Nancy Pelosi wants to lower voting age to 16...

[AzogtheDefiler]

Not the worst idea I’ve ever heard.

While I’m against it myself…I think there is a valid argument that could be made to have the youth voting especially since we have a President who runs up trillion plus dollar yearly deficits that will have to be paid for by the youth…at some point.

LMAO. Until you can serve you cannot vote

Fair point. Can the physically handicapped still vote? What about the elderly?

Of course. But at one time the elderly could have served. The handicapped can still serve albeit not in combat. If I am in a wheelchair I can still type, talk, analyze, etc.

 

[boedicca]

Can you imagine how much worse our schools will be with hateful little leftist teachers pressuring their students to vote “D”?

It's a terrible idea. Children should not be able to vote.

Well maybe for class "officials"........

Not even that. Why teach them to be corrupt politicians in their tender years?

Well...that's only a few degrees more totalitarian than where we are now.

View attachment 250534

Boedicca, what is your ideal un-socialist government? In terms of government responsibility, what would you like to see? How would roads, bridges, dams, food/drug inspections etc be funded? Would 'eminent domain' be legal? Or military used as police? If you are thinking of powerful iron-fisted leadership over governance that provides military power only, maybe Kim Jong Un is the guy for you. You hate public schools, so what do you suggest? You hate public healthcare, so what do you offer? Do you think those in need should just lay down and die and/or watch their kids suffer because they are too proud to ask for help? In your world, would that help be available?

If you think I am for totalitarianism, you are sorely misguided.

My POV:

The scope of the federal government is national defense, federal law enforcement, foreign relations and border control, and the court system. The Feds should not engage in transfer payment and other redistributionist schemes - that is the moral hazard that has created our present day dysfunctional system (aided and abetted by totalitarian progressives).

The more local things are handled, the more the people directly affected have a say in how their community is SERVED by the government - as opposed to the heavy topdown condition of how we now serve as tax serfs and debt donkeys to the big government status quo.

Road, bridges and most infrastructure would be higher quality and lower cost by being privatized and then supported by use fees and tolls.

Students and parents would be better served by having complete school choice. If Public Schools are crap, they will be replaced by private alternatives.

Many of those in need would not be in need if our economy was not shackled and bled out by government bureaucrats and rentseekers.

 

[Hellbilly]

If this is the woman's way of trying to get more democrat votes, it could always backfire on her when iit can mean more republican votes too. How old is that Nick Sandmann kid?

God bless you and him always!!!

Holly

Democrats don’t get help from Russia.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[bullwinkle]

Can you imagine how much worse our schools will be with hateful little leftist teachers pressuring their students to vote “D”?

Well maybe for class "officials"........

Not even that. Why teach them to be corrupt politicians in their tender years?

Well...that's only a few degrees more totalitarian than where we are now.

View attachment 250534

Boedicca, what is your ideal un-socialist government? In terms of government responsibility, what would you like to see? How would roads, bridges, dams, food/drug inspections etc be funded? Would 'eminent domain' be legal? Or military used as police? If you are thinking of powerful iron-fisted leadership over governance that provides military power only, maybe Kim Jong Un is the guy for you. You hate public schools, so what do you suggest? You hate public healthcare, so what do you offer? Do you think those in need should just lay down and die and/or watch their kids suffer because they are too proud to ask for help? In your world, would that help be available?

If you think I am for totalitarianism, you are sorely misguided.

My POV:

The scope of the federal government is national defense, federal law enforcement, foreign relations and border control, and the court system. The Feds should not engage in transfer payment and other redistributionist schemes - that is the moral hazard that has created our present day dysfunctional system (aided and abetted by totalitarian progressives).

The more local things are handled, the more the people directly affected have a say in how their community is SERVED by the government - as opposed to the heavy topdown condition of how we now serve as tax serfs and debt donkeys to the big government status quo.

Road, bridges and most infrastructure would be higher quality and lower cost by being privatized and then supported by use fees and tolls.

Students and parents would be better served by having complete school choice. If Public Schools are crap, they will be replaced by private alternatives.

Many of those in need would not be in need if our economy was not shackled and bled out by government bureaucrats and rentseekers.

I asked, you answered. Thank you.

 

[candycorn]

Not the worst idea I’ve ever heard.

While I’m against it myself…I think there is a valid argument that could be made to have the youth voting especially since we have a President who runs up trillion plus dollar yearly deficits that will have to be paid for by the youth…at some point.

