Love "wins"

Status
Not open for further replies.
It's so obvious why you never served your country "patriot"...no honor.
The only thing you ever "served" was homosexuality. Spare us your "honor" nonsense when you have none. Like all liberals - you've pissed all over the U.S. Constitution for your own selfish agenda.

I have literally served my country more in a week than you have in your entire lifetime.
 
Parents and their children and siblings already have that next of kin relationship. Therefore, they are not eligible for a marriage license.

It's just that simple. Why haven't Conservatives realized this for themselves?

There's nothing sacred or written that marriage is to merely establish a "next of kin" relationship. It is a sacred bond between two people in love, expressed to others. One legal aspect though of marrying a child is that spouses automatically inherit first in many states, then if they die, the children MIGHT have a claim to what's left of the estate. If you wanted to be sure your child was the sole heir of your estate, marrying them would make them your legal spouse: and therefore automatically entitled to all your estate.

I like how the cult of LGBT is suddenly so prude and old fashioned when it comes to "the traditional meaning of marriage...therefore..." :lmao: But hypocrites are so beautiful in their purest form, no?
You're reading so much into my post, why didn't you write it? I never said anything like "the traditional meaning of marriage"! I'm writing about he contractual meaning of marriage, which is all the state considers. 'Sacred' ain't part of it. That's your interpretation.
 
Gay couple don't even remotely meet the "same requirements" of straight couples. A straight couple is one male and one female. A gay couple isn't close to that (why do you think gay couples cannot procreate?!?).

You rewrote marriage to meet your desires. If you can skew it so horribly to make an abnormality like homosexuality acceptable, why can't you do the same for incestuous couples? Who cares if they are family?
"Gay marriage" can't provide either a mother or father for the children involved. It's a contract that strips children of either a mother or father for life. No contract can exist which has provisions that harm children. (See: "Infants Doctrine: Infants and contracts") It's been shown exhaustively that children missing either their mother or father are at a disadvantage. So, "gay marriage" contracts are illegal.

The comeback to this from the gay cult is that single parents don't provide the missing gender. The difference is that children in those situations still have the hope that one day the missing gender will arrive. Or, often, they have contact still with the missing gendered parent. In either event, the situation isn't bound by contractual terms. It's just a situation waiting for a fix. In "gay marriage", there is no fix. It is a legal bind that harms children.
 
If it was good enough for Adam and Eve's kids, it's good enough the rest..
What makes you think Adam and Eve's kids were incestuous? They mated with other humans that coexisted with Adam and Eve but were not yet spiritually awakened, i.e. could not speak in complex syntax and concepts.
 
This is an epic story. Either liberals will be forced to admit their disgusting hypocrisy (like the abortion issue that can be found here) or they must admit that they are so disturbed that they support incest.

Come liberals! What is it? Does love "win" or are you guys going to be hypocrites who pick and choose when love "wins" and when it "loses"?

If All Love Is Equal, This Incestuous Mother And Son Couple Should Be Celebrated

Mother, 36, and son, 19, say they'll do anything to defend their love

This is next on the Leftist Agenda, now they've got the degeneracy of the LGBT stuff in full swing, they'll push to have incest, paedophilia and bestiality all made legal.

Just like Sodom and Gomorrah and what happened in Ancient Greece and in Ancient Rome, and like what happened with those, Western Civilisation will then collapse.

This is why the Leftist Agenda must be stopped.

Mhm....I can see it now, some 30ish old man declares his love for a 12 y/o girl....or his Doberman. But hey...."love wins"


I started one on this and most democrats fought it, it was delicious.......perversion is perversion
So Democrats are now the party of incest; I guess it is fitting for the former first lady of Arkansas.
 
If it was good enough for Adam and Eve's kids, it's good enough the rest..
What makes you think Adam and Eve's kids were incestuous? They mated with other humans that coexisted with Adam and Eve but were not yet spiritually awakened, i.e. could not speak in complex syntax and concepts.
There were Conservatives along with Adam and Eve?
 
