Neurotika
idiots own this world
After the last election I seriously doubt liberals know what THEY think.
we "THINK" we won
could be wrong but the white house is still..black
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
After the last election I seriously doubt liberals know what THEY think.
All I see here is Democrats denigrating Sarah Palin.
None of her detractors mentioned any Democrat who might run against her, should she choose to vie for and won the Republican nomination for President in 2016.
Why is that?
Is it because now that the Ultimate Democrat has been re-elected, but can't run again, nobody can fill his shoes?
Isn't that admission that any Democrat who might try is doomed to failure?
Also, let us remember that elections are like pendulums. The Democrats were written off in 1994 and again in 2010. You write off the Republicans at your own peril.
Palin will never win elective office again...at ANY level
All I see here is Democrats denigrating Sarah Palin.
None of her detractors mentioned any Democrat who might run against her, should she choose to vie for and won the Republican nomination for President in 2016.
Why is that?
Is it because now that the Ultimate Democrat has been re-elected, but can't run again, nobody can fill his shoes?
Isn't that admission that any Democrat who might try is doomed to failure?
Also, let us remember that elections are like pendulums. The Democrats were written off in 1994 and again in 2010. You write off the Republicans at your own peril.
Palin will never win elective office again...at ANY level
You would do yourself a favor educating yourself about the many political failures Abraham Lincoln had before he became one of the greatest President.
Or, to a lesser degree, and ultimately to a much less honorable end, Richard Nixon.
Palin will never win elective office again...at ANY level
You would do yourself a favor educating yourself about the many political failures Abraham Lincoln had before he became one of the greatest President.
Or, to a lesser degree, and ultimately to a much less honorable end, Richard Nixon.
Lincoln was not a quitter
Those old folks you seem to enjoy to denigrate were once young folks, probably voting (IF THEY EVER VOTED) Democrat. But then the inevitable happened: They Grew up!
Same thing will happen to the Young Democrats of today, they are the Old Republicans of tomorrow. Except, of course, those whose "minds" have been already permanently damaged by Obama-Worship.
You would do yourself a favor educating yourself about the many political failures Abraham Lincoln had before he became one of the greatest President.
Or, to a lesser degree, and ultimately to a much less honorable end, Richard Nixon.
Lincoln was not a quitter
Lincoln was a very smart man whose faith guided him throughout his life.
He did not think in simplistic terms like 'quitter' or 'loser'. He took a stand on principle and spent his life fighting for those principles..something a libtard fraud like you could never understand.
You would do yourself a favor educating yourself about the many political failures Abraham Lincoln had before he became one of the greatest President.
Or, to a lesser degree, and ultimately to a much less honorable end, Richard Nixon.
Lincoln was not a quitter
Lincoln was a very smart man whose faith guided him throughout his life.
He did not think in simplistic terms like 'quitter' or 'loser'. He took a stand on principle and spent his life fighting for those principles..something a libtard fraud like you could never understand.
A GOP cure: Sarah Palin for president in 2016 - latimes.com
Palin can more than keep up with the Democrats in appealing to voters' emotions. Hardly anyone could be more blue collar than Palin, out on the fishing boat with her hunky blue-collar husband, Todd. Palin is "View"-ready, she's "Ellen"-ready, she's Kelly-and-Michael-ready.
A Palin "war against women"? Hah! Not only is she a woman, she's got a single-mom daughter, Bristol, to help with the swelling single-mom demographic. On social issues, Palin, unlike Romney, has been absolutely consistent. And let's remember that most Americans, whatever their view of choice, disapprove of most abortions.
Gay marriage? Palin opposes it. But she is also a strong advocate of states' rights, and I'm betting she'd be fine with letting states and their voters grapple with the issue on their own. Remember that all of America didn't swing toward approval of gay marriage on Nov. 6. Three reliably blue states and their voters did. If she were smart, Palin would recruit a member of her impressive gay fanboy base yes, she has one to help run her campaign. I nominate Kevin DuJan of the widely read gay conservative blog HillBuzz, a Palin stalwart since 2008.
Furthermore, looks count in politics, and Palin at age 48, has it all over her possible competition, including Hillary Rodham Clinton, who will be 69 by election day 2016 and who let someone talk her into adopting the flowing blond locks of a college student, making her look like Brunnhilde in a small-town Wagner production. Men love Sarah Palin, and she loves men.
---------------------------------
Wow, her biggest "qualification" is she looks good. She's "hawt". That makes me want to vote for her.
She even wrote a book all by herself. It's called, "Going Rouge by Lynn Vincent".
Lincoln was not a quitter
Lincoln was a very smart man whose faith guided him throughout his life.
He did not think in simplistic terms like 'quitter' or 'loser'. He took a stand on principle and spent his life fighting for those principles..something a libtard fraud like you could never understand.
If anyone could have quit under the burden of leadership, it would be Lincoln
Unlike those who quit for the challenges of a Reality TV show
I think ...
Wow, you should have stopped right there and you might have had a chance at being lucid.
Conservatives dont give a flying shit about what libtards think about fuckall, not even fake little hypocrit libtards that try to pass themselves off as 'rightwinger's.
how many is many? because most Republicans arent thinking about 2016 yet
Then you will lose.
I hope she runs in 2016, so the Dems can make a laughing stock of her again.