Perhaps the first child-killer President in the USA

What do you think about Hillary Clinton's position on abortion?

  • Hillary Clinton is a feminist, Pro-Choice candidat, and that's why support her

    Votes: 1 16.7%
  • Hillary Clinton is a feminist, Pro-Choice candidat, and that's why I oppose her

    Votes: 2 33.3%
  • It doesn't matter, I'll vote for Hillary Clinton

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • It doesn't matter, I'll vote for Donald Trump

    Votes: 3 50.0%
  • Hillary Clinton is not enough feminist, Pro-Choice candidat and that's bad

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    6
  • Poll closed .
Aug 10, 2016
4
0
1
Doral, FL
Hillary Clinton always called herself a feminist, and now (as opposed to the 2008 election campaign) she makes extensive use of voters' false pride by offering them to contribute to participate in would be historical event – the election of the first female US president.

At the same time, you need to be aware of reasons why the former First Lady is so focused on the women's question, and what are her aims in this matter. First of all, the probable cause of it all is the absence or distortion of paternal love in her childhood. For example, Carl Bernstein in his biography of Hillary, "A Woman in Charge: the Life of Hillary Rodham Clinton," wrote that her father used to regularly abuse and humiliate her mother and had established strict physical discipline in their home. Perhaps, it is this distorted vision of traditional values as mere supremacy and authority that made Hillary Clinton a man-hater, if not even a misanthropist.

Well, June 10, 2016 the main US presidential candidate from the Democratic Party said that in the case of victory she would defend the right of women to abortion and public funding of the procedure. Thus, her promises go further than to aimlessly turn pregnant women and doctors into killers, she is going to make all taxpayers abetting in this crime.

Alongside with that, a possible "mistress" of the Oval Office is fully aware that "religious beliefs and structural biases have to be changed" in order to accommodate abortions. Doing so she will destroy the very basis of our society! Moreover, Clinton is committed to deliver the fate of next generations into the hands of organ-traffickers – particularly into the hands of her sponsors from Planned Parenthood.

While expressing her pride for working with Planned Parenthood and StemExpress, happy mother Hilary could not be unaware of allegations against them for illegal and inhumane trafficking of embryos. What is more, she supported them against "unjust attacks"! In exchange for this, CEO of "StemExpress" Cate Dyer gave the former First Lady not only financial assistance, but also an explicit public support. And after that Clinton is trying to convince Americans that her feminism is "moderate" and traditional values are of great importance for her! How naive is that? Nonetheless, a lot of media publications seem to be issued with such an unattainable goal!

Clinton's position on abortions is far from common sense, and it seems like it never was supposed to be reasonable. It is merely a result of warped spirituality, mental depravity and even unhealthy subconscious aspirations. And all these diseases are still feeding it. That is why the former First Lady who is shown to be an example of humanity and progressiveness, fails to hear biologists saying that by 20 weeks after fertilization unborn babies are capable of feeling pain. Yes, when the unborn child in a womb is divided into parts – it hurts them! Nevertheless, Hillary Clinton attacked bill against cruel late-term abortions and other proposed legislative measures dealing with unborn pain, dismemberment abortions, informed consent, webcam abortions, parental involvement, etc.!

Did a feminist Hillary Clinton ever think how many girls she had depraved and sold into slavery to sin or pimps by her pandering to irresponsible behavior? How many girls – the very those who "matter to economic and political progress around the world", might have a chance "to work and earn as full and equal partners in society" and thus lead the country to prosperity, – haven't been born because of her?
 
Last edited:
Clinton is no feminist. She took her husbands compulsive cheating abuse, discredited his victims and rides her husbands coat tails. The "feminist" also said bill will be helping her with Presidential decisions and so forth.
What a fucking joke!
I would like to add, that I am pro-choice, but I DAMN SURE don't want to pay for it. Thats fucking bullshit
 
Hillary Clinton always called herself a feminist, and now (as opposed to the 2008 election campaign) she makes extensive use of voters' false pride by offering them to contribute to participate in would be historical event – the election of the first female US president.

