Kim Davis to join the GOP...

[HappyJoy]

... homophobic bigot ...

Two things....

First, there is LITERALLY no such thing as a Homophobe.

And Second, the ABSOLUTELY COOLEST thing about the word "bigot", is that the mere use of the word, when directed toward another, is a precise demonstration by the user of the word of the underlying meaning of the word.

Thus the individual claiming that another is a bigot, is DEMONSTRATING in irrefutable terms, their having or revealing an obstinate belief in the superiority of their own opinions and a prejudiced intolerance of the opinions of others.

We've gone through this, I linked to the definition of homophobic, you're views are just that which make you a bigot to boot. Once again, we are not debating the meaning of words as you choose to redefine them in your head. You lose again.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Dipshit, I was responding to a post that implied being accepting of gay marriage was going to hurt the democrats.

ROFLMNAO!

I guess I will simply never tire of watching Relativists fallaciously appeal to popularity, as if such were the purest essence of reason itself.

First... IF such were as popular as the would-be "Poll" suggests... why then were 42 States voting to sustain the natural definition of marriage, with 38 placing such in their state Constitutions?

Second, because the popularity of such was and remains NO WHERE NEAR a majority... POLLS TAKEN IN THE VAST MAJORITY OF THE STATES; IN THE FORM OF DEMOCRATIC, DULY PROCESSED LEGISLATION... SIGNED BY DULY ELECTED (Democratic Process... ) Governors... FLAT OUT ESTABLISHED IN DEMOCRATIC TERMS... that a majority of Citizens REJECT the Federal Licensing of Degeneracy.

And THAT is why the Left was forced to abuse the Federal Judiciary and sought illicit means to OVERTURN THE DEMOCRATICALLY ESTABLISHED "WILL OF THE PEOPLE", THROUGH A VOTE OF 5 people on a judicial board of 9 people.

Proving that ONCE AGAIN... if a Leftist asserts it, IT'S A FUCKIN' LIE!

 

[Carla_Danger]

Don't wet your pants, it's just one Democrat fleeing the party.

ROFLMNAO! Yes... just as its just a little ice floating on the surface.

And it's JUST SMOKE! IT CAN'T HURT YOU!

LOL! You people are fuckin' BRILLIANT!

Your party leaders are importing Illegals BY THE TENS OF MILLIONS... did you think they were doing that because they're NICE FOLKS who just want to give hispanics from underdeveloped countries, a chance at: la vida loca?

ROFL! Psst.. Dumbass: You're being REPLACED. And you're being replaced with CATHOLICS.

But don't sweat it, it's not like your party is cozying up with The Pope.

Hmm... of course if it were... and it were importing tens of millions of Catholic Hispanics; Hispanics loyal to a religion that has a dim view of degeneracy... that COULD be an indicator of a sea change that someone figured out a while back, in terms of the means to sustain a culture; even a Leftist culture... within a fragile 'degenerate' frame work.

But hey... that's all just facts, tied up with soundly reasoned, speculation.

You're probably right! And now that you've tied your ship of state to the TWO PERCENT OF THE POPULATION, that bears the intrinsic quality of BEARING NO FUTURE VOTERS... I wouldn't worry about it.

It looks like you've got a pretty good handle on you sitch...

ROFLMNAO!

You fuckin' people are HELPLESS!

Aha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!!! OMG, that was too funny! I should have smoked a fattie before reading that tripe.

OH! Right on time, as usual... Delusion ON PARADE!

Thanks... and don't think that I don't appreciate it. 'Cause I DO!

And with that, your most recent Concession is Duly Noted and Summarily Accepted.

I can't argue that, Where_r_my_Brains. I do enjoy seeing your Delusions ON PARADE!

OH! A Re-Concession? And SO SOON?

Wonderful...

Your Re-Concession is Duly Noted and Summarily Accepted.

Are you slow? I agreed with you once. Your postings are delusional.

 

[HappyJoy]

Dipshit, I was responding to a post that implied being accepting of gay marriage was going to hurt the democrats.

ROFLMNAO!

I guess I will simply never tire of watching Relativists fallaciously appeal to popularity, as if such were the purest essence of reason itself.

First... IF such were as popular as the would-be "Poll" suggests... why then were 42 States voting to sustain the natural definition of marriage, with 38 placing such in their state Constitutions?

