Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No doubt⦠are you calling them woke or are they?With all due respect, Slade...some of the most close minded people I've ever run across are the "Woke" crowd!
The whole "dog whistle" notion is a game, Slade! You're accusing people of sending a message that's only audible to racists. That way you can claim just about anything negative against you liberals is a "dog whistle" attack!Why donāt you just say that they accused the GOP of using dog whistle tactics? Just say with it is and stop playing games
What I'm calling them is idiotic. Didn't I make that clear?No doubt⦠are you calling them woke or are they?
Being called a racist or white supremacists has lost all value....I am actually happy to hear it. The name calling was never nothing more than an attempt to silence any opposition anyways.This guy is an racist and a total sleezebag. This is the way that black elitists preach to the black community....and this racist ideology is how they keep blacks on the plantation:
Liberal MSNBC guest calls Winsome Sears a 'Black mouth' for 'White supremacist practices'
Liberal commentator Michael Eric Dyson called Virginia's incoming lieutenant governor Winsome Sears a "Black mouth" of White supremacy on Thursday in what critics called a "repugnant" segment on MSNBC.Sears, a Jamaican migrant and Marine Corps veteran, became the first Black woman elected to the position in Virginia on Tuesday. She declared herself the embodiment of the American dream and that her victory had destroyed "all of the narratives about race."That apparently didn't sit well on MSNBC, as "The Reidout" host Joy Reid said Republicans "demand credit" for voting for Black candidates. Dyson, a frequent MSNBC guest, agreed with Reid and called Sears a "Black mouth" for "White supremacist practices."Go to this Link to see the video:![]()
Liberal MSNBC guest calls Winsome Sears a 'Black mouth' for 'White supremacist practices'
Liberal commentator Michael Eric Dyson called Virginia's incoming lieutenant governor Winsome Sears a "Black mouth" of White supremacy on Thursday in what critics called a "repugnant" segment on MSNBC.www.foxnews.com
You completely misread what I posted.....Try reading it again for comprehension, fool.Iām flattered that you think Iām a deep thinker. Iām simply stating my observations. Thatās fine if you disagree so why donāt you state your disagreement and actually engage in an debate instead of meaningless personal attacks on me that nobody cares about.
LOL. You donāt get to do that.Have you read the 1619 project? Be honest
It is true. 100%. You just asked me about the 1619 project but didnāt reply to my post. LOLYou know thatās not true Az⦠I know you have a man crush on me. No need to lash out to try and hide that.
You hate white folks. Don't you?You can have women hating women...just look at Phyllis Schlafly.
First of all Iām not accusing anybody of anything. Those that refer to dog whistles donāt mean it literally smart guy.The whole "dog whistle" notion is a game, Slade! You're accusing people of sending a message that's only audible to racists. That way you can claim just about anything negative against you liberals is a "dog whistle" attack!
I donāt put much weight into your interpretation of what my general attitude is, sorry. Iām not flummoxed in the least why you have distain for strangers like me⦠you have an enemy in your head and a lot of built up anger and you need to directed itās at somebody or something. Itās extremely immature but whatever floats your boat dude!You completely misread what I posted.....Try reading it again for comprehension, fool.
Your general attitude is that you and your leftist brethren are soooo much wiser and morally righteous than the rest of the hoi polloy, to the point that you can look down your nose at them and pass judgment on what's going on between their ears, even though you haven't the first fucking clue about them.
I bet you are genuinely flummoxed as to why people like me consider people like you to be some of the most overbearing, effete, snobs on the face of the Earth, aren't ya?
Sure no problem. Yes I agree that shaming and awareness are two different things. I donāt think 1619 is a joke I think it has some really interesting accounts of history that I was never aware of. I think that our country has many wonderful things despite its history of racism, but I disagree that that our country is great because of racism.LOL. You donāt get to do that.
First address my point and I will answer you. Be honest.
No. But I was a guest at a town hall with Nikole Hannah Jones and heard an in depth view firsthand. I find it to be utter drivel.Sure no problem. Yes I agree that shaming and awareness are two different things. I donāt think 1619 is a joke I think it has some really interesting accounts of history that I was never aware of. I agree that our country has many wonderfully things despite its history of racism.
Now your turn⦠have you read the 1619 project?
Which is ignorant and stupid on MSNBC part!The headline of your op is inaccurate fake news. Why is it so hard for you people to make a simple and honest argument?
do better!
Nobody called her a white suprematists⦠she was called "Black mouth" for "White supremacist practices."
You should probably read the thing that youāre criticizing if you want people to take your criticism seriouslyNo. But I was a guest at a town hall with Nikole Hannah Jones and heard an in depth view firsthand. I find it to be utter drivel.
Again, I was at a town hall with her. The author. And I find it to be total drivel. Why read it when I heard it firsthand?You should probably read the thing that youāre criticizing if you want people to take your criticism seriously
Thatās fine⦠just present the situation accurately. Why distort what was said?Which is ignorant and stupid on MSNBC part!
Because Iām not asking about the author Iām asking about the actual thing that your critiquing. Donāt you think itās rather silly that your critiquing something that youāve never even read?Again, I was at a town hall with her. The author. And I find it to be total drivel. Why read it when I heard it firsthand?
She said itās a journal project not supposed to be historical but opinion focused. I disagree With her opinion. No need to read it. She described it in great detail.Because Iām not asking about the author Iām asking about the actual thing that your critiquing. Donāt you think itās rather silly that your critiquing something that youāve never even read?