Kim Davis to join the GOP...

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Had she done her job no one would have heard of her.

Yet she did her job and her name is a household name, she is known the around the world as a woman of impeccable principle. Who can be counted on to DO HER job in the face of profound adversity.

It's a real resume enhancer.

What she's known as is a hypocritical ****...

Only by children and fools. And no American gives a single **** about what you people say, because you can't sustain a word of it and it is subject to change without notice.

(Ya see scamp, that's sorta the downside to being foolish... . On the bright side, children often outgrow their foolish nature. Now, again... how old are you?)

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Do not edit my post to change it's meaning. ...

The meaning of your posts weren't changed, asshat. The posts were edited to cull irrelevance from them, so as to sharpen your point.

But in fairness to you, as an imbecile, there was no way you could have known that.

Reader, let's review how the above cited imbecile came to its current humiliation, cited above: The above cited imbecile referred to another as a Bigot. I pointed out that the use of the word was a demonstration of that which it came to lament. ... it then challenged me to define to word... we pick it up there:

Bigot: a person who is bigoted

Bigoted: having or revealing an obstinate belief in the superiority of one's own opinions and a prejudiced intolerance of the opinions of others

I don't care if her religion tells her ... she is a bigot.

Now... that is HAPPYJOY: revealing an obstinate belief in the superiority of its own opinion and a prejudiced intolerance of the opinion of others.

See how that works? (This is what is otherwise known as a "Paradox". Perhaps it should look THAT up. It might spare it from this sort of humiliation, in the future.)

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Had she done her job no one would have heard of her.

Yet she did her job and her name is a household name, she is known the around the world as a woman of impeccable principle. Who can be counted on to DO HER job in the face of profound adversity.

It's a real resume enhancer.

What she's known as is a hypocritical ****...

Only by children and fools. And no American gives a single **** about what you people say, because you can't sustain a word of it and it is subject to change without notice.

(Ya see scamp, that's sorta the downside to being foolish... . On the bright side, children often outgrow their foolish nature. Now, again... how old are you?)

You and Kim are only slightly more offensive to Jesus than Pilate, and Judas.

 

[HappyJoy]

Do not edit my post to change it's meaning. ...

The meaning of your posts weren't changed, asshat. The posts were edited to cull irrelevance from them, so as to sharpen your point.

But in fairness to you, as an imbecile, there was no way you could have known that.

I'll say it again, do not edit my posts to change or remove (is that better?) their meaning. It's dishonest.

When in doubt, if you are quoting me and not sure of the implication of the edits you make, then don't quote me.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

It will say a lot...about the people in her county.

She will be re-elected by a landslide... by the Americans in her county.

The people who would vote for her are not, and never will be, Americans.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

I'll say it again...

Ok... Suit yourself:

The meaning of your posts weren't changed, asshat. The posts were edited to cull irrelevance from them, so as to sharpen your point.

But in fairness to you, as an imbecile, there was no way you could have known that.

Reader, let's review how the above cited imbecile came to its current humiliation, cited above: The above cited imbecile referred to another as a Bigot. I pointed out that the use of the word was a demonstration of that which it came to lament. ... it then challenged me to define to word... we pick it up there:

Bigot: a person who is bigoted

Bigoted: having or revealing an obstinate belief in the superiority of one's own opinions and a prejudiced intolerance of the opinions of others

I don't care if her religion tells her ... she is a bigot.

Now... that is HAPPYJOY: revealing an obstinate belief in the superiority of its own opinion and a prejudiced intolerance of the opinion of others.

See how that works? (This is what is otherwise known as a "Paradox". Perhaps it should look THAT up. It might spare it from this sort of humiliation, in the future.)

 

[NYcarbineer]

I told you she wasn't a real Democrat lol.

Davis is the only one who determined that there was no room for her with democrats

No, that fact was a given before she chose to do it. The Democrats already were intolerant. It's been evident from the get-go. If someone cannot find support for their viewpoints within their own party, that's to me, very sad, and very telling as to how much they value free thought.

What's tolerant about denying people a marriage license?

