May Jobs Report Had Miscalculated Error That Made The Unemployment Rate Look Lower Than It Is

[Dana7360]

This is interesting.

A footnote on that report says that they made and error, that the unemployment rate really should be at least 3% higher than what reported. Which would be 16.3%.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics says they are working on fixing the problem.

The May jobs report had 'misclassification error' that made the unemployment rate look lower than it is. Here's what happened

When the U.S. government's official jobs report for May came out on Friday, it included a...

www.stamfordadvocate.com

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

This is interesting.

A footnote on that report says that they made and error, that the unemployment rate really should be at least 3% higher than what reported. Which would be 16.3%.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics says they are working on fixing the problem.

The May jobs report had 'misclassification error' that made the unemployment rate look lower than it is. Here's what happened

When the U.S. government's official jobs report for May came out on Friday, it included a...

www.stamfordadvocate.com

Another error in the federal government, and you fuckers want to give over the healthcare system to such people? Egad you idiots are just stupid as hell.

 

[Disir]

Ok. Is this about the actual unemployment error or is this an attempt to create or maintain a conspiracy theory that Trump jacked with the numbers?

 

[Meathead]

This is interesting.

A footnote on that report says that they made and error, that the unemployment rate really should be at least 3% higher than what reported. Which would be 16.3%.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics says they are working on fixing the problem.

The May jobs report had 'misclassification error' that made the unemployment rate look lower than it is. Here's what happened

When the U.S. government's official jobs report for May came out on Friday, it included a...

www.stamfordadvocate.com

Isn't a "miscalculated error" redundant? That's not what the article is titled anyway dingbat.
The May jobs report had 'misclassification error' that made the unemployment rate look lower than it is. Here's what happened

 

[theHawk]

Don’t worry, next month if will go down even lower.

Just by traffic alone I can tell there are a hell of a lot more people going back to work now.

 

[Leweman]

Expectations were for a loss of 7 million jobs and 20 percent unemployment. Even adjusted to 16 percent it was good news. So don't worry things are trending good. I know you were fretting that this meant it wasn't actually good news, but you can sleep better now knowing that it is.

 

[Maxdeath]

This is interesting.

A footnote on that report says that they made and error, that the unemployment rate really should be at least 3% higher than what reported. Which would be 16.3%.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics says they are working on fixing the problem.

The May jobs report had 'misclassification error' that made the unemployment rate look lower than it is. Here's what happened

When the U.S. government's official jobs report for May came out on Friday, it included a...

www.stamfordadvocate.com

So were you expecting 3% with most of the country still under lockdown or partial lockdown? We have a large number of people receiving $600.00 on top of unemployment. They look at that and think they are not losing that much by staying home and being lazy. Let that $600.00 sugar run out and you will see that unemployment number drop like a stone.

 

[edthecynic]

Ok. Is this about the actual unemployment error or is this an attempt to create or maintain a conspiracy theory that Trump jacked with the numbers?

Of course Tramp jacked the numbers!
Just like he jacked the numbers for March an April, there were 642,000 fewer people employed than Tramp's BLS claimed for those 2 months.

 

[Dana7360]

Ok. Is this about the actual unemployment error or is this an attempt to create or maintain a conspiracy theory that Trump jacked with the numbers?

Read the article.

That issue is addressed in the article.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics wouldn't acknowledge the problem and be saying they are going to correct the problem if the problem didn't exist.

 

[jknowgood]

This is interesting.

A footnote on that report says that they made and error, that the unemployment rate really should be at least 3% higher than what reported. Which would be 16.3%.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics says they are working on fixing the problem.

The May jobs report had 'misclassification error' that made the unemployment rate look lower than it is. Here's what happened

When the U.S. government's official jobs report for May came out on Friday, it included a...

www.stamfordadvocate.com

Still alot better than the 30% figure we were told.

 

[Dana7360]

Ok. Is this about the actual unemployment error or is this an attempt to create or maintain a conspiracy theory that Trump jacked with the numbers?

Of course Tramp jacked the numbers!
Just like he jacked the numbers for March an April, there were 642,000 fewer people employed than Tramp's BLS claimed for those 2 months.

