians are just being delusional, legally or otherwise, of course.
That's because Zionists were taking land that wasn't theirs and it doesn't change the reason why they went in.armies were already advancing on the 15th when a cabel was sent to the SC declaring their invasion.
Did arab settlers forget to forge land deeds?That's because Zionists were taking land that wasn't theirs and it doesn't change the reason why they went in.
Of course, palistanians drivel - it's their occupation!That's just drivel, bee-otch!Palistanians are just being delusional, legally or otherwise, of course.
No need to, after 2000 years of constant residence.Did arab settlers forget to forge land deeds?
That's because Zionists were taking land that wasn't theirs and it doesn't change the reason why they went in.armies were already advancing on the 15th when a cabel was sent to the SC declaring their invasion.
Not according to the UN...When the mandate ended, Israel did not take land.
Holding onto land seized in a war, has been outlawed since the end of WWII.During the months preceding the end of the Mandate, Jewish forces had moved to occupy key cities and areas in the territory designated for the Arab State.
Ben-Gurion writes that before the Mandate ended:
"... no Jewish settlement, however remote, was entered or seized by the Arabs, while the Haganah ... captured many Arab positions and liberated Tiberias and Haifa, Jaffa and Safad ... So, on the day of destiny, that part of Palestine where the Haganah could operate was almost clear of Arabs".
The major part of Jerusalem meant to be internationalized under the partition plan, had also been occupied by Jewish forces.
On the termination of the Mandate, Jewish forces moved to occupy further territory beyond the boundaries specified by the Partition resolution.
And just which land is that?By the end of the war Israel won land and that became the ceasefire line. Then they were attacked and won more land.
There was no palestinian state it was mandate land that was won. Jordan annexed the WB. It never created a palestinian state with the land. When Jordan signed a peace agreement with Israel it gave them the land hoping at some point all or most of it would be used to create a palestinian state in the future. That was for Israel and the palestinians to discuss.
Every country takes land for roads and bridges. Taking of land for state projects happens everywhere. If the land was legally owned they are compensated. Same in Israeli courts.
Very little is privately owned. Even the Knesset rents the land it is on from an arab no less.
2000 years!? Must be some potent hallucinogen at work, indeed.No need to, after 2000 years of constant residence. International Homestead Law. Do your homework, mutha-fucka!Did arab settlers forget to forge land deeds?
Do those clowns have a new show?Not according to the UN...
Palistanians have never had no land, no borders and no country, of course. Nevah.Holding onto land seized in a war, has been outlawed since the end of WWII.
(OBSERVATION)That's because Zionists were taking land that wasn't theirs and it doesn't change the reason why they went in.armies were already advancing on the 15th when a cabel was sent to the SC declaring their invasion.
Communication Received from United Kingdom Delegation Concerning Arab Legion in Palestine said:2. As the Commission will appreciate, the Arab Legion is being employed in Palestine as part of the Security Forces under the command of the General Officer Commanding. In order that the Arab Legion may be in a position effectively to carry out its task of assisting in the maintenance of security, it has, of course, to be supplied with arms and equipment as required. I am, therefore, authorised to confirm the statement made in paragraph 2 of the letter referred to above, namely, that on or about the 9th March certain items of equipment to meet Arab Legion requirements were moved from Tel el Kebir in Egypt to Raffah in Palestine.
Communication from THE JEWISH AGENCY FOR PALESTINE said:During the first half of March certain British army supplies were transferred from Egypt to Rafah in Palestine for the use of the Arab Legion. Included in these stores were charging sets, artillery stores, anti-tank rifles and mortars.
The movement into Palestine and the transfer to the Arab Legion of material of this type must necessarily be a source of grave anxiety and the actions of the British authorities in this regard are incomprehensible in the light of their professed neutrality in the present situation in Palestine.
SOURCE: JA DEL LTR 19 March 1948
Communication from UNITED KINGDOM DELEGATION TO THE UNITED NATIONS said:You may have seen reports in the New York press to the effect that several units of the Arab Legion have recently moved into the Hebron area from Transjordan as a result of orders received from the Arab League.
