Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Parkland doctor Dr. Charles Crenshaw explains entry wound in the President's throat and that the fatal shot came from the front.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SGNMBRq3Kxw
the way they debate they would not last one minute in a debating hall.no you don't, by definition you've convinced yourself there was a conspiracy .no hard evidence has ever been found to disprove Oswald worked alone.I know that Oswald was not the lone assassin. So there was, by definition, a conspiracy.
What do you mean hard evidence? The United States House Select Committee on Assassinations ruled President John F. Kennedy was probably assassinated as a result of a conspiracy. And chastised the Warren Commission for it's inept investigation and only looking at the lone gunman theory.
a fine example of hand job's lies, he says the same shit about 911.Parkland doctor Dr. Charles Crenshaw explains entry wound in the President's throat and that the fatal shot came from the front.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SGNMBRq3Kxw
funny how the lone nut theorists wont look at these videos or try to refute them and never have any answers for them.
man there sure are a lot of lone nut theorists here in denial.
The Assassination Chronicles Vol. 1. Issue 4 Winter '95
(not all photos are included in this reproduction.)
Best Witness: JFK's Limousine
Anthony Marsh
The best witness to the JFK assassination was the Presidential limousine.
As other JFK researchers have pointed out, eyewitness testimony can be unreliable. Witnesses can be confused, lie, misremember events, or can be susceptible to suggestion. The damage to the limousine tells a story of its own, an accurate and truthful account of the events in Dealey Plaza.
One of the most important points of damage to the limousine was the dent of the chrome topping above the windshield. Was it caused by a direct hit of a bullet or a bullet fragment? Six Seconds in Dallas, (footnote 16 of chapter 5) cites a letter from Chief of the Secret Service James Rowley, who claimed that the dent was caused way in November 1, 1961, by routine maintenance. The Warren Report was ambiguous about the dent. It appears that the Warren Commission did not attempt to examine any photographs to determine if the chrome topping was undented before the assassination. They might have examined several photographs which could have resolved the issue. Many photographs and films were taken in Dealey Plaza before the shooting started. Several were taken at Love Field which showed the limousine in its pristine condition, such as the one by Tom Dillard (Figure 1). JFK Lancer - President John F. Kennedy Assassination Latest News and Research
You'd figure they'd mention a hole in the windshield...strange that you only get that information on Internet message boards.
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vClwuJ0yuWM&feature=player_embedded#!]The Limo Windshield, Bullet from Front - YouTube[/ame]
ok handjob please present one piece of hard evidence not conspiracy tales, not witness stories but actual evidence like the other guns or a confession by someone else. proof of tampering.no you don't, by definition you've convinced yourself there was a conspiracy .no hard evidence has ever been found to disprove Oswald worked alone.
What do you mean hard evidence? The United States House Select Committee on Assassinations ruled President John F. Kennedy was probably assassinated as a result of a conspiracy. And chastised the Warren Commission for it's inept investigation and only looking at the lone gunman theory.
Since NO LONE NUT THEORIST will acknowledge one of these many facts posted throughout this entire thread and keeps evading this one among many,going to have to keep posting this certain one till someone TRYS.but they wont of course.
dawgshit I see of course is lying,when in fact there has been no hard evidence there wasnt a conspiracy as he has failed miserably to disprove.
even stranger since the glass was bullet proof.You'd figure they'd mention a hole in the windshield...strange that you only get that information on Internet message boards.
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vClwuJ0yuWM&feature=player_embedded#!]The Limo Windshield, Bullet from Front - YouTube[/ame]
Not sure about the "hole", looks like a ding to me. As for the witness, not sure how she would know the direction of the bullet seeing as how she was at the hospital.
Still, I didn't know about the ding and it's suspect that a bullet would go through the front, bypass the front seat and jump seat passengers and hit the passenger in the rear without glass hitting any of the passengers.
even stranger since the glass was bullet proof.
Not sure about the "hole", looks like a ding to me. As for the witness, not sure how she would know the direction of the bullet seeing as how she was at the hospital.
