Monday nights I always inventory my toothpicks, sorry.Yeah, kinda weird the right wing hasn't "set me straight", I assume you can though?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Monday nights I always inventory my toothpicks, sorry.Yeah, kinda weird the right wing hasn't "set me straight", I assume you can though?
I already published the numbers around Clinton's time showing that we finally had a surplus. The CBO said we were on track to go to zero.OK, I know the rights going to CLAIM BJ Bill only got 4 surpluses, 3 after vetoing the GOP's $792+ billion tax cut thanks to Newt and his Contract On America. Let's look at actual data and see
The Real Heroes of the 1998 Budget Surplus: Clinton and His Economy
Take President Clinton’s 1993 budget bill—officially known as the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993. OBRA, which mainly raised taxes on wealthy people but also raised the gas tax, extended limits on discretionary spending and cut back on some mandatory spending, was signed into law on August 10, 1993. Just five months prior, the Congressional Budget Office projected a 1998 deficit of $360 billion. One month after the bill passed, the CBO’s new estimate of the 1988 deficit was down to $200 billion.
The CBO explained the dramatic improvement this way: “For the first time in two and one-half years, the deficit projections have taken a decided turn for the better… The reconciliation act deserves most of the credit for the improvement over the long run.” Indeed, of the $160 billion improvement from March to September of that year, CBO directly credited OBRA with $143 billion. In fact, OBRA turns out to have been the single largest contributor to the 1998 surplus.
After OBRA, the second largest contributor to fiscal improvement over the period was the rapidly strengthening economy.
As the economy improved, the government began to take in more revenue than expected, since taxpayers were making more money, and had to spend somewhat less than expected, as poverty declined and the demand for social services declined with it.
Over the course of the five-year period, CBO assigned a total of $102 billion in fiscal improvement directly to the effects of this kind of broad economic growth
....But there is another reason why the economic boom produced even more revenue than expected, and again, it had absolutely nothing to do with Newt Gingrich....
OK I'LL WAIT START THE AD HOMS NOT BACKED UP AND BS NOW
![]()
RELEASE: The Real Heroes of the 1998 Budget Surplus: Clinton and His Economy
www.americanprogress.org
Already said we were in good shape.Yeah, kinda weird the right wing hasn't "set me straight", I assume you can though?
Current GOP policies.....?Wow I thought this thread would be swarming with data and links to point out how wrong I am about putting most of the blame on the current debt on GOP policies.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
This is eyewash.Sorry Cupcake, you get a big old F
Don't look at Dubya/GOP gutting revenues AS they blew up spending, or Dubya gutting regulators on the beat, just blame the Black Guy, lol
Accusations of fraud? Wow IF we had someone who cared right?
Trump Vowed to Crack Down on Fraudsters, but He’s Pardoned Dozens
Across both of his terms, President Trump has granted clemency to more than 70 allies, donors and others convicted in fraud cases.
NO PAYWALL
Trump pardons wipe nearly $2 billion in victim repayment and taxpayer recovery for Medicare and tax fraud, and more
He was anything but that.DON'T WORRY, I'LL GET TO DUBYA/GOP "FISCAL CONSERVATIVES SOON
legalclarity.org
Yep....In 1994, the American People handed Bill Clinton his ass when they gave the house and senate back to the GOP.Clinton took US from 17.5% of GDP to 20% in 2000 (Third Clinton surplus)
This is eyewash.
What are blathering about.
Bush could have gotten us to zero. Instead he set up Obama.
Obama then did a terrible job during the recovery.
Trump....I never expected him to do anything. I've been critical of him the whole time.
And while you want to blame the GOP, the fact is that congress in general has allowed this to go on.
They don't want to touch it.
And now we are paying well over a trillion a year in interest.
















Here is from Carter's 1977 Social Security Adjustments:OK People let's get to the topic of debt, how we got here ($39+ trillion) and how GOP policy vs Democratic policies influenced it.
