More threatening than the missing explosives?

Fmr jarhead

Senior Member
Aug 9, 2004
1,119
103
48
SoFLA
I have not heard on the news any reports of the 40 cm by 40 cm square holes cut in the fence a long the DMZ on the inner and outer fences seperating the free South Korea from their belligerent northern neighbors.

Seems the North is claiming it was made by a defector, but if they knew that, why would they have let him go?

My concern is that the north may have let some small amounts of enriched uranium out of the country and in to the hands of those who wish to do us the most harm (and only a week before our elections.)

While I may sound paranoid, I am only trying to voice my concerns since we all know that the radical islamic fundamentalists want nothing more than to give birth to the second coming of the Caliphate, through the destruction of anything American or those of our allies.

Be vigilant, people, the election is coming, and I anticipate some action by those who feel obliged to the fatwa issued by ObL.
 
From Stratfor: www.stratfor.com to subscribe

Geopolitical Diary: Monday, Oct. 25, 2004
October 26, 2004 0500 GMT

U.S. media were filled Monday with questions and speculation about the whereabouts of some 350 tons of explosives that went missing in Iraq sometime between January and mid-summer 2003. Late in the day, however, news broke of something much smaller that was missing - a piece of fencing, 40 centimeters by 40 centimeters. This hole, while far from Iraq, has the potential to be of much more significance and immediate importance than explosives last seen 18-20 months ago.

At around 1646 GMT (1:46 a.m. Oct. 26 local time), South Korean soldiers on patrol along the Demilitarized Zone (DMZ) separating North and South Korea discovered holes in the double fence along the southern border of the DMZ. The hole in the outer fence measured 40 cm by 40 cm, and a hole in the inner fence measured 40 cm by 30 cm. The cuts were found near the southern town of Cheolwon, near the central portion of the DMZ, Brig. Gen. Hwang Jung Seon, chief operations officer at the office of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, told reporters.

South Korean defense forces in the area were put on their highest level of alert -- termed Jindokgae Hana -- and were searching for potential North Korean infiltrators. While North and South Korea maintain a somewhat bipolar relationship -- equal parts confrontation and cooperation -- there hasn't been a major infiltration into South Korea since 1996, when a North Korean submarine ran aground and its occupants led South Korean security forces on a hunt for several days before all members were killed, many by each other or their own hands.
 
Do you think it was a NK army op or rather just NK refugees, fleeing to the south? Hard to say, but likely the former, but hope for the latter.
 
I saw the same plot in the movie Team America, World Police. The North Korean dictator is the real master mind behind terrorisim. :happy2:
 
So Mr Knight, do you dismiss the possibility completely, because of a cartoon, instead of what is real?

If you doubt Stratfor's credibility, maybe you should do some checking, first, and not ramble on with a joke about a puppet show.

Here is a review of a book by Stratfor founder George Friedman...a very credible and non-partisan source of information for those that chose to do more than watch cartoons and puppet shows, and think the world is a dangerous place.

THE STARTLING TRUTH BEHIND AMERICA'S FOREIGN POLICY AND WAR EFFORT IN AFGHANISTAN, IRAQ, AND BEYOND--FROM THE FOUNDER OF THE COMPANY DUBBED BY BARRON'S AS "THE SHADOW CIA"

Dubbed by Barron’s as “The Shadow CIA,” George Friedman’s global intelligence company, Stratfor, has provided analysis to Fortune 500 companies, news outlets, and even the U.S. government. Now Friedman delivers the geopolitical story that the mainstream media has been unable to uncover — the startling truth behind America’s foreign policy and war effort in Afghanistan, Iraq, and beyond.

Stratfor, one of the world’s most respected private global intelligence firms, has an unmatched ability to provide clear perspective on the current geopolitical map. In AMERICA’S SECRET WAR, George Friedman identifies the United States’ most dangerous enemies, delves into presidential strategies of the last quarter century, and reveals the real reasons behind the attack of 9/11—and the Bush administration’s motivation for the war in Iraq. It describes in eye-opening detail America’s covert and overt efforts in the global war against terrorism: Not only are U.S. armies in combat on every continent, but since 9/11 the intelligence services of dozens of nations have been operating in close partnership with the CIA.

Drawing on Stratfor’s vast information-gathering network, Friedman presents an insightful picture of today’s world that goes far beyond what is reported on television and in other news media.

