Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
He’s a judge so making a judgement is exactly what his job is.Sullivan hasn’t even done anything yet. All he’s doing is looking for more information before making a ruling. Good lord. What’s so wrong with that?Sure he is. The district court issued a order for him, therefore he is a party.I believe it can be appealed.It's grounds for impeachment and removal, yes.So will Sullivan do it? Can he be removed if he doesn’t?
The judge has no standing to appeal, he's not a party in the case.
.
Yeah, they told him to do his fucking job and follow the precedents. The defense brought the action, do you even know what a writ of mandamus and an order to vacate are?
.
It's not his job, as the court of appeals pointed out. He's not supposed to have a dog in the fight. There is no controversy before him.
.
It isn’t over until Sullivan says it’s over.You mean, other than the case being over?Sullivan hasn’t even done anything yet. All he’s doing is looking for more information before making a ruling. Good lord. What’s so wrong with that?Sure he is. The district court issued a order for him, therefore he is a party.I believe it can be appealed.It's grounds for impeachment and removal, yes.So will Sullivan do it? Can he be removed if he doesn’t?
The judge has no standing to appeal, he's not a party in the case.
.
Yeah, they told him to do his fucking job and follow the precedents. The defense brought the action, do you even know what a writ of mandamus and an order to vacate are?
.
He’s a judge so making a judgement is exactly what his job is.Sullivan hasn’t even done anything yet. All he’s doing is looking for more information before making a ruling. Good lord. What’s so wrong with that?Sure he is. The district court issued a order for him, therefore he is a party.I believe it can be appealed.It's grounds for impeachment and removal, yes.So will Sullivan do it? Can he be removed if he doesn’t?
The judge has no standing to appeal, he's not a party in the case.
.
Yeah, they told him to do his fucking job and follow the precedents. The defense brought the action, do you even know what a writ of mandamus and an order to vacate are?
.
It's not his job, as the court of appeals pointed out. He's not supposed to have a dog in the fight. There is no controversy before him.
.
Judge’s dog is the proper function of the judiciary and protecting it from corrupt prosecutors is in furtherance of that goal.
He canceled the hearing. Too bad, so sad.It isn’t over until Sullivan says it’s over.You mean, other than the case being over?Sullivan hasn’t even done anything yet. All he’s doing is looking for more information before making a ruling. Good lord. What’s so wrong with that?Sure he is. The district court issued a order for him, therefore he is a party.I believe it can be appealed.It's grounds for impeachment and removal, yes.So will Sullivan do it? Can he be removed if he doesn’t?
The judge has no standing to appeal, he's not a party in the case.
.
Yeah, they told him to do his fucking job and follow the precedents. The defense brought the action, do you even know what a writ of mandamus and an order to vacate are?
.
He is a hack who just got bitchslapped by a real court.He’s a judge so making a judgement is exactly what his job is.Sullivan hasn’t even done anything yet. All he’s doing is looking for more information before making a ruling. Good lord. What’s so wrong with that?Sure he is. The district court issued a order for him, therefore he is a party.I believe it can be appealed.It's grounds for impeachment and removal, yes.So will Sullivan do it? Can he be removed if he doesn’t?
The judge has no standing to appeal, he's not a party in the case.
.
Yeah, they told him to do his fucking job and follow the precedents. The defense brought the action, do you even know what a writ of mandamus and an order to vacate are?
.
It's not his job, as the court of appeals pointed out. He's not supposed to have a dog in the fight. There is no controversy before him.
.
Judge’s dog is the proper function of the judiciary and protecting it from corrupt prosecutors is in furtherance of that goal.
It was over when both parties dropped the case, moron.It isn’t over until Sullivan says it’s over.You mean, other than the case being over?Sullivan hasn’t even done anything yet. All he’s doing is looking for more information before making a ruling. Good lord. What’s so wrong with that?Sure he is. The district court issued a order for him, therefore he is a party.I believe it can be appealed.It's grounds for impeachment and removal, yes.So will Sullivan do it? Can he be removed if he doesn’t?
The judge has no standing to appeal, he's not a party in the case.
.
Yeah, they told him to do his fucking job and follow the precedents. The defense brought the action, do you even know what a writ of mandamus and an order to vacate are?
.
That's because none of us have been framed and extorted by the FBI, loser.That's not what happened. None of us would get to plea bargain our way out of prison by pleading guilty to lesser crimes then get the AG to force the courts to let them off because the president wants it done.Every American should be on Flynn's side here. If law enforcement can make up any BS to get a warrant on 3 star general and the president, think how easily they can target any of us for anything......and they have been.These trumpers are looking at corruption and think it's the rule of law.
He is a hack who just got bitchslapped by a real court.He’s a judge so making a judgement is exactly what his job is.Sullivan hasn’t even done anything yet. All he’s doing is looking for more information before making a ruling. Good lord. What’s so wrong with that?Sure he is. The district court issued a order for him, therefore he is a party.I believe it can be appealed.It's grounds for impeachment and removal, yes.So will Sullivan do it? Can he be removed if he doesn’t?
The judge has no standing to appeal, he's not a party in the case.
.
Yeah, they told him to do his fucking job and follow the precedents. The defense brought the action, do you even know what a writ of mandamus and an order to vacate are?
.
It's not his job, as the court of appeals pointed out. He's not supposed to have a dog in the fight. There is no controversy before him.