If you don't want to bring actual facts or data, just stand off
From 1945 to 1980 the US debt to GDP was shrinking. Measuring the debt via GDP accounts for population growth and inflation, and it's how every credible economist or nation measures revenues and expenses
US debt to GDP ABOUT 119% IN 1945, THE HIGHEST EVER TO THAT TIME
US DEBT TO GDP IN 1980 was 31%
What were we hearing from the GOP at that time? Let's take a ;look at Ronnie
"During the 1980 campaign, Ronald Reagan heavily criticized Jimmy Carter for federal budget deficits, which reached roughly $59 billion to $74 billion plus "off-budget" items. Reagan termed these deficits a failure of leadership, blaming them and resulting inflation on excessive government spending and taxing, while pledging to balance the budget by 1983 through tax cuts."
Now what did Ronnie actually do as Prez? Not the mythology the right created after seeing how popular and successful Clinton was, the actual data
"During Reagan's eight year presidency, the annual deficits averaged 4.0% of GDP, compared to a 2.2% average during the preceding eight years."
![]()
Federal Surplus or Deficit [-] as Percent of Gross Domestic Product
Graph and download economic data for Federal Surplus or Deficit [-] as Percent of Gross Domestic Product from 1929 to 2025 about budget, federal, GDP, and USA.fred.stlouisfed.org
WHAT? How could this be possible?
U.S. federal debt-to-GDP ratio at the end of fiscal year 1989 (September 30, 1989) was approximately 39% . Debt had increased from under $1 trillion to over $2.86 trillion in Ronnie final F/Y
But I thought tax cuts were going to bring in more revenues? Well let's look
F/Y 1980, CARTER'S FINAL F/Y - 19.2% of GDP, with total receipts of $517.1 billion. The total federal outlays (spending) for the same period was 21.2% of GDP
1981 F/Y - Carter's last year - 19.1% GDP revenues
1982- Reagan FIRST YEAR 18.6%
1983- Reagan 17%
1984- Reagan 16.9%
1985- Reagan 17.2%
1986- Reagan 17%
1987- Reagan 17.9%
1988- Reagan 17.7% (Cut taxes from top rate of 50% the US had since LBJ, to 28%, LARGEST TAX CUT FOR THE RICH TO DATE)
1989- Reagan 17.8%
Yes, President Ronald Reagan signed multiple tax increases into law after his major 1981 tax cut, in part to address rising budget deficits and close loopholes. While often remembered for cutting taxes, Reagan authorized 11 tax increases between 1981 and 1987, reversing nearly half of the initial 1981 tax savings.
- 1982 Tax Increase: Reagan signed the Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982 (TEFRA), which is described as one of the largest peacetime tax increases in U.S. history. It brought in revenue by closing loopholes and enhancing compliance.
- 1983 Social Security Reform:
He signed legislation that included payroll tax increases on Social Security and Medicare. HUGE TAX INCREASES ON THE WORKING MAN
Federal Budget Receipts and Outlays
Federal Budget Receipts and Outlays: | The American Presidency Project
www.presidency.ucsb.edu
NOW I'll be happy to debate, show the data and actual math, just ask. PLEASE don't deflect
Reversing 1981 Cuts: These subsequent tax hikes, including in 1984 and 1987, acted as a correction to the record-setting 1981 tax reductions, effectively rolling back a significant portion of those cuts
Despite the rhetoric of being a "tax cutter," Reagan signed legislation that increased taxes multiple times to handle the economic realities of the 1980s
DAMN, TRIPLING US DEBT (though increasing it ONLY 31% of GDP to 39% of GDP, is pretty good, compared to Dubya/Dementia Donnie
Yes, I'll touch bases on policies that drove the Muslim guys debt from Kenya.
Here is from Carter's 1977 Social Security Adjustments:
I am happy to be here today to sign legislation which will reassure the 33 million people who are receiving benefits and the 104 million workers now making contributions that the social security system will be financially sound well into the next century.
*******************************
See that bolded party? That was a joke. Four years later, congress was beating on Reagan's door because the system was literarlly months from going bankrupt and missing payments (so they said... that would not happen.... they would be reduced.....and it's going to happen in 2033).
Wanna know who set Carter upl? LBJ. The trust fund was getting so big, that LBJ instructed congress to increase benefits. He was worried the trust fund would impact global interest rates. Yep.... a democrat essentially ****** a democrat....and America.
At this point, people who didn't need it were getting real nice checks while the poor were not doing so well. So much for security.
Reagan fixed it for Carter, then opened the door in 1983 with a bunch of amendments.
And Thanks to FDR, LBJ, Carter, Reagan, Bush (and Obama suspended the tax for a while only further pulling down the trust fund that much faster).