Al Qaeda’s war plans and how they led to 9/11
The threat of a suitcase nuclear bomb in New York and how that changed the course of the war.
The deal the U.S. made with Russia and Iran which made the invasion of Afghanistan possible – and how those deals affect the United States today.
How fear and suspicion of the Saudis after 9-11 tore apart the Bush-Saudi relationship and why Saudi Arabia’s closest friends in the administration became the Saudi’s worst enemies.
The real reasons behind George W. Bush’s invasion of Iraq and how WMD became the cover for a much deeper game.
How the CIA miscalculated about Saddam Hussein’s and Iran’s real plans, leaving the U.S. bogged down in the war.
How the war in Iraq began with a ruse, pretending that a “target of opportunity” attack on Saddam Hussein had presented itself.
The real story about why the U.S. raises and lowers its alert status and why the United States can’t find and destroy al Qaeda.
The strategic successes that are slowly leading the United States to victory

AMERICA’S SECRET WAR is an unprecedented look at the new world war being waged behind-the-scenes today. It is sure to stir debate and capture headlines around the world.
 
Fmr jarhead said:
Here is a review of a book by Stratfor founder George Friedman...a very credible and non-partisan source of information for those that chose to do more than watch cartoons and puppet shows, and think the world is a dangerous place.


We all contribute what we can, I guess. :rolleyes:
 
there hasn't been a major infiltration into South Korea since 1996
I was in Korea then and also that same year a defecting NK pilot flew his MiG-15 over the DMZ and landed it at Suwon Air Base. Also while I was there, there was an infiltration that occurred involving 2-3 NK operatives. One drowned in the Imjin river and I think the other one or two were caught...not sure. All I know is that I spent that weekend with my M-249 and foxhole watching the fenceline.
 
I had a similar experience in the early 80's.....the incursions and automatic weapon fire on the border goes on almost daily....and never gets reported, EVER!
 
Isaac Brock said:
Do you think it was a NK army op or rather just NK refugees, fleeing to the south? Hard to say, but likely the former, but hope for the latter.

I think it was to smuggle out contraband to enemies of the free world....when I feel paranoid, anyway.

I hope it was nothing more than a family who decided it was worth risking their lives to live in freedom.....something we take for granted way to often.
 
Fmr jarhead said:
I had a similar experience in the early 80's.....the incursions and automatic weapon fire on the border goes on almost daily....and never gets reported, EVER!
Yep Yep
It is amazing how many "training accidents" occur in that area.
I was never really thrilled with flying along the DMZ. If it wasn't the rounds flying towards you (they never really aimed at you, just made sure you saw the tracers) it was the grueling S2 debrief that followed.
 
This George Friedman, is he Jewish? :rolleyes:
Just kidding.

Anyone who keeps up with the current news of the day, can see one of the most obvious reasons for the invasion of Iraq.
Unlike most Third World Nation in which, we have no problem with daily human suffering and WMD programs. Iraq has something of unique interest to us.
It does not require allot of insight to see that the worlds oil wells are peaking out. The best time estimate is 2020, the worst 2005.
Most of the big wells were discovered how long ago? If they are half empty now, how long, with the worlds increased demand, will it take for them to run dry?
Oil is something we use allot of, we could not feed the worlds populations without it, and we could not lead the world in good works on a demised economy. http://www.eia.doe.gov/kids/energyfacts/sources/non-renewable/oil.html

Since we use allot of it and it is a non-renewable resource on the decline. It is one of the main pillars of our modern economy, it would make sense, to think ahead by secureing reserves for our future use.

Getting back to your point, I’m open minded, what’s Mr. Friedman’s perspective on the current events of the day?
 
Kind of getting off topic...but you've got a serious case of "I'm gullible" Mr. Knight....
Guess the year.....
1. Bureau of Mines "enough oil for only 10 more years"
2. Dept of INterior "oil will run out in 13 years."
3. Dept of interior again says "oil will run out in 13 years"

The experts have been predicting we will run out of oil since I was a little kid, and will continue to do so for several hundred more years, even counting the increased demand.....

Here are the answers
1. 1914
2. 1939
3. 1951

There are more people buying in to the notion that oil will run out in another 10 years, now....but by all accounts, there is no documentation to prove it.

Go stand in the corner, and don't come back until you can get back on topic, please.
 
I wish you were right.
But the facts say otherwise. Do a search for Hubert’s Bell or peak. It was accurately predicted for the U.S. mainly Texas for the late 70,s. It was in the early 80’s when ‘DO DA‘ days finally ended in Texas. The Saudis biggest wells are pumping more water then oil now. I would say unless we cut back on usage, less then 100 years after we peak. One thing that is certain for the immediate future the price of oil will continue to rise.
Believe what you want,
I don’t think countries are looking to lay claim to the poles because they need Ice.

I read your article, what does the author think the real reason behind the war is, not the liberal view that the economy was anemic and people were complaining about the inability to find Osama bin Laden. and in the other corner, the neoconservatives in the Cabinet were itching to launch ships and planes to the Mideast and take control of Iraq, the president connected Hussein to Bin Laden, even if the CIA could not?
So, your what's the point of your topic?
 
Read the first post.....you will then understand what this thread is about.

It is not Iraq, oil or al Qaeda,....the rest is up to you.
 

Forum List

Back
Top