james bond
Gold Member
- Oct 17, 2015
- 13,407
- 1,805
- 170
Intelligent people know that our creatures have excellent body designs and there is a lack of "transitional forms."
More Strong Evidence for Evolution: Anatomical Vestiges
- Thread starter abu afak
- Start date
james bond
Gold Member
- Oct 17, 2015
- 13,407
- 1,805
- 170
There's no need for evolution and long time with natural selection. We can observe it happen. Also, creationists came up with it BEFORE Durwood Darwin.
"According to Loren C. Eiseley, Benjamin Franklin Professor of Anthropology and the History of Science at the University of Pennsylvania before his death, "the leading tenets of Darwin's work — the struggle for existence, variation, natural selection, and sexual selection — are all fully expressed" in a paper written by creationist Edward Blyth in 18351 (emphasis added). Unlike Darwin, however, Blyth saw natural selection as a preserving factor rather than as "a potentially liberalizing" one. According to this under-appreciated naturalist, the conserving principle was "intended by Providence to keep up the typical qualities of a species." Atypical variations, to use Eiseley's words, led to the animal's "discovery and destruction."2
Eiseley, not a creationist, wrote that "Blyth is more than a Darwinian precursor, he is, instead, a direct intellectual forebear. . . ." In Eiseley's estimation, Blyth "belongs in the royal line . . . one of the forgotten parents of a great classic." On the same page, Eiseley also affirmed that "Darwin made unacknowledged use of Blyth's work."3
Editor Kenneth Heuer concluded, "this is Eiseley's discovery." Darwin had "failed to acknowledge his obligation to Blyth."4 He did acknowledge others (and even Blyth peripherally), but, as Eiseley demonstrates persuasively, Darwin for some reason chose not to credit creationist Blyth with the key element in his theory — natural selection."
There's no need for evolution and long time with natural selection. We can observe it happen. Also, creationists came up with it BEFORE Durwood Darwin.
"According to Loren C. Eiseley, Benjamin Franklin Professor of Anthropology and the History of Science at the University of Pennsylvania before his death, "the leading tenets of Darwin's work — the struggle for existence, variation, natural selection, and sexual selection — are all fully expressed" in a paper written by creationist Edward Blyth in 18351 (emphasis added). Unlike Darwin, however, Blyth saw natural selection as a preserving factor rather than as "a potentially liberalizing" one. According to this under-appreciated naturalist, the conserving principle was "intended by Providence to keep up the typical qualities of a species." Atypical variations, to use Eiseley's words, led to the animal's "discovery and destruction."2
Eiseley, not a creationist, wrote that "Blyth is more than a Darwinian precursor, he is, instead, a direct intellectual forebear. . . ." In Eiseley's estimation, Blyth "belongs in the royal line . . . one of the forgotten parents of a great classic." On the same page, Eiseley also affirmed that "Darwin made unacknowledged use of Blyth's work."3
Editor Kenneth Heuer concluded, "this is Eiseley's discovery." Darwin had "failed to acknowledge his obligation to Blyth."4 He did acknowledge others (and even Blyth peripherally), but, as Eiseley demonstrates persuasively, Darwin for some reason chose not to credit creationist Blyth with the key element in his theory — natural selection."
ICR. Another term for the Flat Earth Society.
james bond
Gold Member
- Oct 17, 2015
- 13,407
- 1,805
- 170
It shows natural selection is not part of evolution because it does not involve long time. The evos are WRONG once again.
james bond
Gold Member
- Oct 17, 2015
- 13,407
- 1,805
- 170
The #1 Flat Earther here is YOU. Nobody surpasses Flattie Hollie lol.
Lol. It's funny watching the Flat Earthers celebrate their Flat Earth'ness, lol.
james bond
Gold Member
- Oct 17, 2015
- 13,407
- 1,805
- 170
You are TOO CREEPY with your Flat Earthness. No one can discuss science with you here. You should only stay in the religion forum. Better yet, the rubber room.
Last edited:
Embrace your Flat Earth'ness. Don't be just another pick and choose Flat Earther.
james bond
Gold Member
- Oct 17, 2015
- 13,407
- 1,805
- 170
abu afak: Soy un perdedor.
Sure. I already established that creationist Edward Blyth discovered natural selection before Darwin -- Edward Blyth and the Theory of Natural Selection - Nature.
Religious extremists know nothing of science which is why they deny transitional fossils.Intelligent people know that our creatures have excellent body designs and there is a lack of "transitional forms."
james bond
Gold Member
- Oct 17, 2015
- 13,407
- 1,805
- 170
As usual, you are WRONG and a loser. The creationists know the most science here over the evolutionists.
Creationerism is religious extremism, not science.
itfitzme
Silver Member
Evolution.
james bond
Gold Member
- Oct 17, 2015
- 13,407
- 1,805
- 170
No, it isn't. Creation has already happened and stopped. The scientific evidence backs creation. However, evolution has come along and denies it.
No scientific evidence "backs" magic or supernaturalism.
james bond
Gold Member
- Oct 17, 2015
- 13,407
- 1,805
- 170
You mean evolution. No scientific evidence backs evolution.
Just look at the mistakes in this our universe evolved article.
I can see someone like abu afak falling for it, but you, too lol?
The Evolution of the Universe
Similar threads
New Topics
-
-
-
-
-
"Queering The Map" Why Does The Left Want Maps To Be More Gay?
- Started by mudwhistle
- Replies: 2
Latest Discussions
-
-
-
Are there here users of John Deere equipment. You may have a problem- Latest: OhPleaseJustQuit
