Know-Nothings Gone Wild

True. But I am not talking about case law. I am talking about his claiming the 2nd amendment says he can have the same guns criminals have. It says nothing of the sort, nor does any case law support his opinion.
Well what he is saying amounts to 'There can be no laws governing weapons or regulation of them' if his stance is literally that we have the same legal rights in carrying weapons that criminals use, which is to ignore the law completely.

IMO, only felons forfeit Constitutional rights regarding weapons, and nonfelons have the right to carry anything they want, ammended by common sense weapons control laws that are state and local municipality.

If I want to carry a razor sharp sword downtown with me, that can be provocative and is really obsolete for self defense anyway, so I think local laws are well within the 2A to limit them.

But weapons that are effective for self defense should not be restricted to law abiding citizens of the USA, such as guns, knives and subdual devices like pepper spray and tazors.

We should be MUCH BETTER ARMED than criminals.
So your saying a man Can’t defend his family from invaders because of a fight when he was 17? Lol yea who needs help

No, I am not.
Now your not? God damn make up your mind lol hahah

I made it up a long time ago, and have not changed my mind.

And just for clarity, are you talking about defending you and your family from criminals or defending the country from an invading army?
Do you need to talk to a constitutional lawyer.. poor guy..
you’re just now realizing you’re anti-American lol
 

Where what?

I said you aren't limited to one option.
Thank you! You are learning .. you will be American yet lol

I am an American.

And yes, you have options. But, since you are a convicted felon, an AR is not a legal option for you.

But your pretense that the same gun carried in the Civil War, used at the beginning to tame the west, and carried byTexas Ranger is somehow not enough is simply bullshit.

Buy a good blackpowder revolver or take the risk of going to prison. The choice is yours.
I have weapons you’ll never be able to touch I’m talking about I’m freeman should be able to protect your family with the same guns the invaders have.. you are against that.. you are anti constitution
OK, INCEL :71:
 
Junior, I have forgotten more about firearms than you will ever know.

The problem is, you want the US Constitution to be the ONLY law in this case. It isn't. But since you do have options (that do not include ARs and other cartridge weapons), and CAN own arms, it is not in violation of the 2nd amendment.

And, since you believe the "will of the people" can over rule the US Constitution, the will of the people was that felons can't own guns.
That’s not what the constitution says.. I’m just pointing out you are against the constitution..

You really are slow aren't you.

The US Constitution says you have the right to bear arms. It makes no mention of what type of arms.

The Gun Control Act of 1968 says that felons cannot own firearms, but makes exceptions for blackpowder arms.

So, since you CAN own blackpowder firearms, your 2nd amendment rights are not being violated and you CAN protect yourself and your family against criminals.


So no, I am not against the constitution (as you are with your advocating lynching).
I totally understand your frustration , you are realizing you are ANTI CONSTITUTION! It’s sucks to be anti American, all because your scared of me.. relax bro I won’t hurt you

My only frustration is your refusal to acknowledge what the US Constitution actually says. I am behind it 100%.

And you keep telling me you won't hurt me. You aren't listening. I already know you won't hurt me, even if you try.
Where in the original constitution does it say you can restrict my right to bear arms? Go ahead.. sit down while you look your feelings will be hurt lol

It doesn't specifically say that.

Where in the original constitution does it say you have a right to own whatever firearms criminals own?
 
Where?? Lol hehe

Where what?

I said you aren't limited to one option.
Thank you! You are learning .. you will be American yet lol

I am an American.

And yes, you have options. But, since you are a convicted felon, an AR is not a legal option for you.

But your pretense that the same gun carried in the Civil War, used at the beginning to tame the west, and carried byTexas Ranger is somehow not enough is simply bullshit.

Buy a good blackpowder revolver or take the risk of going to prison. The choice is yours.
I have weapons you’ll never be able to touch I’m talking about I’m freeman should be able to protect your family with the same guns the invaders have.. you are against that.. you are anti constitution
OK, INCEL :71:
Ok Mary lol :abgg2q.jpg:
 
Jitss is trolling you Winterborn.

At least I hope that is trolling.

If he is for real he needs some serious counseling.
Lol I need counseling? He’s anti constitution, anti trump. He’s the one that’s needs help

I just posted showing I am not anti-constitution. Whereas you, in your defense of lyching, are certainly anti-constitution.

You have advocated numerous times that people's 6th amendment rights be denied.
Lynching isnt , if the judge said it’s a way to carry out a execution

If he went before a judge and was sentenced to hang, it wouldn't be a lynching. What you defended and advocated was hanging someone with a trial. That is against the US Constitution. Of course, you defended it with your "Will of the people" nonsense. Which you don't want to apply in this situation.
That’s how we work in America.. don’t like this move out.. I love me lynching

No, it is NOT how we work in America. And for the last time, I am not moving out.

