Maybe v. A Sure Thing

[Flanders]

All of the policy differences between Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton is just so much folderol when the bureaucrats continue doing whatever suits their agenda. The only true difference between Trump and Clinton is the people who will do whatever it takes to put one of their own in the White House —— namely Hillary Clinton. You will not find one loyal American among the lot of them:

http://www.wnd.com/files/2016/08/wb-0816-COVER.jpg

Aligned with Hillary and Bill Clinton is the Democratic Party, now so radical as to be further left than many of the Western world’s socialist governments – all of them failing, or worse. Also aligned with the Clintons are not only virtually the entire “mainstream media,” but also academia and Hollywood – what filmmaker Dinesh D’Souza calls society’s “three big megaphones.” But there’s more: Essentially the entire financial and banking sector (“Wall Street”) sides with Clinton, as do the globalist elite, including corporate interests that, in pursuit of cheap labor, favor open borders, amnesty and one-sided “free trade” agreements, regardless of their negative impact on American jobs and workers. Same with the worldwide “climate-change” movement dedicated to massive taxation, global wealth redistribution and unprecedented power-grabbing on the pretext of saving the planet. Even some Republicans, a few openly but many more secretly, support returning the Clintons to the White House.​

War of the Worlds
Posted By -NO AUTHOR- On 08/09/2016 @ 7:25 pm

War of the Worlds​

The most laughable aspect in he-said-she-said media babble is Hillary’s gang saying that Trump

MIGHT​

harm the country if he becomes president. They must mean maybe because there is no evidence to support the charge that a private citizen ever did anything that can be compared to the harm Democrat government officials have been doing every day for decades. (Today’s illegal alien mess began in 1965.)

On the other side in the war of worlds Trump’s detractors are basically saying vote for blood soaked Hillary Clinton even though she has a long record of harming the country, and she will do it again, and again, and again for as long as she is president.

Bottom line for idiots: Do not vote for a person that MIGHT betray you. Vote for the person you know will betray you.

 

[candycorn]

A Trump presidency will do irreparable harm to the nation. So says 50 former Republican intelligence officials who signed a letter stating as such.

They write:

Now, either all 50 of these people, Susan Collins, other leading Republicans, two former Republican Presidents, etc… have all went off their rocker at the same time or they know what they are talking about and Mr. Trump does not.

Trump supporters are not supporters in the traditional sense of supporting a candidate. Rather, this small fraction of a man who has bullied his way to the top of GOP politics is unfit for public service. His supporters can easily see this. For example, you see almost no positive threads from his mouthpieces here but attacks on Ms. Clinton; calling into question her appearance, her voice, her weight, and now most recently and most regrettably, her health. This example along with Mr. Trump’s obvious shortcomings, simply put, cast his supporters as not political backers but more like enablers for a loser whose only remaining contribution to make is hitting bottom with an ounce of class; if he has that much left.

 

[Flanders]

To candycorn: Thank you for proving my case:

Bottom line for idiots: Do not vote for a person that MIGHT betray you. Vote for the person you know will betray you.

Before you cite any more security experts you better check the loyalties of the first 50. They are the same EXPERTS who created ISIS and then brag about losing the war.

Now, either all 50 of these people, Susan Collins, other leading Republicans, two former Republican Presidents, etc… have all went off their rocker at the same time or they know what they are talking about and Mr. Trump does not.

As to Susan Collins and two Republican presidents: Collins has always been a joke elected by clowns in Maine.

Her votes have been classic betrayals. Voting for New START tops her list of infamy. This next vote is only good for number two while it would top the list of every RINO except Collins:

Every Democrat voting for free healthcare for illegals while Americans are suffering is nothing new, nor was Susan Collins’ vote a big surprise. The state of Maine loves to send RINO to the Senate. The other one, Olympia Snowe, would still be there if she had not retired. Senators like those two must do something for Maine because they do not do anything for the country when they support free healthcare for illegal immigrants.​

Congress Did It!