It really wasn't Carter's fault his administration could not add 2 and 2.
They blew it.
So when blowhards like JohnKochsucker try to pin this on Reagan...you'll know what happened.
Yep....In 1994, the American People handed Bill Clinton his ass when they gave the house and senate back to the GOP.
He got the message.
He threw the left under the bus and went to work.
And he did a great job.
He was anything but that.
He and the GOP congress were drunken spenders.
Total assholes.
Reagan did't put us on something non recoverable.
The arch under Clinton was headed to zero.
BTW: GFY over SS tax increases by Reagan.
![]()
Congress Approves Social Security Bill (Published 1977)
Sen, 56-21, and HR, 189-163, approve and send to Pres Carter Soc Security financing bill that Repubs denounce as 'biggest peacetime tax increase in history'; bill mandates series of increases, beginning in '79, for payroll taxes levied on more than 100-million employers, workers and...www.nytimes.com
So Carter passes this stupid thing, but didn't really fix it. It was supposed to be fixed for 30 years according to Peanut brain.
But....
![]()
Ronald Reagan’s Social Security Reforms and Amendments
Detailed analysis of how Reagan’s 1983 amendments solved the Social Security fiscal crisis and created the modern trust fund structure.legalclarity.org
In 1981.....the system was going bankrupt (so much for Carters 30 year fix) and he had to bail it out.
Later he had to do more, including taxing benefits. Somehow he let them have access to the trust fund.
You are going to whine about Reagan in 1983? Seriously?
[/URL]
So, how did all this get started? Back when FDR wanted his precious social security system passed he sold it as a load of bullshit. People bought in. Those who designed it fended off the complaints of those who said it would one day be a fiasco by saying "we'll be dead by then". They were both right.
So this started with a Democratic president....a democratic congress and a shiftless corrupt SCOTUS.
So **** you and your GOP policy bullshit.
And NOBODY want's to deal with the debt and SS is going to be the main reason we never get it under control. When the trust fund depletes they'll just start borrowing to keep beneifits where they are and our children are royally fucked.
This is eyewash.
What are blathering about.
Bush could have gotten us to zero. Instead he set up Obama.
Obama then did a terrible job during the recovery.
Trump....I never expected him to do anything. I've been critical of him the whole time.
And while you want to blame the GOP, the fact is that congress in general has allowed this to go on.
They don't want to touch it.
And now we are paying well over a trillion a year in interest.
Already said we were in good shape.
There are lots of another analaysis that show that the economy was positioned to do well, but thank Heavens Clinton stayed a true course. He deserves credit.
I don't believe I could be in the same room with GWB. My desire to choke him to death would override my logic.
Rep. Newt Gingrich (R-GA), February 2, 1993: We have all too many people in the Democratic administration who are talking about bigger Government, bigger bureaucracy, more programs, and higher taxes. I believe that that will in fact kill the current recovery and put us back in a recession. It might take 1 1/2 or 2 years, but it will happen. (Congressional Record, 1993, Thomas)
Rep. Bill Archer (R-TX), May 24, 1993: I would much rather be here today supporting the President and I would do so if his proposals could expect to increase jobs and the standard of living for Americans, but I believe his massive tax increases will do just the opposite. (Congressional Record, 1993, Thomas)
I already published the numbers around Clinton's time showing that we finally had a surplus. The CBO said we were on track to go to zero.
Along comes GWB and his stupid wars.
So, GFY for thinking you somehow presented something new.
We are in a deep world of poop.
Democrats and Republicans don't care.
Right, Ronnie tripling the debt AS he blew up spending, didn't start it. Newt and company trying to gut revenues (tax cuts) didn't do it under Clinton, it all started with Dubya, lolCurrent GOP policies.....?
This started with Bush.
So he didn't get his ass handed to him in 1994?More BS, thanks to the 1993 omnibus he got the job done Cupcake, the one EVERY GOPer voted against
Both sides suck.RIGHT, BOTH SIDES, NOT THE FISCAL DISCIPLINE OF THE DEMS 1993 OMNIBUS BILL AND CLINTON STOPPING THE GOP FROM GUTTING TAXES, WHERE HE HAD TO VETO THE GOP'S TAX CUTS AFTER HIS FIRST SURPLUS, LOL
Yeah, Cheeto is showing how "fiscal conservative" the GOP is, lol