Second, because the popularity of such was and remains NO WHERE NEAR a majority... POLLS TAKEN IN THE VAST MAJORITY OF THE STATES; IN THE FORM OF DEMOCRATIC, DULY PROCESSED LEGISLATION... SIGNED BY DULY ELECTED (Democratic Process... ) Governors... FLAT OUT ESTABLISHED IN DEMOCRATIC TERMS... that a majority of Citizens REJECT the Federal Licensing of Degeneracy.

And THAT is why the Left was forced to abuse the Federal Judiciary and sought illicit means to OVERTURN THE DEMOCRATICALLY ESTABLISHED "WILL OF THE PEOPLE", THROUGH A VOTE OF 5 people on a judicial board of 9 people.

Proving that ONCE AGAIN... if a Leftist asserts it, IT'S A FUCKIN' LIE!

You can make it up all you want. Or, find something that demonstrates that gay marriage is unpopular in this country. Run along now.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

...Understand that the New GOP is not interested, in the slightest, in "Compromising" with the Left....

So, what's the difference between the new and the old version exactly?

The New GOP is being rid of Leftists... . Thus is exclusively represents Americans. Which is to say those who; Recognize, Respect, Defend and Adhere to the principles that define: America.

This in contrast to those who advocate for Foreign Ideas that are Hostile to: American principle; which is to say Relativists of every stripe... Liberals, Progressives, Socialists, Muslims... all of the elements which provide political means for the advancement of evil.

So...you don't like our nation's founders either, Birther.

What nation is that?

 

[Jantje_Smit]

It's not a secret. It's written in the Charter of American Principle, that declared the basis for our founding Father's to separate themselves from the tyranny which governed it.

If its a secret, then it's the single oldest fully published 'secret' in American History... debated for YEARS in the colonial house, ratified by the respective state legislatures and published and distributed throughout the country for all to read, under the signatures of every signing representative and sent to the tyrant and his nation on a distinct continent, so that he and his nation might have a chance to recognize those principles.

I fail to understand how, given the nature of the principles, the unprecedented successes of and in which they have manifested, that even those cloistered in a dutch hovel could not be aware of them... yet you're stone ignorant of them.

Now isn't that fascinatin'...

Ok, do you have a link to that non secret because google doesn't even show it?

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Dipshit, I was responding to a post that implied being accepting of gay marriage was going to hurt the democrats.

ROFLMNAO!

I guess I will simply never tire of watching Relativists fallaciously appeal to popularity, as if such were the purest essence of reason itself.

First... IF such were as popular as the would-be "Poll" suggests... why then were 42 States voting to sustain the natural definition of marriage, with 38 placing such in their state Constitutions?

Second, because the popularity of such was and remains NO WHERE NEAR a majority... POLLS TAKEN IN THE VAST MAJORITY OF THE STATES; IN THE FORM OF DEMOCRATIC, DULY PROCESSED LEGISLATION... SIGNED BY DULY ELECTED (Democratic Process... ) Governors... FLAT OUT ESTABLISHED IN DEMOCRATIC TERMS... that a majority of Citizens REJECT the Federal Licensing of Degeneracy.

And THAT is why the Left was forced to abuse the Federal Judiciary and sought illicit means to OVERTURN THE DEMOCRATICALLY ESTABLISHED "WILL OF THE PEOPLE", THROUGH A VOTE OF 5 people on a judicial board of 9 people.

Proving that ONCE AGAIN... if a Leftist asserts it, IT'S A FUCKIN' LIE!

You can make it up all you want. Or, find something that demonstrates that gay marriage is unpopular in this country. Run along now.

ROFLMNAO!

I guess I will simply never tire of watching Relativists fallaciously appeal to popularity, as if such were the purest essence of reason itself.

First... IF such were as popular as the would-be "Poll" suggests... why then were 42 States voting to sustain the natural definition of marriage, with 38 placing such in their state Constitutions?

Second, because the popularity of such was and remains NO WHERE NEAR a majority... POLLS TAKEN IN THE VAST MAJORITY OF THE STATES; IN THE FORM OF DEMOCRATIC, DULY PROCESSED LEGISLATION... SIGNED BY DULY ELECTED (Democratic Process... ) Governors... FLAT OUT ESTABLISHED IN DEMOCRATIC TERMS... that a majority of Citizens REJECT the Federal Licensing of Degeneracy.

And THAT is why the Left was forced to abuse the Federal Judiciary and sought illicit means to OVERTURN THE DEMOCRATICALLY ESTABLISHED "WILL OF THE PEOPLE", THROUGH A VOTE OF 5 people on a judicial board of 9 people.

