Kyle Rittenhouse trial...already disproving SO MANY LIES from the left

[Ray From Cleveland]

Manslaughter is murder. Why should he be convicted of manslaughter when by any reasonable definition of the term he didn't commit manslaughter?

Ritten didn't "instigate" jack shit. You have a very flexible definition of the term "instigate."

Murder is intentional and premeditated. Manslaughter happens when you kill somebody but not premeditated.

 

[progressive hunter]

What do you mean "their" community? The kid didn't even live in that state. No you do not have the right to protect your community. In most states you cannot even protect your property using deadly force. If you go out as a vigilante then you assume the penalties of the laws you break in the process. I didn't bring up Rittenhouse as a cop, you brought up private security.

hey ray!!

have you found any evidence kyle tried to arrest or stop anyone from committing a crime or do you retract your claim??

 

[progressive hunter]

But jurors need to know why he was there in the first place. He didn't live there. He didn't even live in the state. He went there because there was trouble going on and the jury has to consider that.

In my state he'd likely be convicted, and we are a much more liberal gun state with conservative leadership for years. But when you take a firearm into a violent situation you are responsible for your actions because you intentionally involved yourself in a likely situation that would end up in violence. He knew it, I know it, and you know it. I didn't study the laws of Wisconsin, but I can't believe they are much different than ours.

why did you leave out he worked there and had friends there?? also that he lived right across the border??

 

[Correll]

No. He should get at least 20 years.. and he'll get out early for good behavior. The kid is really stupid.. a HS drop out and a liar.

EXPLAINER: Prosecutors play up Rittenhouse inexperience

Prosecutors trying to convict Kyle Rittenhouse of murder are trying to paint the Illinois man as an inexperienced teen who misrepresented his age and medical training to other armed civilians in his group on the night he shot three men during a protest against police brutality in Wisconsin last year

apnews.com

I asked how it was relevant that he might not have been certified as an EMT and you responded by stating that you believe he should do at least twenty years.


Do you imagine that that statement is an answer to my question? Because to me, and I think any reasonable observer, you utterly failed to explain why or how the EMT question means jack shit.

 

[eagle1462010]

But jurors need to know why he was there in the first place. He didn't live there. He didn't even live in the state. He went there because there was trouble going on and the jury has to consider that.

In my state he'd likely be convicted, and we are a much more liberal gun state with conservative leadership for years. But when you take a firearm into a violent situation you are responsible for your actions because you intentionally involved yourself in a likely situation that would end up in violence. He knew it, I know it, and you know it. I didn't study the laws of Wisconsin, but I can't believe they are much different than ours.

He drove 20 miles to get there. Hell I drive 45 miles to work everyday.

 

[StevenC]

But jurors need to know why he was there in the first place. He didn't live there. He didn't even live in the state. He went there because there was trouble going on and the jury has to consider that.

In my state he'd likely be convicted, and we are a much more liberal gun state with conservative leadership for years. But when you take a firearm into a violent situation you are responsible for your actions because you intentionally involved yourself in a likely situation that would end up in violence. He knew it, I know it, and you know it. I didn't study the laws of Wisconsin, but I can't believe they are much different than ours.

You should look up the laws then.

Wisconsin Legislature: 939.48

docs.legis.wisconsin.gov

From what I have read Rittenhouse was justified in his use of force.

 

[Correll]

Because he had no business there in the first place, and made the claim one of the reasons he was there is to give medical assistance when he had no more training than you and I.

That does not mean that his intent was not still to give medical aid.

 

[jc456]

Because all statements and evidence have to be directly related to the case. Otherwise it will get tossed out of court.

But it goes to frame of mind why the homeless pedophile was behaving like he was! Can you say nut job? Threatened Kyle

 

[Flash]

Because he had no business there in the first place, and made the claim one of the reasons he was there is to give medical assistance when he had no more training than you and I.

I don't lifeguard emergency training. Do you?

 

[Flash]

Because he had no business there in the first place, and made the claim one of the reasons he was there is to give medical assistance when he had no more training than you and I.

What Kyle did or did not do prior to the attack has no bearing on this case.

