Marjorie Taylor Greene's "Protect Children’s Innocence Act" outlaws gender-affirming medical care for trans youth & makes providing such care a felony

You fluffers throw that term around as a battering ram talking point. All you're doing is creating a cover for real child groomers by trying to spread your bigotry, hatred, and intolerance to include all LGBTQ+ people.

You people are cancers.

Should a 15 year old be able to get a mastectomy? What about bottom surgery? Should they be allowed puberty blockers and hormones?
 
Depends on how committed the committee is to making it fair and just. Just like abortion, you dont want extremists to WRITE law on that. There IS a very small fraction of births that are sexually ambiguous and NEED "gender correction". That's a pure medical decision. Nothing to do with 47 genders and pronouns and making it Fadish so that the "trans identification" of teens has risen 4000% in the past 8 or 10 years.

THERE is the source of the "problem" and expect a huge rise in future SUICIDES from this "fad" if their parents allow and encourage "gender correction surgeries".

Should also be protections for the kids in having qualified medical panels REVIEW requests that run afoul of ANY law. Preferably with EXCLUDING those in the Psych side of the equation. It's got nothing to DO with MENTAL state. It's a physical argument...

One also has to remember that only one reason for a person wanting to play "opposite sex" is not reality. There are some real cases of gender dysphoria, but most of what we are seeing today is pure fetish, at least from the older trans people.

Still, in the first case the best solution is to get the person to accept their gender, surgery and such is a last resort. In the second case, a fetish isn't a protected class.
 
Should a 15 year old be able to get a mastectomy? What about bottom surgery? Should they be allowed puberty blockers and hormones?
Again. If they are minors, the decision is up to the parents unless there is a specific law that permits minors to make those decisions outside of their parent's knowledge. And to my understanding, there are FEW exceptions to the parent's right over the well being of their children. What you see in the news are the extreme cases.
 
Again. If they are minors, the decision is up to the parents unless there is a specific law that permits minors to make those decisions outside of their parent's knowledge. And to my understanding, there are FEW exceptions to the parent's right over the well being of their children. What you see in the news are the extreme cases.

Parents should be able to let their kids be surgically mutilated?

What about a kid who wants to chop his hand off?
 
Doesn't matter. It's not the same argument.
These substances are freely available.

You ever see a child take their parents to court over not being able to drink or smoke before they are of legal age?
If your 10 year old boy came to you and said he is a pirate are you going to chop off his right leg below the knee, poke out his left eyeball and put a parrot on his shoulder?
 
Parents should be able to let their kids be surgically mutilated?

What about a kid who wants to chop his hand off?
We can sit here and give silly examples all day long. But the thread is about gender affirming medical care.
You don't like it because to you, this is unnatural. It is an affront to the God you believe in. Parents do have
the say in their children's upbringing. I would hope that this gender affirming care would come after much
counseling and information to both the parents and the child.

At the end of the day, if both parents and child agree, the state has jack to say about. To say nothing of the
Cross Fit cultist hag sponsoring her hate legislation (let's face it, that's all this is).
 
If your 10 year old boy came to you and said he is a pirate are you going to chop off his right leg below the knee, poke out his left eyeball and put a parrot on his shoulder?
Again with the silly examples that veer off the topic.

I would tell the 10 year old if he does that, his job prospects in the future will be severely limited.
I mean, did you see what happened to the pirates in the movie "Captain Phillips"? :)
 
We can sit here and give silly examples all day long. But the thread is about gender affirming medical care.
You don't like it because to you, this is unnatural. It is an affront to the God you believe in. Parents do have
the say in their children's upbringing. I would hope that this gender affirming care would come after much
counseling and information to both the parents and the child.

At the end of the day, if both parents and child agree, the state has jack to say about. To say nothing of the
Cross Fit cultist hag sponsoring her hate legislation (let's face it, that's all this is).

Amazing how you can't talk about specifics, you have to use the trope "gender affirming care" It's a fucking cop out. Just like saying puberty blockers are reversible, when you mean the ACTION is reversible, the consequences are not.

JackOfNoTrades: advocating mastectomies, and gelding of people under 18.

The worst part of all this shit is you can NEVER give the person what they supposedly want, be the other sex. All you can do is give them a grisly approximation of being the other sex.
 
JackOfNoTrades: advocating mastectomies, and gelding of people under 18.
Absent a cancer situation, can you cite where this is happening in the US? Thats not what the other side is saying, so a supported point here would be helpful.
 
Absent a cancer situation, can you cite where this is happening in the US? Thats not what the other side is saying, so a supported point here would be helpful.
It is better for you to deny it is happening so when people see news of it, they see how disingenuous democrats here are.

Do you deny children getting trans surgery is happening?
 
Amazing how you can't talk about specifics, you have to use the trope "gender affirming care" It's a fucking cop out. Just like saying puberty blockers are reversible, when you mean the ACTION is reversible, the consequences are not.

JackOfNoTrades: advocating mastectomies, and gelding of people under 18.

The worst part of all this shit is you can NEVER give the person what they supposedly want, be the other sex. All you can do is give them a grisly approximation of being the other sex.
Quite frankly, what the other person supposedly "wants" is none of your friggin business. Again, you are appalled and incensed by what you perceive as an abomination.
And you're willing to use the state to exert control. Typical right wing statist.
 
Absent a cancer situation, can you cite where this is happening in the US? Thats not what the other side is saying, so a supported point here would be helpful.

‘I literally lost organs:’ Why detransitioned teens regret changing genders

When Chloe was 12 years old, she decided she was transgender. At 13, she came out to her parents. That same year, she was put on puberty blockers and prescribed testosterone. At 15, she underwent a double mastectomy. Less than a year later, she realized she’d made a mistake — all by the time she was 16 years old.
 
Quite frankly, what the other person supposedly "wants" is none of your friggin business. Again, you are appalled and incensed by what you perceive as an abomination.
And you're willing to use the state to exert control. Typical right wing statist.

It's called stopping child abuse.

Again, if a kid wants to chop his left hand off, and the parents agree, it should be allowed?
 
Quite frankly, what the other person supposedly "wants" is none of your friggin business. Again, you are appalled and incensed by what you perceive as an abomination.
And you're willing to use the state to exert control. Typical right wing statist.
States rights. Mutilating kids is okay.
 
Again. If they are minors, the decision is up to the parents unless there is a specific law that permits minors to make those decisions outside of their parent's knowledge. And to my understanding, there are FEW exceptions to the parent's right over the well being of their children. What you see in the news are the extreme cases.
If we leave a child in the car for a couple of hours the system certainly will not agree with your thread. And spanking a child is now considered abuses by the propagandized educated. Laws made by the insane in power does not mean its common sense.
 

Forum List

Back
Top