If it was good enough for Adam and Eve's kids, it's good enough the rest..
What makes you think Adam and Eve's kids were incestuous? They mated with other humans that coexisted with Adam and Eve but were not yet spiritually awakened, i.e. could not speak in complex syntax and concepts.
There were Conservatives along with Adam and Eve?
See how stupid you libtards are?

There were no conservatives back then or libtards, just angels and devils respectively.
 
"Gay marriage" can't provide either a mother or father for the children involved. It's a contract that strips children of either a mother or father for life. No contract can exist which has provisions that harm children. (See: "Infants Doctrine: Infants and contracts") It's been shown exhaustively that children missing either their mother or father are at a disadvantage. So, "gay marriage" contracts are illegal.

The comeback to this from the gay cult is that single parents don't provide the missing gender. The difference is that children in those situations still have the hope that one day the missing gender will arrive. Or, often, they have contact still with the missing gendered parent. In either event, the situation isn't bound by contractual terms. It's just a situation waiting for a fix. In "gay marriage", there is no fix. It is a legal bind that harms children.

Nope, I just checked again and gay marriage is still legal in every state despite all your whining and imaginary standards that no one is bound by. By the way, hope doesn't replace a parent, ding dong. Funny how you have all this standards that suddenly fall by the wayside the instant you can't use them to harm gay people and their families. Good thing you can't do shit about it. :thup:
 
If it was good enough for Adam and Eve's kids, it's good enough the rest..
What makes you think Adam and Eve's kids were incestuous? They mated with other humans that coexisted with Adam and Eve but were not yet spiritually awakened, i.e. could not speak in complex syntax and concepts.
There were Conservatives along with Adam and Eve?
yeah William Buckley, Phyllis Schafley and Ronald Reagan
 
Nope, I just checked again and gay marriage is still legal in every state despite all your whining and imaginary standards that no one is bound by. By the way, hope doesn't replace a parent, ding dong. Funny how you have all this standards that suddenly fall by the wayside the instant you can't use them to harm gay people and their families. Good thing you can't do shit about it. :thup:
Actually....it's not. The Supreme Court simply has no authority to create law. Law can only be created by the legislative branch while the Supreme Court is the judicial branch. Thanks for playing.
 
Sounds like Conservatives! could not speak in complex syntax and concepts.

IT would be funny, except democrats think islands can tip over and Wisconsin borders Mexico.....ELECTED democrats believe that. Oh and the ***** in Colorado that thinks you can use up a magazine by shooting a gun.
 
Nope, I just checked again and gay marriage is still legal in every state despite all your whining and imaginary standards that no one is bound by. By the way, hope doesn't replace a parent, ding dong. Funny how you have all this standards that suddenly fall by the wayside the instant you can't use them to harm gay people and their families. Good thing you can't do shit about it. :thup:
Actually....it's not. The Supreme Court simply has no authority to create law. Law can only be created by the legislative branch while the Supreme Court is the judicial branch. Thanks for playing.

Nope, still legal. Perhaps if you stomp your feet some more it might make a difference, but I doubt it. Thanks for whining.
 
Nope, I just checked again and gay marriage is still legal in every state despite all your whining and imaginary standards that no one is bound by. By the way, hope doesn't replace a parent, ding dong. Funny how you have all this standards that suddenly fall by the wayside the instant you can't use them to harm gay people and their families. Good thing you can't do shit about it. :thup:
Actually....it's not. The Supreme Court simply has no authority to create law. Law can only be created by the legislative branch while the Supreme Court is the judicial branch. Thanks for playing.

Nope, still legal. Perhaps if you stomp your feet some more it might make a difference, but I doubt it. Thanks for whining.
Proclaiming something "legal" doesn't actually make it so. It's ok - we realize that the U.S. Constitution is just too complex for the simple liberal mind. Just sit back and let the adults run this country. We'll clean up your mess (like parents) and handle everything from here.
 
15th post
Nope, I just checked again and gay marriage is still legal in every state despite all your whining and imaginary standards that no one is bound by. By the way, hope doesn't replace a parent, ding dong. Funny how you have all this standards that suddenly fall by the wayside the instant you can't use them to harm gay people and their families. Good thing you can't do shit about it. :thup:
Actually....it's not. The Supreme Court simply has no authority to create law. Law can only be created by the legislative branch while the Supreme Court is the judicial branch. Thanks for playing.

