Know-Nothings Gone Wild

[WinterBorn]

As violent as you claim to be, and with as little self discipline as you obviously possess, I have no doubt you would end up shooting someone because they verbally insulted you or even spoke Spanish in a private conversation.

I am not scared of you. I am worried for those around you.

That’s America.. you can’t live here

Then man up and come down to Atlanta and try to send me out of the country. Come on, big boy, give it your best shot.
I am an American citizen. I am not going anywhere.

I can’t leave Massachusetts I’m currently a felon

Then it sounds like you don't have a say in my staying here. (of course you never did)

Jitss is trolling you Winterborn.

At least I hope that is trolling.

If he is for real he needs some serious counseling.

His need for counseling is real.

 

[JimBowie1958]

True. But I am not talking about case law. I am talking about his claiming the 2nd amendment says he can have the same guns criminals have. It says nothing of the sort, nor does any case law support his opinion.

Well what he is saying amounts to 'There can be no laws governing weapons or regulation of them' if his stance is literally that we have the same legal rights in carrying weapons that criminals use, which is to ignore the law completely.

IMO, only felons forfeit Constitutional rights regarding weapons, and nonfelons have the right to carry anything they want, ammended by common sense weapons control laws that are state and local municipality.

If I want to carry a razor sharp sword downtown with me, that can be provocative and is really obsolete for self defense anyway, so I think local laws are well within the 2A to limit them.

But weapons that are effective for self defense should not be restricted to law abiding citizens of the USA, such as guns, knives and subdual devices like pepper spray and tazors.

We should be MUCH BETTER ARMED than criminals.

 

[Muhammed]

According to the news report, the police are saying that the girls attacked because they thought the other girls were making fun of them rather than because they were speaking Spanish.

...which is because they were speaking spanish, not english. This is why they yelled, "This is America, speak English!"

yes, they were attacked for speaking spanish.

That is a stupid assumption, you feeble-minded, easily brainwashed moron.

 

[JimBowie1958]

According to the news report, the police are saying that the girls attacked because they thought the other girls were making fun of them rather than because they were speaking Spanish.

...which is because they were speaking spanish, not english. This is why they yelled, "This is America, speak English!"
yes, they were attacked for speaking spanish.

That is a stupid assumption, you feeble-minded, easily brainwashed moron.

To the 'mind' of Woketards like Fart Fun, the only reason anyone might say 'Speak English!' is because, in their shallow and uncreative minds, that would be the sole reason for ever saying such a thing. They cannot imagine one would be simply insulting the other by implying that they couldnt speak English, as though they were just off the boat or too stupid to do so.

 

[Unkotare]

According to the local news, the women (drunk as hell) thought the woman and her child were talking about them.

 

[Jitss617]

...
I can’t leave Massachusetts ....

You've most likely never been to Massachusetts, so that shouldn't be a problem.

Ok troll

 

[Jitss617]

You just said the second amendment original version said felons can’t have arms everyone else has.. you need to read more

No I did not.

What I said was "The US Constitution does not say anything about having the same arms as the invaders have". So you being restricted to blackpowder weapons is not a violation of the 2nd amendment.

Yes I have a right to bear arms not powder guns lol haha to easy ... you could honestly win a conversation if you were for the right things in life if you were for the constitution.. This is why you can’t win arguments against me

"powder guns"?

Blackpowder firearms are arms. And the US Constitution only mentions "arms".

Yes arms lol u are learning

Junior, I have forgotten more about firearms than you will ever know.

The problem is, you want the US Constitution to be the ONLY law in this case. It isn't. But since you do have options (that do not include ARs and other cartridge weapons), and CAN own arms, it is not in violation of the 2nd amendment.

And, since you believe the "will of the people" can over rule the US Constitution, the will of the people was that felons can't own guns.

That’s not what the constitution says.. I’m just pointing out you are against the constitution..

 

[Jitss617]

As violent as you claim to be, and with as little self discipline as you obviously possess, I have no doubt you would end up shooting someone because they verbally insulted you or even spoke Spanish in a private conversation.

I am not scared of you. I am worried for those around you.

That’s America.. you can’t live here

Then man up and come down to Atlanta and try to send me out of the country. Come on, big boy, give it your best shot.
I am an American citizen. I am not going anywhere.

