blackhawk
Diamond Member
Big deal it's not the first time someone swithched parties and it won't be the last.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What, in your deranged mind, constitutes me as a sexual deviant? From which, the rest of your hallucinations derive. Keep in mind, I'm 100% heterosexual; presumably, as yourself.This where the tires meet the road ... it's one thing to tolerate someone's opinion. It's another thing entirely to tolerate them violating the law.
Yet you sexual deviants....
Needless to say this has nothing to do with Kim Davis, what political party she belongs to, or what's written on marriage licenses.
...understanding that 14th Amendment jurisprudence ...
Who besides libruls are promoting the distribution of pornography through public access networks?
Who besides liberals are represented here:
...Note the sexual behavior in nothing short of "Public".
Should we discuss the more traditional media? "50 Shades of Ghey", the recent televising of Sexualized MUPPETS in prime time, on network (public) television.
Suffice it to say that there is NOTHING, ZERO, NADA, ZILCH... about the PUBLIC ADVOCACY TO NORMALIZE SEXUAL ABNORMALITY... that is not public.
And of course, not the least of which is their chronic pretense of Marriage... a public institution.

You really sound shrill...like someone who is trying hard to convince themselves that they've been in the right while the world around them shows they are wrong.This where the tires meet the road ... it's one thing to tolerate someone's opinion. It's another thing entirely to tolerate them violating the law.
Yet you sexual deviants openly broke the law for DECADES... Your media promoted breaking the law... .
You abused the legal process through the open abuse of the Judiciary... illicitly OVER-TURNING THE LAW.
So, it's hysterical that your bleeding asses come running to establish yourselves as proponents of THE LAW.
And it's not going to help as subjective law, is not law. And no American is obligated to so much as recognize it, let alone obey it.
Ya see scamp, our 'consent to be governed' rests entirely upon the objective nature of Constitution and where a people subjectively manipulate that constitution... we openly reject them, their law and their degeneracy on the whole.
Questions?
Who besides libruls are promoting the distribution of pornography through public access networks?
Every guy with a computer and probably a lot of the girls too
Who besides liberals are represented here:
...Note the sexual behavior in nothing short of "Public".
What sexual behaviour?
Oh, and you just posted that on a public site. Are you a librul distributing pornography?
Should we discuss the more traditional media? "50 Shades of Ghey", the recent televising of Sexualized MUPPETS in prime time, on network (public) television.
Suffice it to say that there is NOTHING, ZERO, NADA, ZILCH... about the PUBLIC ADVOCACY TO NORMALIZE SEXUAL ABNORMALITY... that is not public.
It seems you're a bit confused about the public sex thing, nobody forces you to read a book or watch the muppets. People read or watch that in private.
And of course, not the least of which is their chronic pretense of Marriage... a public institution.
Eh, what? Gay people can't get married because that makes you think of sex? Seriously?
So much for your "priciples", you can't respect other peoples rights because it makes you feel uncomfortable to imagine what they do in private.
No wonder you support the Kim Davis nut
[sic]
Needless to say this has nothing to do with Kim Davis, what political party she belongs to, or what's written on marriage licenses.
It has everything to do with the battle being waged by Americans... against the evil being perpetrated upon the US Culture by the Ideological Left. A war which has barely begun... and which the Ideological Left will soon rue that they every considered starting it.
The forum notes gay_keys could not answer my question without defining himself as a sexual deviant. And who knows him better than himself?What, in your deranged mind, constitutes me as a sexual deviant? From which, the rest of your hallucinations derive. Keep in mind, I'm 100% heterosexual; presumably, as yourself.This where the tires meet the road ... it's one thing to tolerate someone's opinion. It's another thing entirely to tolerate them violating the law.
Yet you sexual deviants....
Needless to say this has nothing to do with Kim Davis, what political party she belongs to, or what's written on marriage licenses.
It has everything to do with the battle being waged by Americans... against the evil being perpetrated upon the US Culture by the Ideological Left. A war which has barely begun... and which the Ideological Left will soon rue that they every considered starting it.
Are you by chance channeling Timmy McVeigh from his cell in hell? And what exactly do you find evil about every man and women being equal before the law?
Needless to say this has nothing to do with Kim Davis, what political party she belongs to, or what's written on marriage licenses.
It has everything to do with the battle being waged by Americans... against the evil being perpetrated upon the US Culture by the Ideological Left. A war which has barely begun... and which the Ideological Left will soon rue that they every considered starting it.
Are you by chance channeling Timmy McVeigh from his cell in hell? And what exactly do you find evil about every man and women being equal before the law?
Why would I be channeling a Muslim Convert which was the product of Michigan socialists?
He did refer to himself as a "sexual deviant," soooo.....Needless to say this has nothing to do with Kim Davis, what political party she belongs to, or what's written on marriage licenses.
It has everything to do with the battle being waged by Americans... against the evil being perpetrated upon the US Culture by the Ideological Left. A war which has barely begun... and which the Ideological Left will soon rue that they every considered starting it.
Are you by chance channeling Timmy McVeigh from his cell in hell? And what exactly do you find evil about every man and women being equal before the law?
Why would I be channeling a Muslim Convert which was the product of Michigan socialists?
My post was too abstract for you! It's no wonder you're chronically confused, as well as character flawed.
Needless to say this has nothing to do with Kim Davis, what political party she belongs to, or what's written on marriage licenses.
It has everything to do with the battle being waged by Americans... against the evil being perpetrated upon the US Culture by the Ideological Left. A war which has barely begun... and which the Ideological Left will soon rue that they every considered starting it.
Are you by chance channeling Timmy McVeigh from his cell in hell? And what exactly do you find evil about every man and women being equal before the law?
Why would I be channeling a Muslim Convert which was the product of Michigan socialists?
My post was too abstract for you!
Well, if unmarried sex is good enough for priests, it should be good enough for all gays who arn't pediphiles!
Needless to say this has nothing to do with Kim Davis, what political party she belongs to, or what's written on marriage licenses.
It has everything to do with the battle being waged by Americans... against the evil being perpetrated upon the US Culture by the Ideological Left. A war which has barely begun... and which the Ideological Left will soon rue that they every considered starting it.
Are you by chance channeling Timmy McVeigh from his cell in hell? And what exactly do you find evil about every man and women being equal before the law?
Why would I be channeling a Muslim Convert which was the product of Michigan socialists?
Wow. Dementia at that level is fairly rare even around here.
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/26/u...riage-dispute-kim-davis-joining-gop.html?_r=0
I guess the dummies calling her a Democrat can rest their typing fingers now. She is finally switching parties BECAUSE of her stance on gay marriage.
Well this only speaks to the tolerance (or lack thereof) of the Democratic Party.
She needs to do the job she was elected to, but this intolerance for her viewpoints only speak ill of Democrats.
Yeah, sure...and anyone who speaks ill of the behavior of anyone is a bigot too. You are the people Pogo warned us about ("We have met the enemy and he is us").
But your definition of a "sexual deviant" is a married heterosexual who has sex with no one but his wife. So hopefully you can understand why no one takes your own personal definitions seriously.Well, if unmarried sex is good enough for priests, it should be good enough for all gays who arn't pediphiles!
So you're saying that premarital sex is good for priests, therefore it's good enough for sexual deviants, who aren't sexual deviants.
Gotcha... you've clearly gone out of your way to push up some juicy rationalizations.
But hey... that's Relativism for ya.