Know-Nothings Gone Wild

[WinterBorn]

A constitutional lawyer? I suggest you talk to one. You are the one who is trying to read something in the 2nd amendment that does not exist.

I have the right to bear arms is never going to change you’re never going to change it you can either be American and except the original version or you can except the second versionWhich is unAmerican

Yes you do. And blackpowder firearms are arms. So your rights have not been violated.

That’s one arms is plural lol and that’s one type of arms.. you are learning lol

There are numerous types of blackpowder firearms.

Where does it say felons are limited to black powder revolvers? That’s not what the Constitution says sir.. So again do you except the original version of the constitution yes or no

As I have said before, in plain English, the US Constitution does not say that. But the Gun Control Act of 1968 does say that. But, since it allows for the use of blackpowder firearms, the limitations do not violate your right to bear arms. You can bear arms.

By the way, how is the guy you kicked in the head?

 

[WinterBorn]

No, it is NOT how we work in America. And for the last time, I am not moving out.

But I will support law enforcement arresting someone for murdering a person by lynching them.

You say you love lynching, which is in direct violation of the US Constitution. That makes you anti-constitution and anti-America.

Americans lynch all the time lol In Afghanistan and Iraq we used to have missions will be set out to find somebody and kill them

Yeah, in your imagination.

But do tell me how the Afghanis and Iraqis come under the US Constitution, and how they have constitutional rights.

Huh? Who said that? Can you read? I think you have a reading disorder this is why you can’t understand the constitution lol

Do you think the US Constitution gives rights to people in other countries?

Also, things that happen in war would be crimes in regular life.

Americans carry out lynching all the time in Afghanistan and Iraq, Vietnam wwtwo

First of all, that is in war. Second of all, the people being lynched are not covered by the US Constitution. Just like women in Saudi Arabia do not have freedom of speech and people in England do not have the right to bear arms.

 

[Jitss617]

Do you need to talk to a constitutional lawyer.. poor guy..
you’re just now realizing you’re anti-American lol

A constitutional lawyer? I suggest you talk to one. You are the one who is trying to read something in the 2nd amendment that does not exist.

I have the right to bear arms is never going to change you’re never going to change it you can either be American and except the original version or you can except the second versionWhich is unAmerican

Yes you do. And blackpowder firearms are arms. So your rights have not been violated.

Black powder firearms do not require any FID or LTC in mass. However, buying and possesign the powder and firing caps themselves, you do at least need an FID.


your wring again .. again do you want free men to be able to protect their family or not?

Got a link for that?

Mass.gov

 

[Jitss617]

I have the right to bear arms is never going to change you’re never going to change it you can either be American and except the original version or you can except the second versionWhich is unAmerican

Yes you do. And blackpowder firearms are arms. So your rights have not been violated.

That’s one arms is plural lol and that’s one type of arms.. you are learning lol

There are numerous types of blackpowder firearms.

Where does it say felons are limited to black powder revolvers? That’s not what the Constitution says sir.. So again do you except the original version of the constitution yes or no

As I have said before, in plain English, the US Constitution does not say that. But the Gun Control Act of 1968 does say that. But, since it allows for the use of blackpowder firearms, the limitations do not violate your right to bear arms. You can bear arms.

By the way, how is the guy you kicked in the head?

Read more: This Day in History: Gun Control Act of 1968 Signed into Law
Under Creative Commons License: Attribution
Follow us: @Ammoland on Twitter | Ammoland on Facebook


Senator Chris Dodd’s father was on the Nazi tribunal after WW2. He received a copy of the Nazi gun control laws. Constitution-hating Chris Dodd used THAT VERY Nazi copy to form the 1968 GCA.
The democrats demand a socialist/communist America.
In a totalitarian Amerika, the slaves will not be allowed to own firearms.

The Tree of Liberty is long over due for a refreshing.

Now I understand why you like nazis so much

 

[Jitss617]

Americans lynch all the time lol In Afghanistan and Iraq we used to have missions will be set out to find somebody and kill them

Yeah, in your imagination.

But do tell me how the Afghanis and Iraqis come under the US Constitution, and how they have constitutional rights.

Huh? Who said that? Can you read? I think you have a reading disorder this is why you can’t understand the constitution lol

Do you think the US Constitution gives rights to people in other countries?

Also, things that happen in war would be crimes in regular life.

Americans carry out lynching all the time in Afghanistan and Iraq, Vietnam wwtwo

First of all, that is in war. Second of all, the people being lynched are not covered by the US Constitution. Just like women in Saudi Arabia do not have freedom of speech and people in England do not have the right to bear arms.

But Americans are doing it .. got cha

 

[WinterBorn]

Yes you do. And blackpowder firearms are arms. So your rights have not been violated.

That’s one arms is plural lol and that’s one type of arms.. you are learning lol

There are numerous types of blackpowder firearms.