As to former Republican presidents: Bush the Elder was a New World Order guy as far as the 1960s when he was congressman:

​

For all of Bush the Elder’s “rule of law” crap in the video, the New World Order is all about abolishing America’s sovereignty and giving ruling classes in every country protection and absolute legal power over the governed; including the power to slaughter them. All of America’s foreign policy is based on that objective.

All of America’s foreign policy strengthens existing ruling classes loyal to the New World Order, and establishing loyal ruling classes in Third World countries. Obviously, American tax dollars are required; hence, giving the United Nations taxing authority in UN treaties must be accomplished as soon as possible —— before American taxpayers revolt and pull the plug. For some unknown reason American quislings think tax dollars levied and collected by the UN are not as offensive as tax dollars collected by the IRS and given to the UN.

Parenthetically, Bush & Company probably think they will run the show forever. Either they advocate the coming genocides under the UN’s watchful eye, or they are too stupid to see that brutal dictatorships and ruling classes in militarily powerful countries like China and Russia have global government plans of their own. No less of a “rule of law” hypocrite than Bush the Elder has long been an advocate of genocide in the name of population controls:​

George H.W. Bush: Evil Population Control Ghoul

George H.W. Bush: Evil Population Control Ghoul​

AVIS & the Posse

The lying sneaks you are so proud of are hiding their first loyalty to the United Nations by claiming Trump is unfit, unqualified, dangerous, and blah, blah, blah. The truth is that they are more dangerous than Trump will ever be with all of the LIMITED presidential powers he will exercise as president. Proof: Most of the people who have been betraying this country for so long will retain their power and influence irrespective of who is president.

Finally, the traitors want Hillary because she will speed up the New World Order’s agenda.

 

[candycorn]

Oh boy, conspiracy theories are now the norm in the GOP…. Nice. What’s next; are you going to claim there were no planes that hit the towers or double down on the lie of “thousands of dancing arabs” in New Jersey?

I think when Dylan Avery is your go-to-guy for information, it’s one of the sure signs that your messiah is leading you into the abyss.

But lets look at some of your post and see if there is anything worth responding to:

"Before you cite any more security experts you better check the loyalties of the first 50. They are the same EXPERTS who created ISIS and then brag about losing the war.”

Okay… now the 50 republican experts created ISIS.

According to your messiah, Hillary and Obama did it. Sometimes it’s just Obama, sometimes it’s just Hillary. Nice to see you’re sharing the credit with 50 Republicans.

 

[Flanders]

Okay… now the 50 republican experts created ISIS.

According to your messiah, Hillary and Obama did it. Sometimes it’s just Obama, sometimes it’s just Hillary. Nice to see you’re sharing the credit with 50 Republicans.

To candycorn: Put some work in on your reading comprehension skills:

You will not find one loyal American among the lot of them:

You forget to include known-traitor John Kerry. They all betray the country for the same New World Order agenda.

 

[Flanders]

Before you cite any more security experts you better check the loyalties of the first 50. They are the same EXPERTS who created ISIS and then brag about losing the war.

include known-traitor John Kerry. They all betray the country for the same New World Order agenda.

The Donald made one mistake. They are all guilty:

​

Donald Trump doubled down Thursday morning, saying President Obama was “absolutely” the founder of the Islamic State terror group and Hillary Clinton was a co-founder.​

Donald Trump doubles down: Obama was ‘absolutely’ the founder of ISIS
By David Sherfinski
Thursday, August 11, 2016

Donald Trump doubles down: Obama was ‘absolutely’ the founder of ISIS​

 

[Flanders]

Donald Trump doubles down: Obama was ‘absolutely’ the founder of ISIS

Cooking up crises in their diseased brains is the only accomplishment the certified mental case and the spiritual leader can claim:

http://media.townhall.com/Townhall/Car/b/mle160813c20160812070157.jpg

Donald Trump’s declaration this week at a campaign rally that President Obama and Hillary Clinton “founded” ISIS drew outrage from establishment media, and the Republican nominee now insists he was being sarcastic, but a Defense Intelligence Agency document declassified last year shows the Obama administration was warned in 2012 that if it continued its policies, a radical Islamic regime could form in Eastern Syria.