 

[NYcarbineer]

Well this only speaks to the tolerance (or lack thereof) of the Democratic Party.

She needs to do the job she was elected to, but this intolerance for her viewpoints only speak ill of Democrats.

The intolerance of asking her to do her job? How dare they!

If you would read once in your life Aaron, I said "She needs to do the job she was elected to."


Just set aside her duties as a clerk for a moment, and simply look at the intellectual and philosophical McCarthyism going on within your own (I presume you are a Democrat/Liberal) party. Like I said, there is no tolerance for opposing views or beliefs, not in your party, or the party I used to belong to.

Oh, and you're going to bed without your cheeseburgers tonight.

I'm a Libertarian and Republicans are the only of the two big parties I have ever considered voting for. Presuming makes an ass out of ... Wait... That's not how it goes.

I'm a libertarian (little 'l'), too. She should be doing her job. That's it. That's all.

She is doing her job. That's why she's being persecuted.

No, denying marriage licenses is not her job. Issuing marriage licenses is her job.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Can't blame her, you idiot dems demonized her.

You can't demonize the Devil; he is already there.

 

[HappyJoy]

I'll say it again...

Ok... Suit yourself:

The meaning of your posts weren't changed, asshat. The posts were edited to cull irrelevance from them, so as to sharpen your point.

But in fairness to you, as an imbecile, there was no way you could have known that.

Reader, let's review how the above cited imbecile came to its current humiliation, cited above: The above cited imbecile referred to another as a Bigot. I pointed out that the use of the word was a demonstration of that which it came to lament. ... she then challenged me to define to word... we pick it up there:

Bigot: a person who is bigoted

Bigoted: having or revealing an obstinate belief in the superiority of one's own opinions and a prejudiced intolerance of the opinions of others

I don't care if her religion tells her ... she is a bigot.

Now... that is HAPPYJOY: revealing an obstinate belief in the superiority of its own opinion and a prejudiced intolerance of the opinion of others.

See how that works? (This is what is otherwise known as a "Paradox". Perhaps it should look THAT up. It might spare it from this sort of humiliation, in the future.)

This is what I said, I've bolded the parts that you quoted. Clearly, you altered the meaning of my post.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What are you 12?

I don't care about her religion. She can practice it how she wants on her own time, she can stand out on the street corner claiming gay marriage will send us all to hell, that is her right and I would never get in the way of that. My opinion is not superior to hers as I'm not forcing my views on her or stating that my views take precedent over hers.

It's her job to follow the law as an employee of the state. She is a bigot because she thinks her views on gay marriage ARE superior to gays trying to get marriage licenses and the law backs up those gay couples. This by definition makes her a bigot according to the definition you posted. What do you think about that Einstein?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

You are dishonest or incapable of actually replying to my post so you made some empty strawman out of it instead.

If you are unclear of the implications you make by quoting me and then gutting my post then don't do it.

 

[NYcarbineer]

She would probably be even MORE accepted had she joined ISIS.

Now that's funny.

It's also funny how none of you condemn ISIS for its views on homosexuals, but are willing to wage war on a single person for holding to their religious beliefs. Tell me, you impetuous little troll, where's that tolerance of yours?

I mean, when you have no argument, you either compare people to terrorists... or to Hitler, like Debbie Wasserman Schultz did to Marco Rubio.

It's about time I put you on my ignore list.

Name ANY liberal on this board who expressed support for ISIS's treatment of homosexuals.

 

[NYcarbineer]

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/26/u...riage-dispute-kim-davis-joining-gop.html?_r=0

I guess the dummies calling her a Democrat can rest their typing fingers now. She is finally switching parties BECAUSE of her stance on gay marriage.

Well this only speaks to the tolerance (or lack thereof) of the Democratic Party.

She needs to do the job she was elected to, but this intolerance for her viewpoints only speak ill of Democrats.

The Right's definition of 'intolerance'

"They won't let us discriminate!"

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

The people who would vote for her are not, and never will be, Americans.

ROFLMNAO!

Imagine an irony SO SWEET... that a Leftist comes to define "American"?