Where does it say felons are limited to black powder revolvers? That’s not what the Constitution says sir.. So again do you except the original version of the constitution yes or no

As I have said before, in plain English, the US Constitution does not say that. But the Gun Control Act of 1968 does say that. But, since it allows for the use of blackpowder firearms, the limitations do not violate your right to bear arms. You can bear arms.

By the way, how is the guy you kicked in the head?

Read more: This Day in History: Gun Control Act of 1968 Signed into Law
Under Creative Commons License: Attribution
Follow us: @Ammoland on Twitter | Ammoland on Facebook


Senator Chris Dodd’s father was on the Nazi tribunal after WW2. He received a copy of the Nazi gun control laws. Constitution-hating Chris Dodd used THAT VERY Nazi copy to form the 1968 GCA.
The democrats demand a socialist/communist America.
In a totalitarian Amerika, the slaves will not be allowed to own firearms.

The Tree of Liberty is long over due for a refreshing.

Now I understand why you like nazis so much

A lot of republicans voted in favor of the act too.

And it is not slaves that are not allowed to own firearms (even though slavery is illegal). It is convicted felons.

 

[WinterBorn]

Yeah, in your imagination.

But do tell me how the Afghanis and Iraqis come under the US Constitution, and how they have constitutional rights.

Huh? Who said that? Can you read? I think you have a reading disorder this is why you can’t understand the constitution lol

Do you think the US Constitution gives rights to people in other countries?

Also, things that happen in war would be crimes in regular life.

Americans carry out lynching all the time in Afghanistan and Iraq, Vietnam wwtwo

First of all, that is in war. Second of all, the people being lynched are not covered by the US Constitution. Just like women in Saudi Arabia do not have freedom of speech and people in England do not have the right to bear arms.

But Americans are doing it .. got cha

You got nothing. Yes, it is Americans doing it. But they are doing it in a war zone and the victims are not American citizens. There is never a trial before killing someone when you are war.

 

[Jitss617]

That’s one arms is plural lol and that’s one type of arms.. you are learning lol

There are numerous types of blackpowder firearms.

Where does it say felons are limited to black powder revolvers? That’s not what the Constitution says sir.. So again do you except the original version of the constitution yes or no

As I have said before, in plain English, the US Constitution does not say that. But the Gun Control Act of 1968 does say that. But, since it allows for the use of blackpowder firearms, the limitations do not violate your right to bear arms. You can bear arms.

By the way, how is the guy you kicked in the head?

Read more: This Day in History: Gun Control Act of 1968 Signed into Law
Under Creative Commons License: Attribution
Follow us: @Ammoland on Twitter | Ammoland on Facebook


Senator Chris Dodd’s father was on the Nazi tribunal after WW2. He received a copy of the Nazi gun control laws. Constitution-hating Chris Dodd used THAT VERY Nazi copy to form the 1968 GCA.
The democrats demand a socialist/communist America.
In a totalitarian Amerika, the slaves will not be allowed to own firearms.

The Tree of Liberty is long over due for a refreshing.

Now I understand why you like nazis so much

A lot of republicans voted in favor of the act too.

And it is not slaves that are not allowed to own firearms (even though slavery is illegal). It is convicted felons.

And blacks live in high populated police areas in a more susceptible to getting a felony.. their for it was meant to stop blacks from owning a gun. The wording of the 1968 act resembled the 1938 act of Nazi Germany.. guess who you SIDE WITH LOL

 

[Jitss617]

Huh? Who said that? Can you read? I think you have a reading disorder this is why you can’t understand the constitution lol

Do you think the US Constitution gives rights to people in other countries?

Also, things that happen in war would be crimes in regular life.

Americans carry out lynching all the time in Afghanistan and Iraq, Vietnam wwtwo

First of all, that is in war. Second of all, the people being lynched are not covered by the US Constitution. Just like women in Saudi Arabia do not have freedom of speech and people in England do not have the right to bear arms.

But Americans are doing it .. got cha

You got nothing. Yes, it is Americans doing it. But they are doing it in a war zone and the victims are not American citizens. There is never a trial before killing someone when you are war.

Ahh so we do do it haha

 

[WinterBorn]

There are numerous types of blackpowder firearms.

Where does it say felons are limited to black powder revolvers? That’s not what the Constitution says sir.. So again do you except the original version of the constitution yes or no

As I have said before, in plain English, the US Constitution does not say that. But the Gun Control Act of 1968 does say that. But, since it allows for the use of blackpowder firearms, the limitations do not violate your right to bear arms. You can bear arms.

By the way, how is the guy you kicked in the head?

