The Original Tree
Diamond Member
Wrong. The Data Transfer Rate was embedded in the files as MetaData. This MetaData was shared with the Public and verified to have not been altered.Images can be altered. I do it all the time.
Pretty hard to modify a compressed encrypted disk image stored on a read only media.
The Data Transfer Rate of Podesta's emails could only have been accomplished using a USB Drive.
But, said Barger and other experts, that overlooks the possibility the files were copied multiple times before being released, something that may be more probable than not in a bureaucracy like Russian intelligence.
“A hacker might have downloaded it to one computer, then shared it by USB to an air gapped [off the internet] network for translation, then copied by a different person for analysis, then brought a new USB to an entirely different air gapped computer to determine a strategy all before it was packaged for Guccifer 2.0 to leak,” said Barger.
Every time the files were copied, depending on the method they were transmitted, there would be a new chance for the metadata to be changed.
Hultquist said the date that Forensicator believes that the files were downloaded, based on the metadata, is almost definitely not the date the files were removed from the DNC.
Why the latest theory about the DNC not being hacked is probably wrong
The Pakistani Hackers or Seth Rich himself did this
LOL
Try again with another lie, dummy.