Kamala Harris's Bogus Eulogy at Jimmy Carter's Funeral

mikegriffith1

Mike Griffith
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2012
Messages
6,983
Reaction score
4,172
Points
1,085
Location
Virginia
During her eulogy at former President Jimmy Carter’s funeral a few weeks ago, Kamala Harris falsely claimed Carter as a fellow liberal, painting him as a pioneering progressive who championed all the same causes that she now champions. Here are some of the facts about Carter that Harris conveniently ignored:

-- Carter signed the Hyde Amendment, which banned the federal funding of abortion.

-- Carter opened 100% of Alaska’s coastline for oil and natural gas exploration. He did this in exchange for Congress’s agreement to designate 157 million acres as protected wilderness areas or national parks, a reasonable compromise that liberal Democrats would excoriate.

-- Carter approved a record amount of oil and natural gas drilling. In 1980 alone, more oil and natural gas wells were drilled than in any previous year in American history.

-- Carter pushed for a large increase in coal production.

-- Carter increased defense spending every year he was in office. Defense spending rose by 10% in real terms, i.e., after inflation, during Carter's four years. That was one of the reasons the liberal wing of his party was upset with him, and one of the reasons Ted Kennedy challenged him in the 1980 Democratic primary.

-- Carter strongly supported the development of the B-2 stealth bomber, the Trident D5, the F/A-18 Hornet, the Aegis radar-weapon system, and the MX missile. He approved the deployment of air-launched cruise missiles. Nine of the first 10 Los Angeles-class nuclear fast attack submarines were commissioned under Carter, seven of them in the last two years of Carter’s term. The first three Ohio-class nuclear ballistic missile submarines were launched or laid down under Carter.

-- Carter stationed medium-range nuclear missiles in Europe aimed at the Soviet Union, a move that the Soviets and their American liberal apologists deemed “provocative.”

-- Carter pushed through large increases in military pay: 6.2% for 1978, 5.5% for 1979, 7.0% for 1980, and 11.7% for 1981. Reagan was hailed for signing a 14.3% military pay hike for 1982, but that pay hike had been submitted in the last Carter defense budget.

-- Carter pushed through massive deregulation. He deregulated entire industries, including air travel, trucking, railroads, natural gas, and long-distance telephone service. He needed strong support from Republicans in Congress because so many Democrats opposed his deregulation efforts.

-- Carter reduced the number of federal employees from 3.2 million to 2.9 million, and reduced the number of federal agencies/bureaus/offices from 1,900 to 1,500.

-- Under Carter, the economy added 9.8 million non-farm/salaried jobs (10.1 million total), for an average job growth rate of 211,000 per month, which was a higher job growth rate than under Reagan, Ford, Bush Sr., Bush Jr., and Obama.

-- Carter reduced the federal deficit and added less debt to the national debt per year than Reagan, Ford, Nixon, Bush Sr., and Bush Jr. Notes Joe Renouard,

Under Carter, the annual federal deficit was consistently low, the national debt stayed below $1 trillion, and gross federal debt as a percentage of GDP peaked below 40%, the lowest of any presidency since the 1920s. During his final year in office, the debt-to-GDP ratio was 32% and the deficit-to-GDP ratio was 1.7%. In the ensuing twelve years of Reagan and Bush (1981-1993), the debt quadrupled to over $4 trillion and the debt-to-GDP ratio doubled. (Jimmy Carter: The Last of the Fiscally Responsible Presidents)

-- Carter ended the 1977-78 coal miners’ strike by invoking the Taft-Hartley law and ordering the miners back to work. He even cut off food stamps to miners who defied the order. Carter invoked Taft-Hartley after the miners’ union rejected two contract offers brokered by Carter. Following Carter's return-to-work order, the union soon accepted a new contract.

-- Carter pushed for zero-based budgeting, a frugal type of budgeting advocated by conservatives and loathed by liberals, but was never able to get Congress to cooperate.

I could mention other conservative actions/policies that Carter pursued, but this post is already long enough.
 
I thought your faith required you to be honest in all your dealings, including your profession.

Harris did a fine professional job, you are simply not a credit to the profession.

What a minute.

Are you a reform Mormon in that you believed Joseph Smith was monogamous and wonder why the need for LDS temples.
 
I thought your faith required you to be honest in all your dealings, including your profession. Harris did a fine professional job, you are simply not a credit to the profession.
You are just goofy. I take it you're not going to try to explain why Harris did not mention a single one of the facts I listed, right? Let me explain it to you: she didn't mention them in her bogus eulogy because they would have refuted the misleading picture she wanted to paint of Carter.