At the same time, you need to be aware of reasons why the former First Lady is so focused on the women's question, and what are her aims in this matter. First of all, the probable cause of it all is the absence or distortion of paternal love in her childhood. For example, Carl Bernstein in his biography of Hillary, "A Woman in Charge: the Life of Hillary Rodham Clinton," wrote that her father used to regularly abuse and humiliate her mother and had established strict physical discipline in their home. Perhaps, it is this distorted vision of traditional values as mere supremacy and authority that made Hillary Clinton a man-hater, if not even a misanthropist.

Well, June 10, 2016 the main US presidential candidate from the Democratic Party said that in the case of victory she would defend the right of women to abortion and public funding of the procedure. Thus, her promises go further than to aimlessly turn pregnant women and doctors into killers, she is going to make all taxpayers abetting in this crime.

Alongside with that, a possible "mistress" of the Oval Office is fully aware that "religious beliefs and structural biases have to be changed" in order to accommodate abortions. Doing so she will destroy the very basis of our society! Moreover, Clinton is committed to deliver the fate of next generations into the hands of organ-traffickers – particularly into the hands of her sponsors from Planned Parenthood.

While expressing her pride for working with Planned Parenthood and StemExpress, happy mother Hilary could not be unaware of allegations against them for illegal and inhumane trafficking of embryos. What is more, she supported them against "unjust attacks"! In exchange for this, CEO of "StemExpress" Cate Dyer gave the former First Lady not only financial assistance, but also an explicit public support. And after that Clinton is trying to convince Americans that her feminism is "moderate" and traditional values are of great importance for her! How naive is that? Nonetheless, a lot of media publications seem to be issued with such an unattainable goal!

Clinton's position on abortions is far from common sense, and it seems like it never was supposed to be reasonable. It is merely a result of warped spirituality, mental depravity and even unhealthy subconscious aspirations. And all these diseases are still feeding it. That is why the former First Lady who is shown to be an example of humanity and progressiveness, fails to hear biologists saying that by 20 weeks after fertilization unborn babies are capable of feeling pain. Yes, when the unborn child in a womb is divided into parts – it hurts them! Nevertheless, Hillary Clinton attacked bill against cruel late-term abortions and other proposed legislative measures dealing with unborn pain, dismemberment abortions, informed consent, webcam abortions, parental involvement, etc.!

Did a feminist Hillary Clinton ever think how many girls she had depraved and sold into slavery to sin or pimps by her pandering to irresponsible behavior? How many girls – the very those who "matter to economic and political progress around the world", might have a chance "to work and earn as full and equal partners in society" and thus lead the country to prosperity, – haven't been born because of her?

Another dumb right wing diatribe short on reality, but long on bullshit.
 
I'd say another dumb left wing comment "short on reality, but long on bullshit" but I'll rather ask whether you've checked the links from my post. Is there not enough reality?
 
As for Hillary Clinton's "feminism", I'd rather call it Misandry. As the Scripture says: "You will know them by their fruits". Do you remember how she "defended" female staff while being Walmart board member? Women at Walmart were paid less than men in every position, and advanced into management at lower rates - even though their performance reviews were higher. While Clinton's presence on the board helped to make the company look like a better place for women, there is no evidence that she took any measures as a board member to address Walmart's systemic sexism.

Or have female Americans had any benefits from her opposition to Medicare for All? Single-payer health care was the only system in which health care supposed to be independent of employment or marriage, both critical considerations for women. It was Hillary who leave us without it.

Finally, she (well, indirectly) threatens women's right to motherhood. She'd better create more opportunities for single mothers than advocate abortions!

And yes, she simply makes use of her husband. There's no honor in this for a woman.
 
HRC hates men rather than defends women. She cares just about herself.
Her marriage to Bill was used not only as a stepping-stone for her political career but as a sham to distract public attention from her lesbianism as well. No wonder she closed eyes to his infidelity. Someone could even praise it as an act of her "self-denial" and "forgiveness"!
 

Forum List

Back
Top