Nope, still legal. Perhaps if you stomp your feet some more it might make a difference, but I doubt it. Thanks for whining.
Proclaiming something "legal" doesn't actually make it so. It's ok - we realize that the U.S. Constitution is just too complex for the simple liberal mind. Just sit back and let the adults run this country. We'll clean up your mess (like parents) and handle everything from here.

Yes, it is best if I leave the impotent pussyaching and moaning to you. After all, it is what you do best.
 
Nope, I just checked again and gay marriage is still legal in every state despite all your whining and imaginary standards that no one is bound by. By the way, hope doesn't replace a parent, ding dong. Funny how you have all this standards that suddenly fall by the wayside the instant you can't use them to harm gay people and their families. Good thing you can't do shit about it. :thup:
Actually....it's not. The Supreme Court simply has no authority to create law. Law can only be created by the legislative branch while the Supreme Court is the judicial branch. Thanks for playing.

Nope, still legal. Perhaps if you stomp your feet some more it might make a difference, but I doubt it. Thanks for whining.
Proclaiming something "legal" doesn't actually make it so. It's ok - we realize that the U.S. Constitution is just too complex for the simple liberal mind. Just sit back and let the adults run this country. We'll clean up your mess (like parents) and handle everything from here.

Yes, it is best if I leave the impotent pussyaching and moaning to you. After all, it is what you do best.
So far - you're the only one whining like a little *****. I provided facts. You've provided absolutely nothing but insults and uneducated opinion.

The Judicial branch has no power to create law. It really is that simple (though apparently more complex than the liberal mind is capable of handling).
 
Nope, I just checked again and gay marriage is still legal in every state despite all your whining and imaginary standards that no one is bound by. By the way, hope doesn't replace a parent, ding dong. Funny how you have all this standards that suddenly fall by the wayside the instant you can't use them to harm gay people and their families. Good thing you can't do shit about it. :thup:
Actually....it's not. The Supreme Court simply has no authority to create law. Law can only be created by the legislative branch while the Supreme Court is the judicial branch. Thanks for playing.

Nope, still legal. Perhaps if you stomp your feet some more it might make a difference, but I doubt it. Thanks for whining.
Proclaiming something "legal" doesn't actually make it so. It's ok - we realize that the U.S. Constitution is just too complex for the simple liberal mind. Just sit back and let the adults run this country. We'll clean up your mess (like parents) and handle everything from here.

Yes, it is best if I leave the impotent pussyaching and moaning to you. After all, it is what you do best.
So far - you're the only one whining like a little *****. I provided facts. You've provided absolutely nothing but insults and uneducated opinion.

The Judicial branch has no power to create law. It really is that simple (though apparently more complex than the liberal mind is capable of handling).

Why would I whine? Gay marriage is legal in every state despite all your hissy fits. Too bad, so sad. Perhaps another tear-stained post will change that fact. lol
 
Actually....it's not. The Supreme Court simply has no authority to create law. Law can only be created by the legislative branch while the Supreme Court is the judicial branch. Thanks for playing.

Nope, still legal. Perhaps if you stomp your feet some more it might make a difference, but I doubt it. Thanks for whining.
Proclaiming something "legal" doesn't actually make it so. It's ok - we realize that the U.S. Constitution is just too complex for the simple liberal mind. Just sit back and let the adults run this country. We'll clean up your mess (like parents) and handle everything from here.

Yes, it is best if I leave the impotent pussyaching and moaning to you. After all, it is what you do best.
So far - you're the only one whining like a little *****. I provided facts. You've provided absolutely nothing but insults and uneducated opinion.

The Judicial branch has no power to create law. It really is that simple (though apparently more complex than the liberal mind is capable of handling).

Why would I whine? Gay marriage is legal in every state despite all your hissy fits. Too bad, so sad. Perhaps another tear-stained post will change that fact. lol
It's really not. There is a huge difference between "occurring" and "legal". No worries though my friend - nobody expects a liberal to grasp this basic concept. We've all come to expect less out of that side of the aisle.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom