Lewandowski testifying in the house...

[The Original Tree]

Images can be altered. I do it all the time.

Pretty hard to modify a compressed encrypted disk image stored on a read only media.

The Data Transfer Rate of Podesta's emails could only have been accomplished using a USB Drive.

But, said Barger and other experts, that overlooks the possibility the files were copied multiple times before being released, something that may be more probable than not in a bureaucracy like Russian intelligence.

“A hacker might have downloaded it to one computer, then shared it by USB to an air gapped [off the internet] network for translation, then copied by a different person for analysis, then brought a new USB to an entirely different air gapped computer to determine a strategy all before it was packaged for Guccifer 2.0 to leak,” said Barger.

Every time the files were copied, depending on the method they were transmitted, there would be a new chance for the metadata to be changed.

Hultquist said the date that Forensicator believes that the files were downloaded, based on the metadata, is almost definitely not the date the files were removed from the DNC.

Why the latest theory about the DNC not being hacked is probably wrong

The Pakistani Hackers or Seth Rich himself did this

LOL

Wrong. The Data Transfer Rate was embedded in the files as MetaData. This MetaData was shared with the Public and verified to have not been altered.

Try again with another lie, dummy.

 

[BlindBoo]

Images can be altered. I do it all the time.

Pretty hard to modify a compressed encrypted disk image stored on a read only media.

The Data Transfer Rate of Podesta's emails could only have been accomplished using a USB Drive.

But, said Barger and other experts, that overlooks the possibility the files were copied multiple times before being released, something that may be more probable than not in a bureaucracy like Russian intelligence.

“A hacker might have downloaded it to one computer, then shared it by USB to an air gapped [off the internet] network for translation, then copied by a different person for analysis, then brought a new USB to an entirely different air gapped computer to determine a strategy all before it was packaged for Guccifer 2.0 to leak,” said Barger.

Every time the files were copied, depending on the method they were transmitted, there would be a new chance for the metadata to be changed.

Hultquist said the date that Forensicator believes that the files were downloaded, based on the metadata, is almost definitely not the date the files were removed from the DNC.

Why the latest theory about the DNC not being hacked is probably wrong

The Pakistani Hackers or Seth Rich himself did this

LOL

Wrong. The Data Transfer Rate was embedded in the files as MetaData. This MetaData was shared with the Public and verified to have not been altered.

Try again with another lie, dummy.

The metadata only reflects the last time the file was copied, not when it was removed from the DNC servers.

 

[iceberg]

Images can be altered. I do it all the time.

Pretty hard to modify a compressed encrypted disk image stored on a read only media.

The Data Transfer Rate of Podesta's emails could only have been accomplished using a USB Drive.

But, said Barger and other experts, that overlooks the possibility the files were copied multiple times before being released, something that may be more probable than not in a bureaucracy like Russian intelligence.

“A hacker might have downloaded it to one computer, then shared it by USB to an air gapped [off the internet] network for translation, then copied by a different person for analysis, then brought a new USB to an entirely different air gapped computer to determine a strategy all before it was packaged for Guccifer 2.0 to leak,” said Barger.

Every time the files were copied, depending on the method they were transmitted, there would be a new chance for the metadata to be changed.

Hultquist said the date that Forensicator believes that the files were downloaded, based on the metadata, is almost definitely not the date the files were removed from the DNC.

Why the latest theory about the DNC not being hacked is probably wrong

The Pakistani Hackers or Seth Rich himself did this

LOL

Wrong. The Data Transfer Rate was embedded in the files as MetaData. This MetaData was shared with the Public and verified to have not been altered.

Try again with another lie, dummy.

The metadata only reflects the last time the file was copied, not when it was removed from the DNC servers.

this would be an incorrect statement.

What is file metadata?
Metadata is information stored in almost any type of file. It can include your name, your company or organization's name, the name of your computer, the name of the network server or drive where you saved the file, personalized comments and the names and times of previous document authors, revisions, or versions.

These details could be useful or detrimental to you depending on the situation. For example, if you want to track the different authors of a file, it could be good, though if you wish to conceal the different authors of a file it could be bad. If you are working in legal matters or simply wish to maintain privacy, removing as much data as possible can be prudent, as metadata will follow the file if you share a copy of it with someone else.

Metadata can also be very helpful, especially when making searches in Windows and other operating systems. For example, if your collection of pictures has well maintained metadata, then it is very easy to search and find a certain picture you took, at a certain location on a very specific day, with a specific camera.

To simplify the concept, you can think of metadata as a file's description. The description can be anything and it can includes all kinds of data that describe the file: its type, its size, who created it, when, with what, and so on.

 

[The Original Tree]

Images can be altered. I do it all the time.

Pretty hard to modify a compressed encrypted disk image stored on a read only media.

The Data Transfer Rate of Podesta's emails could only have been accomplished using a USB Drive.

But, said Barger and other experts, that overlooks the possibility the files were copied multiple times before being released, something that may be more probable than not in a bureaucracy like Russian intelligence.

“A hacker might have downloaded it to one computer, then shared it by USB to an air gapped [off the internet] network for translation, then copied by a different person for analysis, then brought a new USB to an entirely different air gapped computer to determine a strategy all before it was packaged for Guccifer 2.0 to leak,” said Barger.

Every time the files were copied, depending on the method they were transmitted, there would be a new chance for the metadata to be changed.

Hultquist said the date that Forensicator believes that the files were downloaded, based on the metadata, is almost definitely not the date the files were removed from the DNC.

Why the latest theory about the DNC not being hacked is probably wrong

The Pakistani Hackers or Seth Rich himself did this

LOL

Wrong. The Data Transfer Rate was embedded in the files as MetaData. This MetaData was shared with the Public and verified to have not been altered.

Try again with another lie, dummy.

The metadata only reflects the last time the file was copied, not when it was removed from the DNC servers.

The Metadata has a date and time stamp as well as the transfer rate. This verifies The Data was copied to a USB drive on the date in question, and not afterwards.

Do some real UNBIASED research, dummy, instead of serving as a leftist shill engaged in apologetics and sophistry.

The Democrat Party is nothing but a Smear Machine these days, and does nothing but spend their time and efforts manufacturing lies and schemes to engage in The Politics of Personal Destruction.

They are on par with The Nazi Propaganda Machine of the 1930s, so this is why they earned the moniker DemNazis from me.

They are desperate for power, and desperate to push a Globalist-Marxist-Socialist agenda upon Freedom Loving Americans, so they are becoming more and more criminally dishonest day by day.

I expect more such attacks and hoaxes unleashed upon the next SCOTUS nominee and regurgitated and unoriginal attacks upon The President after Ginsberg's soon upcoming permanent vacation to Hell.

Being ***** Slapped by both Mueller and Corey Lewandowski, as well as Kavanaugh isn't going to stop these fiends from vomiting forth their daily quota of lies, misinformation and Propaganda!

Russian Collusion #MeToo. Just nothing but Dem Scams, same as The New Green Scam, and current Gun Control Scam they are running.

Free shit is just another Scam to shield The Do Nothing Dems from The Truth.

They hate America, they hate Americans, and they want to stay right where they are as the 1% Elitist Slave Masters they have always been, as they try to destroy The Middle Class and dismantle our Constitutional Rights day by day, and bankrupt this country with their Socialist Bribes of Free Shit for everyone.

 

[iceberg]

Images can be altered. I do it all the time.

Pretty hard to modify a compressed encrypted disk image stored on a read only media.

The Data Transfer Rate of Podesta's emails could only have been accomplished using a USB Drive.

But, said Barger and other experts, that overlooks the possibility the files were copied multiple times before being released, something that may be more probable than not in a bureaucracy like Russian intelligence.

“A hacker might have downloaded it to one computer, then shared it by USB to an air gapped [off the internet] network for translation, then copied by a different person for analysis, then brought a new USB to an entirely different air gapped computer to determine a strategy all before it was packaged for Guccifer 2.0 to leak,” said Barger.

Every time the files were copied, depending on the method they were transmitted, there would be a new chance for the metadata to be changed.

Hultquist said the date that Forensicator believes that the files were downloaded, based on the metadata, is almost definitely not the date the files were removed from the DNC.

Why the latest theory about the DNC not being hacked is probably wrong

The Pakistani Hackers or Seth Rich himself did this

LOL

Wrong. The Data Transfer Rate was embedded in the files as MetaData. This MetaData was shared with the Public and verified to have not been altered.

Try again with another lie, dummy.

not sure they used metadata for transfer rate in as much as timestamps. will need to look but i don't believe the rate of which a file is transferred is a "metadata" item. rather they used the metadata to determine transfer rate from time stamps and file sizes.

 

[iceberg]

Images can be altered. I do it all the time.

Pretty hard to modify a compressed encrypted disk image stored on a read only media.

The Data Transfer Rate of Podesta's emails could only have been accomplished using a USB Drive.

But, said Barger and other experts, that overlooks the possibility the files were copied multiple times before being released, something that may be more probable than not in a bureaucracy like Russian intelligence.

“A hacker might have downloaded it to one computer, then shared it by USB to an air gapped [off the internet] network for translation, then copied by a different person for analysis, then brought a new USB to an entirely different air gapped computer to determine a strategy all before it was packaged for Guccifer 2.0 to leak,” said Barger.

Every time the files were copied, depending on the method they were transmitted, there would be a new chance for the metadata to be changed.

Hultquist said the date that Forensicator believes that the files were downloaded, based on the metadata, is almost definitely not the date the files were removed from the DNC.

Why the latest theory about the DNC not being hacked is probably wrong

The Pakistani Hackers or Seth Rich himself did this

LOL

Wrong. The Data Transfer Rate was embedded in the files as MetaData. This MetaData was shared with the Public and verified to have not been altered.

Try again with another lie, dummy.

The metadata only reflects the last time the file was copied, not when it was removed from the DNC servers.

The Metadata has a date and time stamp as well as the transfer rate. This verifies The Data was copied to a USB drive on the date in question, and not afterwards. Do some real UNBIASED research, dummy, instead of serving as a leftist shill engaged in apologetics and sophistry

again - meta data was used but i don't believe metadata itself carries the transfer speed at which the file was copied. metadata however was used along with other facts and methods in order to determine said speed and likely conclusions that would get these types of results.

Guccifer 2.0 NGP/VAN Metadata Analysis

 

[BlindBoo]

Images can be altered. I do it all the time.

Pretty hard to modify a compressed encrypted disk image stored on a read only media.

The Data Transfer Rate of Podesta's emails could only have been accomplished using a USB Drive.

But, said Barger and other experts, that overlooks the possibility the files were copied multiple times before being released, something that may be more probable than not in a bureaucracy like Russian intelligence.

“A hacker might have downloaded it to one computer, then shared it by USB to an air gapped [off the internet] network for translation, then copied by a different person for analysis, then brought a new USB to an entirely different air gapped computer to determine a strategy all before it was packaged for Guccifer 2.0 to leak,” said Barger.

Every time the files were copied, depending on the method they were transmitted, there would be a new chance for the metadata to be changed.

Hultquist said the date that Forensicator believes that the files were downloaded, based on the metadata, is almost definitely not the date the files were removed from the DNC.

Why the latest theory about the DNC not being hacked is probably wrong

The Pakistani Hackers or Seth Rich himself did this

LOL

Wrong. The Data Transfer Rate was embedded in the files as MetaData. This MetaData was shared with the Public and verified to have not been altered.

Try again with another lie, dummy.

The metadata only reflects the last time the file was copied, not when it was removed from the DNC servers.

this would be an incorrect statement.

What is file metadata?
Metadata is information stored in almost any type of file. It can include your name, your company or organization's name, the name of your computer, the name of the network server or drive where you saved the file, personalized comments and the names and times of previous document authors, revisions, or versions.

These details could be useful or detrimental to you depending on the situation. For example, if you want to track the different authors of a file, it could be good, though if you wish to conceal the different authors of a file it could be bad. If you are working in legal matters or simply wish to maintain privacy, removing as much data as possible can be prudent, as metadata will follow the file if you share a copy of it with someone else.

Metadata can also be very helpful, especially when making searches in Windows and other operating systems. For example, if your collection of pictures has well maintained metadata, then it is very easy to search and find a certain picture you took, at a certain location on a very specific day, with a specific camera.

To simplify the concept, you can think of metadata as a file's description. The description can be anything and it can includes all kinds of data that describe the file: its type, its size, who created it, when, with what, and so on.

I stand corrected. The metadata examined by The Forensicator was Transfer rate of the last time the file was copied. Of course metadata can be altered with the right software.

 

[iceberg]

Images can be altered. I do it all the time.

Pretty hard to modify a compressed encrypted disk image stored on a read only media.

The Data Transfer Rate of Podesta's emails could only have been accomplished using a USB Drive.

But, said Barger and other experts, that overlooks the possibility the files were copied multiple times before being released, something that may be more probable than not in a bureaucracy like Russian intelligence.

“A hacker might have downloaded it to one computer, then shared it by USB to an air gapped [off the internet] network for translation, then copied by a different person for analysis, then brought a new USB to an entirely different air gapped computer to determine a strategy all before it was packaged for Guccifer 2.0 to leak,” said Barger.

Every time the files were copied, depending on the method they were transmitted, there would be a new chance for the metadata to be changed.

Hultquist said the date that Forensicator believes that the files were downloaded, based on the metadata, is almost definitely not the date the files were removed from the DNC.

Why the latest theory about the DNC not being hacked is probably wrong

The Pakistani Hackers or Seth Rich himself did this

LOL

Wrong. The Data Transfer Rate was embedded in the files as MetaData. This MetaData was shared with the Public and verified to have not been altered.

Try again with another lie, dummy.

The metadata only reflects the last time the file was copied, not when it was removed from the DNC servers.

this would be an incorrect statement.

What is file metadata?
Metadata is information stored in almost any type of file. It can include your name, your company or organization's name, the name of your computer, the name of the network server or drive where you saved the file, personalized comments and the names and times of previous document authors, revisions, or versions.

These details could be useful or detrimental to you depending on the situation. For example, if you want to track the different authors of a file, it could be good, though if you wish to conceal the different authors of a file it could be bad. If you are working in legal matters or simply wish to maintain privacy, removing as much data as possible can be prudent, as metadata will follow the file if you share a copy of it with someone else.

Metadata can also be very helpful, especially when making searches in Windows and other operating systems. For example, if your collection of pictures has well maintained metadata, then it is very easy to search and find a certain picture you took, at a certain location on a very specific day, with a specific camera.

To simplify the concept, you can think of metadata as a file's description. The description can be anything and it can includes all kinds of data that describe the file: its type, its size, who created it, when, with what, and so on.

I stand corrected. The metadata examined by The Forensicator was Transfer rate of the last time the file was copied. Of course metadata can be altered with the right software.

yep. facts are facts in this case.

in the end, unless you jack with these daily it's hard to know just what is in metadata as that can vary by file type. i had to go look it up before i said anything to make sure.

finding articles on how to edit it are also widely available.

now in this case that would be a ton of editing that simply isn't feasible given all they looked at. gaps would show and inconsistencies of file copying, times, and so forth. it would be obvious unless they edited everything else along the way.

1 edited file would stand out as a WTF in this scenario.

 

[BlindBoo]

Images can be altered. I do it all the time.

Pretty hard to modify a compressed encrypted disk image stored on a read only media.

The Data Transfer Rate of Podesta's emails could only have been accomplished using a USB Drive.

But, said Barger and other experts, that overlooks the possibility the files were copied multiple times before being released, something that may be more probable than not in a bureaucracy like Russian intelligence.

“A hacker might have downloaded it to one computer, then shared it by USB to an air gapped [off the internet] network for translation, then copied by a different person for analysis, then brought a new USB to an entirely different air gapped computer to determine a strategy all before it was packaged for Guccifer 2.0 to leak,” said Barger.

Every time the files were copied, depending on the method they were transmitted, there would be a new chance for the metadata to be changed.

Hultquist said the date that Forensicator believes that the files were downloaded, based on the metadata, is almost definitely not the date the files were removed from the DNC.

Why the latest theory about the DNC not being hacked is probably wrong

The Pakistani Hackers or Seth Rich himself did this

LOL

Wrong. The Data Transfer Rate was embedded in the files as MetaData. This MetaData was shared with the Public and verified to have not been altered.

Try again with another lie, dummy.

The metadata only reflects the last time the file was copied, not when it was removed from the DNC servers.

The Metadata has a date and time stamp as well as the transfer rate. This verifies The Data was copied to a USB drive on the date in question, and not afterwards. Do some real UNBIASED research, dummy, instead of serving as a leftist shill engaged in apologetics and sophistry

again - meta data was used but i don't believe metadata itself carries the transfer speed at which the file was copied. metadata however was used along with other facts and methods in order to determine said speed and likely conclusions that would get these types of results.

Guccifer 2.0 NGP/VAN Metadata Analysis

I think it has a start time and and end time.

 

[The Original Tree]

And you all are aware that the US has Forensic tools that can reveal any hidden and overwritten MetaData, correct? I mean, you guys know this, right?

But that would have forced The Obama Administration to actually look at the server instead of accept a discredited and biased report compiled by a firm paid for by The DNC who had a lot to hide and even more to gain from smearing Trump.

It would have forced the Obama Administration to produce a report on that very thing, and since it was a government report it would have been subject to FOIA.

That is why Obama forbade anyone from actually looking at the server. It could have been subpoenaed, especially since it was a "MATTER OF NATIONAL SECURITY" but The Obama Administration was ODDLY completely disinterested in examining the server.

Oh, they wanted to look at The Trump Tower Server Immediately. And Trump immediately gave them access to it.

And then there is Hillary's server that despite two Federal Court orders not to tamper with her server, nor delete or alter any data on it, Comey allowed her to Bleach Bit over 30,000 emails on it.

If it smells like a dead fish, quacks like a dead fish, and walks like a dead fish. It's a dead fish that smells fishy.

GET THE **** OUT OF HERE WITH YOUR NONSENSE. ALL OF YOU.

Hey, btw, Where are the Notes James Comey was supposed to keep on Interviews with The Entire Clinton Staff he Gave Immunity to for NO ******* REASON at all, except to shield them as he was ordered to do by Obama?

What? Comey violated FBI Policy, and not only did not record a single thing or take a single note, but also allowed Clinton to destroy 17 electronic devices in addtion to bleach bitting her sever?

And then when he found out she was lying about all those emails when they were found on one of her many Pervert Friends laptops, Anthony Weiner, he again covered for her?

But if you dared know Trump, and made single misstatement when asked to orally recall facts you already disclosed on a disclosure form, WELL THEN, PREDAWN RAID and dragging your wife out of bed in her nightie with a machine gun pointed at her head, and amphibious assault vehicles, helicopters and tanks at a Senior Citizens home despite the fact he was fully cooperating with you. Threatening to financially ruin you and throw your whole family in jail?
Yah, that doesn't smell at all by comparison, does it?

And don't forget kids, that you are supposed to tip off CNN right before the super duper double secret Pre-Dawn Raids (BOTH TIMES) so they can film them and put it on the news to further smear the president, his family and friends.

Cuz "RESISTANCE" CUZ "INSURANCE POLICY"

Obama will burn in Hell, trust me, and you'll know this when many of you join him and he greets you there. That's called "Direct Evidence" or a "First Hand Account."

Now take your dose of STFU, and accept your ***** slapping like the little vaginas you all are.

Score:

Tree 10,000

DemNazi LibTard Apologists....

NOTHING, NADA, ZILCH, 0!

 

[BlindBoo]

And you all are aware that the US has Forensic tools that can reveal any hidden and overwritten MetaData

How would anyone if the data was successfully altered?

But that would have forced The Obama Administration to actually look at the server

There was no physical server to examine.

 

[The Original Tree]

And you all are aware that the US has Forensic tools that can reveal any hidden and overwritten MetaData

How would anyone if the data was successfully altered?

But that would have forced The Obama Administration to actually look at the server

There was no physical server to examine.

 

[iceberg]

And you all are aware that the US has Forensic tools that can reveal any hidden and overwritten MetaData, correct? I mean, you guys know this, right?

But that would have forced The Obama Administration to actually look at the server instead of accept a discredited and biased report compiled by a firm paid for by The DNC who had a lot to hide and even more to gain from smearing Trump.

It would have forced the Obama Administration to produce a report on that very thing, and since it was a government report it would have been subject to FOIA.

That is why Obama forbade anyone from actually looking at the server. It could have been subpoenaed, especially since it was a "MATTER OF NATIONAL SECURITY" but The Obama Administration was ODDLY completely disinterested in examining the server.

Oh, they wanted to look at The Trump Tower Server Immediately. And Trump immediately gave them access to it.

And then there is Hillary's server that despite two Federal Court orders not to tamper with her server, nor delete or alter any data on it, Comey allowed her to Bleach Bit over 30,000 emails on it.

If it smells like a dead fish, quacks like a dead fish, and walks like a dead fish. It's a dead fish that smells fishy.

GET THE **** OUT OF HERE WITH YOUR NONSENSE. ALL OF YOU.

Hey, btw, Where are the Notes James Comey was supposed to keep on Interviews with The Entire Clinton Staff he Gave Immunity to for NO ******* REASON at all, except to shield them as he was ordered to do by Obama?

What? Comey violated FBI Policy, and not only did not record a single thing or take a single note, but also allowed Clinton to destroy 17 electronic devices in addtion to bleach bitting her sever?

And then when he found out she was lying about all those emails when they were found on one of her many Pervert Friends laptops, Anthony Weiner, he again covered for her?

But if you dared know Trump, and made single misstatement when asked to orally recall facts you already disclosed on a disclosure form, WELL THEN, PREDAWN RAID and dragging your wife out of bed in her nightie with a machine gun pointed at her head, and amphibious assault vehicles, helicopters and tanks at a Senior Citizens home despite the fact he was fully cooperating with you. Threatening to financially ruin you and throw your whole family in jail?
Yah, that doesn't smell at all by comparison, does it?

And don't forget kids, that you are supposed to tip off CNN right before the super duper double secret Pre-Dawn Raids (BOTH TIMES) so they can film them and put it on the news to further smear the president, his family and friends.

Cuz "RESISTANCE" CUZ "INSURANCE POLICY"

Obama will burn in Hell, trust me, and you'll know this when many of you join him and he greets you there. That's called "Direct Evidence" or a "First Hand Account."

Now take your dose of STFU, and accept your ***** slapping like the little vaginas you all are.

Score:

Tree 10,000

DemNazi LibTard Apologists....

NOTHING, NADA, ZILCH, 0!

not getting into your emotional turmoil and hurricane, dude. i've been in IT for 30 years and can at least understand the language.

you're just rambling and screaming a lot.

 

[The Original Tree]

Hey, Remember how Lois Lerner stalled for time so they could scrub her emails at THE IRS where it showed Obama used the IRS to target and punish Conservative groups, until someone with a brain said, wait, her emails aren't on her suddenly malfunctioning hard drive on her PC. They are on a server and there are backup tapes. And then they stalled some more so they could scrub the back up jobs.

Why didn't they just use Bleach Bit, and why didn't Lois Lerner say all her emails were about Yoga Pants and Wedding Plans?

And Remember how THE FBI said there was no way they could ever recover any texts between Page and Strozk because of a massive software malfunction that effected the entire FBI, and The IG was able to go to the ISP and get them all within 24 hours?

And Remember when Eric Holder lied, when Brennan and Clapper lied, when Comey lied, and McCabe lied and none of them even got a slap on the wrist?

Remember when Mueller and Weismann manufactured evidence and lied to the court to railroad and imprison innocent men to jail and the taxpayer had to pay out millions in damages?

Remember when James Comey and Mueller concealed the fact that they knew Rosatom was bribing people like Clinton, McCain, and Holder to get the Uranium One Deal Approved?

Remember when Bob Mueller and Comey was found to have made over 72 FISA Violations?

You Pathological Evil Lying Mother Fuckers don't fool me for one second.

 

[The Original Tree]

And you all are aware that the US has Forensic tools that can reveal any hidden and overwritten MetaData, correct? I mean, you guys know this, right?

But that would have forced The Obama Administration to actually look at the server instead of accept a discredited and biased report compiled by a firm paid for by The DNC who had a lot to hide and even more to gain from smearing Trump.

It would have forced the Obama Administration to produce a report on that very thing, and since it was a government report it would have been subject to FOIA.

That is why Obama forbade anyone from actually looking at the server. It could have been subpoenaed, especially since it was a "MATTER OF NATIONAL SECURITY" but The Obama Administration was ODDLY completely disinterested in examining the server.

Oh, they wanted to look at The Trump Tower Server Immediately. And Trump immediately gave them access to it.

And then there is Hillary's server that despite two Federal Court orders not to tamper with her server, nor delete or alter any data on it, Comey allowed her to Bleach Bit over 30,000 emails on it.

If it smells like a dead fish, quacks like a dead fish, and walks like a dead fish. It's a dead fish that smells fishy.

GET THE **** OUT OF HERE WITH YOUR NONSENSE. ALL OF YOU.

Hey, btw, Where are the Notes James Comey was supposed to keep on Interviews with The Entire Clinton Staff he Gave Immunity to for NO ******* REASON at all, except to shield them as he was ordered to do by Obama?

What? Comey violated FBI Policy, and not only did not record a single thing or take a single note, but also allowed Clinton to destroy 17 electronic devices in addtion to bleach bitting her sever?

And then when he found out she was lying about all those emails when they were found on one of her many Pervert Friends laptops, Anthony Weiner, he again covered for her?

But if you dared know Trump, and made single misstatement when asked to orally recall facts you already disclosed on a disclosure form, WELL THEN, PREDAWN RAID and dragging your wife out of bed in her nightie with a machine gun pointed at her head, and amphibious assault vehicles, helicopters and tanks at a Senior Citizens home despite the fact he was fully cooperating with you. Threatening to financially ruin you and throw your whole family in jail?
Yah, that doesn't smell at all by comparison, does it?

And don't forget kids, that you are supposed to tip off CNN right before the super duper double secret Pre-Dawn Raids (BOTH TIMES) so they can film them and put it on the news to further smear the president, his family and friends.

Cuz "RESISTANCE" CUZ "INSURANCE POLICY"

Obama will burn in Hell, trust me, and you'll know this when many of you join him and he greets you there. That's called "Direct Evidence" or a "First Hand Account."

Now take your dose of STFU, and accept your ***** slapping like the little vaginas you all are.

Score:

Tree 10,000

DemNazi LibTard Apologists....

NOTHING, NADA, ZILCH, 0!

not getting into your emotional turmoil and hurricane, dude. i've been in IT for 30 years and can at least understand the language.

you're just rambling and screaming a lot.

Because I HATE LIARS. AND KNOW WHEN I AM BEING LIED TO.

 

[iceberg]

And you all are aware that the US has Forensic tools that can reveal any hidden and overwritten MetaData, correct? I mean, you guys know this, right?

But that would have forced The Obama Administration to actually look at the server instead of accept a discredited and biased report compiled by a firm paid for by The DNC who had a lot to hide and even more to gain from smearing Trump.

It would have forced the Obama Administration to produce a report on that very thing, and since it was a government report it would have been subject to FOIA.

That is why Obama forbade anyone from actually looking at the server. It could have been subpoenaed, especially since it was a "MATTER OF NATIONAL SECURITY" but The Obama Administration was ODDLY completely disinterested in examining the server.

Oh, they wanted to look at The Trump Tower Server Immediately. And Trump immediately gave them access to it.

And then there is Hillary's server that despite two Federal Court orders not to tamper with her server, nor delete or alter any data on it, Comey allowed her to Bleach Bit over 30,000 emails on it.

If it smells like a dead fish, quacks like a dead fish, and walks like a dead fish. It's a dead fish that smells fishy.

GET THE **** OUT OF HERE WITH YOUR NONSENSE. ALL OF YOU.

Hey, btw, Where are the Notes James Comey was supposed to keep on Interviews with The Entire Clinton Staff he Gave Immunity to for NO ******* REASON at all, except to shield them as he was ordered to do by Obama?

What? Comey violated FBI Policy, and not only did not record a single thing or take a single note, but also allowed Clinton to destroy 17 electronic devices in addtion to bleach bitting her sever?

And then when he found out she was lying about all those emails when they were found on one of her many Pervert Friends laptops, Anthony Weiner, he again covered for her?

But if you dared know Trump, and made single misstatement when asked to orally recall facts you already disclosed on a disclosure form, WELL THEN, PREDAWN RAID and dragging your wife out of bed in her nightie with a machine gun pointed at her head, and amphibious assault vehicles, helicopters and tanks at a Senior Citizens home despite the fact he was fully cooperating with you. Threatening to financially ruin you and throw your whole family in jail?
Yah, that doesn't smell at all by comparison, does it?

And don't forget kids, that you are supposed to tip off CNN right before the super duper double secret Pre-Dawn Raids (BOTH TIMES) so they can film them and put it on the news to further smear the president, his family and friends.

Cuz "RESISTANCE" CUZ "INSURANCE POLICY"

Obama will burn in Hell, trust me, and you'll know this when many of you join him and he greets you there. That's called "Direct Evidence" or a "First Hand Account."

Now take your dose of STFU, and accept your ***** slapping like the little vaginas you all are.

Score:

Tree 10,000

DemNazi LibTard Apologists....

NOTHING, NADA, ZILCH, 0!

not getting into your emotional turmoil and hurricane, dude. i've been in IT for 30 years and can at least understand the language.

you're just rambling and screaming a lot.

Because I HATE LIARS. AND KNOW WHEN I AM BEING LIED TO.

great. but your reaction and how you handle it do not support your argument.

meta-data doesn't give a flying horseshit how you FEEL. it is what it is and it doesn't do some of the things ON IT'S OWN you're trying to say it does.

rant on. i'm back out.

 

[The Original Tree]

And you all are aware that the US has Forensic tools that can reveal any hidden and overwritten MetaData, correct? I mean, you guys know this, right?

But that would have forced The Obama Administration to actually look at the server instead of accept a discredited and biased report compiled by a firm paid for by The DNC who had a lot to hide and even more to gain from smearing Trump.

It would have forced the Obama Administration to produce a report on that very thing, and since it was a government report it would have been subject to FOIA.

That is why Obama forbade anyone from actually looking at the server. It could have been subpoenaed, especially since it was a "MATTER OF NATIONAL SECURITY" but The Obama Administration was ODDLY completely disinterested in examining the server.

Oh, they wanted to look at The Trump Tower Server Immediately. And Trump immediately gave them access to it.

And then there is Hillary's server that despite two Federal Court orders not to tamper with her server, nor delete or alter any data on it, Comey allowed her to Bleach Bit over 30,000 emails on it.

If it smells like a dead fish, quacks like a dead fish, and walks like a dead fish. It's a dead fish that smells fishy.

GET THE **** OUT OF HERE WITH YOUR NONSENSE. ALL OF YOU.

Hey, btw, Where are the Notes James Comey was supposed to keep on Interviews with The Entire Clinton Staff he Gave Immunity to for NO ******* REASON at all, except to shield them as he was ordered to do by Obama?

What? Comey violated FBI Policy, and not only did not record a single thing or take a single note, but also allowed Clinton to destroy 17 electronic devices in addtion to bleach bitting her sever?

And then when he found out she was lying about all those emails when they were found on one of her many Pervert Friends laptops, Anthony Weiner, he again covered for her?

And Remember how THE FBI said there was no way they could ever recover any texts between Page and Strozk because of a massive software malfunction that affected the entire FBI and all of their agents, and The IG was able to go to the ISP and get them all within 24 hours?

And Remember when Eric Holder lied, when Brennan and Clapper lied, when Comey lied, and McCabe lied and none of them even got a slap on the wrist?

Remember when Mueller and Weismann manufactured evidence, tampered with witness statements and lied to the court to railroad and imprison innocent men to jail in both the Anthrax and Enron cases and the taxpayer had to pay out millions in damages?

Remember when James Comey and Mueller concealed the fact that they knew Rosatom was bribing people like Clinton, McCain, and Holder to get the Uranium One Deal Approved?

Remember when Bob Mueller and Comey was found to have made over 72 FISA Violations, and were never sanctioned for it?