I can’t leave Massachusetts I’m currently a felon

Then it sounds like you don't have a say in my staying here. (of course you never did)

Jitss is trolling you Winterborn.

At least I hope that is trolling.

If he is for real he needs some serious counseling.

Lol I need counseling? He’s anti constitution, anti trump. He’s the one that’s needs help

 

[WinterBorn]

No I did not.

What I said was "The US Constitution does not say anything about having the same arms as the invaders have". So you being restricted to blackpowder weapons is not a violation of the 2nd amendment.

Yes I have a right to bear arms not powder guns lol haha to easy ... you could honestly win a conversation if you were for the right things in life if you were for the constitution.. This is why you can’t win arguments against me

"powder guns"?

Blackpowder firearms are arms. And the US Constitution only mentions "arms".

Yes arms lol u are learning

Junior, I have forgotten more about firearms than you will ever know.

The problem is, you want the US Constitution to be the ONLY law in this case. It isn't. But since you do have options (that do not include ARs and other cartridge weapons), and CAN own arms, it is not in violation of the 2nd amendment.

And, since you believe the "will of the people" can over rule the US Constitution, the will of the people was that felons can't own guns.

That’s not what the constitution says.. I’m just pointing out you are against the constitution..

You really are slow aren't you.

The US Constitution says you have the right to bear arms. It makes no mention of what type of arms.

The Gun Control Act of 1968 says that felons cannot own firearms, but makes exceptions for blackpowder arms.

So, since you CAN own blackpowder firearms, your 2nd amendment rights are not being violated and you CAN protect yourself and your family against criminals.


So no, I am not against the constitution (as you are with your advocating lynching).

 

[Jitss617]

True. But I am not talking about case law. I am talking about his claiming the 2nd amendment says he can have the same guns criminals have. It says nothing of the sort, nor does any case law support his opinion.

Well what he is saying amounts to 'There can be no laws governing weapons or regulation of them' if his stance is literally that we have the same legal rights in carrying weapons that criminals use, which is to ignore the law completely.

IMO, only felons forfeit Constitutional rights regarding weapons, and nonfelons have the right to carry anything they want, ammended by common sense weapons control laws that are state and local municipality.

If I want to carry a razor sharp sword downtown with me, that can be provocative and is really obsolete for self defense anyway, so I think local laws are well within the 2A to limit them.

But weapons that are effective for self defense should not be restricted to law abiding citizens of the USA, such as guns, knives and subdual devices like pepper spray and tazors.

We should be MUCH BETTER ARMED than criminals.

So your saying a man Can’t defend his family from invaders because of a fight when he was 17? Lol yea who needs help

 

[WinterBorn]

That’s America.. you can’t live here

Then man up and come down to Atlanta and try to send me out of the country. Come on, big boy, give it your best shot.
I am an American citizen. I am not going anywhere.

I can’t leave Massachusetts I’m currently a felon

Then it sounds like you don't have a say in my staying here. (of course you never did)

Jitss is trolling you Winterborn.

At least I hope that is trolling.

If he is for real he needs some serious counseling.

Lol I need counseling? He’s anti constitution, anti trump. He’s the one that’s needs help

I just posted showing I am not anti-constitution. Whereas you, in your defense of lyching, are certainly anti-constitution.

You have advocated numerous times that people's 6th amendment rights be denied.

 

[WinterBorn]

True. But I am not talking about case law. I am talking about his claiming the 2nd amendment says he can have the same guns criminals have. It says nothing of the sort, nor does any case law support his opinion.

Well what he is saying amounts to 'There can be no laws governing weapons or regulation of them' if his stance is literally that we have the same legal rights in carrying weapons that criminals use, which is to ignore the law completely.

IMO, only felons forfeit Constitutional rights regarding weapons, and nonfelons have the right to carry anything they want, ammended by common sense weapons control laws that are state and local municipality.

If I want to carry a razor sharp sword downtown with me, that can be provocative and is really obsolete for self defense anyway, so I think local laws are well within the 2A to limit them.

But weapons that are effective for self defense should not be restricted to law abiding citizens of the USA, such as guns, knives and subdual devices like pepper spray and tazors.

We should be MUCH BETTER ARMED than criminals.

So your saying a man Can’t defend his family from invaders because of a fight when he was 17? Lol yea who needs help

No, I am not.

