Kyle Rittenhouse trial...already disproving SO MANY LIES from the left

[progressive hunter]

No one else felt he was a real threat. Only Kyle.

well kyle is the only one he was chasing and said he would kill him earlier,,

 

[j-mac]

EXPLAINER: Prosecutors play up Rittenhouse inexperience

Prosecutors trying to convict Kyle Rittenhouse of murder are trying to paint the Illinois man as an inexperienced teen who misrepresented his age and medical training to other armed civilians in his group on the night he shot three men during a protest against police brutality in Wisconsin last year

apnews.com

Ok, and that means what exactly to the post you quoted?

 

[j-mac]

Dumbfuck, he's not been charged with lying about being an EMT. The states burden is to prove guilt of the charges.

They‘re failing badly….Hell, the prosecutor already lied, trying to say that Rittenhouse was the aggressor….

 

[Soupnazi630]

Yes, unfortunately he is a murderer. His victims were unarmed.

I have wondered why Trump never reached out to Antifa and BLM. Why didn't he hear their grievances instead of talking tough and sandbagging them?

Wrong.

He is not a murderer.

Rosenbaum reached for his rifle which constitutes a lethal threat. The same element was present in the Micheal Brown shooting. For that reason and several others Darren Wilson commited a justified shooting.

Huber attacked and struck him with a skateboard which is an improvised weapon but still capable of causing serious harm or death.

Grosskreutz Pointed a handgun at him which is clearly a deadly threat.

He was justified in shooting all three.

 

[Soupnazi630]

The first person Rittenhouse killed was unarmed and no shots had been fired. Witnesses testify that the man was not a threat.

Its very sad that this stupid kid traveled to a protest and took a gun, but that's just what he did. There's just no excuse for killing two people and maiming a third.

Wrong.

Others were in fact shooting when Rosenbaum was shot by Rittenhouse and so far every witness has testified that Rosenbaum was reaching for Rittenhouse's rifle which makes him a threat.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Battery?? There's no evidence Rosenbaum ever touched Rittenhouse or his rifle. The evidence thus far is just that he lunged at him.

No one said he touched it he did in fact attempt to take it and was shot before he could take it.

 

[Faun]

They‘re failing badly….Hell, the prosecutor already lied, trying to say that Rittenhouse was the aggressor….

Yeah, they are. I was hoping for more from that infrared shot which never materialized as promised.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Aren't you? His mother takes him to bars with Proud Boys.

Look at him.. He's a soft, plump, baby faces drop out who pretends he's an EMT, lies about his age and uses a gun to feel bigger and better.

Wendy Lewis biography: 13 things about Kyle Rittenhouse’s mother from Antioch, Illinois

Wendy Lewis is a white woman from Antioch, Antioch Township, Lake County, Illinois, United States. She is a law enforcement supporter. Aside from Antioch, Lewis has lived in other parts of Ill…

conandaily.com

Being chubby does not negate the right to self defense.

Being stupid does not negate the right to self defense.

Being a proud boy or hanging with them does not negate the right to self defense.

Going to bars under age does not negate the right to self defense.

He should be acquitted he only defended himself and did so righteously

 

[Soupnazi630]

The owner of said business testified under oath he did not ask them to "look in on" his business.

Wrong.

It was his sons not the owner himself.

 

[Faun]

No one said he touched it he did in fact attempt to take it and was shot before he could take it.

If he touched neither Rittenhouse nor his rifle, then it's not battery.

 

[Soupnazi630]

If he touched neither Rittenhouse nor his rifle, then it's not battery.

No one said it was battery.

It was a lethal threat.

 

[Faun]

No one said it was battery.

Idiot, pay attention...

The first attacker was attacking Rittenhouse and trying to steal his rifle, the attacker was guilty of battery at the very least, and quite possibly assault with a deadly weapon.

​

[emphasis mine]

 

[lantern2814]

Unless you support extra judicial killings…it doesn’t matter what he was. He was convicted, served time, and was released. He still has the same basic rights as you or I. Being unsavory is not a license to kill.

No, but being chased by someone with intent to kill you is license to defend yourself by whatever means necessary. Funny you keep forgetting that...

 

[lantern2814]

No one else felt he was a real threat. Only Kyle.

Gee dummy, that might be because this asshole was chasing him with the intent to KILL HIM. As he himself admitted.

 

[Faun]

No, but being chased by someone with intent to kill you is license to defend yourself by whatever means necessary. Funny you keep forgetting that...

It does but the law limits those means to be no greater than a force necessary to stop the threat. Shooting someone in the back who is face down is excessive of what the law permits and transitions from self-defense to murder.

 

[Rigby5]

Kyle was defending a car lot.

He was moving around, was not at a car lot, and the car lot people said they never talked to him and did not want him to do anything for them.

 

[Rigby5]

Wrong.

He is not a murderer.

Rosenbaum reached for his rifle which constitutes a lethal threat. The same element was present in the Micheal Brown shooting. For that reason and several others Darren Wilson commited a justified shooting.

Huber attacked and struck him with a skateboard which is an improvised weapon but still capable of causing serious harm or death.

Grosskreutz Pointed a handgun at him which is clearly a deadly threat.

He was justified in shooting all three.

Nope, because he cause all 3 reactions by the open carry of the rifle.
It was highly provocative, offensive, and belligerent.
And you can't claim self defense went you contributed to the situation.
If he had not had the rifle, then no one would have noticed him, much less attacked him.

 

[Rigby5]

No, but being chased by someone with intent to kill you is license to defend yourself by whatever means necessary. Funny you keep forgetting that...

But since not one threatened Rittenhouse with a weapon, there was no intent to harm, much less kill.
The only one with the deadly threat to others was Rittenhouse.

 

[surada]

No one said it was battery.

It was a lethal threat.

Young military guy who was there said there was NO threat in court on Friday.

 

[Soupnazi630]

It does but the law limits those means to be no greater than a force necessary to stop the threat. Shooting someone in the back who is face down is excessive of what the law permits and transitions from self-defense to murder.

No one was shot in the back or face down you moron.

They were all three shot facing him.