Nadler Calls For DOJ Review

Pray Tell why not.It did for Richard Jewell and Nick Sandmann.
Same basic principle.Lies and smearing of a person's character.
The Press has a responsibility to use Two verifiable sources before
going to Press.Not going to press with Opinion Journalism.

Sandman did sue WaPo, CNN, and NBC and won substantial awards through settlements.


Jewell, according to the Clint Eastwood film, refused to sue, though he had a solid case.
 
Nadler is America's #1 Smear Merchant
nadlercorruptlyingpos8.jpg
 
Last edited:
Yep, the fat little shit wants the DOJ to review the Rittenhouse verdict.....

House Judiciary Committee Chairman Rep. Jerry Nadler said the acquittal of Kenosha shooter Kyle Rittenhouse on Friday afternoon sets a “dangerous precedent” that the Justice Department ought to review.


“This heartbreaking verdict is a miscarriage of justice and sets a dangerous precedent which justifies federal review by DOJ,” the New York Democrat tweeted minutes after a jury found Rittenhouse not guilty of all charges related to the deaths of Joseph Rosenbaum and Anthony Huber.


These powerful Marxist-Democrats obviously would like to overthrow our judicial system. Nadler should be censured. Apparently the fat little asshole thinks a fair trial and a jury verdict is 'heartbreaking'....Who the Hell votes for these stupid dickheads? NY 10th congressional district should be ashamed.


That massive assflap needs to STFU.
 
Canada should prepare to confront a surge in white supremacist vigilantes.
Not only are Canada’s Indigenous people marginalized, and not only are they perceived as threatening by many in the same white majority that marginalizes them


You got real problems in Canada, MYOB first.
Request denied!
 
Request denied!
Of course you’d rather turn a blind eye to the racist cesspool Canada really is and like a piss ant scream point your finger at America that actually has a real justice sysyem.
 
Because as an American citizen he has a right to stop criminal behavior. If you don't like it suck it.
Do you believe that just because something is a right, it’s the tight thing to do?

Also do you believe that rights come with responsibilities?
 
Last edited:
Do you believe that just because something is a tight, it’s the tight thing to do?

Also do you believe that rights come with responsibilities?
Rittenhouse was not irresponsible. The ones that chased him down and tried to kill him were and 2 of them paid with their lives.
 
Everyone involved was irresponsible. Everyone.
Rittenhouse was not found to be irresponsible despite your opinion and it is reprehensible that you compare Rittenhouse to the rioters. He was helping and protecting at the behest of the property owners, not destroying property.
 
Rittenhouse was not found to be irresponsible despite your opinion and it is reprehensible that you compare Rittenhouse to the rioters. He was helping and protecting at the behest of the property owners, not destroying property.
He did indeed act irresponsibly. So did his mother transporting him o the riot. Rittenhouse was a rioter. He was a participant on one side. He wasn’t protecting his mother’s home. His home and neighborhood never was at risk. His father’s home or his grandparents home was never at risk.

He made a poor decision as many teenagers do. His mother showed horrible parenting skills by allowing him to make that decision.

Rittenhouse is a troubled young man who is a product of a dysfunctional family. He had an absentee father. No solid male role model in his home.

Hopefully this fiasco has taught him a life lesson which will prevent him from becoming a national news story again.
 
Last edited:
He did indeed act irresponsibly. So did his mother transporting him o the riot. Rittenhouse was a rioter. He was a participant on one side. He wasn’t protecting his mother’s home. His home and neighborhood never was at risk. His father’s home or his grandparents home was never at risk.

He made a poor decision as many teenagers do. His mother showed horrible parenting skills by allowing him to make that decision.

Rittenhouse is a troubled young man who is a product of a dysfunctional family. He had an absentee father. No solid male role model in his home.

Hopefully this fiasco has taught him a life lesson which will prevent him from becoming a national news story again.
He has courage. More than others. You will never be trusted anymore. Even if you are right.
 
He did indeed act irresponsibly. So did his mother transporting him o the riot. Rittenhouse was a rioter.

:rofl:

The fucking lies you morons tell.

Do you think you're making points with such absurd lies?

He was a participant on one side. He wasn’t protecting his mother’s home. His home and neighborhood never was at risk. His father’s home or his grandparents home was never at risk.

What he was or was not protecting was irrelevant. He was putting out fires that democrats were setting.

He made a poor decision as many teenagers do. His mother showed horrible parenting skills by allowing him to make that decision.

All that is needed for democrats to win is for good men to do nothing.

Kyle is a good man, and he confronted the evil that is the Nazi democrat Reich - he faced down your Brown Shirts.

Rittenhouse is a troubled young man who is a product of a dysfunctional family. He had an absentee father. No solid male role model in his home.

Hopefully this fiasco has taught him a life lesson which will prevent him from becoming a national news story again.

:rofl:

Wow, the mindless slander never stops with you Nazi fucks.

Guess the "racist" and "white supremacist" idiocy wasn't polling well, so you came up with some new, and even stupider lies....
 
Do you believe that just because something is a right, it’s the tight thing to do?

Also do you believe that rights come with responsibilities?
The right to protest was not handled very responsibly. Starting fires, yelling the "N" word, and threatening lives, Rittenhouse's life, is not responsible behavior.
 
He did indeed act irresponsibly. So did his mother transporting him o the riot. Rittenhouse was a rioter. He was a participant on one side. He wasn’t protecting his mother’s home. His home and neighborhood never was at risk. His father’s home or his grandparents home was never at risk.

He made a poor decision as many teenagers do. His mother showed horrible parenting skills by allowing him to make that decision.

Rittenhouse is a troubled young man who is a product of a dysfunctional family. He had an absentee father. No solid male role model in his home.

Hopefully this fiasco has taught him a life lesson which will prevent him from becoming a national news story again.
A rioter in a situation of insurrectionists. A true hero and patriot.
 

Forum List

Back
Top