Read more: This Day in History: Gun Control Act of 1968 Signed into Law
Under Creative Commons License: Attribution
Follow us: @Ammoland on Twitter | Ammoland on Facebook


Senator Chris Dodd’s father was on the Nazi tribunal after WW2. He received a copy of the Nazi gun control laws. Constitution-hating Chris Dodd used THAT VERY Nazi copy to form the 1968 GCA.
The democrats demand a socialist/communist America.
In a totalitarian Amerika, the slaves will not be allowed to own firearms.

The Tree of Liberty is long over due for a refreshing.

Now I understand why you like nazis so much

A lot of republicans voted in favor of the act too.

And it is not slaves that are not allowed to own firearms (even though slavery is illegal). It is convicted felons.

And blacks live in high populated police areas in a more susceptible to getting a felony.. their for it was meant to stop blacks from owning a gun. The wording of the 1968 act resembled the 1938 act of Nazi Germany.. guess who you SIDE WITH LOL

In 1938 in Germany, the act was passed to confiscate all privately owned firearms. The Gun Control Act of 1968 does not do anything even close to that.

 

[WinterBorn]

Do you think the US Constitution gives rights to people in other countries?

Also, things that happen in war would be crimes in regular life.

Americans carry out lynching all the time in Afghanistan and Iraq, Vietnam wwtwo

First of all, that is in war. Second of all, the people being lynched are not covered by the US Constitution. Just like women in Saudi Arabia do not have freedom of speech and people in England do not have the right to bear arms.

But Americans are doing it .. got cha

You got nothing. Yes, it is Americans doing it. But they are doing it in a war zone and the victims are not American citizens. There is never a trial before killing someone when you are war.

Ahh so we do do it haha

So you do kill people in a war zone? Duh. Although the "we" in this case is just fellow Americans. You weren't there.

 

[Jitss617]

Where does it say felons are limited to black powder revolvers? That’s not what the Constitution says sir.. So again do you except the original version of the constitution yes or no

As I have said before, in plain English, the US Constitution does not say that. But the Gun Control Act of 1968 does say that. But, since it allows for the use of blackpowder firearms, the limitations do not violate your right to bear arms. You can bear arms.

By the way, how is the guy you kicked in the head?

Read more: This Day in History: Gun Control Act of 1968 Signed into Law
Under Creative Commons License: Attribution
Follow us: @Ammoland on Twitter | Ammoland on Facebook


Senator Chris Dodd’s father was on the Nazi tribunal after WW2. He received a copy of the Nazi gun control laws. Constitution-hating Chris Dodd used THAT VERY Nazi copy to form the 1968 GCA.
The democrats demand a socialist/communist America.
In a totalitarian Amerika, the slaves will not be allowed to own firearms.

The Tree of Liberty is long over due for a refreshing.

Now I understand why you like nazis so much

A lot of republicans voted in favor of the act too.

And it is not slaves that are not allowed to own firearms (even though slavery is illegal). It is convicted felons.

And blacks live in high populated police areas in a more susceptible to getting a felony.. their for it was meant to stop blacks from owning a gun. The wording of the 1968 act resembled the 1938 act of Nazi Germany.. guess who you SIDE WITH LOL

In 1938 in Germany, the act was passed to confiscate all privately owned firearms. The Gun Control Act of 1968 does not do anything even close to that.

50 homicides already in Chicago this year,, I can post daily pictures of people being attacked in neighborhoods that have gun free zones.. I can post daily pictures and stories storefronts being broken into and robbed. How do you feel about the 10th amendment?

 

[Jitss617]

 

[WinterBorn]

As I have said before, in plain English, the US Constitution does not say that. But the Gun Control Act of 1968 does say that. But, since it allows for the use of blackpowder firearms, the limitations do not violate your right to bear arms. You can bear arms.

By the way, how is the guy you kicked in the head?

Read more: This Day in History: Gun Control Act of 1968 Signed into Law
Under Creative Commons License: Attribution
Follow us: @Ammoland on Twitter | Ammoland on Facebook


Senator Chris Dodd’s father was on the Nazi tribunal after WW2. He received a copy of the Nazi gun control laws. Constitution-hating Chris Dodd used THAT VERY Nazi copy to form the 1968 GCA.
The democrats demand a socialist/communist America.
In a totalitarian Amerika, the slaves will not be allowed to own firearms.

The Tree of Liberty is long over due for a refreshing.

Now I understand why you like nazis so much

A lot of republicans voted in favor of the act too.

And it is not slaves that are not allowed to own firearms (even though slavery is illegal). It is convicted felons.

And blacks live in high populated police areas in a more susceptible to getting a felony.. their for it was meant to stop blacks from owning a gun. The wording of the 1968 act resembled the 1938 act of Nazi Germany.. guess who you SIDE WITH LOL

In 1938 in Germany, the act was passed to confiscate all privately owned firearms. The Gun Control Act of 1968 does not do anything even close to that.