XXXXX​

Hillary Clinton was secretary of state at the time under President Obama.​

2012 Pentagon report warned Obama was creating ISIS
Posted By Art Moore On 08/12/2016 @ 8:33 pm

2012 Pentagon report warned Obama was creating ISIS​

 

[HUGGY]

Now that Trump back peddled away from his statement on the founders of ISIS where does that leave the mindless minions?

 

[Flanders]

Now that Trump back peddled away from his statement on the founders of ISIS where does that leave the mindless minions?

To HUGGY: Answer to your question: Having a field day exposing Clinton treason. See the video:

Sarcasm on the campaign trail

And let us not downplay the humor Donald Trump provided exposing media bias. Even better, Trump singlehandedly did more than everybody else did to highlight Hillary’s lies in the 25 years she has been getting away with lie on top of lie thanks to her media stooges:

Ann Coulter says that Donald Trump is the victim of "media rape" in her latest column.

Coulter, a conservative author and vocal Trump supporter, says the avalanche of negative press toward the GOP nominee is unprecedented.

"There’s no strategy for overcoming this level of media hostility," she writes. "Trump has made some mistakes during this campaign, but he hasn’t done anything wrong for months now. He could say 'yes,' and the media would change the question to, 'Are you a child molester?'​

August 12, 2016, 11:02 am
Coulter: Trump is victim of 'media rape'
By Joe Concha

Coulter: Trump is victim of 'media rape'​

 

[Flanders]

Cooking up crises in their diseased brains is the only accomplishment the certified mental case and the spiritual leader can claim:

Doubt me at your own peril:

http://www.americanthinker.com/images/bucket/2016-08/196938_5_.jpg

https://encrypted-tbn1.gstatic.com/...Fa_95heVmLw3bQRrpZJlKC4LG4RBBP7c4Bung4krZqbYF

 

[jwoodie]

Now that Trump back peddled away from his statement on the founders of ISIS where does that leave the mindless minions?

Why don't you tell us? And speaking of mindless, please explain why quibbling over the term "founders" is more important than the fact that our complete withdrawal from Iraq is the primary reason for the rise of ISIS?

 

[HUGGY]

Now that Trump back peddled away from his statement on the founders of ISIS where does that leave the mindless minions?

Why don't you tell us? And speaking of mindless, please explain why quibbling over the term "founders" is more important than the fact that our complete withdrawal from Iraq is the primary reason for the rise of ISIS?

The withdrawal from Iraq was a treaty signed by Bush you dolts. Obama was attempting to honor Bush's treaty with Iraq.

 

[Flanders]

All the hoopla over her ‘historic’ nomination doesn't change the sad facts of her decades in public life. The fact that Hillary Clinton is the first female to win a major party’s presidential nomination should not obscure the harm she’s done to our politics in her decades-long career. Arrogance, secrecy, mendacity, and implausible claims of victimhood will be her ultimate legacy.​

XXXXX​

Throughout all her ups and downs, Clinton demonstrated a remarkable capacity for self-pity. To hear her tell it, she’s perpetually the victim of unfair attacks, unreasonable expectations, and targeted malevolence. Only the hardest heart could lack sympathy for the national humiliation her husband put her through during the Monica Lewinsky scandal in 1998, but she famously blamed that entire mess on a “vast, right-wing conspiracy.” She once compared the anger of the 9/11 hijackers to that expressed by those who protested her health-care proposal way back when. More recently, she’s seen herself as “dead broke” while living a life of luxury and contends that she — probably among the five most influential figures in Washington over the past 25 years — couldn’t possibly be part of the “establishment” because she’s a woman.