Carter was nothing like Kamala Harris. The Ted Kennedy wing of the party despised Carter. Carter was fiscally conservative, strong on defense, sensible on environmental issues, super conservative on deregulation, and pro-life on federal funding of abortion.
 
You are just goofy. I take it you're not going to try to explain why Harris did not mention a single one of the facts I listed, right? Let me explain it to you: she didn't mention them in her bogus eulogy because they would have refuted the misleading picture she wanted to paint of Carter.

Carter was nothing like Kamala Harris. The Ted Kennedy wing of the party despised Carter. Carter was fiscally conservative, strong on defense, sensible on environmental issues, super conservative on deregulation, and pro-life on federal funding of abortion.
It was a good eulogy, and my historian friends over at the U will say you are in loonyland.
 
It was a good eulogy, and my historian friends over at the U will say you are in loonyland.
If you actually have any historian friends, they will tell you that every item I listed is a documented fact that can be readily verified in any number of sources.

And, by the way, it's "looney land," not "loonyland." If you don't even know how to spell "looney" correctly, perhaps you should not try to use the word when you're writing your silly unserious replies.
 
You did not list all the pertinent points.

As always, being so far up the spectrum, you load only with what you think is negative and nothing you think is worthwhile.

You are not a professional historian.
 
You did not list all the pertinent points.
Umm, I specified that I was listing some of the facts about Carter's record that Harris ignored. I listed some of Carter's conservative actions that Harris omitted. Did you not read the OP?

As always, being so far up the spectrum, you load only with what you think is negative and nothing you think is worthwhile.
Again, you are just goofy. The point of the OP was to present facts about Carter's record that Harris ignored, and to point out that she ignored them because she was falsely painting Carter as a fellow liberal.

You are not a professional historian.
How would you know? In your first reply, you said you had "historian friends" who would say that my factual list of some of Carter's conservative achievements put me in "loonyland" [sic].

Are you ever going to identify at least one of my points that is not accurate? Again, go ask your alleged "historian friends," and they will tell you that every one of my points is factual and is a matter of easily verifiable record.
 
List all the pertinent facts, pro and con, and we can talk.
Read: You're just going to keep avoiding the point. If one had not read many of your replies, one would almost think you have trouble understanding English.

It's very simple: Kamala Harris falsely painted Carter as a fellow progressive who pursued the same policies that she supports, but this is demonstrably false.

Carter backed a huge increase in oil, natural gas, and coal production, whereas Harris has doggedly opposed any such increases.

Carter pushed through the most massive deregulation in American history, whereas Harris has opposed and condemned deregulation efforts.

Carter was strong on national defense, increasing defense spending by 10% in real terms during his presidency and approving several new weapon systems, whereas Harris has always tried to gut defense spending.

Carter signed the Hyde Amendment, whereas Harris has always condemned and opposed the Hyde Amendment.

Carter favored zero-based budgeting, whereas Harris has always opposed it.

Carter added only $449 billion to the national debt in 4 years, whereas Biden-Harris added $7.5 trillion to the national debt in 4 years, over 3 times more than Carter added (even after adjusting for inflation--$449 billion in 2025 dollars is $1.7 trillion). And on and on I could go.
 
mike is not being historically accurate, and his arguments are flawed.

When he is willing to include ALL the pertinents facts, pro and con, we can talk.
 
mike is not being historically accurate,
Uh-huh. I again ask you to identify one statement in my reply that is incorrect. This is the fourth time I've asked you to document a single error in my points. As usual, you just keep issuing summary dismissals.

and his arguments are flawed.
How so? How are they flawed? Give me one example. If this were a private discussion, I would have stopped responding to your silliness after your second reply. I'm only answering you for the sake of others.

When he is willing to include ALL the pertinents facts, pro and con, we can talk.
Do you think people can't see through this silly dodge? What pertinent facts am I omitting in support of my argument that Harris's portrait of Carter was demonstrably misleading and incomplete? Name one.

We already have the "pro and con." We have Harris's eulogy and we have my list of facts about Carter's record that she ignored.

Here are more links that document my points:

Jimmy Carter Was a Successful (Conservative) President | TIME

Passing of President Jimmy Carter (examines Carter's pro-defense policies)

Jimmy Carter, the Great Deregulator

RIP Jimmy Carter, "The Great Deregulator"

Jimmy Carter, Deregulator Extraordinaire

Jimmy Carter Was a Better President Than You Think

Jimmy Carter Supported a Strong National OCS Oil and Gas Program
 
Mike doubles down on his perspective and excludes matters he does not like.
 