All that matters is if it was self defense or not when he was attacked.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

But jurors need to know why he was there in the first place. He didn't live there. He didn't even live in the state. He went there because there was trouble going on and the jury has to consider that.

In my state he'd likely be convicted, and we are a much more liberal gun state with conservative leadership for years. But when you take a firearm into a violent situation you are responsible for your actions because you intentionally involved yourself in a likely situation that would end up in violence. He knew it, I know it, and you know it. I didn't study the laws of Wisconsin, but I can't believe they are much different than ours.

The jury was told why he was there. He worked in Kenosha. After work he was with friends cleaning graffiti when they were asked to look in on a business.

 

[Flash]

yep. shouldn't even be a question. He should be locked up.

what a complete POS.

Even though, odds are hes just a lying POS too. Its very doubtful that anyone gets a camera inside that courtroom.\\You are confused

You are confused as to was the piece of shit. In this case pieces of shit.

The pieces of shit were the Communists that attacked him. They were real scumbags prior to being in Kenosha. Hell, one of them was a convicted Pedophile. Another one threatened to kill his family because his sister didn't clean the house like he wanted.

They were pieces of shit being involved in the destruction of Kenosha.

However they were world class pieces of shit for trying to run down Kyle to kill him.

 

[JohnDB]

But it goes to frame of mind why the homeless pedophile was behaving like he was! Can you say nut job? Threatened Kyle

The fact that Rosenbaum has no one but a bunch of political hacks defending him also speaks volumes...

No family members, foster parents or adoptive parents to say anything to anyone about how sad they are that he is dead...

He was a child rapist...

 

[bripat9643]

Because he had no business there in the first place, and made the claim one of the reasons he was there is to give medical assistance when he had no more training than you and I.

You keep saying that, but it's pure horseshit. Rittenhouse had every right to be there. He had just as much right to be there as any of those scum he blew away.

You also made an unproven claim. How do you know he doesn't have any training?

 

[maybelooking]

You are confused as to was the piece of shit. In this case pieces of shit.

The pieces of shit were the Communists that attacked him. They were real scumbags prior to being in Kenosha. Hell, one of them was a convicted Pedophile. Another one threatened to kill his family because his sister didn't clean the house like he wanted.

They were pieces of shit being involved in the destruction of Kenosha.

However they were world class pieces of shit for trying to run down Kyle to kill him.

I think we got crossed up.

I wasn't referring to Kyle. I was referring to the POS in the video calling for the Jurors to convict or face consequences. Did I manage to post in the wrong thread?

whoops.

 

[jc456]

You should look up the laws then.

Wisconsin Legislature: 939.48

docs.legis.wisconsin.gov

From what I have read Rittenhouse was justified in his use of force.

Rosenbaum a mental fk fro Texas no job no money starting fires in Kenosha WI, then chased a seventeen year old boy for no reason and attempted to kill him, he said so! But the jury isn’t allowed to know all that, why?

 

[jc456]

You keep saying that, but it's pure horseshit. Rittenhouse had every right to be there. He had just as much right to be there as any of those scum he blew away.

You also made an unproven claim. How do you know he doesn't have any training?

He was referring to Rosenbaum

 

[EvilCat Breath]

But it goes to frame of mind why the homeless pedophile was behaving like he was! Can you say nut job? Threatened Kyle

 

[Flash]

I think we got crossed up.

I wasn't referring to Kyle. I was referring to the POS in the video calling for the Jurors to convict or face consequences. Did I manage to post in the wrong thread?

whoops.

Sorry. Probably my bad.

 

[Faun]

No one has proven he isn't, jackass.

Are you ever not a fucking moron?

Ever???

Videographer tells jury that Rosenbaum lunged for Rittenhouse's gun and missed before shooting

He [McGinnis] encountered Rittenhouse, then 17, and began talking about his role amid the unrest. Rittenhouse, a part-time lifeguard, told McGinniss he was an adult and a certified emergency technician. The Chicago Tribune found no record of Rittenhouse being a licensed EMT in Illinois or Wisconsin.​