Lib court: blacks can flee police

due to racial profiling and avoid criminal charges for gun crimeS

Court: Black men may flee cops because of profiling
Get-Out-of-Jail-Card.jpg
 
Yet...in Boston...nearly 80% of the homicide rates are black. 80%....yet they make up only 24% of the population.
And according to the Boston Globe...convicted crimes...blacks commit 10.39 to 1 when compared to whites.
Hmm..
 
running away when you see a cop doesn't mean your guilty of something?
Of course it does. 'Running while black'. There's not a court in the land that would dismiss.
are you retarded?

did you stare at my post for a long time trying to come up with something better than 'running while black' but couldn't?

the only people that would run from a cop is someone that did something, and if they match the description....
 
Yet...in Boston...nearly 80% of the homicide rates are black. 80%....yet they make up only 24% of the population.
And according to the Boston Globe...convicted crimes...blacks commit 10.39 to 1 when compared to whites.
Hmm..

So with the facts and numbers and stuff, you will confuse the libs.
 
From the link for a better background for the thread:

The SJC found that police did not have a reasonable suspicion to stop Warren and his friend, noting that an officer’s hunch is not enough. The court cited a report by the Boston Police Department that found black men were disproportionately stopped and frisked by Boston police between 2007 and 2010. The court said black men in Boston who flee when approached by police does not necessarily indicate that they are guilty of a crime.

“Rather, the finding that black males in Boston are disproportionately and repeatedly targeted for FIO (field interrogation and observation) encounters suggests a reason for flight totally unrelated to consciousness of guilt. Such an individual, when approached by the police, might just as easily be motivated by the desire to avoid the recurring indignity of being racially profiled as by the desire to hide criminal activity,” Justice Geraldine Hines wrote for the court in the unanimous opinion.

“Given this reality for black males in the city of Boston, a judge should, in appropriate cases, consider the report’s findings in weighing flight as a factor in the reasonable suspicion calculus.”

The court vacated Warren’s conviction.
 
Liberals will cry foul when a handful of blacks are shot by police under questionable conditions but turn their backs when black people intentionally assassinate police officers.

Liberals are phonies. They are simply LYING to us about their motivation.
 
From the link for a better background for the thread:

The SJC found that police did not have a reasonable suspicion to stop Warren and his friend, noting that an officer’s hunch is not enough. The court cited a report by the Boston Police Department that found black men were disproportionately stopped and frisked by Boston police between 2007 and 2010. The court said black men in Boston who flee when approached by police does not necessarily indicate that they are guilty of a crime.

“Rather, the finding that black males in Boston are disproportionately and repeatedly targeted for FIO (field interrogation and observation) encounters suggests a reason for flight totally unrelated to consciousness of guilt. Such an individual, when approached by the police, might just as easily be motivated by the desire to avoid the recurring indignity of being racially profiled as by the desire to hide criminal activity,” Justice Geraldine Hines wrote for the court in the unanimous opinion.

“Given this reality for black males in the city of Boston, a judge should, in appropriate cases, consider the report’s findings in weighing flight as a factor in the reasonable suspicion calculus.”

The court vacated Warren’s conviction.
Then he's free to bust some Pokémon player in the head and take his shit.
 

Forum List

Back
Top