2. I have been in communication with Jerusalem on this point and have received the following information: -
(i) Elements of the Arab Legion serving in Palestine under British command have recently been posted to the Hebron area.
(ii) This is part of the general re-deployment of forces under the command of the General Officer Commanding and in conformity with his policy of, as far as possible, posting elements of the Arab Legion serving under his command to Arab areas.
(iii) It is thus not correct that units of the Arab Legion now in the Hebron area moved in from Transjordan as a result of orders from the Arab League.
3. This information has been given to the Jewish Agency representatives in New York in reply to an enquiry received from them.
SOURCE: A/AC.21/UK/83 24 March 1948
SOURCE: UK DEL Letter 24 March 1948
TRANSJORDAN NOTIFIES UN OF ARMED ENTRY INTO PALESTINE 16 MAY 1948 said:"Secretary-General we were compelled to enter Palestine to protect unarmed Arabs against massacres similar to those of Deir Yasin. We are aware of our national duty towards Palestine in general and Jerusalem in particular and also Nazareth and Bethlehem. Be sure that we shall be very considerate in connection with Jews in Palestine and while maintaining at the same time the full rights of the Arabs in Palestine. Zionism did not react to our offers made before the entry of armed forces.
(signed) Abdullah R"SOURCE: PAL/167 16 May 1948
And your point is what?By dawn of the 15th Israel was engaged with the Jordanian forces. 5am Tel Aviv was being bomb by air.
The declaration of independence made not claim of territorial limits, no stated boundaries, that came with the end of the war, they were simply ceasefire lines.
And your point is what?By dawn of the 15th Israel was engaged with the Jordanian forces. 5am Tel Aviv was being bomb by air.
The declaration of independence made not claim of territorial limits, no stated boundaries, that came with the end of the war, they were simply ceasefire lines.
And your point is what?By dawn of the 15th Israel was engaged with the Jordanian forces. 5am Tel Aviv was being bomb by air.
The declaration of independence made not claim of territorial limits, no stated boundaries, that came with the end of the war, they were simply ceasefire lines.
Israel has no land or borders.
Who told you that lie, Tinmore? Israel has borders.And your point is what?By dawn of the 15th Israel was engaged with the Jordanian forces. 5am Tel Aviv was being bomb by air.
The declaration of independence made not claim of territorial limits, no stated boundaries, that came with the end of the war, they were simply ceasefire lines.
Israel has no land or borders.
Of course, a legal case can be made that this is so."...Israel has no land or borders."
2. The Armistice Demarcation Line is not to be construed in any sense as a political or territorial boundary,...
The Avalon Project : Egyptian-Israeli General Armistice Agreement, February 24, 1949
(COMMENT)Israel still use 1949 armistice lines as de facto borders.
2. The Armistice Demarcation Line is not to be construed in any sense as a political or territorial boundary,...
The Avalon Project : Egyptian-Israeli General Armistice Agreement, February 24, 1949
Treaty with Egypt said:Article II
The permanent boundary between Egypt and Israel is the recognized international boundary between Egypt and the former mandated territory of Palestine, as shown on the map at Annex II, without prejudice to the issue of the status of the Gaza Strip. The Parties recognize this boundary as inviolable. Each will respect the territorial integrity of the other, including their territorial waters and airspace.
Treaty with Jordan said:Article 3 - International Boundary
1. The international boundary between Israel and Jordan is delimited with reference to the boundary definition under the Mandate as is shown in Annex I(a), on the mapping materials attached thereto and co-ordinates specified therein.
2. The boundary, as set out in Annex I (a), is the permanent, secure and recognised international boundary between Israel and Jordan, without prejudice to the status of any territories that came under Israeli military government control in 1967.
3. The parties recognise the international boundary, as well as each other's territory, territorial waters and airspace, as inviolable, and will respect and comply with them.
4. The demarcation of the boundary will take place as set forth in Appendix (I) to Annex I and will be concluded not later than nine months after the signing of the Treaty.
