More than anything else, the 2024 presidential race boiled down to good vs evil.

Totally untrue as Jackson was the first one.

1837: Andrew Jackson-This resulted in a huge government surplus of funds. (In 1835, the $17.9 million budget surplus was greater than the total government expenses for that year.) By January of 1835, for the first and only time, all of the government's interest-bearing debt was paid off.

History of the Debt - TreasuryDirect

We’re talking about modern times after the introduction of the radical left and their massive spending.
 
I understand how/why a lot of people see politics in moral terms.

I don't, and I disagree with the whole concept.

For me, it's the economy stupid. Morality belongs to the individual, not the collective. The whole idea of "collective morality" is very dangerous.
 
Totally untrue as Jackson was the first one.

1837: Andrew Jackson-This resulted in a huge government surplus of funds. (In 1835, the $17.9 million budget surplus was greater than the total government expenses for that year.) By January of 1835, for the first and only time, all of the government's interest-bearing debt was paid off.

History of the Debt - TreasuryDirect

We should tax and spend like we did when Jackson was president.
 
It is silly to mix theological terms with politics. "Evil" has nothing to do with it. Incompetent is the term that applies to the duopoly's offerings. People mostly didn't vote "for", they voted "against". Harris was the only rational argument for voting for Trump for voters so caught in the duality that they could not bring themselves to vote "other".
 
As far as I know he has four more years to do it. Recall his first term when Democrats did everything in their power to keep him from building the wall, and he STILL completed a lot of it.
Mexico doesn't have democrats in their government.



Former Mexican president to Donald Trump: "I'm not going ...​

1732098986205.png
Vox
https://www.vox.com › vicente-fox-donald-trump-wall

Feb 25, 2016 — ... Mexico should pay for Donald Trump's wall at the US-Mexico border. “I declare: I'm not going to pay for that fucking wall,” Fox said. “He ...

But do you think it's fair to stand in his way, and later proclaim he failed?

See above.
 
Yet he lied about who would pay for it.

Do you think he will send them an invoice or perhaps they will be paying in other ways?(tarriffs)

Bottom line for me is that even if the US foots the bill, we will recoup the money in very short order by far less illegal immigration. As an added bonus, we will also make our country more secure. It is a win/win.
 
The GOP spends no less.

Agreed, hopefully that will change this term.

I think Republicans in general would be ok with a much more limited federal government. National defense, interstates and limited social welfare. I’m sure I left out a few things, but just the basics. It is an easier sell to Republicans to cut than to Democrats as they see the federal government as much bigger controlling force.
 
Just like a terlit you keep on flushing the same shit.

NationalDebt_v02_DP_1684339148116_hpEmbed_1x1_992.jpg

FLeuNoEX0AIMuDj.jpg
 
Just like a terlit you keep on flushing the same shit.

NationalDebt_v02_DP_1684339148116_hpEmbed_1x1_992.jpg

FLeuNoEX0AIMuDj.jpg
Okay. Get the suddenly bipartisanship loving Progs to balance the budget with the Republicans. We will continue to live off of other nations while we make China the world power in a couple of decades.
 

Forum List

Back
Top