Remember when James Comey falsified statements on his FISA applications stating that the stories were corroborated by a 3rd party when all they really did was send Chris Steele to Yahoo to create a fake corroboration, and then afterwards "Fake Fired" him to distance themselves from him, and still paid him under the table and worked with him?

And remember Nellie Ohr working for The Clinton Campaign illegally gave her husband so called Opposition Research, which was Russian Propaganda delivered by Steele to Fusion GPS?

And Remember when Fusion GPS sent Natalia V to Trump Tower to try to set up Eric Trump?


But if you dared know Trump, and made single misstatement when asked to orally recall facts you already disclosed on a disclosure form, WELL THEN, PREDAWN RAID and dragging your wife out of bed in her nightie with a machine gun pointed at her head, and amphibious assault vehicles, helicopters and tanks at a Senior Citizens home despite the fact he was fully cooperating with you. Threatening to financially ruin you and throw your whole family in jail?
Yah, that doesn't smell at all by comparison, does it?

And don't forget kids, that you are supposed to tip off CNN right before the super duper double secret Pre-Dawn Raids (BOTH TIMES) so they can film them and put it on the news to further smear the president, his family and friends.

Cuz "RESISTANCE" CUZ "INSURANCE POLICY"

Obama will burn in Hell, trust me, and you'll know this when many of you join him and he greets you there. That's called "Direct Evidence" or a "First Hand Account."

Now take your dose of STFU, and accept your ***** slapping like the little vaginas you all are.

Score:

Tree 10,000

DemNazi LibTard Apologists....

NOTHING, NADA, ZILCH, 0!

not getting into your emotional turmoil and hurricane, dude. i've been in IT for 30 years and can at least understand the language.

you're just rambling and screaming a lot.

Because I HATE LIARS. AND KNOW WHEN I AM BEING LIED TO.

great. but your reaction and how you handle it do not support your argument.

meta-data doesn't give a flying horseshit how you FEEL. it is what it is and it doesn't do some of the things ON IT'S OWN you're trying to say it does.

rant on. i'm back out.

And Remember how THE FBI said there was no way they could ever recover any texts between Page and Strozk because of a massive software malfunction that affected the entire FBI and all of their agents, and The IG was able to go to the ISP and get them all within 24 hours?

And Remember when Eric Holder lied, when Brennan and Clapper lied, when Comey lied, and McCabe lied and none of them even got a slap on the wrist?

Remember when Mueller and Weismann manufactured evidence, tampered with witness statements and lied to the court to railroad and imprison innocent men to jail in both the Anthrax and Enron cases and the taxpayer had to pay out millions in damages?

Remember when James Comey and Mueller concealed the fact that they knew Rosatom was bribing people like Clinton, McCain, and Holder to get the Uranium One Deal Approved?

Remember when Bob Mueller and Comey was found to have made over 72 FISA Violations, and were never sanctioned for it?

Remember when James Comey falsified statements on his FISA applications stating that the stories were corroborated by a 3rd party when all they really did was send Chris Steele to Yahoo to create a fake corroboration, and then afterwards "Fake Fired" him to distance themselves from him, and still paid him under the table and worked with him?

And remember Nellie Ohr working for The Clinton Campaign illegally gave her husband so called Opposition Research which was actually Russian Propaganda delivered by Steele and he gave that to James Comey and McCabe like legitimate intelligence?

And Remember how James Comey was told by Loretta Lynch to make Clinton's issues go away by calling them "matters"?

And Remember when Loretta Lynch met Bill Clinton on The Tarmac secretly to discuss grand kids and golf when she doesn't golf, when Hillary was under Investigation?

And Remember how Trump Hater McCain was also given a copy of The Steele Dossier to make it look like the Fake Intelligence was coming from multiple sources?

And Remember how James Comey sent a Prostitute to try to entice Papadouplous in to saying something stupid in exchange for sex?

And Remember how a Australian Diplomat and friend of The Clintons approached a Trump Campaign Volunteer with an offer of dirt on Clinton?

 

[The Original Tree]

Remember when Hillary Clinton and Schultz hired Pakistani Hackers with Criminal Records to pry in to Congressional Files, Hack Shit and Steal Shit, and even when they were caught, she brought one of them directly in to her campaign, while the others were miraculously allowed to escape back to Pakistan, while leaving behind a trail of smashed hard drives?

Remember when Hillary Clinton stole FBI files so she could get dirt on her political rivals and black mail them in to doing her bidding in FBI File Gate?

 

[The Original Tree]

AND THE LEFTIST COCKROACHES SCATTER WHEN THE LIGHT HITS THEM.

 

[Terri4Trump]

Well I hear the farmers are crying right now

You're the only ****** who cries, everyday, like a *****.