Mike doubles down on his perspective
LOL! It's not "perspective." The fact that Carter increased defense spending every year and approved numerous new weapon systems is a documented, easily verifiable fact. The fact that Carter signed the Hyde Amendment is a documented, easily verifiable fact. The fact that Carter greatly increased oil, natural gas, and coal production is a documented, easily verifiable fact. The fact that Carter opened all of Alaska's coastline for oil and natural gas exploration is a documented, easily verifiable fact. And on and on I could go.

and excludes matters he does not like.
Such as? Give me one example. Do you have any idea how silly you are making yourself look? You simply refuse to cite a single example of an error in my list. You are unserious to the point of silliness.
 
During her eulogy at former President Jimmy Carter’s funeral a few weeks ago, Kamala Harris falsely claimed Carter as a fellow liberal, painting him as a pioneering progressive who championed all the same causes that she now champions. Here are some of the facts about Carter that Harris conveniently ignored:

-- Carter signed the Hyde Amendment, which banned the federal funding of abortion.

-- Carter opened 100% of Alaska’s coastline for oil and natural gas exploration. He did this in exchange for Congress’s agreement to designate 157 million acres as protected wilderness areas or national parks, a reasonable compromise that liberal Democrats would excoriate.

-- Carter approved a record amount of oil and natural gas drilling. In 1980 alone, more oil and natural gas wells were drilled than in any previous year in American history.

-- Carter pushed for a large increase in coal production.

-- Carter increased defense spending every year he was in office. Defense spending rose by 10% in real terms, i.e., after inflation, during Carter's four years. That was one of the reasons the liberal wing of his party was upset with him, and one of the reasons Ted Kennedy challenged him in the 1980 Democratic primary.

-- Carter strongly supported the development of the B-2 stealth bomber, the Trident D5, the F/A-18 Hornet, the Aegis radar-weapon system, and the MX missile. He approved the deployment of air-launched cruise missiles. Nine of the first 10 Los Angeles-class nuclear fast attack submarines were commissioned under Carter, seven of them in the last two years of Carter’s term. The first three Ohio-class nuclear ballistic missile submarines were launched or laid down under Carter.

-- Carter stationed medium-range nuclear missiles in Europe aimed at the Soviet Union, a move that the Soviets and their American liberal apologists deemed “provocative.”

-- Carter pushed through large increases in military pay: 6.2% for 1978, 5.5% for 1979, 7.0% for 1980, and 11.7% for 1981. Reagan was hailed for signing a 14.3% military pay hike for 1982, but that pay hike had been submitted in the last Carter defense budget.

-- Carter pushed through massive deregulation. He deregulated entire industries, including air travel, trucking, railroads, natural gas, and long-distance telephone service. He needed strong support from Republicans in Congress because so many Democrats opposed his deregulation efforts.

-- Carter reduced the number of federal employees from 3.2 million to 2.9 million, and reduced the number of federal agencies/bureaus/offices from 1,900 to 1,500.

-- Under Carter, the economy added 9.8 million non-farm/salaried jobs (10.1 million total), for an average job growth rate of 211,000 per month, which was a higher job growth rate than under Reagan, Ford, Bush Sr., Bush Jr., and Obama.

-- Carter reduced the federal deficit and added less debt to the national debt per year than Reagan, Ford, Nixon, Bush Sr., and Bush Jr. Notes Joe Renouard,

Under Carter, the annual federal deficit was consistently low, the national debt stayed below $1 trillion, and gross federal debt as a percentage of GDP peaked below 40%, the lowest of any presidency since the 1920s. During his final year in office, the debt-to-GDP ratio was 32% and the deficit-to-GDP ratio was 1.7%. In the ensuing twelve years of Reagan and Bush (1981-1993), the debt quadrupled to over $4 trillion and the debt-to-GDP ratio doubled. (Jimmy Carter: The Last of the Fiscally Responsible Presidents)

-- Carter ended the 1977-78 coal miners’ strike by invoking the Taft-Hartley law and ordering the miners back to work. He even cut off food stamps to miners who defied the order. Carter invoked Taft-Hartley after the miners’ union rejected two contract offers brokered by Carter. Following Carter's return-to-work order, the union soon accepted a new contract.

-- Carter pushed for zero-based budgeting, a frugal type of budgeting advocated by conservatives and loathed by liberals, but was never able to get Congress to cooperate.

I could mention other conservative actions/policies that Carter pursued, but this post is already long enough.

Why was Kamala Harris at an event where white supremacy hate symbols were prominently displayed?

1739981937265.webp
 
Back
Top Bottom