Still, I didn't know about the ding and it's suspect that a bullet would go through the front, bypass the front seat and jump seat passengers and hit the passenger in the rear without glass hitting any of the passengers.
even stranger since the glass was bullet proof.
Not sure about the "hole", looks like a ding to me. As for the witness, not sure how she would know the direction of the bullet seeing as how she was at the hospital.
Still, I didn't know about the ding and it's suspect that a bullet would go through the front, bypass the front seat and jump seat passengers and hit the passenger in the rear without glass hitting any of the passengers.
actually no, when glass is hit by small objects at high speed the "pitting" occurs at the point of impact it's basically the same a meteor strike.even stranger since the glass was bullet proof.Not sure about the "hole", looks like a ding to me. As for the witness, not sure how she would know the direction of the bullet seeing as how she was at the hospital.
Still, I didn't know about the ding and it's suspect that a bullet would go through the front, bypass the front seat and jump seat passengers and hit the passenger in the rear without glass hitting any of the passengers.
i dont know if that is the car or not
however it looks as if the hole is cone shaped
with the smallest hole toward the interior and the larger hole to the exterior
if so the bullet traveled from rear to front through the glass
even stranger since the glass was bullet proof.Not sure about the "hole", looks like a ding to me. As for the witness, not sure how she would know the direction of the bullet seeing as how she was at the hospital.
Still, I didn't know about the ding and it's suspect that a bullet would go through the front, bypass the front seat and jump seat passengers and hit the passenger in the rear without glass hitting any of the passengers.
i dont know if that is the car or not
however it looks as if the hole is cone shaped
with the smallest hole toward the interior and the larger hole to the exterior
if so the bullet traveled from rear to front through the glass
The Assassination Chronicles Vol. 1. Issue 4 Winter '95
(not all photos are included in this reproduction.)
Best Witness: JFK's Limousine
Anthony Marsh
The best witness to the JFK assassination was the Presidential limousine.
As other JFK researchers have pointed out, eyewitness testimony can be unreliable. Witnesses can be confused, lie, misremember events, or can be susceptible to suggestion. The damage to the limousine tells a story of its own, an accurate and truthful account of the events in Dealey Plaza.
One of the most important points of damage to the limousine was the dent of the chrome topping above the windshield. Was it caused by a direct hit of a bullet or a bullet fragment? Six Seconds in Dallas, (footnote 16 of chapter 5) cites a letter from Chief of the Secret Service James Rowley, who claimed that the dent was caused way in November 1, 1961, by routine maintenance. The Warren Report was ambiguous about the dent. It appears that the Warren Commission did not attempt to examine any photographs to determine if the chrome topping was undented before the assassination. They might have examined several photographs which could have resolved the issue. Many photographs and films were taken in Dealey Plaza before the shooting started. Several were taken at Love Field which showed the limousine in its pristine condition, such as the one by Tom Dillard (Figure 1). JFK Lancer - President John F. Kennedy Assassination Latest News and Research
You'd figure they'd mention a hole in the windshield...strange that you only get that information on Internet message boards.
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vClwuJ0yuWM&feature=player_embedded#!]The Limo Windshield, Bullet from Front - YouTube[/ame]
ALLTHOSE PEOPLE ARE POINTING TO THE SIDE OF THIER HEADS THE RIGHT SIDE AS I SAID.
it's pretty fucking obvious that the bullet took the path of least resistance out the hole it had just made in the back right side of his head.
not one of those folks say it was a frontal shot
yes he was shot in the temple (from behind)
he was turning his head to the right when shot.
if the shot came from the front as he turned his head you'd expect the entry to be more toward the center of his face not his right temple.
btw if there were a grassy knoll shooter .also on his right the kill shot would have blown the left side of his head out not the right.
Oh, the bullet made a U-turn? Obviously? REALLY?? Now we are talking about a REAL magic bullet...
Ever hear of Issac Newton???
Newton's Laws - Lesson 1
Newton's First Law of Motion
Newton's first law of motion:
An object at rest stays at rest and an object in motion stays in motion with the same speed and in the same direction unless acted upon by an unbalanced force.
this spells it out for the lone nut theorists dummies style as best as you can.somehow all these experts doctors views seem to escape the deniars like black dog who is not a paid troll like dawgshit,candyass and rightwinger,just in denial and only sees what he wants to see.