LMAO. Until you can serve you cannot vote

Fair point. Can the physically handicapped still vote? What about the elderly?

Of course. But at one time the elderly could have served. The handicapped can still serve albeit not in combat. If I am in a wheelchair I can still type, talk, analyze, etc.

Ahh. What about gays? Your blob kicked them out of the military.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Not the worst idea I’ve ever heard.

While I’m against it myself…I think there is a valid argument that could be made to have the youth voting especially since we have a President who runs up trillion plus dollar yearly deficits that will have to be paid for by the youth…at some point.

LMAO. Until you can serve you cannot vote

Fair point. Can the physically handicapped still vote? What about the elderly?

Of course. But at one time the elderly could have served. The handicapped can still serve albeit not in combat. If I am in a wheelchair I can still type, talk, analyze, etc.

Ahh. What about gays? Your blob kicked them out of the military.

I am Sure there are many gays in the military. My blob? That’s getting old. Almost as old as you.

 

[grainbely]

You can't get more obvious than this.

INSANITY: 125 Democrats Just Voted To Let 16 Year Olds Cast a Presidential Ballot - Big League Politics

Are they gonna vote to let them legally purchase assault rifles, drink, drive, get married, and perform military service too?

Because nobody should really be allowed to vote until they reach that level of maturity.

That brings up an interesting point then. Should anyone under 18 be taxed for their work or at all? My state gives drivers license at 16, fyi.

 

[grainbely]

You can't get more obvious than this.

INSANITY: 125 Democrats Just Voted To Let 16 Year Olds Cast a Presidential Ballot - Big League Politics

I was unaware there was a need to do this. There time would be better spent fighting the right's vote suppression agenda, and against partisan gerrymandering.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

You can't get more obvious than this.

INSANITY: 125 Democrats Just Voted To Let 16 Year Olds Cast a Presidential Ballot - Big League Politics

Are they gonna vote to let them legally purchase assault rifles, drink, drive, get married, and perform military service too?

Because nobody should really be allowed to vote until they reach that level of maturity.

That brings up an interesting point then. Should anyone under 18 be taxed for their work or at all? My state gives drivers license at 16, fyi.

Of course. Taxes have nothing to do with any permit to vote.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

You can't get more obvious than this.

INSANITY: 125 Democrats Just Voted To Let 16 Year Olds Cast a Presidential Ballot - Big League Politics

I was unaware there was a need to do this. There time would be better spent fighting the right's vote suppression agenda, and against partisan gerrymandering.

There is no voter suppression. Gerrymandering is a game played by both sides.

Illegals and 16 YOs, on the other hand, greatly interest the Democrats.

 

[candycorn]

Not the worst idea I’ve ever heard.

While I’m against it myself…I think there is a valid argument that could be made to have the youth voting especially since we have a President who runs up trillion plus dollar yearly deficits that will have to be paid for by the youth…at some point.

LMAO. Until you can serve you cannot vote

Fair point. Can the physically handicapped still vote? What about the elderly?

Of course. But at one time the elderly could have served. The handicapped can still serve albeit not in combat. If I am in a wheelchair I can still type, talk, analyze, etc.

Ahh. What about gays? Your blob kicked them out of the military.

I am Sure there are many gays in the military. My blob? That’s getting old. Almost as old as you.

Hey, it’s your standard. A trans or gay can’t serve in our military thanks to your blob. And you say only those who can serve should vote.

Explain.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

LMAO. Until you can serve you cannot vote

Fair point. Can the physically handicapped still vote? What about the elderly?

Of course. But at one time the elderly could have served. The handicapped can still serve albeit not in combat. If I am in a wheelchair I can still type, talk, analyze, etc.

Ahh. What about gays? Your blob kicked them out of the military.

I am Sure there are many gays in the military. My blob? That’s getting old. Almost as old as you.

Hey, it’s your standard. A trans or gay can’t serve in our military thanks to your blob. And you say only those who can serve should vote.

Explain.

Not what I said and Trans should not serve I agree. Can and should are disparate. Keep trying.

 

[candycorn]

Fair point. Can the physically handicapped still vote? What about the elderly?

Of course. But at one time the elderly could have served. The handicapped can still serve albeit not in combat. If I am in a wheelchair I can still type, talk, analyze, etc.

Ahh. What about gays? Your blob kicked them out of the military.

I am Sure there are many gays in the military. My blob? That’s getting old. Almost as old as you.