50 homicides already in Chicago this year,, I can post daily pictures of people being attacked in neighborhoods that have gun free zones.. I can post daily pictures and stories storefronts being broken into and robbed. How do you feel about the 10th amendment?

And all of those things are illegal. And we are not talking about gun free zones. Those are pure lunacy propped up by the Democrats.

I feel great about the 10th amendment.

 

[WinterBorn]

View attachment 311498

It still says nothing about the type of firearm or any guarantee that you can own the same type as the criminals. Just that you be allowed to bear arms.


And, once again, to clarify, when you talk about protecting your family from invaders, do you mean criminals or an invading foreign army?

 

[Jitss617]

Read more: This Day in History: Gun Control Act of 1968 Signed into Law
Under Creative Commons License: Attribution
Follow us: @Ammoland on Twitter | Ammoland on Facebook


Senator Chris Dodd’s father was on the Nazi tribunal after WW2. He received a copy of the Nazi gun control laws. Constitution-hating Chris Dodd used THAT VERY Nazi copy to form the 1968 GCA.
The democrats demand a socialist/communist America.
In a totalitarian Amerika, the slaves will not be allowed to own firearms.

The Tree of Liberty is long over due for a refreshing.

Now I understand why you like nazis so much

A lot of republicans voted in favor of the act too.

And it is not slaves that are not allowed to own firearms (even though slavery is illegal). It is convicted felons.

And blacks live in high populated police areas in a more susceptible to getting a felony.. their for it was meant to stop blacks from owning a gun. The wording of the 1968 act resembled the 1938 act of Nazi Germany.. guess who you SIDE WITH LOL

In 1938 in Germany, the act was passed to confiscate all privately owned firearms. The Gun Control Act of 1968 does not do anything even close to that.

50 homicides already in Chicago this year,, I can post daily pictures of people being attacked in neighborhoods that have gun free zones.. I can post daily pictures and stories storefronts being broken into and robbed. How do you feel about the 10th amendment?

And all of those things are illegal. And we are not talking about gun free zones. Those are pure lunacy propped up by the Democrats.

I feel great about the 10th amendment.

So you agree no federal amendments.. Chicago is a gun free zone, it’s almost impossible for a black to own a gun in New York with out hiring a lawyer, I could have bought a black powder gun and ammo and would have been in jail for 10 years lol. You are a moooron

 

[Jitss617]

View attachment 311498

It still says nothing about the type of firearm or any guarantee that you can own the same type as the criminals. Just that you be allowed to bear arms.


And, once again, to clarify, when you talk about protecting your family from invaders, do you mean criminals or an invading foreign army?

You can’t infringe on my rights,, go away loser.. good byyyye lol

 

[WinterBorn]

View attachment 311498

It still says nothing about the type of firearm or any guarantee that you can own the same type as the criminals. Just that you be allowed to bear arms.


And, once again, to clarify, when you talk about protecting your family from invaders, do you mean criminals or an invading foreign army?

You can’t infringe on my rights,, go away loser.. good byyyye lol

I'm not.

Why not answer the question? Is it too difficult?

 

[WinterBorn]

A lot of republicans voted in favor of the act too.

And it is not slaves that are not allowed to own firearms (even though slavery is illegal). It is convicted felons.

And blacks live in high populated police areas in a more susceptible to getting a felony.. their for it was meant to stop blacks from owning a gun. The wording of the 1968 act resembled the 1938 act of Nazi Germany.. guess who you SIDE WITH LOL

In 1938 in Germany, the act was passed to confiscate all privately owned firearms. The Gun Control Act of 1968 does not do anything even close to that.

50 homicides already in Chicago this year,, I can post daily pictures of people being attacked in neighborhoods that have gun free zones.. I can post daily pictures and stories storefronts being broken into and robbed. How do you feel about the 10th amendment?

And all of those things are illegal. And we are not talking about gun free zones. Those are pure lunacy propped up by the Democrats.

I feel great about the 10th amendment.

So you agree no federal amendments.. Chicago is a gun free zone, it’s almost impossible for a black to own a gun in New York with out hiring a lawyer, I could have bought a black powder gun and ammo and would have been in jail for 10 years lol. You are a moooron

No federal amendments? You mean like what is contained in the Bill of Rights?

 

[Jitss617]

View attachment 311498

It still says nothing about the type of firearm or any guarantee that you can own the same type as the criminals. Just that you be allowed to bear arms.


And, once again, to clarify, when you talk about protecting your family from invaders, do you mean criminals or an invading foreign army?

You can’t infringe on my rights,, go away loser.. good byyyye lol

I'm not.

Why not answer the question? Is it too difficult?

I’m talking about anti-Americans like you that want to infringe on my right to protect my family hunt for food to feed my family.. you gotta go.. the wave is coming If I were you I would honestly stop posting about your anti-American rants