XXXXX​

If you think of yourself as a victim, unjustly opposed by irredeemably evil foes, almost any act of retaliation — any lie, any violation of the law, any unsavory exercise of power — can be justified. That is as true now as it was in 1992, and given all we know of the Clintons now that we didn’t know then, there is no excuse for letting them anywhere near the White House ever again.​

Hillary Has Made Our Politics Worse
by Jim Geraghty
June 9, 2016 11:22 AM

Hillary Has Made Our Politics Worse​

Remember when the media played the victim card for Hillary Clinton at every turn? It took a stroke of genius to turn then-First Lady Hillary into a victim when she took pride in being in charge of bimbo eruptions.

Today, Donald Trump has to proceed with caution lest he turn a rich crook into a victim because she is a helpless woman. Sad to say that rape victim Trump gets no sympathy:

Ann Coulter says that Donald Trump is the victim of "media rape" in her latest column.

Happy to say that irrational Howard Dean has a better chance of portraying Count Dracula as a victim than he has of passing off Bloody Hillary Clinton as a victim:

Hillary Clinton supporter Howard Dean said Wednesday that she shouldn’t do a press conferences because the media’s questions aren’t “legitimate” and the press doesn’t treat her fairly.​

Dean: Clinton Shouldn’t Do Press Conferences Because Media’s Questions Aren’t ‘Legitimate’
BY: David Rutz
August 24, 2016 5:38 pm

Dean: Clinton Shouldn’t Do Press Conferences Because Media’s Questions Aren’t ‘Legitimate’​

 

[jwoodie]

The withdrawal from Iraq was a treaty signed by Bush you dolts. Obama was attempting to honor Bush's treaty with Iraq.

That is the most pathetic "Blame Bush" concoction I have read in some time. Will you still be using it in 2020?

The only thing Obama was honoring was his own campaign pledge to end the "bad" war in Iraq as soon as possible so that he could concentrate on the "good" war in Afghanistan. Too bad it took him six years to figure out that was a stupid policy.

P.S. Who, exactly, would have forced us to abandon Iraq, especially with its dysfunctional government? Wouldn't it be better if we still had a base over there to monitor and counterbalance Iran's aggressive intentions?

 

[HUGGY]

The withdrawal from Iraq was a treaty signed by Bush you dolts. Obama was attempting to honor Bush's treaty with Iraq.

That is the most pathetic "Blame Bush" concoction I have read in some time. Will you still be using it in 2020?

The only thing Obama was honoring was his own campaign pledge to end the "bad" war in Iraq as soon as possible so that he could concentrate on the "good" war in Afghanistan. Too bad it took him six years to figure out that was a stupid policy.

P.S. Who, exactly, would have forced us to abandon Iraq, especially with its dysfunctional government? Wouldn't it be better if we still had a base over there to monitor and counterbalance Iran's aggressive intentions?

You are an idiot. Look up the Iraq withdrawal treaty moron and get back to me.

 

[candycorn]

The withdrawal from Iraq was a treaty signed by Bush you dolts. Obama was attempting to honor Bush's treaty with Iraq.

That is the most pathetic "Blame Bush" concoction I have read in some time. Will you still be using it in 2020?

The only thing Obama was honoring was his own campaign pledge to end the "bad" war in Iraq as soon as possible so that he could concentrate on the "good" war in Afghanistan. Too bad it took him six years to figure out that was a stupid policy.

P.S. Who, exactly, would have forced us to abandon Iraq, especially with its dysfunctional government? Wouldn't it be better if we still had a base over there to monitor and counterbalance Iran's aggressive intentions?

No.

The lack of a crisis atmosphere has lead to the markets expanding and the price of gasoline lowering.

 

[jwoodie]

The withdrawal from Iraq was a treaty signed by Bush you dolts. Obama was attempting to honor Bush's treaty with Iraq.

That is the most pathetic "Blame Bush" concoction I have read in some time. Will you still be using it in 2020?

The only thing Obama was honoring was his own campaign pledge to end the "bad" war in Iraq as soon as possible so that he could concentrate on the "good" war in Afghanistan. Too bad it took him six years to figure out that was a stupid policy.

P.S. Who, exactly, would have forced us to abandon Iraq, especially with its dysfunctional government? Wouldn't it be better if we still had a base over there to monitor and counterbalance Iran's aggressive intentions?