But I will support law enforcement arresting someone for murdering a person by lynching them.

You say you love lynching, which is in direct violation of the US Constitution. That makes you anti-constitution and anti-America.
 
Well what he is saying amounts to 'There can be no laws governing weapons or regulation of them' if his stance is literally that we have the same legal rights in carrying weapons that criminals use, which is to ignore the law completely.

IMO, only felons forfeit Constitutional rights regarding weapons, and nonfelons have the right to carry anything they want, ammended by common sense weapons control laws that are state and local municipality.

If I want to carry a razor sharp sword downtown with me, that can be provocative and is really obsolete for self defense anyway, so I think local laws are well within the 2A to limit them.

But weapons that are effective for self defense should not be restricted to law abiding citizens of the USA, such as guns, knives and subdual devices like pepper spray and tazors.

We should be MUCH BETTER ARMED than criminals.
So your saying a man Can’t defend his family from invaders because of a fight when he was 17? Lol yea who needs help

No, I am not.
Now your not? God damn make up your mind lol hahah

I made it up a long time ago, and have not changed my mind.

And just for clarity, are you talking about defending you and your family from criminals or defending the country from an invading army?
Do you need to talk to a constitutional lawyer.. poor guy..
you’re just now realizing you’re anti-American lol

A constitutional lawyer? I suggest you talk to one. You are the one who is trying to read something in the 2nd amendment that does not exist.
 
That’s not what the constitution says.. I’m just pointing out you are against the constitution..

You really are slow aren't you.

The US Constitution says you have the right to bear arms. It makes no mention of what type of arms.

The Gun Control Act of 1968 says that felons cannot own firearms, but makes exceptions for blackpowder arms.

So, since you CAN own blackpowder firearms, your 2nd amendment rights are not being violated and you CAN protect yourself and your family against criminals.


So no, I am not against the constitution (as you are with your advocating lynching).
I totally understand your frustration , you are realizing you are ANTI CONSTITUTION! It’s sucks to be anti American, all because your scared of me.. relax bro I won’t hurt you

My only frustration is your refusal to acknowledge what the US Constitution actually says. I am behind it 100%.

And you keep telling me you won't hurt me. You aren't listening. I already know you won't hurt me, even if you try.
Where in the original constitution does it say you can restrict my right to bear arms? Go ahead.. sit down while you look your feelings will be hurt lol

It doesn't specifically say that.

Where in the original constitution does it say you have a right to own whatever firearms criminals own?
ARMS doesn’t say limits your arms choices if you bounced a bad check lol .. you gotta grow up,, and either accept America or move out
 
Lol I need counseling? He’s anti constitution, anti trump. He’s the one that’s needs help

I just posted showing I am not anti-constitution. Whereas you, in your defense of lyching, are certainly anti-constitution.

You have advocated numerous times that people's 6th amendment rights be denied.
Lynching isnt , if the judge said it’s a way to carry out a execution

If he went before a judge and was sentenced to hang, it wouldn't be a lynching. What you defended and advocated was hanging someone with a trial. That is against the US Constitution. Of course, you defended it with your "Will of the people" nonsense. Which you don't want to apply in this situation.
That’s how we work in America.. don’t like this move out.. I love me lynching

No, it is NOT how we work in America. And for the last time, I am not moving out.

But I will support law enforcement arresting someone for murdering a person by lynching them.

You say you love lynching, which is in direct violation of the US Constitution. That makes you anti-constitution and anti-America.
Americans lynch all the time lol In Afghanistan and Iraq we used to have missions will be set out to find somebody and kill them
 
You really are slow aren't you.

The US Constitution says you have the right to bear arms. It makes no mention of what type of arms.

The Gun Control Act of 1968 says that felons cannot own firearms, but makes exceptions for blackpowder arms.

So, since you CAN own blackpowder firearms, your 2nd amendment rights are not being violated and you CAN protect yourself and your family against criminals.


So no, I am not against the constitution (as you are with your advocating lynching).
I totally understand your frustration , you are realizing you are ANTI CONSTITUTION! It’s sucks to be anti American, all because your scared of me.. relax bro I won’t hurt you

My only frustration is your refusal to acknowledge what the US Constitution actually says. I am behind it 100%.

And you keep telling me you won't hurt me. You aren't listening. I already know you won't hurt me, even if you try.
Where in the original constitution does it say you can restrict my right to bear arms? Go ahead.. sit down while you look your feelings will be hurt lol

It doesn't specifically say that.