Proving that ONCE AGAIN... if a Leftist asserts it, IT'S A FUCKIN' LIE!

 

[HappyJoy]

Dipshit, I was responding to a post that implied being accepting of gay marriage was going to hurt the democrats.

ROFLMNAO!

I guess I will simply never tire of watching Relativists fallaciously appeal to popularity, as if such were the purest essence of reason itself.

First... IF such were as popular as the would-be "Poll" suggests... why then were 42 States voting to sustain the natural definition of marriage, with 38 placing such in their state Constitutions?

Second, because the popularity of such was and remains NO WHERE NEAR a majority... POLLS TAKEN IN THE VAST MAJORITY OF THE STATES; IN THE FORM OF DEMOCRATIC, DULY PROCESSED LEGISLATION... SIGNED BY DULY ELECTED (Democratic Process... ) Governors... FLAT OUT ESTABLISHED IN DEMOCRATIC TERMS... that a majority of Citizens REJECT the Federal Licensing of Degeneracy.

And THAT is why the Left was forced to abuse the Federal Judiciary and sought illicit means to OVERTURN THE DEMOCRATICALLY ESTABLISHED "WILL OF THE PEOPLE", THROUGH A VOTE OF 5 people on a judicial board of 9 people.

Proving that ONCE AGAIN... if a Leftist asserts it, IT'S A FUCKIN' LIE!

You can make it up all you want. Or, find something that demonstrates that gay marriage is unpopular in this country. Run along now.

ROFLMNAO!

I guess I will simply never tire of watching Relativists fallaciously appeal to popularity, as if such were the purest essence of reason itself.

First... IF such were as popular as the would-be "Poll" suggests... why then were 42 States voting to sustain the natural definition of marriage, with 38 placing such in their state Constitutions?

Second, because the popularity of such was and remains NO WHERE NEAR a majority... POLLS TAKEN IN THE VAST MAJORITY OF THE STATES; IN THE FORM OF DEMOCRATIC, DULY PROCESSED LEGISLATION... SIGNED BY DULY ELECTED (Democratic Process... ) Governors... FLAT OUT ESTABLISHED IN DEMOCRATIC TERMS... that a majority of Citizens REJECT the Federal Licensing of Degeneracy.

And THAT is why the Left was forced to abuse the Federal Judiciary and sought illicit means to OVERTURN THE DEMOCRATICALLY ESTABLISHED "WILL OF THE PEOPLE", THROUGH A VOTE OF 5 people on a judicial board of 9 people.

Proving that ONCE AGAIN... if a Leftist asserts it, IT'S A FUCKIN' LIE!

Constantly repeating yourself isn't helping the cause and it probably bores your imaginary reader.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

It's not a secret. It's written in the Charter of American Principle, that declared the basis for our founding Father's to separate themselves from the tyranny which governed it.

If its a secret, then it's the single oldest fully published 'secret' in American History... debated for YEARS in the colonial house, ratified by the respective state legislatures and published and distributed throughout the country for all to read, under the signatures of every signing representative and sent to the tyrant and his nation on a distinct continent, so that he and his nation might have a chance to recognize those principles.

I fail to understand how, given the nature of the principles, the unprecedented successes of and in which they have manifested, that even those cloistered in a dutch hovel could not be aware of them... yet you're stone ignorant of them.

Now isn't that fascinatin'...

Ok, do you have a link to that non secret because google doesn't even show it?

My God lady... are you fuckin' kiddin' me? Are you people capable of ANYTHING 'CONSTRUCTIVE'? Must EVERYTHING you DO result in DESTRUCTION? Be a Rebel... and fight for CHANGE.

Like this:

The American Charter of Principle, Declared
In Congress, July 4, 1776​

When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal; that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights; that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness; that, to secure these rights, governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed;

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

that whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles, and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Prudence, indeed, will dictate that governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shown that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object, evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such government, and to provide new guards for their future security. Such has been the patient sufferance of these colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former systems of government.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Any questions?

 

[Jantje_Smit]

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal; that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights; that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness; that, to secure these rights, governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed;

Ah, that sounds familiar.

And evil libruls and other assorted leftists don't agree with that? Don't gay people have a right to happiness like the Davis clown seems to think?