 

[Jitss617]

Yes I have a right to bear arms not powder guns lol haha to easy ... you could honestly win a conversation if you were for the right things in life if you were for the constitution.. This is why you can’t win arguments against me

"powder guns"?

Blackpowder firearms are arms. And the US Constitution only mentions "arms".

Yes arms lol u are learning

Junior, I have forgotten more about firearms than you will ever know.

The problem is, you want the US Constitution to be the ONLY law in this case. It isn't. But since you do have options (that do not include ARs and other cartridge weapons), and CAN own arms, it is not in violation of the 2nd amendment.

And, since you believe the "will of the people" can over rule the US Constitution, the will of the people was that felons can't own guns.

That’s not what the constitution says.. I’m just pointing out you are against the constitution..

You really are slow aren't you.

The US Constitution says you have the right to bear arms. It makes no mention of what type of arms.

The Gun Control Act of 1968 says that felons cannot own firearms, but makes exceptions for blackpowder arms.

So, since you CAN own blackpowder firearms, your 2nd amendment rights are not being violated and you CAN protect yourself and your family against criminals.


So no, I am not against the constitution (as you are with your advocating lynching).

I totally understand your frustration , you are realizing you are ANTI CONSTITUTION! It’s sucks to be anti American, all because your scared of me.. relax bro I won’t hurt you

 

[Jitss617]

Then man up and come down to Atlanta and try to send me out of the country. Come on, big boy, give it your best shot.
I am an American citizen. I am not going anywhere.

I can’t leave Massachusetts I’m currently a felon

Then it sounds like you don't have a say in my staying here. (of course you never did)

Jitss is trolling you Winterborn.

At least I hope that is trolling.

If he is for real he needs some serious counseling.

Lol I need counseling? He’s anti constitution, anti trump. He’s the one that’s needs help

I just posted showing I am not anti-constitution. Whereas you, in your defense of lyching, are certainly anti-constitution.

You have advocated numerous times that people's 6th amendment rights be denied.

Lynching isnt , if the judge said it’s a way to carry out a execution

 

[Jitss617]

True. But I am not talking about case law. I am talking about his claiming the 2nd amendment says he can have the same guns criminals have. It says nothing of the sort, nor does any case law support his opinion.

Well what he is saying amounts to 'There can be no laws governing weapons or regulation of them' if his stance is literally that we have the same legal rights in carrying weapons that criminals use, which is to ignore the law completely.

IMO, only felons forfeit Constitutional rights regarding weapons, and nonfelons have the right to carry anything they want, ammended by common sense weapons control laws that are state and local municipality.

If I want to carry a razor sharp sword downtown with me, that can be provocative and is really obsolete for self defense anyway, so I think local laws are well within the 2A to limit them.

But weapons that are effective for self defense should not be restricted to law abiding citizens of the USA, such as guns, knives and subdual devices like pepper spray and tazors.

We should be MUCH BETTER ARMED than criminals.

So your saying a man Can’t defend his family from invaders because of a fight when he was 17? Lol yea who needs help

No, I am not.

Now your not? God damn make up your mind lol hahah

 

[WinterBorn]

"powder guns"?

Blackpowder firearms are arms. And the US Constitution only mentions "arms".

Yes arms lol u are learning

Junior, I have forgotten more about firearms than you will ever know.

The problem is, you want the US Constitution to be the ONLY law in this case. It isn't. But since you do have options (that do not include ARs and other cartridge weapons), and CAN own arms, it is not in violation of the 2nd amendment.

And, since you believe the "will of the people" can over rule the US Constitution, the will of the people was that felons can't own guns.

That’s not what the constitution says.. I’m just pointing out you are against the constitution..

You really are slow aren't you.

The US Constitution says you have the right to bear arms. It makes no mention of what type of arms.

The Gun Control Act of 1968 says that felons cannot own firearms, but makes exceptions for blackpowder arms.

So, since you CAN own blackpowder firearms, your 2nd amendment rights are not being violated and you CAN protect yourself and your family against criminals.


So no, I am not against the constitution (as you are with your advocating lynching).

I totally understand your frustration , you are realizing you are ANTI CONSTITUTION! It’s sucks to be anti American, all because your scared of me.. relax bro I won’t hurt you

My only frustration is your refusal to acknowledge what the US Constitution actually says. I am behind it 100%.

