The Iran Nuke Primer

[PoliticalChic]

And the Biden Admin lost the election. MAGA is going to be smashed.

Who do you wish wins the war, America or Iran?

 

[Marener]

"Your claim is that ending restrictions on uranium enrichment guarantees Iran nuclear weapons."


And?

Trump end the deal's restrictions on uranium enrichment in 2018.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Bakhtiar? the Shah's last prime-minister?

In March 1979 the Iranian army refused to follow Bakhtiar's orders, since the national council had rejected him and chosen Khomeini, and therefore maintained it's neutrality. The idiot Bakhtiar then had arranged a coup in July 1980 (whilst hiding out in France since July 1979) - that's 16 month after the Ayatollah took over power in Iran. And 8 month after the Iranian hostage crisis. You can bet your ass, that the CIA had approached this fellow - under Carter's orders. And Bakhtiar got whacked 1991 in France by Iran.

Carter NEVER even manged to open up a direct line of communication with the Ayatollah. Even after Sullivan the US ambassador in Tehran had warned Carter about an imminent danger, Carter refused to listen to him and stated that: he will stay on the side of the Shah. See: Julie Nelson: American Presidents: Year by Year. Volumes 1–3: 1732–2000. Oxon 2015, S. 675f.

That the Ayatollah had reached out to the West - was never a secret - only in the USA, since they (Carter) wanted everyone to believe about his "wickedness" and supposed anti-American agenda. Upon Carter having refused to extradite the Shah - the Ayatollah, one day after storming the US Embassy, proclaimed the USA to be the "great Satan".

Carter had ABSOLUTELY no say in regards to Iran's INTERNAL affairs. And he had placed himself checkmate by his reluctance to extradite the Shah and his billions. - Therefore the enraged students - occupying the US embassy and talking it's staff as hostages.

You're trying to construe some ridiculous Iran MAGA legend onto Democrats - whilst ignoring defying the truth about Carter aka Democrats, having been in defiance of the Ayatollah. and supporting the Shah. - so direct your silly nonsense to them!!!

Sad little girl - please stick to reading Aladdin's magic lamp.

Carter dumped the Shah to clear the space for Khomeini.


Carter installed the Mullahs, Obama guaranteed nukes to the barbarians,. Biden paid for their development.

 

[Zincwarrior]

Who do you wish wins the war, America or Iran?

Irrelevant to the discussion. Remember, its not a war, its an excursion.

 

[BlindBoo]

Now I remember you......the most disreputable

Hahaha, you and your lame insults and fake news, still fly like a lead balloon.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Hahaha, you and your lame insults and fake news, still fly like a lead balloon.

You see how her vocabulary and intelligence fall apart, when she strays from using AI and copy pasting other people's work to write her posts.

 

[BlindBoo]

Another TOTAL bullshit story

The above mentioned military inventory was held by the ANSDF - the regular forces of the Afghan government.
Whilst TACO screwed up 20 years of Afghanistan, as well as defining the "ridiculous" time line for the US withdrawal.

TACO subsequently cut a deal directly with the Taliban, that freed 5,000 imprisoned fighters, allowing them to return to the battlefield to regain strength, and put the Taliban in its strongest military position in 20 years.

SOP for that one. The greatest military in the world planned and executed the final evacuation. President Biden gave the Generals everything they asked for. The 5 to 1 prisoner swap was in the Doha accords and was one of the only conditions placed on the Taliban that they actually complied with. They complied because it was a great advantage for them. 5 to 1. Recall Benedict Donald ordered US troops strength to be lowered to 2,500 troops days before Biden took office, half the number of the Taliban fighters he forced our Afghan allies to release back to the battlefield.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Trump end the deal's restrictions on uranium enrichment in 2018.

Now you are ready to admit that ending restrictions means nuclear weapons/


Excellent.

Irrelevant to the discussion. Remember, its not a war, its an excursion.

Who do you wish wins the war, America or Iran?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Hahaha, you and your lame insults and fake news, still fly like a lead balloon.

Who do you wish wins the war, America or Iran?

 

[BlindBoo]

Iran was guaranteed nukes by 2030.
So saith Obama and the Democrats.



AI Overview
The JCPOA (2015) was designed to keep Iran at least one year away from producing enough weapons-grade uranium for a nuclear weapon for at least 10–15 years
. The deal’s restrictions on centrifuges and uranium stockpiles began to expire in January 2026, with major restrictions lifting by 2030–2031.

False. The non-weapons obligation was permanent.

 

[PoliticalChic]

False. The non-weapons obligation was permanent.

Simpleton......how would you know that with no inspections allowed?????????


Try to scrub that Democrat boot black off your tongue.

 

[BlindBoo]

Simpleton......how would you know that with no inspections allowed?????????


Try to scrub that Democrat boot black off your tongue.

Another lie-n-insult on your part.

"While some aspects of the agreement would phase out after 10 to 25 years, "there was no sunset of the non-weapons obligation," he said. This doesn't mean that, at some point, Iran couldn't have ended up with nuclear weapons — but if it did so, it would have occurred by contravening the agreement, not by exercising a right it granted."

Fact-checking Trump's comments that a 2015 deal gave Iran the right to nuclear weapons

President Donald Trump repeatedly said the 2015 nuclear deal he pulled out of gave Iran the right to secure nuclear weapons. PolitiFact rated the statement False.

www.pbs.org

 

[PoliticalChic]

False. The non-weapons obligation was permanent.

Can you remind me why you thought giving this to the savages was a really great idea.....

the Taliban seized way more ScanEagle drones than the government is saying they did. There is no accounting on the number of crashed units.