Understand Reader, an American is one who recognizes, respects, defends and adheres TO to the principles that define America.

It is through this certainty that we can know that:

THERE ARE NO LEFTIST AMERICANS!​

And that is because Nature precludes the means for one to simultaneously adhere to both the Thesis and the Antithesis.

And FTR: The above cited would-be "Contributor", is not a US Citizen... it is a mouthy British Socialist POSING as a US Citizen... as a means to deceive YOU... the Reader of this August board.

Remember, the Ideological Left is wholly unprincipled, resting entirely upon Relativism... and represents nothing beyond:

Deceit, FRAUD and Ignorance.​

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Name ANY liberal on this board who expressed support for ISIS... .

You. And you've done so through your undying support for the Founder of ISIS, one barack hussein obama.

Along with every other Leftist on this board and everywhere else on this PLANET!

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

The Right's definition of 'intolerance'

"They won't let us discriminate!"

ROFL! Poor Gilligan!

Discrimination: the ability to discern good judgment from poor judgement; sound behavior from unsound behavior; right from wrong.

 

[nat4900]

I must point out, that if you want to claim to be tolerant, then you would be tolerant of those mired in intolerance, in other words, you wouldn't care. Each man and woman are entitled to their opinions. Neither you or I are in such a position to attempt to convince them of it.

I actually agree and you're correct, I DO NOT care if Davis is an intolerant hick.......and NO ONE on the left is in any way telling her to deny her religious tenets.....This whole moronic tale could have ended if she simply QUIT her post on the basis that she could NOT perform her duties.

(Instead she opted for her notoriety fueled by other intolerant nitwits.)

 

[nat4900]

She is doing her job. That's why she's being persecuted.

Her job description states that she should NOT give marriage license to gays?????

The things you learn from the children on this board....amazing.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

No, denying marriage licenses is not her job. Issuing marriage licenses is her job.

The Law in Kentucky defines Marriage as the Joining of One Man and One Woman. The SCOTUS voted and it turned out that 5 of 9 people on the court decided that it's not fair to preclude people wholly unsuited for marriage, from marriage.

But in reality, the marriage standard, like every other standards, exists for the expressed purpose of exclude people who fail to rise to the threshold defended by the standard. It's what standards DO.

You "FEEL" that the SCOTUS divining law, changes law, when in truth, the SCOTUS does not make law... having no power in the US Constitution to Legislate, which is constitutionally... the exclusive domain of the Legislature.

What you fail to understand, is that the people of the US are becoming sick and tired of you idiots... and many states are now in full fledge defiance of the US Federal Government.

Mrs. Davis represents those people and the Constitution upon which she and her constituent consented to be governed.... and she is in full defiance of the US Federal Judicial Branch, which has decided to become the SUPREME LEGISLATURE.

Now... we're prepared to go to war over it.

So, if you're prepared to do the same, I say LET THE GAMES BEGIN!

Please let me know what ya decide at your earliest convenience.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

The people who would vote for her are not, and never will be, Americans.

ROFLMNAO!

Imagine an irony SO SWEET... that a Leftist comes to define "American"?

Understand Reader, an American is one who recognizes, respects, defends and adheres TO to the principles that define America.

It is through this certainty that we can know that:

THERE ARE NO LEFTIST AMERICANS!​

And that is because Nature precludes the means for one to simultaneously adhere to both the Thesis and the Antithesis.

And FTR: The above cited would-be "Contributor", is not a US Citizen... it is a mouthy British Socialist POSING as a US Citizen... as a means to deceive YOU... the Reader of this August board.

Remember, the Ideological Left is wholly unprincipled, resting entirely upon Relativism... and represents nothing beyond:

Deceit, FRAUD and Ignorance.​

Equality before the state is one basic principle, and there are others I won't trouble you with.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Name ANY liberal on this board who expressed support for ISIS... .

You. And you've done so through your undying support for the Founder of ISIS, one barack hussein obama.

Along with every other Leftist on this board and everywhere else on this PLANET!

Nice meltdown. You're on the board for this week's best meltdown award.