And you keep telling me you won't hurt me. You aren't listening. I already know you won't hurt me, even if you try.

 

[WinterBorn]

I can’t leave Massachusetts I’m currently a felon

Then it sounds like you don't have a say in my staying here. (of course you never did)

Jitss is trolling you Winterborn.

At least I hope that is trolling.

If he is for real he needs some serious counseling.

Lol I need counseling? He’s anti constitution, anti trump. He’s the one that’s needs help

I just posted showing I am not anti-constitution. Whereas you, in your defense of lyching, are certainly anti-constitution.

You have advocated numerous times that people's 6th amendment rights be denied.

Lynching isnt , if the judge said it’s a way to carry out a execution

If he went before a judge and was sentenced to hang, it wouldn't be a lynching. What you defended and advocated was hanging someone with a trial. That is against the US Constitution. Of course, you defended it with your "Will of the people" nonsense. Which you don't want to apply in this situation.

 

[WinterBorn]

True. But I am not talking about case law. I am talking about his claiming the 2nd amendment says he can have the same guns criminals have. It says nothing of the sort, nor does any case law support his opinion.

Well what he is saying amounts to 'There can be no laws governing weapons or regulation of them' if his stance is literally that we have the same legal rights in carrying weapons that criminals use, which is to ignore the law completely.

IMO, only felons forfeit Constitutional rights regarding weapons, and nonfelons have the right to carry anything they want, ammended by common sense weapons control laws that are state and local municipality.

If I want to carry a razor sharp sword downtown with me, that can be provocative and is really obsolete for self defense anyway, so I think local laws are well within the 2A to limit them.

But weapons that are effective for self defense should not be restricted to law abiding citizens of the USA, such as guns, knives and subdual devices like pepper spray and tazors.

We should be MUCH BETTER ARMED than criminals.

So your saying a man Can’t defend his family from invaders because of a fight when he was 17? Lol yea who needs help

No, I am not.

Now your not? God damn make up your mind lol hahah

I made it up a long time ago, and have not changed my mind.

And just for clarity, are you talking about defending you and your family from criminals or defending the country from an invading army?

 

[Jitss617]

Yes arms lol u are learning

Junior, I have forgotten more about firearms than you will ever know.

The problem is, you want the US Constitution to be the ONLY law in this case. It isn't. But since you do have options (that do not include ARs and other cartridge weapons), and CAN own arms, it is not in violation of the 2nd amendment.

And, since you believe the "will of the people" can over rule the US Constitution, the will of the people was that felons can't own guns.

That’s not what the constitution says.. I’m just pointing out you are against the constitution..

You really are slow aren't you.

The US Constitution says you have the right to bear arms. It makes no mention of what type of arms.

The Gun Control Act of 1968 says that felons cannot own firearms, but makes exceptions for blackpowder arms.

So, since you CAN own blackpowder firearms, your 2nd amendment rights are not being violated and you CAN protect yourself and your family against criminals.


So no, I am not against the constitution (as you are with your advocating lynching).

I totally understand your frustration , you are realizing you are ANTI CONSTITUTION! It’s sucks to be anti American, all because your scared of me.. relax bro I won’t hurt you

My only frustration is your refusal to acknowledge what the US Constitution actually says. I am behind it 100%.

And you keep telling me you won't hurt me. You aren't listening. I already know you won't hurt me, even if you try.

Where in the original constitution does it say you can restrict my right to bear arms? Go ahead.. sit down while you look your feelings will be hurt lol

 

[Jitss617]

Then it sounds like you don't have a say in my staying here. (of course you never did)

Jitss is trolling you Winterborn.

At least I hope that is trolling.

If he is for real he needs some serious counseling.

Lol I need counseling? He’s anti constitution, anti trump. He’s the one that’s needs help

I just posted showing I am not anti-constitution. Whereas you, in your defense of lyching, are certainly anti-constitution.

You have advocated numerous times that people's 6th amendment rights be denied.

Lynching isnt , if the judge said it’s a way to carry out a execution

If he went before a judge and was sentenced to hang, it wouldn't be a lynching. What you defended and advocated was hanging someone with a trial. That is against the US Constitution. Of course, you defended it with your "Will of the people" nonsense. Which you don't want to apply in this situation.

That’s how we work in America.. don’t like this move out.. I love me lynching