Laws I Would Enact in an Officially Christian United States Government

When you listed the laws you would enact, this was the first one, "1. Human lives are of supreme importance. Animals are subordinate".

How is that not the case now? When have animal's lives been put above humans in the law?
 
Yeah, there won't be any laughing in hell. That song irks me anyway. Here we have 5-foot-5 Billy Joel setting himself up as a tough guy, as if he is even able to corrupt a good Catholic girl. It's laughable.

So...you've never actually listened to the song, then.

One...he doesn't. He's trying, but never manages.
Two...he's also calling out the girl's mother as a hypocrite.
 
So...you've never actually listened to the song, then.

One...he doesn't. He's trying, but never manages.
Two...he's also calling out the girl's mother as a hypocrite.
What in my post would suggest to you I've never listened to the song? Since you're trolling me from thread to thread now.
 
One...he doesn't. He's trying, but never manages.

Pretty sure he eventually nails Virginia ... he knocks her up and dumps her and she has to go to "Girls Town"

601q.jpg
 
When you listed the laws you would enact, this was the first one, "1. Human lives are of supreme importance. Animals are subordinate".

How is that not the case now? When have animal's lives been put above humans in the law?
Simple. It is illegal to kill a dog through, say dogfighting, but it is perfectly fine to kill a human baby in the womb.
 
Simple. It is illegal to kill a dog through, say dogfighting, but it is perfectly fine to kill a human baby in the womb.
Apparently you don't understand subordinate. Your statement would be effective if the life of the baby was subordinate to the life of the animal. They are unrelated.
 
Apparently you don't understand subordinate. Your statement would be effective if the life of the baby was subordinate to the life of the animal. They are unrelated.
It is subordinate at times, and my example showed it.
 
Simple. It is illegal to kill a dog through, say dogfighting, but it is perfectly fine to kill a human baby in the womb.
Not everybody agrees when a fetus becomes a human being. I would say when it's viable.
 
Apparently you don't understand subordinate. Your statement would be effective if the life of the baby was subordinate to the life of the animal. They are unrelated.
Here's another one for you. In loony Austin, Texas, it is illegal to kill fetal animals.
for the first time anywhere, a major U.S. city has enshrined protections for visibly pregnant moms and their full-term puppies/kittens.

Killing little babies in the womb? Perfectly fine.
 
Here's another one for you. In Austin, Texas, it is illegal to kill fetal animals.
for the first time anywhere, a major U.S. city has enshrined protections for visibly pregnant moms and their full-term puppies/kittens.

Killing little babies in the womb? Perfectly fine.
One has to be dependent on the other. It's not. You are trying to say something like "more important than," not subordinate.

Edit: apologies the rest was rude.
 
Last edited:
Here are a few beneficial changes that would be made under a Christian United States government. So many problems would vanish overnight with this legislation. Many more would reduce over time. There could be more. These were just a few things I thought of initially. Really common sense stuff, basically a return to 1950s television, an era when families were stronger and children became independent earlier, and societal norms opposed sex outside marriage. A time when top shows were Donna Reed and Leave it to Beaver. A time when it was the norm to attend church, there were the most priests and sisters and Catholic schools in history.

This could be a reality, folks, if enough of us think about it, work towards it, and pray hard. They never though Roe v Wade would fall, and now look what is happening, so it CAN be done!


In the Schools:
Christian/Catholic sexual morality taught from the earliest grades:
1. Human lives are of supreme importance. Animals are subordinate,
2. Sex is only permissible through marriage
3. Birth control will not be discussed, nor will condoms be distributed in the schools.
4. Sex education would be replaced with sensible teaching on dating which would include recommendations of:
..... a. Relatively early curfew times
..... b. No passionate kissing prior to marriage
.....c. Emphasis on getting to know the other person
.....d. Duggar-style side hugs, rather than frontal.

Ten Commandments, crosses, and crucifixes may be displayed.
School prayer allowed and encouraged.
Christmas may be celebrated. Christian themed decorations may be used
Christian-themed Christmas plays may be performed.
Racist CRT banned.
Prominent Americans returned to the history books. Lives of the greatest canonized saints would be added in order to inspire children.
Christian schools would be strengthened.
All leftwing/ Marxist propaganda removed from schools and universities. Overt Marxists teachers would either reform or be dismissed.
No alcohol allowed in university dorms which house underaged students. (You might be amazed this is allowed in many or most freshman dorms).


In movies and television:

  • Nudity is banned.
  • Depictions of sex outside marriage banned
  • Foul language banned
  • Graphic physical harm depictions banned
  • Only nuclear family depictions: Parents married.
  • Depictions of cohabitation banned.
  • Gay sex acts are banned.
In media:
No legislation may be pushed by a news outlet that violates Christian moral teaching. Abortion, rioting, extra rights for gays or trans, pitting women against men may not be advocated. Basically any promotion of the issues Marxist atheists use to divide and undermine the country will be banned.

In commerce and law:
Pornography banned.
Abortion mills illegal.
Mexico City Policy made permanent.
Most government domestic programs will be shut down, and a private sharing program would be established where people send funds directly to those designated in need. This would eliminate large piles of money. This will be the topic of another thread. It is based on charity, rather than coercion. It would also remove power from leftwing politicians
Government photo and/or fingerprint or retinal ID would be used for all voting. No drop boxes. Only verified mail-in voting. Very limited early voting.
Illegal immigration would be stopped cold. Legal immigration requirements would be relaxed for countries for which they are onerous.
Recreational drugs once again illegalized.
Don´t try to ridicule us or yourself. As if there would be any voting other than the choice between sending your boy to church or receive 100 lashes - per hour.
That shit - although some of it may have good intentions - ruled Europe for centuries. People got away from it and founded America.
Under that rule, people could only be punished after their confession, but it was totally fine to torture them to get that confession. Thousands of "witches" have been burned in my country, with confessions tortured out of them.
It is the dark age, we are talking about and that continued into the modern era.
 
You may have listened to it and just not understood the words.
Of course I understood the words. What would make you think I didn't? Nowhere did I say he bagged the girl. I just said it's preposterous that he thinks he is capable of it. Joel is a midget at 5'5". Not the tough guy in a tough gang like he portrays.
 

Forum List

Back
Top