Kim Davis to join the GOP...

[SwimExpert]

It has no kinship with the Charter of American Principle declared at the Founding of our nation

 

[Mertex]

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/26/u...riage-dispute-kim-davis-joining-gop.html?_r=0

I guess the dummies calling her a Democrat can rest their typing fingers now. She is finally switching parties BECAUSE of her stance on gay marriage.

Good.......we don't really need a whacko in our party.

Yeah.....your party has so many...one less wacko won't hurt.

Says the one who supports the "clown" candidates...........

 

[Mertex]

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/26/u...riage-dispute-kim-davis-joining-gop.html?_r=0

I guess the dummies calling her a Democrat can rest their typing fingers now. She is finally switching parties BECAUSE of her stance on gay marriage.

If I may, let me then summarize the above:

Davis shows a lack of tolerance toward existing laws which is a requisite in implementing her elected position......

She then decides to join a party which supports her lack of tolerance and breach of existing laws.....

Ergo, the republican party is LESS tolerant and LESS law-abiding?

Just asking.......

When Obama decides to follow all of our laws instead of just the ones he likes....you'll have room to talk......but not until then.

Which ones are you talking about specifically? Because it has become quite obvious that Republicans/conservatives make up shit that doesn't exist and then just never explain when they are confronted.

I'll wait!

 

[Mertex]

At the same moment you say this...you're showing a lack of tolerance.

Exactly how am I showing lack of tolerance. Questioning the meaning of a person's statement doesn't equate to iintolerance.....red herring.

 

[Mertex]

But this fake belief that Republicans are less law-abiding in this case.....especially since this woman is a Democrat, is totally unfounded. I suspect you're projecting her supposed sins unto the GOP, and that is dishonest.

Yep, she claims to be a Democrat......but she finally realized that Democrats don't support her view, and she is changing political parties.....is she going to comply with the law now that she's a Republican or find some way to subvert it?

 

[nat4900]

Which ones are you talking about specifically? Because it has become quite obvious that Republicans/conservatives make up shit that doesn't exist and then just never explain when they are confronted.

I'll wait!

....Yep, any minute now.....LOL

 

[mudwhistle]

But this fake belief that Republicans are less law-abiding in this case.....especially since this woman is a Democrat, is totally unfounded. I suspect you're projecting her supposed sins unto the GOP, and that is dishonest.

Yep, she claims to be a Democrat......but she finally realized that Democrats don't support her view, and she is changing political parties.....is she going to comply with the law now that she's a Republican or find some way to subvert it?

Well, she sure as hell doesn't want to act like that dickhead Obama......as in always finding some way to subvert the law.

 

[Mertex]

But this fake belief that Republicans are less law-abiding in this case.....especially since this woman is a Democrat, is totally unfounded. I suspect you're projecting her supposed sins unto the GOP, and that is dishonest.

Yep, she claims to be a Democrat......but she finally realized that Democrats don't support her view, and she is changing political parties.....is she going to comply with the law now that she's a Republican or find some way to subvert it?

Well, she sure as hell doesn't want to act like that dickhead Obama......as in always finding some way to subvert the law.

Bwahahaha....says the one whose party just admitted their whole reason for forming a Benghazi committee (the 9th one) was to try and bring Hillary's poll numbers down....and the idiot, who is supposed to replace Boehner claims she is un-trustable.....as if he and his phony committee are so "trustable". And he's supposed to get the name "Speaker"....maybe they should change it to "Blabber"!

And, by the way.....I'm still waiting for you to tell me which laws Obama has subverted....

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/26/u...riage-dispute-kim-davis-joining-gop.html?_r=0

I guess the dummies calling her a Democrat can rest their typing fingers now. She is finally switching parties BECAUSE of her stance on gay marriage.

If I may, let me then summarize the above:

Davis shows a lack of tolerance toward existing laws which is a requisite in implementing her elected position......

She then decides to join a party which supports her lack of tolerance and breach of existing laws.....

Ergo, the republican party is LESS tolerant and LESS law-abiding?

Just asking.......

When Obama decides to follow all of our laws instead of just the ones he likes....you'll have room to talk......but not until then.

Which ones are you talking about specifically? Because it has become quite obvious that Republicans/conservatives make up shit that doesn't exist and then just never explain when they are confronted.

I'll wait!

 

[Mertex]

And it's not going to help as subjective law, is not law. And no American is obligated to so much as recognize it, let alone obey it.

Not if you don't want to land your ass in jail.

The Supreme Court deemed same-sex marriage legal........same sex marriage is now "law" whether you like it or not. And you don't have to recognize it, I'm sure no one will notice that you don't, because nobody give a rat's ass what you think. But people like Kim Davis, can either obey the law or find another job, or land her ass in jail.

 

[Mertex]

Your comment sounds like you are saying that her elected position has a requisite of "lack of tolerance toward existing laws" - which is entirely false. Her elected position requires her to follow the law. So, yes, the Republican party is "less tolerant" and "less law-abiding". They certainly do not tolerate abortion which is legal, and same-sex marriage which is also legal. The fact that Davis is refusing to do her job shows she is less law-abiding and certainly not tolerant. Are Republicans not the ones cheering her on?

So what is your question exactly?

Alas, my sarcasm was completely lost if the above is all you discerned from my post.

Sorry........I'm sometimes slow on the sarcasm. I must have been in a hurry when I read your post. My apologies.