Dawgshit,candyass,rightwinger,rat in the ass and others already know this of course though but will not admit it cause they know they will not get paid by their hanlders if they dont troll these boards endorcing the fairy tales of the warren commissionwrong! exit wounds are always larger then entry wounds.The President's neck wound was an entry wound, and the fatal head shot came from the front, threw the President's head against the trunk lid and his wife climbed out on the trunk to retrieve part of his skull. The back of the President head was blown out, it was an exit wound.
most of the whole right side of Kennedy's head was blown forward not back. his being thrown back is not from a bullet, but from muscle spasms because that part of which controls movement was gone.
the grey matter and skull fragments found on trunk and inside the car were cause by his head exploding (ever heard of hydrostatic shock?) you did know that the brain is pressurized.
if the kill shot come from the front then there would have been much more skull and grey matter in on the trunk and in the limo not to mentioning the cops and secret service guy directly behind the limo.
If the shot came from the 6th floor of the TSDB, struck the back of President Kennedy's head at a downward angle, where is the exit wound that would be in his face???
He was shot in the temple (just like Asst. Press Secretary Malcolm Kilduff shows after talking to the Parkland doctors)
And the back of his head was blown out, just like Dr. McClelland shows in the sketch he drew and the picture, along with about 20 other Parkland doctors, nurses and medical assistants saw.
ROBERT McCLELLAND, MD: "...I could very closely examine the head wound, and I noted that the right posterior portion of the skull had been extremely blasted. It had been shattered...so that the parietal bone was protruded up through the scalp and seemed to be fractured almost along its right posterior half, as well as some of the occipital bone being fractured in its lateral half, and this sprung open the bones that I mentioned in such a way that you could actually look down into the skull cavity itself and see that probably a third or so, at least, of the brain tissue, posterior cerebral tissue and some of the cerebellar tissue had been blasted out...." (WC--V6:33)
Just curious so I thought I'd throw out a historical opinion question. Anyone here think Oswald shot Kennedy, or did other "forces" take him out.
wrong! exit wounds are always larger then entry wounds.The President's neck wound was an entry wound, and the fatal head shot came from the front, threw the President's head against the trunk lid and his wife climbed out on the trunk to retrieve part of his skull. The back of the President head was blown out, it was an exit wound.
most of the whole right side of Kennedy's head was blown forward not back. his being thrown back is not from a bullet, but from muscle spasms because that part of which controls movement was gone.
the grey matter and skull fragments found on trunk and inside the car were cause by his head exploding (ever heard of hydrostatic shock?) you did know that the brain is pressurized.
if the kill shot come from the front then there would have been much more skull and grey matter in on the trunk and in the limo not to mentioning the cops and secret service guy directly behind the limo.
If the shot came from the 6th floor of the TSDB, struck the back of President Kennedy's head at a downward angle, where is the exit wound that would be in his face???
He was shot in the temple (just like Asst. Press Secretary Malcolm Kilduff shows after talking to the Parkland doctors)
And the back of his head was blown out, just like Dr. McClelland shows in the sketch he drew and the picture, along with about 20 other Parkland doctors, nurses and medical assistants saw.
ROBERT McCLELLAND, MD: "...I could very closely examine the head wound, and I noted that the right posterior portion of the skull had been extremely blasted. It had been shattered...so that the parietal bone was protruded up through the scalp and seemed to be fractured almost along its right posterior half, as well as some of the occipital bone being fractured in its lateral half, and this sprung open the bones that I mentioned in such a way that you could actually look down into the skull cavity itself and see that probably a third or so, at least, of the brain tissue, posterior cerebral tissue and some of the cerebellar tissue had been blasted out...." (WC--V6:33)
Just curious so I thought I'd throw out a historical opinion question. Anyone here think Oswald shot Kennedy, or did other "forces" take him out.
Lee Harvey Oswald shot Kennedy with a rifle from the Texas Book Depository building.
End of story.
