Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Absurd questions like who builds, maintains, and pays for the roads and whether the systematic oppression of an entire race is acceptable?
Why don't you just come out and admit what you really think? Why do you libertardians only admit what you really think on accident?
I don't entertain poorly veiled sock puppet communists anymore, either.Absurd questions like who builds, maintains, and pays for the roads and whether the systematic oppression of an entire race is acceptable?
Why don't you just come out and admit what you really think? Why do you libertardians only admit what you really think on accident?
I believe Article 1 Section 8 of the Constitution spells out the requirements about the government's role in building/keeping roads.Absurd questions like who builds, maintains, and pays for the roads
Now we're going into non-sequiturs.the systematic oppression of an entire race is acceptable?
Because what you think libertarians "really" think is not what they "really" think.Why don't you just come out and admit what you really think? Why do you libertardians only admit what you really think on accident?
How many Libertarians does it take to screw in a light bulb? None. The Market will take care of it.
Wowzers!...The Fabians at Salon smear libertarians?!?!??This is a better representation:
The lesson of Rand Paul: libertarianism is juvenile - War Room - Salon.com
![]()
Stop the presses!![]()
Like you'd give a critique of Fabian socialism from Town Hall any credence?Wowzers!...The Fabians at Salon smear libertarians?!?!??This is a better representation:
The lesson of Rand Paul: libertarianism is juvenile - War Room - Salon.com
![]()
Stop the presses!![]()
how many media do you have to attack in order to make the libertarian message palatable?
Like you'd give a critique of Fabian socialism from Town Hall any credence?Wowzers!...The Fabians at Salon smear libertarians?!?!??
Stop the presses!![]()
how many media do you have to attack in order to make the libertarian message palatable?
Go fish.![]()
How many liberoidal socialist nitwits does it take to change a light bulb?Peck said:How many Liberals does it take to screw in a light bulb? None. The Government will take care of it.
Good one!![]()
Don't be silly, JB...he doesn't think. Others do that for him.Absurd questions like who builds, maintains, and pays for the roads and whether the systematic oppression of an entire race is acceptable?
Why don't you just come out and admit what you really think? Why do you libertardians only admit what you really think on accident?
You just post nonsense.
Good job throwing Rand Paul under the bus.
![]()
Fascinating rebuttal. You clearly pwned the duder on this one.
His C&P is a non sequitur.
Not to mention that Rand Paul, and most libertarians, are probably supportive of a state's right to enact Jim Crow laws.
Most libertarians actually support the federal governments authority to enforce the constitution, which specifically prohibits states from making Jim Crow laws. If the federal government had done its job there would have been no Jim Crow laws, and no one would be able to now claim that most libertarians supported them. I used to wonder why both parties are unable to man up and admit when they are wrong, now I know it is becasue they simply are never wrong.
How many liberoidal socialist nitwits does it take to change a light bulb?Peck said:How many Liberals does it take to screw in a light bulb? None. The Government will take care of it.
Good one!![]()
None!...That's the IBEW's job and we'll break your knee caps if you try to change it!
I don't entertain poorly veiled sock puppet communists anymore, either.Absurd questions like who builds, maintains, and pays for the roads and whether the systematic oppression of an entire race is acceptable?
Why don't you just come out and admit what you really think? Why do you libertardians only admit what you really think on accident?
Maybe you'll be more at home HERE.
union thugs tend to carry clubs.How many liberoidal socialist nitwits does it take to change a light bulb?
Good one!![]()
None!...That's the IBEW's job and we'll break your knee caps if you try to change it!
you're afraid of Union 'thugs'?
I thought you were a tough guy.
---
http://www.usmessageboard.com/education-and-history/118296-the-manifoil-libertarian-principle-challenge-is-voting-a-civil-right.html
union thugs tend to carry clubs.How many liberoidal socialist nitwits does it take to change a light bulb?
None!...That's the IBEW's job and we'll break your knee caps if you try to change it!
you're afraid of Union 'thugs'?
I thought you were a tough guy.
---
http://www.usmessageboard.com/education-and-history/118296-the-manifoil-libertarian-principle-challenge-is-voting-a-civil-right.html
Great comment from the link in the OP:
When criminals have the tacit approval of the police (aka, the state) it would have been very difficult for the free market to sort it out. The reason is that the state was deliberately looking the other way instead of enforcing the laws. This is not a free market problem. This a problem of evil people running the show.
The classical liberal view of why men form governments is to protect the unalienable rights of the citizens. In the case of Jim Crow laws the state was actively denying the rights of the citizenry. To blame libertarians for this is not just a misrepresentation, it is an outright lie. The NY Times should be ashamed to have run such a dishonest article.
The writers at the NYTs screwed up again. That, however, won't stop the rabid wackos from supporting their lies.
Great comment from the link in the OP:
When criminals have the tacit approval of the police (aka, the state) it would have been very difficult for the free market to sort it out. The reason is that the state was deliberately looking the other way instead of enforcing the laws. This is not a free market problem. This a problem of evil people running the show.
The classical liberal view of why men form governments is to protect the unalienable rights of the citizens. In the case of Jim Crow laws the state was actively denying the rights of the citizenry. To blame libertarians for this is not just a misrepresentation, it is an outright lie. The NY Times should be ashamed to have run such a dishonest article.
The writers at the NYTs screwed up again. That, however, won't stop the rabid wackos from supporting their lies.
Yep...
peace...
"Probably"??His C&P is a non sequitur.
Not to mention that Rand Paul, and most libertarians, are probably supportive of a state's right to enact Jim Crow laws.
Care to back that up with anything other than your clearly bigoted surmise?
Do you support state's having the right to segregate? If yes in some cases, list the cases.