5. It is agreed that where the boundary follows a river, in the event of natural changes in the course of the flow of the river as described in Annex I (a), the boundary shall follow the new course of the flow. In the event of any other changes the boundary shall not be affected unless otherwise agreed.
6. Immediately upon the exchange of the instruments of ratification of this Treaty, each Party will deploy on its side of the international boundary as defined in Annex I (a).
7. The Parties shall, upon the signature of the Treaty, enter into negotiations to conclude, within 9 months, an agreement on the delimitation of their maritime boundary in the Gulf of Aqaba.
8. Taking into account the special circumstances of the Naharayim/Baqura area, which is under Jordanian sovereignty, with Israeli private ownership rights, the Parties agreed to apply the provisions set out in Annex I (b).
9. With respect to the Zofar/Al-Ghamr area, the provisions set out in Annex I (c) will apply.
P F Tinmore, et al,
Yes, the original borders were spelled out in GA Resolution 181(II). However, with the attempt by the Arab League to halt the implementation by force, Treaties had to be the solution.
(COMMENT)Israel still use 1949 armistice lines as de facto borders.
2. The Armistice Demarcation Line is not to be construed in any sense as a political or territorial boundary,...
The Avalon Project : Egyptian-Israeli General Armistice Agreement, February 24, 1949
The Armistice Agreements between Egypt and Jordan are history, overtaken by the event of Peace Treaties.
- Treaty of Peace between the Arab Republic of Egypt and the State of Israel, 26 March 1979
- Treaty of Peace between The State of Israel and The Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan 26 October 1994
In the Treaty with Egypt:
Treaty with Egypt said:Article II
The permanent boundary between Egypt and Israel is the recognized international boundary between Egypt and the former mandated territory of Palestine, as shown on the map at Annex II, without prejudice to the issue of the status of the Gaza Strip. The Parties recognize this boundary as inviolable. Each will respect the territorial integrity of the other, including their territorial waters and airspace.
In the Treaty with Jordan:
Treaty with Jordan said:Article 3 - International Boundary
1. The international boundary between Israel and Jordan is delimited with reference to the boundary definition under the Mandate as is shown in Annex I(a), on the mapping materials attached thereto and co-ordinates specified therein.
2. The boundary, as set out in Annex I (a), is the permanent, secure and recognised international boundary between Israel and Jordan, without prejudice to the status of any territories that came under Israeli military government control in 1967.
3. The parties recognise the international boundary, as well as each other's territory, territorial waters and airspace, as inviolable, and will respect and comply with them.
4. The demarcation of the boundary will take place as set forth in Appendix (I) to Annex I and will be concluded not later than nine months after the signing of the Treaty.
5. It is agreed that where the boundary follows a river, in the event of natural changes in the course of the flow of the river as described in Annex I (a), the boundary shall follow the new course of the flow. In the event of any other changes the boundary shall not be affected unless otherwise agreed.
6. Immediately upon the exchange of the instruments of ratification of this Treaty, each Party will deploy on its side of the international boundary as defined in Annex I (a).
7. The Parties shall, upon the signature of the Treaty, enter into negotiations to conclude, within 9 months, an agreement on the delimitation of their maritime boundary in the Gulf of Aqaba.
8. Taking into account the special circumstances of the Naharayim/Baqura area, which is under Jordanian sovereignty, with Israeli private ownership rights, the Parties agreed to apply the provisions set out in Annex I (b).
9. With respect to the Zofar/Al-Ghamr area, the provisions set out in Annex I (c) will apply.
Neither Lebanon or Syria have made an agreement, thus Armistice Line are still being enforced.
The Palestinians have never concluded a Peace Treaty since becoming a State in 1988 and internationally recognized with the capacity (Part II, Article 6, Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties).
NOTE:
- UNTC Registry No. 17813 EGYPT and ISRAEL Page 100 (Eng Fr Arabic Hebrew) Maps start on Page 178
Most Respectfully,
R
(COMMENT)Israel claims borders on land that it has never legally acquired.
(COMMENT)Israel claims to get Palestinian borders by treaties with third parties.