Direct Quote from Report
“This also raises concerns about how NAVAIR justified procuring 105 ScanEagle vehicles totaling over $32 million and spare parts totaling over $52 million, and future planned procurements.”

This week, the SIGAR audit on the $174 million drone loss disappeared from its website. Here is the link that was removed.

Here is a breakdown of estimated vehicle costs:

• Armored personnel carriers such as the M113A2 cost $170,000 each and recent purchases of the M577A2 post carrier cost $333,333 each.
• Mine resistant vehicles ranges from $412,000 to $767,000. The total cost could range between $382 million to $711 million.
• Recovery vehicles such as the ‘truck, wrecker’ cost between for the base model $168,960 and $880,674 for super strength versions.
• Medium range tactical vehicles include 5-ton cargo and general transport trucks were priced at $67,139. However, the family of MTV heavy vehicleshad prices ranging from $235,500 to $724,820 each. Cargo trucks to transport airplanes cost $800,865.
• Humvees – ambulance type (range from $37,943 to $142,918 with most at $96,466); cargo type, priced at $104,682. Utility Humvees were typically priced at $91,429. However, the 12,000 lb. troop transport version cost up to $329,000.
• Light tactical vehicles: Fast attack combat vehicles ($69,400); and passenger motor vehicles ($65,500). All terrain 4-wheel vehicles go up to $42,273 in the military databases.

If you thought the Joe Biden Afghanistan disaster was bad now – things are going to get much worse. Joe Biden supplied the Taliban terrorist organization and their Islamist accomplices with billions of dollars worth of US armaments. Rather than destroying the equipment before leaving the...

www.thegatewaypundit.com

 

[PoliticalChic]

Another lie-n-insult on your part.,

"While some aspects of the agreement would phase out after 10 to 25 years, "there was no sunset of the non-weapons obligation," he said. This doesn't mean that, at some point, Iran couldn't have ended up with nuclear weapons — but if it did so, it would have occurred by contravening the agreement, not by exercising a right it granted."

Fact-checking Trump's comments that a 2015 deal gave Iran the right to nuclear weapons

President Donald Trump repeatedly said the 2015 nuclear deal he pulled out of gave Iran the right to secure nuclear weapons. PolitiFact rated the statement False.

www.pbs.org

PBS, like you, is a Democrat broadcasting subsidiary.


How would you know what Iran was doing, with no inspections allowed???

 

[Marener]

Now you are ready to admit that ending restrictions means nuclear weapons/


Excellent.

This is your framing. Did Trump guarantee Iran nuclear weapons when he ended restrictions?

Are you consistent or just making shit up?

 

[PoliticalChic]

This is your framing. Did Trump guarantee Iran nuclear weapons when he ended restrictions?

Are you consistent or just making shit up?

No vulgarity, no matter how deeply I've injured you.

 

[BlindBoo]

Can you remind me why you thought giving this to the savages was a really great idea

Haha. You are a true parrot. Specifically I supported attacking, killing and or capturing those responsible for 9-11 in Afghanistan, or anywhere they could be found. I opposed the occupation of Afghanistan along with the invasion and occupation of Iraq when the Bush Administration started trying to morph the anger Americans felt against the 9-11 attackers into support for attacking Iraq.

Would you have destroyed/degrading all the weapons we gave the Afghanis that they were using against the Taliban?

Not to mention the often posted lies in your Cut-n-Pasties

 

[Marener]

No vulgarity, no matter how deeply I've injured you.

You have a habit of avoiding straightforward questions.

You an hide behind whatever excuse you want, but the problem remains unresolved.

Did Trump guarantee Iran nuclear weapons when he ended restrictions?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Haha. You are a true parrot. Specifically I supported attacking, killing and or capturing those responsible for 9-11 in Afghanistan, or anywhere they could be found. I opposed the occupation of Afghanistan along with the invasion and occupation of Iraq when the Bush Administration started trying to morph the anger Americans felt against the 9-11 attackers into support for attacking Iraq.

Would you have destroyed/degrading all the weapons we gave the Afghanis that they were using against the Taliban?

Not to mention the often posted lies in your Cut-n-Pasties

But you were lying when you said this: "the generals testified that to keep Bagram open we'd need at least 5,000 troops. There was no evacuation plan left by Benedict Donald for the next administration."



AI Overview
Top U.S. military leaders, including General Mark Milley and General Frank McKenzie, testified that they advised President Biden to maintain a residual force of approximately 2,500 troops in Afghanistan to prevent a Taliban takeover and to hold Bagram Air Base
. This advice contradicted President Biden's public assertion in August 2021 that none of his advisors told him to keep troops at Bagram.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Haha. You are a true parrot. Specifically I supported attacking, killing and or capturing those responsible for 9-11 in Afghanistan, or anywhere they could be found. I opposed the occupation of Afghanistan along with the invasion and occupation of Iraq when the Bush Administration started trying to morph the anger Americans felt against the 9-11 attackers into support for attacking Iraq.

Would you have destroyed/degrading all the weapons we gave the Afghanis that they were using against the Taliban?

Not to mention the often posted lies in your Cut-n-Pasties

And you were lying about Trump not having a definite plan:

1.We will withdraw our civilians first

2. Then we will bring out our allies civilians

3. Next, the Afghans who aided us, the interpreters

4. Only then, will we draw out our US troops.

5. This will be done at Bagram Military Airbase, a fully defensible airport.

Under Biden: “The Bagram district governor, Darwish Raufi, expressed irritation with not being included in the process. He said in a statement that the U.S. military left “without coordinating with security and defense forces and in general without coordinating” with the Afghan government and officials in Bagram district.” https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2021/07/02/bagram-afghanistan-biden-war/



You just lie for the Democrats, huh?