Scientist express horror as they see a 2.5 C increase in earth's temperature

[CrusaderFrank]

You're welcome.

$1 Billion per electric vehicle charging station does seem reasonable

 

[Crick]

$1 Billion per electric vehicle charging station does seem reasonable

You should have taken this opportunity to improve your general knowledge, like Ms Brennan. Charging stations are large users of electric power. You cannot simply drop them on to the existing grid and expect them to work.

You almost drive me towards commentary on your intelligence. That could be avoided, you know.

 

[JimH52]

You're welcome.

Frank is a hopeless drunk.

 

[Markle]

You should have taken this opportunity to improve your general knowledge, like Ms Brennan. Charging stations are large users of electric power. You cannot simply drop them on to the existing grid and expect them to work.

You almost drive me towards commentary on your intelligence. That could be avoided, you know.

In your way of thinking, ONE THOUSAND MILLION DOLLARS is a reasonable cost for one charging station due to the immense amount of power and infrastructure it requires. Our power grids are already at or beyond their capacity. What is going to provide the vast amount of additional energy to power millions of EVs?

Instead of jumping to denigrate someone else's knowledge about a subject, perhaps do a bit of investigating on your own first. Just a thought.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

You should have taken this opportunity to improve your general knowledge, like Ms Brennan. Charging stations are large users of electric power. You cannot simply drop them on to the existing grid and expect them to work.

You almost drive me towards commentary on your intelligence. That could be avoided, you know.

So you're saying we need to burn more "fossil fuels" to support the energy saving, planet saving EV stations?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

We should probably be more concerned about things like a CME or the ongoing magnetic pole shift. But yeah, punishing the US alone for China and India's more than double our CO2 output seems like the smart and sane thing to do.

 

[Crick]

In your way of thinking, ONE THOUSAND MILLION DOLLARS is a reasonable cost for one charging station due to the immense amount of power and infrastructure it requires. Our power grids are already at or beyond their capacity. What is going to provide the vast amount of additional energy to power millions of EVs?

Instead of jumping to denigrate someone else's knowledge about a subject, perhaps do a bit of investigating on your own first. Just a thought.

Are you all this stupid or is it just dishonesty?

The $7.5 billion is intended to pay for 500,000 chargers. That would be $15,000 for each charger and the infrastructure changes that would support them and accomodate even more, besides offering improved grid function - fewer and shorter power outages, more access to alternative energy sources, etc, etc, etc.

 

[JimH52]

Are you all this stupid or is it just dishonesty?

The $7.5 billion is intended to pay for 500,000 chargers. That would be $15,000 for each charger and the infrastructure changes that would support them and accomodate even more, besides offering improved grid function - fewer and shorter power outages, more access to alternative energy sources, etc, etc, etc.

"ONE THOUSAND MILLION DOLLARS" is beyond stupid....

 

[Crick]

"ONE THOUSAND MILLION DOLLARS" is beyond stupid....

It's a stupid claim because its blatantly false.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Are you all this stupid or is it just dishonesty?

The $7.5 billion is intended to pay for 500,000 chargers. That would be $15,000 for each charger and the infrastructure changes that would support them and accomodate even more, besides offering improved grid function - fewer and shorter power outages, more access to alternative energy sources, etc, etc, etc.

So why did the government, in its infinite wisdom, need to overfund by $7,499,850,000? Who is getting the funding?

And how much "fossil fuel" will be used to generate the electricity?

 

[Markle]

Are you all this stupid or is it just dishonesty?

The $7.5 billion is intended to pay for 500,000 chargers. That would be $15,000 for each charger and the infrastructure changes that would support them and accomodate even more, besides offering improved grid function - fewer and shorter power outages, more access to alternative energy sources, etc, etc, etc.

A bureaucrat's favorite word...INTENDED! How many have been built, and how much has been spent over how many years? As you know, we don't have the power grid to support anywhere near 500,000 chargers, and this administration is drastically reducing our capacity to produce energy cheaply.

 

[Crick]

A bureaucrat's favorite word...INTENDED! How many have been built, and how much has been spent over how many years? As you know, we don't have the power grid to support anywhere near 500,000 chargers, and this administration is drastically reducing our capacity to produce energy cheaply.

So, it's stupidity.

Solar and wind produce energy dramatically less than any fossil fuel. And now you admit that the grid has to be improved to support those chargers. So, you admit that your zillions of dollars per charger was dishonest bullshit.

 

[EMH]

The OP is a massive destruction of McBullshit by all available data, and yet there you are defending McBullshit aka Co2 FRAUD with a parroted "study" that "dated wood to 30k years old" except wood completely decomposes in 100 years....

Wood and soil.

Did you ever find a source that proves "wood completely decomposes in 100 years", or did the Jews hide all your sources?

LOL!!!

Congrats to the Mossad, Google search no longer answer it at the top...


LOL!!!!


Censorship, one of the Zionist Fascist "conservative values" for sure...


oooppps, you did not get ALL OF THEM!!! LOL!!!!

how long does wood take to decompose - Google Search

Forest researchers at the U.S. Forest Service and the University of Minnesota have created a computer model that calculates how long it will take for a tree to completely decompose. Conifer species range from 57 to 124 years. Hardwood species typically take 46 to 71 years.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

LOL!!!

Congrats to the Mossad, Google search no longer answer it at the top...


LOL!!!!


Censorship, one of the Zionist Fascist "conservative values" for sure...


oooppps, you did not get ALL OF THEM!!! LOL!!!!

how long does wood take to decompose - Google Search

Forest researchers at the U.S. Forest Service and the University of Minnesota have created a computer model that calculates how long it will take for a tree to completely decompose. Conifer species range from 57 to 124 years. Hardwood species typically take 46 to 71 years.

So, there is no wood on the planet older than 124 years?
Or there is but the Jews are hiding it all?

 

[JimH52]

So, it's stupidity.

Solar and wind produce energy dramatically less than any fossil fuel. And now you admit that the grid has to be improved to support those chargers. So, you admit that your zillions of dollars per charger was dishonest bullshit.

If the trump cult had their way, we would be back in the '50's with black and white bathrooms, coal plants belching blooms of black smoke, and women restricted to the kitchen and the bedroom.

 

[Grumblenuts]

Solar Energy vs Fossil Fuels: How Do They Compare?

For anyone who has read a recent article about solar energy vs. fossil fuels, it might appear as if solar energy has already won the battle.

www.energysage.com

 

[Markle]

If the trump cult had their way, we would be back in the '50's with black and white bathrooms, coal plants belching blooms of black smoke, and women restricted to the kitchen and the bedroom.