You are an idiot. Look up the Iraq withdrawal treaty moron and get back to me.

Ho hum- your continuous resort to name calling is so tiresome. Have you ever considered addressing the points I brought up?

P.S. Since when is Obama concerned with "honoring" treaties (other than his own)? Do you really think we would have pulled out all our troops if a Republican had been elected instead?

Bush Reiterates Opposition To Iraq Withdrawal

 

[HUGGY]

The withdrawal from Iraq was a treaty signed by Bush you dolts. Obama was attempting to honor Bush's treaty with Iraq.

That is the most pathetic "Blame Bush" concoction I have read in some time. Will you still be using it in 2020?

The only thing Obama was honoring was his own campaign pledge to end the "bad" war in Iraq as soon as possible so that he could concentrate on the "good" war in Afghanistan. Too bad it took him six years to figure out that was a stupid policy.

P.S. Who, exactly, would have forced us to abandon Iraq, especially with its dysfunctional government? Wouldn't it be better if we still had a base over there to monitor and counterbalance Iran's aggressive intentions?

You are an idiot. Look up the Iraq withdrawal treaty moron and get back to me.

Ho hum- your continuous resort to name calling is so tiresome. Have you ever considered addressing the points I brought up?

P.S. Since when is Obama concerned with "honoring" treaties (other than his own)? Do you really think we would have pulled out all our troops if a Republican had been elected instead?

Bush Reiterates Opposition To Iraq Withdrawal

THAT was in 2006 Idjit.

 

[jwoodie]

The withdrawal from Iraq was a treaty signed by Bush you dolts. Obama was attempting to honor Bush's treaty with Iraq.

That is the most pathetic "Blame Bush" concoction I have read in some time. Will you still be using it in 2020?

The only thing Obama was honoring was his own campaign pledge to end the "bad" war in Iraq as soon as possible so that he could concentrate on the "good" war in Afghanistan. Too bad it took him six years to figure out that was a stupid policy.

P.S. Who, exactly, would have forced us to abandon Iraq, especially with its dysfunctional government? Wouldn't it be better if we still had a base over there to monitor and counterbalance Iran's aggressive intentions?

You are an idiot. Look up the Iraq withdrawal treaty moron and get back to me.

Ho hum- your continuous resort to name calling is so tiresome. Have you ever considered addressing the points I brought up?

P.S. Since when is Obama concerned with "honoring" treaties (other than his own)? Do you really think we would have pulled out all our troops if a Republican had been elected instead?

Bush Reiterates Opposition To Iraq Withdrawal

THAT was in 2006 Idjit.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/16/washington/16prexy.html?_r=0

GOP presidential field unified in opposition to Iraq withdrawal

 

[HUGGY]

The withdrawal from Iraq was a treaty signed by Bush you dolts. Obama was attempting to honor Bush's treaty with Iraq.

That is the most pathetic "Blame Bush" concoction I have read in some time. Will you still be using it in 2020?

The only thing Obama was honoring was his own campaign pledge to end the "bad" war in Iraq as soon as possible so that he could concentrate on the "good" war in Afghanistan. Too bad it took him six years to figure out that was a stupid policy.

P.S. Who, exactly, would have forced us to abandon Iraq, especially with its dysfunctional government? Wouldn't it be better if we still had a base over there to monitor and counterbalance Iran's aggressive intentions?

You are an idiot. Look up the Iraq withdrawal treaty moron and get back to me.

Ho hum- your continuous resort to name calling is so tiresome. Have you ever considered addressing the points I brought up?

P.S. Since when is Obama concerned with "honoring" treaties (other than his own)? Do you really think we would have pulled out all our troops if a Republican had been elected instead?

Bush Reiterates Opposition To Iraq Withdrawal

THAT was in 2006 Idjit.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/16/washington/16prexy.html?_r=0

GOP presidential field unified in opposition to Iraq withdrawal

2008? Then why did he negotiate and sign a withdrawal treaty? Bush was incompetent right up to the last day in office eh?