 

[Misty]

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/26/u...riage-dispute-kim-davis-joining-gop.html?_r=0

I guess the dummies calling her a Democrat can rest their typing fingers now. She is finally switching parties BECAUSE of her stance on gay marriage.

There will be more like her that will switch parties because of this.

How many so far? It's been months, years in some states.

There are more people afraid to say the truth about how they really feel because of being labeled intolerant.

I personally don't care about gay marriage and I don't relate to either party. I hate them both but the left is more evil IMHO. And the media is the most evil of all.

 

[HappyJoy]

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/26/u...riage-dispute-kim-davis-joining-gop.html?_r=0

I guess the dummies calling her a Democrat can rest their typing fingers now. She is finally switching parties BECAUSE of her stance on gay marriage.

There will be more like her that will switch parties because of this.

How many so far? It's been months, years in some states.

There are more people afraid to say the truth about how they really feel because of being labeled intolerant.

I personally don't care about gay marriage and I don't relate to either party. I hate them both but the left is more evil IMHO. And the media is the most evil of all.

There is no evidence of this.

Clearly Republicans have no problem voicing their opinions on gay marriage.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal; that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights; that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness; that, to secure these rights, governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed;

Ah, that sounds familiar.

And evil libruls and other assorted leftists don't agree with that? Don't gay people have a right to happiness like the Davis clown seems to think?

Well you're a librul... and adherent to assorted notions of Left-think... who comes to imply that you agree with those principles. And in so doing you demonstrate your ignorance of what rights are.

For a Right to Exist, it does so with intrinsic RESPONSIBILITY. Not the least of which, is to not exercise one's right to the detriment of the means of another to exercise their own rights.

We know this to be self evidently so.. because where two people have the right to **** the other with their respective rights, the net effect is that neither have any rights... .

Do you understand that? It's important that you do, because if ya don't, then you're not capable of being free. And in general nature, you amount to what is commonly recognized as "FOOD".

So let me know if you've no means to grasp the concept of rights and I'll just write you off and send your ass to ignore with the other vegetables.

Now the principle states that 'all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights. Therefore sexual deviants are not excluded, where the deviant bears the intrinsic responsibility that sustain their rights.

So sexual behavior is what? It is private behavior... and we can know this, because where one is rightfully entitled to such, the bearer of that right is not entitled to exercise it, to the detriment of another's means to exercise their own rights. And where we expose ourselves, in sexual terms, to those who are offended by our sexual behavior, we usurp their right to not be exposed to such.

So, where we claim a right to our private sexual behavior, we sustain that right by bearing the responsibility to keep that which we rightfully claim to be PRIVATE: PRIVATE!

Understand?

 

[HappyJoy]

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal; that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights; that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness; that, to secure these rights, governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed;

Ah, that sounds familiar.

And evil libruls and other assorted leftists don't agree with that? Don't gay people have a right to happiness like the Davis clown seems to think?

Well you're a librul... and adherent to assorted notions of Left-think... who comes to imply that you agree with those principles. And in so doing you demonstrate your ignorance of what rights are.

For a Right to Exist, it does so with intrinsic RESPONSIBILITY. Not the least of which, is to not exercise one's right to the detriment of the means of another to exercise their own rights.

Now the principle states that 'all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights. Therefore sexual deviants are not excluded, where the deviant bears the intrinsic responsibility that sustain their rights.

So sexual behavior is what? It is private behavior... and we can know this, because where one is rightfully entitled to such, the bearer of that right is not entitled to exercise it, to the detriment of another's means to exercise their own rights. And where we expose ourselves, in sexual terms, to those who are offended by our sexual behavior, we usurp their right to not be exposed to such.

So, where we claim a right to our private sexual behavior, we sustain that right by bearing the responsibility to keep that which we rightfully claim to be PRIVATE: PRIVATE!

Understand?

See? What's wrong with a little state sanctioned bigotry? It's only icky gay stuff after all.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/26/u...riage-dispute-kim-davis-joining-gop.html?_r=0

I guess the dummies calling her a Democrat can rest their typing fingers now. She is finally switching parties BECAUSE of her stance on gay marriage.

There will be more like her that will switch parties because of this.

How many so far? It's been months, years in some states.

There are more people afraid to say the truth about how they really feel because of being labeled intolerant.

I personally don't care about gay marriage and I don't relate to either party. I hate them both but the left is more evil IMHO. And the media is the most evil of all.

The Left is Evil > . <