.
Judge’s dog is the proper function of the judiciary and protecting it from corrupt prosecutors is in furtherance of that goal.
Her ruling? It was an appeals court ruling. And Sullivan canceled the hearing.He is a hack who just got bitchslapped by a real court.He’s a judge so making a judgement is exactly what his job is.Sullivan hasn’t even done anything yet. All he’s doing is looking for more information before making a ruling. Good lord. What’s so wrong with that?Sure he is. The district court issued a order for him, therefore he is a party.I believe it can be appealed.It's grounds for impeachment and removal, yes.So will Sullivan do it? Can he be removed if he doesn’t?
The judge has no standing to appeal, he's not a party in the case.
.
Yeah, they told him to do his fucking job and follow the precedents. The defense brought the action, do you even know what a writ of mandamus and an order to vacate are?
.
It's not his job, as the court of appeals pointed out. He's not supposed to have a dog in the fight. There is no controversy before him.
.
Judge’s dog is the proper function of the judiciary and protecting it from corrupt prosecutors is in furtherance of that goal.
Sullivan has been a judge for 36 years. Rao has been on the bench about a year.
Her ruling might get an en blanc review. Could be exciting. Who knows?
Well, she wrote the ruling with another judge so you’re correct on that one.Her ruling? It was an appeals court ruling. And Sullivan canceled the hearing.He is a hack who just got bitchslapped by a real court.He’s a judge so making a judgement is exactly what his job is.Sullivan hasn’t even done anything yet. All he’s doing is looking for more information before making a ruling. Good lord. What’s so wrong with that?Sure he is. The district court issued a order for him, therefore he is a party.I believe it can be appealed.It's grounds for impeachment and removal, yes.So will Sullivan do it? Can he be removed if he doesn’t?
The judge has no standing to appeal, he's not a party in the case.
.
Yeah, they told him to do his fucking job and follow the precedents. The defense brought the action, do you even know what a writ of mandamus and an order to vacate are?
.
It's not his job, as the court of appeals pointed out. He's not supposed to have a dog in the fight. There is no controversy before him.
.
Judge’s dog is the proper function of the judiciary and protecting it from corrupt prosecutors is in furtherance of that goal.
Sullivan has been a judge for 36 years. Rao has been on the bench about a year.
Her ruling might get an en blanc review. Could be exciting. Who knows?
Hey idiot, there is no such thing as an “en blanc” review.He is a hack who just got bitchslapped by a real court.He’s a judge so making a judgement is exactly what his job is.Sullivan hasn’t even done anything yet. All he’s doing is looking for more information before making a ruling. Good lord. What’s so wrong with that?Sure he is. The district court issued a order for him, therefore he is a party.I believe it can be appealed.It's grounds for impeachment and removal, yes.So will Sullivan do it? Can he be removed if he doesn’t?
The judge has no standing to appeal, he's not a party in the case.
.
Yeah, they told him to do his fucking job and follow the precedents. The defense brought the action, do you even know what a writ of mandamus and an order to vacate are?
.
It's not his job, as the court of appeals pointed out. He's not supposed to have a dog in the fight. There is no controversy before him.
.
Judge’s dog is the proper function of the judiciary and protecting it from corrupt prosecutors is in furtherance of that goal.
Sullivan has been a judge for 36 years. Rao has been on the bench about a year.
Her ruling might get an en blanc review. Could be exciting. Who knows?
Hey idiot, there is no such thing as an “en blanc” review.
You posted it wrong twice.Hey idiot, there is no such thing as an “en blanc” review.
en banc. Not a word I type very often. Thanks for the correction.
When you're nit picking like this, it's not a sign of a good argument.You posted it wrong twice.Hey idiot, there is no such thing as an “en blanc” review.
en banc. Not a word I type very often. Thanks for the correction.
justthenews.com
Some people need to go to prison for what they did to this American hero.More good news for Flynn. Imagine that! More notes found proving his innocence.
New evidence turned over to Flynn shows DOJ doubted criminal case against Trump adviser
Fourteen pages of new memos include handwritten notes from senior DOJ officials from early 2017.
I agree.Some people need to go to prison for what they did to this American hero.More good news for Flynn. Imagine that! More notes found proving his innocence.
New evidence turned over to Flynn shows DOJ doubted criminal case against Trump adviser
Fourteen pages of new memos include handwritten notes from senior DOJ officials from early 2017.
LOLMore good news for Flynn. Imagine that! More notes found proving his innocence.
New evidence turned over to Flynn shows DOJ doubted criminal case against Trump adviser
Fourteen pages of new memos include handwritten notes from senior DOJ officials from early 2017.
Yes.LOLMore good news for Flynn. Imagine that! More notes found proving his innocence.
New evidence turned over to Flynn shows DOJ doubted criminal case against Trump adviser
Fourteen pages of new memos include handwritten notes from senior DOJ officials from early 2017.
So Flynn's case has been dismissed, has it?
LOLOLOLYes.LOLMore good news for Flynn. Imagine that! More notes found proving his innocence.
New evidence turned over to Flynn shows DOJ doubted criminal case against Trump adviser
Fourteen pages of new memos include handwritten notes from senior DOJ officials from early 2017.
So Flynn's case has been dismissed, has it?
www.foxnews.com