Hey, it’s your standard. A trans or gay can’t serve in our military thanks to your blob. And you say only those who can serve should vote.

Explain.

Not what I said and Trans should not serve I agree. Can and should are disparate. Keep trying.

Again...your standard....your mess

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Of course. But at one time the elderly could have served. The handicapped can still serve albeit not in combat. If I am in a wheelchair I can still type, talk, analyze, etc.

Ahh. What about gays? Your blob kicked them out of the military.

I am Sure there are many gays in the military. My blob? That’s getting old. Almost as old as you.

Hey, it’s your standard. A trans or gay can’t serve in our military thanks to your blob. And you say only those who can serve should vote.

Explain.

Not what I said and Trans should not serve I agree. Can and should are disparate. Keep trying.

Again...your standard....your mess

Not my mess. Trans people are insane if you cannot see that it’s on you

 

[candycorn]

Ahh. What about gays? Your blob kicked them out of the military.

I am Sure there are many gays in the military. My blob? That’s getting old. Almost as old as you.

Hey, it’s your standard. A trans or gay can’t serve in our military thanks to your blob. And you say only those who can serve should vote.

Explain.

Not what I said and Trans should not serve I agree. Can and should are disparate. Keep trying.

Again...your standard....your mess

Not my mess. Trans people are insane if you cannot see that it’s on you

Making arbitrary decisions about who gets to vote based on their sexuality is insane.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

I am Sure there are many gays in the military. My blob? That’s getting old. Almost as old as you.

Hey, it’s your standard. A trans or gay can’t serve in our military thanks to your blob. And you say only those who can serve should vote.

Explain.

Not what I said and Trans should not serve I agree. Can and should are disparate. Keep trying.

Again...your standard....your mess

Not my mess. Trans people are insane if you cannot see that it’s on you

Making arbitrary decisions about who gets to vote based on their sexuality is insane.

I never said they should not vote.

 

[ABikerSailor]

Not the worst idea I’ve ever heard.

While I’m against it myself…I think there is a valid argument that could be made to have the youth voting especially since we have a President who runs up trillion plus dollar yearly deficits that will have to be paid for by the youth…at some point.

LMAO. Until you can serve you cannot vote

Fair point. Can the physically handicapped still vote? What about the elderly?

Of course. But at one time the elderly could have served. The handicapped can still serve albeit not in combat. If I am in a wheelchair I can still type, talk, analyze, etc.

If you don't serve in the military, you shouldn't be able to vote? Really? Did you know that out of all the people in the USA who are between the ages of 18 to 35 (age requirements to join the military), only 30 percent of them are qualified? And, out of that 30 percent that are qualified, only 1 percent actually join and go to boot camp? Are you saying that you want this country run by one percent of the population?

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Not the worst idea I’ve ever heard.

While I’m against it myself…I think there is a valid argument that could be made to have the youth voting especially since we have a President who runs up trillion plus dollar yearly deficits that will have to be paid for by the youth…at some point.

LMAO. Until you can serve you cannot vote

Fair point. Can the physically handicapped still vote? What about the elderly?

Of course. But at one time the elderly could have served. The handicapped can still serve albeit not in combat. If I am in a wheelchair I can still type, talk, analyze, etc.

If you don't serve in the military, you shouldn't be able to vote? Really? Did you know that out of all the people in the USA who are between the ages of 18 to 35 (age requirements to join the military), only 30 percent of them are qualified? And, out of that 30 percent that are qualified, only 1 percent actually join and go to boot camp? Are you saying that you want this country run by one percent of the population?

I said Can not Will

 

[candycorn]

Hey, it’s your standard. A trans or gay can’t serve in our military thanks to your blob. And you say only those who can serve should vote.

Explain.

Not what I said and Trans should not serve I agree. Can and should are disparate. Keep trying.

Again...your standard....your mess

Not my mess. Trans people are insane if you cannot see that it’s on you

Making arbitrary decisions about who gets to vote based on their sexuality is insane.

I never said they should not vote.

Yes, you did...your stipulation tied voting to military service.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Not what I said and Trans should not serve I agree. Can and should are disparate. Keep trying.

Again...your standard....your mess

Not my mess. Trans people are insane if you cannot see that it’s on you

Making arbitrary decisions about who gets to vote based on their sexuality is insane.

I never said they should not vote.

Yes, you did...your stipulation tied voting to military service.

No I said cannot serve, meaning old enough.