Where in the original constitution does it say you have a right to own whatever firearms criminals own?
ARMS doesn’t say limits your arms choices if you bounced a bad check lol .. you gotta grow up,, and either accept America or move out

You keep wanting to equate limiting your choice of arms with not allowing you any arms. That is not true.
 
So your saying a man Can’t defend his family from invaders because of a fight when he was 17? Lol yea who needs help

No, I am not.
Now your not? God damn make up your mind lol hahah

I made it up a long time ago, and have not changed my mind.

And just for clarity, are you talking about defending you and your family from criminals or defending the country from an invading army?
Do you need to talk to a constitutional lawyer.. poor guy..
you’re just now realizing you’re anti-American lol

A constitutional lawyer? I suggest you talk to one. You are the one who is trying to read something in the 2nd amendment that does not exist.
I have the right to bear arms is never going to change you’re never going to change it you can either be American and except the original version or you can except the second versionWhich is unAmerican
 
I just posted showing I am not anti-constitution. Whereas you, in your defense of lyching, are certainly anti-constitution.

You have advocated numerous times that people's 6th amendment rights be denied.
Lynching isnt , if the judge said it’s a way to carry out a execution

If he went before a judge and was sentenced to hang, it wouldn't be a lynching. What you defended and advocated was hanging someone with a trial. That is against the US Constitution. Of course, you defended it with your "Will of the people" nonsense. Which you don't want to apply in this situation.
That’s how we work in America.. don’t like this move out.. I love me lynching

No, it is NOT how we work in America. And for the last time, I am not moving out.

But I will support law enforcement arresting someone for murdering a person by lynching them.

You say you love lynching, which is in direct violation of the US Constitution. That makes you anti-constitution and anti-America.
Americans lynch all the time lol In Afghanistan and Iraq we used to have missions will be set out to find somebody and kill them

Yeah, in your imagination.

But do tell me how the Afghanis and Iraqis come under the US Constitution, and how they have constitutional rights.
 
Lynching isnt , if the judge said it’s a way to carry out a execution

If he went before a judge and was sentenced to hang, it wouldn't be a lynching. What you defended and advocated was hanging someone with a trial. That is against the US Constitution. Of course, you defended it with your "Will of the people" nonsense. Which you don't want to apply in this situation.
That’s how we work in America.. don’t like this move out.. I love me lynching

No, it is NOT how we work in America. And for the last time, I am not moving out.

But I will support law enforcement arresting someone for murdering a person by lynching them.

You say you love lynching, which is in direct violation of the US Constitution. That makes you anti-constitution and anti-America.
Americans lynch all the time lol In Afghanistan and Iraq we used to have missions will be set out to find somebody and kill them

Yeah, in your imagination.

But do tell me how the Afghanis and Iraqis come under the US Constitution, and how they have constitutional rights.
Huh? Who said that? Can you read? I think you have a reading disorder this is why you can’t understand the constitution lol
 
No, I am not.
Now your not? God damn make up your mind lol hahah

I made it up a long time ago, and have not changed my mind.

And just for clarity, are you talking about defending you and your family from criminals or defending the country from an invading army?
Do you need to talk to a constitutional lawyer.. poor guy..
you’re just now realizing you’re anti-American lol

A constitutional lawyer? I suggest you talk to one. You are the one who is trying to read something in the 2nd amendment that does not exist.
I have the right to bear arms is never going to change you’re never going to change it you can either be American and except the original version or you can except the second versionWhich is unAmerican

Yes you do. And blackpowder firearms are arms. So your rights have not been violated.
 
Now your not? God damn make up your mind lol hahah

I made it up a long time ago, and have not changed my mind.

And just for clarity, are you talking about defending you and your family from criminals or defending the country from an invading army?
Do you need to talk to a constitutional lawyer.. poor guy..
you’re just now realizing you’re anti-American lol

A constitutional lawyer? I suggest you talk to one. You are the one who is trying to read something in the 2nd amendment that does not exist.
I have the right to bear arms is never going to change you’re never going to change it you can either be American and except the original version or you can except the second versionWhich is unAmerican

Yes you do. And blackpowder firearms are arms. So your rights have not been violated.
That’s one arms is plural lol and that’s one type of arms.. you are learning lol
 
If he went before a judge and was sentenced to hang, it wouldn't be a lynching. What you defended and advocated was hanging someone with a trial. That is against the US Constitution. Of course, you defended it with your "Will of the people" nonsense. Which you don't want to apply in this situation.
That’s how we work in America.. don’t like this move out.. I love me lynching

No, it is NOT how we work in America. And for the last time, I am not moving out.