The article says that the BLS denies that trump changed the numbers.

The BLS does acknowledge there is a problem and it will be corrected.

So expect the numbers to change.

I will point out, people are going back to a job they already had. This isn't people who were unemployed before the virus who found a job.

 

[Sun Devil 92]

Ok. Is this about the actual unemployment error or is this an attempt to create or maintain a conspiracy theory that Trump jacked with the numbers?

Of course Tramp jacked the numbers!
Just like he jacked the numbers for March an April, there were 642,000 fewer people employed than Tramp's BLS claimed for those 2 months.

The article says that the BLS denies that trump changed the numbers.

The BLS does acknowledge there is a problem and it will be corrected.

So expect the numbers to change.

I will point out, people are going back to a job they already had. This isn't people who were unemployed before the virus who found a job.

Which is funny because you lying fucks had done nothing but blame him for the high unemployment numbers.

You have no integrity.

 

[Sun Devil 92]

TDS thread 1,668

Because it is all about make sure that Trump looks as bad as they can make him look.

 

[Meister]

So.....are we parsing a percentage while there were over 2 million jobs created?
Kinda of nitpicking if you ask me.

 

[Dana7360]

This is interesting.

A footnote on that report says that they made and error, that the unemployment rate really should be at least 3% higher than what reported. Which would be 16.3%.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics says they are working on fixing the problem.

The May jobs report had 'misclassification error' that made the unemployment rate look lower than it is. Here's what happened

When the U.S. government's official jobs report for May came out on Friday, it included a...

www.stamfordadvocate.com

Still alot better than the 30% figure we were told.

The number that I had been seeing was 20% not 30%.

Yes it's much better than 20% unemployment. Hopefully the numbers will continue to fall as people go back to their existing jobs.

We have to wait to see if employers are going to bring back the same amount of employees. I've been reading articles that business isn't going to do that.

Boeing didn't take any bail out money from the government so they aren't required to hire back all their employees. They announced recently they don't plan to bring all employees back.

Time will tell on what the result of all this will be.

 

[DOTR]

Ok. Is this about the actual unemployment error or is this an attempt to create or maintain a conspiracy theory that Trump jacked with the numbers?

Of course Tramp jacked the numbers!
Just like he jacked the numbers for March an April, there were 642,000 fewer people employed than Tramp's BLS claimed for those 2 months.

The article says that the BLS denies that trump changed the numbers.

The BLS does acknowledge there is a problem and it will be corrected.

So expect the numbers to change.

I will point out, people are going back to a job they already had. This isn't people who were unemployed before the virus who found a job.

Before the China virus hoax most of America was employed. Its a hallmark of Trumps administration. The lowest unemployment rate in half a century.

What an amazing President he has been.

 

[DOTR]

Don’t worry, next month if will go down even lower.

Just by traffic alone I can tell there are a hell of a lot more people going back to work now.

Ive noticed that as well. Its like a pent up demand for traffic jams Traffic everywhere.

 

[debbiedowner]

This is interesting.

A footnote on that report says that they made and error, that the unemployment rate really should be at least 3% higher than what reported. Which would be 16.3%.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics says they are working on fixing the problem.

The May jobs report had 'misclassification error' that made the unemployment rate look lower than it is. Here's what happened

When the U.S. government's official jobs report for May came out on Friday, it included a...

www.stamfordadvocate.com

It didn't take an Einstein to see it wasn't right and should have been higher but it sure fooled wall street and many trumpturds.

 

[Disir]

Ok. Is this about the actual unemployment error or is this an attempt to create or maintain a conspiracy theory that Trump jacked with the numbers?

Read the article.

That issue is addressed in the article.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics wouldn't acknowledge the problem and be saying they are going to correct the problem if the problem didn't exist.

I read the article. You lack integrity and notoriously have an angle--that's why I am asking you what, precisely, are you attempting to sell?

 

[debbiedowner]

So.....are we parsing a percentage while there were over 2 million jobs created?
Kinda of nitpicking if you ask me.

Created or just returning workers?