Kim Davis to join the GOP...

This where the tires meet the road ... it's one thing to tolerate someone's opinion. It's another thing entirely to tolerate them violating the law.

Yet you sexual deviants....
What, in your deranged mind, constitutes me as a sexual deviant? From which, the rest of your hallucinations derive. Keep in mind, I'm 100% heterosexual; presumably, as yourself.
 
Needless to say this has nothing to do with Kim Davis, what political party she belongs to, or what's written on marriage licenses.

It has everything to do with the battle being waged by Americans... against the evil being perpetrated upon the US Culture by the Ideological Left. A war which has barely begun... and which the Ideological Left will soon rue that they every considered starting it.
 
Last edited:
...understanding that 14th Amendment jurisprudence ...

" ... provides the Left with imaginary fixes of everything from the RIGHT to Marry people of the same gender, to a wonderful recipe for Chicken Soup."

They're helpless because they're manifestly: EVIL.
 
Who besides libruls are promoting the distribution of pornography through public access networks?

Every guy with a computer and probably a lot of the girls too
Who besides liberals are represented here:

...Note the sexual behavior in nothing short of "Public".

What sexual behaviour?

Oh, and you just posted that on a public site. Are you a librul distributing pornography?
Should we discuss the more traditional media? "50 Shades of Ghey", the recent televising of Sexualized MUPPETS in prime time, on network (public) television.

Suffice it to say that there is NOTHING, ZERO, NADA, ZILCH... about the PUBLIC ADVOCACY TO NORMALIZE SEXUAL ABNORMALITY... that is not public.

It seems you're a bit confused about the public sex thing, nobody forces you to read a book or watch the muppets. People read or watch that in private.
And of course, not the least of which is their chronic pretense of Marriage... a public institution.

Eh, what? Gay people can't get married because that makes you think of sex? Seriously?

So much for your "priciples", you can't respect other peoples rights because it makes you feel uncomfortable to imagine what they do in private.

No wonder you support the Kim Davis nut

:alcoholic:
 
This where the tires meet the road ... it's one thing to tolerate someone's opinion. It's another thing entirely to tolerate them violating the law.

Yet you sexual deviants openly broke the law for DECADES... Your media promoted breaking the law... .

You abused the legal process through the open abuse of the Judiciary... illicitly OVER-TURNING THE LAW.

So, it's hysterical that your bleeding asses come running to establish yourselves as proponents of THE LAW.

And it's not going to help as subjective law, is not law. And no American is obligated to so much as recognize it, let alone obey it.

Ya see scamp, our 'consent to be governed' rests entirely upon the objective nature of Constitution and where a people subjectively manipulate that constitution... we openly reject them, their law and their degeneracy on the whole.

Questions?
You really sound shrill...like someone who is trying hard to convince themselves that they've been in the right while the world around them shows they are wrong.

Liberty demands that the government stay out of the bedroom and that all men and women are equal under the law.

I doubt alcohol is Key's problem, it goes much deeper into a flawed character, ripe with hypocrisy and void of empathy - classic conditions existent in the set of callous conservatives.
 
Who besides libruls are promoting the distribution of pornography through public access networks?

Every guy with a computer and probably a lot of the girls too

So every guy and girl with a computer is a liberal? My goodness, the Dutch Socialists enjoy every bit of the lofty heights of the intellectual shadow as their British comrades.

Go figure..
Who besides liberals are represented here:

...Note the sexual behavior in nothing short of "Public".

What sexual behaviour?

The trend remains in vertical descent.

Oh, and you just posted that on a public site. Are you a librul distributing pornography?

Terminal velocity has been acquired... .

Should we discuss the more traditional media? "50 Shades of Ghey", the recent televising of Sexualized MUPPETS in prime time, on network (public) television.

Suffice it to say that there is NOTHING, ZERO, NADA, ZILCH... about the PUBLIC ADVOCACY TO NORMALIZE SEXUAL ABNORMALITY... that is not public.

It seems you're a bit confused about the public sex thing, nobody forces you to read a book or watch the muppets. People read or watch that in private.

First, placing material onto public airways exposes me to the degeneracy that it represents. Through advertisement which is set into material that I have chosen to view, read, or what have you. It implies such into my consciousness... where it serves a degenerative purpose.

Second, I did not watch any of it, and that was my choice and I exercised my right to make the choice... which says nothing about what set of ideas sets such degenerative material into public access networks; which is the point to which you're quickly conceding.


And of course, not the least of which is their chronic pretense of Marriage... a public institution.

Eh, what? Gay people can't get married because that makes you think of sex? Seriously?

Marriage is about sex.. and marriage is a PUBLIC institution. And Nature defined the human physiological standard; wherein it provided two distinct Genders, each respectively and specifically designed TO JOIN WITH THE OTHER... and in so doing it defined Marriage as: The Joining of One Man and One Woman.

As a consequence of God's endowment of life and the rights to pursue that which fulfills that life, it is the responsibility of every American that to sustain the viability of their culture through the objective adherence to the laws of nature... and where a degenerative cult comes to separate them and their children from those law, it is the right sustaining responsibility of the American, to remove the degenerate cult; which threatens their means to exercise that right, from their culture. Less they forfeit their means to exercise their right.

To so much as discuss the altering of that standard, to comport with sexual deviancy... removes sexual deviancy from the claimed rightful realm OKA: PRIVACY, into the realm where the RIGHT TO PRIVACY cannot go... OKA: that which is PUBLIC.

See how that works?

So much for your "priciples", you can't respect other peoples rights because it makes you feel uncomfortable to imagine what they do in private.

