If it was the Obama administration, it would have been created, so let's go with that.So.....are we parsing a percentage while there were over 2 million jobs created?
Kinda of nitpicking if you ask me.
Created or just returning workers?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If it was the Obama administration, it would have been created, so let's go with that.So.....are we parsing a percentage while there were over 2 million jobs created?
Kinda of nitpicking if you ask me.
Created or just returning workers?
ass wipe it does not make any difference, people are going back to work and the country is opening back up no matter how much you despise that factSo.....are we parsing a percentage while there were over 2 million jobs created?
Kinda of nitpicking if you ask me.
Created or just returning workers?
ass wipe it does not make any difference, people are going back to work and the country is opening back up no matter how much you despise that factSo.....are we parsing a percentage while there were over 2 million jobs created?
Kinda of nitpicking if you ask me.
Created or just returning workers?
BLS has done nothing to correct the problem and will do nothing to correct the problem to make Tramp look good!Of course Tramp jacked the numbers!Ok. Is this about the actual unemployment error or is this an attempt to create or maintain a conspiracy theory that Trump jacked with the numbers?
Just like he jacked the numbers for March an April, there were 642,000 fewer people employed than Tramp's BLS claimed for those 2 months.
The article says that the BLS denies that trump changed the numbers.
The BLS does acknowledge there is a problem and it will be corrected.
So expect the numbers to change.
I will point out, people are going back to a job they already had. This isn't people who were unemployed before the virus who found a job.
Hogwash, and over 1 1/2 million were PART TIME!there were over 2 million jobs created?
BULLSHIT!Before the China virus hoax most of America was employed. It
BULLSHIT!Before the China virus hoax most of America was employed. It
by Tramp's own standard the REAL unemployment rate was 63.8% before the lockdown.
Donald Trump Explains All
In an interview with TIME, the leading Republican candidate talks about what's wrong with the Clintons, his opponents' weaknesses and what it takes to be greattime.com
Don’t forget in the meantime we have a real unemployment rate that’s probably 21%. It’s not 6. It’s not 5.2 and 5.5. Our real unemployment rate–in fact, I saw a chart the other day, our real unemployment–because you have ninety million people that aren’t working. Ninety-three million to be exact.
If you start adding it up, our real unemployment rate is 42%.
- Donald J Trump, Time interview, Aug. 18, 2015
This is Trump's federal government. Don't forget the qualifier..Another error in the federal government, and you fuckers want to give over the healthcare system to such people? Egad you idiots are just stupid as hell.This is interesting.
A footnote on that report says that they made and error, that the unemployment rate really should be at least 3% higher than what reported. Which would be 16.3%.
The Bureau of Labor Statistics says they are working on fixing the problem.
The May jobs report had 'misclassification error' that made the unemployment rate look lower than it is. Here's what happened
When the U.S. government's official jobs report for May came out on Friday, it included a...www.stamfordadvocate.com
Is it, or still Oblummer left overs, still trying to bushwhack the Trump Admin?This is Trump's federal government. Don't forget the qualifier..Another error in the federal government, and you fuckers want to give over the healthcare system to such people? Egad you idiots are just stupid as hell.This is interesting.
A footnote on that report says that they made and error, that the unemployment rate really should be at least 3% higher than what reported. Which would be 16.3%.
The Bureau of Labor Statistics says they are working on fixing the problem.
The May jobs report had 'misclassification error' that made the unemployment rate look lower than it is. Here's what happened
When the U.S. government's official jobs report for May came out on Friday, it included a...www.stamfordadvocate.com
Why yes, yes it would. Even though it was brought on by a pandemic scare from the leftists and their media so they could blame it on Trump.So what? The unemployment rate was so volatile during the pandemic that official statistics couldn't keep up with it. Would a higher unemployment rate be good news to the left?
BLS has done nothing to correct the problem and will do nothing to correct the problem to make Tramp look good!Of course Tramp jacked the numbers!Ok. Is this about the actual unemployment error or is this an attempt to create or maintain a conspiracy theory that Trump jacked with the numbers?
Just like he jacked the numbers for March an April, there were 642,000 fewer people employed than Tramp's BLS claimed for those 2 months.
The article says that the BLS denies that trump changed the numbers.
The BLS does acknowledge there is a problem and it will be corrected.
So expect the numbers to change.
I will point out, people are going back to a job they already had. This isn't people who were unemployed before the virus who found a job.
From the BLS:
However, according to usual practice, the data from the household survey are accepted as recorded. To maintain data integrity, no ad hoc actions are taken to reclassify survey responses.
This is interesting.
A footnote on that report says that they made and error, that the unemployment rate really should be at least 3% higher than what reported. Which would be 16.3%.
The Bureau of Labor Statistics says they are working on fixing the problem.
The May jobs report had 'misclassification error' that made the unemployment rate look lower than it is. Here's what happened
When the U.S. government's official jobs report for May came out on Friday, it included a...www.stamfordadvocate.com
BLS has done nothing to correct the problem and will do nothing to correct the problem to make Tramp look good!Of course Tramp jacked the numbers!Ok. Is this about the actual unemployment error or is this an attempt to create or maintain a conspiracy theory that Trump jacked with the numbers?
Just like he jacked the numbers for March an April, there were 642,000 fewer people employed than Tramp's BLS claimed for those 2 months.
The article says that the BLS denies that trump changed the numbers.
The BLS does acknowledge there is a problem and it will be corrected.
So expect the numbers to change.
I will point out, people are going back to a job they already had. This isn't people who were unemployed before the virus who found a job.
From the BLS:
However, according to usual practice, the data from the household survey are accepted as recorded. To maintain data integrity, no ad hoc actions are taken to reclassify survey responses.
The article says they are taking steps to correct it.
Of course it's not going to be corrected while trump is president.
Notice they didn't say when it would be corrected.