But I will support law enforcement arresting someone for murdering a person by lynching them.

You say you love lynching, which is in direct violation of the US Constitution. That makes you anti-constitution and anti-America.
Americans lynch all the time lol In Afghanistan and Iraq we used to have missions will be set out to find somebody and kill them

Yeah, in your imagination.

But do tell me how the Afghanis and Iraqis come under the US Constitution, and how they have constitutional rights.
Huh? Who said that? Can you read? I think you have a reading disorder this is why you can’t understand the constitution lol

Do you think the US Constitution gives rights to people in other countries?

Also, things that happen in war would be crimes in regular life.
 
Now your not? God damn make up your mind lol hahah

I made it up a long time ago, and have not changed my mind.

And just for clarity, are you talking about defending you and your family from criminals or defending the country from an invading army?
Do you need to talk to a constitutional lawyer.. poor guy..
you’re just now realizing you’re anti-American lol

A constitutional lawyer? I suggest you talk to one. You are the one who is trying to read something in the 2nd amendment that does not exist.
I have the right to bear arms is never going to change you’re never going to change it you can either be American and except the original version or you can except the second versionWhich is unAmerican

Yes you do. And blackpowder firearms are arms. So your rights have not been violated.
Black powder firearms do not require any FID or LTC in mass. However, buying and possesign the powder and firing caps themselves, you do at least need an FID.


your wring again .. again do you want free men to be able to protect their family or not?
 
15th post
I made it up a long time ago, and have not changed my mind.

And just for clarity, are you talking about defending you and your family from criminals or defending the country from an invading army?
Do you need to talk to a constitutional lawyer.. poor guy..
you’re just now realizing you’re anti-American lol

A constitutional lawyer? I suggest you talk to one. You are the one who is trying to read something in the 2nd amendment that does not exist.
I have the right to bear arms is never going to change you’re never going to change it you can either be American and except the original version or you can except the second versionWhich is unAmerican

Yes you do. And blackpowder firearms are arms. So your rights have not been violated.
That’s one arms is plural lol and that’s one type of arms.. you are learning lol

There are numerous types of blackpowder firearms.
 
That’s how we work in America.. don’t like this move out.. I love me lynching

No, it is NOT how we work in America. And for the last time, I am not moving out.

But I will support law enforcement arresting someone for murdering a person by lynching them.

You say you love lynching, which is in direct violation of the US Constitution. That makes you anti-constitution and anti-America.
Americans lynch all the time lol In Afghanistan and Iraq we used to have missions will be set out to find somebody and kill them

Yeah, in your imagination.

But do tell me how the Afghanis and Iraqis come under the US Constitution, and how they have constitutional rights.
Huh? Who said that? Can you read? I think you have a reading disorder this is why you can’t understand the constitution lol

Do you think the US Constitution gives rights to people in other countries?

Also, things that happen in war would be crimes in regular life.
Americans carry out lynching all the time in Afghanistan and Iraq, Vietnam wwtwo
 
Do you need to talk to a constitutional lawyer.. poor guy..
you’re just now realizing you’re anti-American lol

A constitutional lawyer? I suggest you talk to one. You are the one who is trying to read something in the 2nd amendment that does not exist.
I have the right to bear arms is never going to change you’re never going to change it you can either be American and except the original version or you can except the second versionWhich is unAmerican

Yes you do. And blackpowder firearms are arms. So your rights have not been violated.
That’s one arms is plural lol and that’s one type of arms.. you are learning lol

There are numerous types of blackpowder firearms.
Where does it say felons are limited to black powder revolvers? That’s not what the Constitution says sir.. So again do you except the original version of the constitution yes or no
 
I made it up a long time ago, and have not changed my mind.

And just for clarity, are you talking about defending you and your family from criminals or defending the country from an invading army?
Do you need to talk to a constitutional lawyer.. poor guy..
you’re just now realizing you’re anti-American lol

A constitutional lawyer? I suggest you talk to one. You are the one who is trying to read something in the 2nd amendment that does not exist.
I have the right to bear arms is never going to change you’re never going to change it you can either be American and except the original version or you can except the second versionWhich is unAmerican

Yes you do. And blackpowder firearms are arms. So your rights have not been violated.
Black powder firearms do not require any FID or LTC in mass. However, buying and possesign the powder and firing caps themselves, you do at least need an FID.


your wring again .. again do you want free men to be able to protect their family or not?

Got a link for that?
 
Back
Top Bottom