No wonder you support the Kim Davis nut

:alcoholic:[sic]

Well there ya go Reader. And THAT is yet another demonstration of why:

THERE ARE NO
LEFTIST AMERICANS!
Wherein principle holds that one is precluded from simultaneous adherence to the both the Thesis and the Antithesis.

It simply can't be done.
 
Last edited:
Now Reader, remember... the key to defeating Leftists in debate rests in two key fundamentals:

1 - Find a Leftist.

2 - Get them to Speak.
 
Needless to say this has nothing to do with Kim Davis, what political party she belongs to, or what's written on marriage licenses.

It has everything to do with the battle being waged by Americans... against the evil being perpetrated upon the US Culture by the Ideological Left. A war which has barely begun... and which the Ideological Left will soon rue that they every considered starting it.

Are you by chance channeling Timmy McVeigh from his cell in hell? And what exactly do you find evil about every man and women being equal before the law?
 
This where the tires meet the road ... it's one thing to tolerate someone's opinion. It's another thing entirely to tolerate them violating the law.

Yet you sexual deviants....
What, in your deranged mind, constitutes me as a sexual deviant? From which, the rest of your hallucinations derive. Keep in mind, I'm 100% heterosexual; presumably, as yourself.
The forum notes gay_keys could not answer my question without defining himself as a sexual deviant. And who knows him better than himself?
 
Needless to say this has nothing to do with Kim Davis, what political party she belongs to, or what's written on marriage licenses.

It has everything to do with the battle being waged by Americans... against the evil being perpetrated upon the US Culture by the Ideological Left. A war which has barely begun... and which the Ideological Left will soon rue that they every considered starting it.

Are you by chance channeling Timmy McVeigh from his cell in hell? And what exactly do you find evil about every man and women being equal before the law?

Why would I be channeling a Muslim Convert which was the product of Michigan socialists?
 
Needless to say this has nothing to do with Kim Davis, what political party she belongs to, or what's written on marriage licenses.

It has everything to do with the battle being waged by Americans... against the evil being perpetrated upon the US Culture by the Ideological Left. A war which has barely begun... and which the Ideological Left will soon rue that they every considered starting it.

Are you by chance channeling Timmy McVeigh from his cell in hell? And what exactly do you find evil about every man and women being equal before the law?

Why would I be channeling a Muslim Convert which was the product of Michigan socialists?

My post was too abstract for you! It's no wonder you're chronically confused, as well as character flawed.
 
Needless to say this has nothing to do with Kim Davis, what political party she belongs to, or what's written on marriage licenses.

It has everything to do with the battle being waged by Americans... against the evil being perpetrated upon the US Culture by the Ideological Left. A war which has barely begun... and which the Ideological Left will soon rue that they every considered starting it.

Are you by chance channeling Timmy McVeigh from his cell in hell? And what exactly do you find evil about every man and women being equal before the law?

Why would I be channeling a Muslim Convert which was the product of Michigan socialists?

My post was too abstract for you! It's no wonder you're chronically confused, as well as character flawed.
He did refer to himself as a "sexual deviant," soooo.....
 
Needless to say this has nothing to do with Kim Davis, what political party she belongs to, or what's written on marriage licenses.

It has everything to do with the battle being waged by Americans... against the evil being perpetrated upon the US Culture by the Ideological Left. A war which has barely begun... and which the Ideological Left will soon rue that they every considered starting it.

Are you by chance channeling Timmy McVeigh from his cell in hell? And what exactly do you find evil about every man and women being equal before the law?

Why would I be channeling a Muslim Convert which was the product of Michigan socialists?

Wow. Dementia at that level is fairly rare even around here.
 
Well, if unmarried sex is good enough for priests, it should be good enough for all gays who arn't pediphiles!
 
15th post
Well, if unmarried sex is good enough for priests, it should be good enough for all gays who arn't pediphiles!

So you're saying that premarital sex is good for priests, therefore it's good enough for sexual deviants, who aren't sexual deviants.

Gotcha... you've clearly gone out of your way to push up some juicy rationalizations.

But hey... that's Relativism for ya.
 
Needless to say this has nothing to do with Kim Davis, what political party she belongs to, or what's written on marriage licenses.

It has everything to do with the battle being waged by Americans... against the evil being perpetrated upon the US Culture by the Ideological Left. A war which has barely begun... and which the Ideological Left will soon rue that they every considered starting it.

Are you by chance channeling Timmy McVeigh from his cell in hell? And what exactly do you find evil about every man and women being equal before the law?

Why would I be channeling a Muslim Convert which was the product of Michigan socialists?

Wow. Dementia at that level is fairly rare even around here.

Your concession is noted ... Gilligan.
 
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/26/u...riage-dispute-kim-davis-joining-gop.html?_r=0

I guess the dummies calling her a Democrat can rest their typing fingers now. She is finally switching parties BECAUSE of her stance on gay marriage.

Well this only speaks to the tolerance (or lack thereof) of the Democratic Party.

She needs to do the job she was elected to, but this intolerance for her viewpoints only speak ill of Democrats.

Yeah, sure...and anyone who speaks ill of the behavior of anyone is a bigot too. You are the people Pogo warned us about ("We have met the enemy and he is us").

Just by calling me a bigot only shows how intolerant you are. Once again you make my point.
 
Well, if unmarried sex is good enough for priests, it should be good enough for all gays who arn't pediphiles!

So you're saying that premarital sex is good for priests, therefore it's good enough for sexual deviants, who aren't sexual deviants.

Gotcha... you've clearly gone out of your way to push up some juicy rationalizations.

But hey... that's Relativism for ya.
But your definition of a "sexual deviant" is a married heterosexual who has sex with no one but his wife. So hopefully you can understand why no one takes your own personal definitions seriously.
 
Back
Top Bottom