Kamala Harris "Hurricane relief will be based on equity and given to communties of color"

Newsflash...Harris never said Hurrican relief for Florida was going to be based on equities.

https://www.politifact.com/factchec...arris-didnt-say-hurricane-ian-relief-wo/posed ABOUT

She said that in general terms regarding climate change (in response to a question ABOUT climate change and equities) that poorer communities and nations should not be excluded.

This thread is bullshit
Well if Poltifact says so I know its True what she said. Are you deaf? Listen to her own words idiot

And your link is broken it goes to a place that doesn't exist
 
What a bitch. White people are affected just as much or even more than minorities when it comes to most US hurricanes.
This is true, but she thinks that their white privilege is going to get them through, where as the minorities have no one but government to see them through. That's where her dumb self was coming from, but it's a lie, because this mythical white privilege being brushed over with a broad brush is leaving white's that aren't privileged labeled as privileged because of their skin color, and that's just absurd.

Minority doesn't mean skin color, but it means a minority in number who are of any color that might need assistance or help if they are downtrodden in life, but equity has nothing to do with any of this, in fact equity is a false term created by those seeking to embezzle money out of the general funds for use in vote buying scheme's and loyalty drives come election times.
 
Well if Poltifact says so I know its True what she said. Are you deaf? Listen to her own words idiot

And your link is broken it goes to a place that doesn't exist
They quoted her response and the question you fucking retard

I gave you the link. Read it
 
Equal Protection

The prohibition on governmental discrimination is not absolute; it depends on the class of persons targeted for special treatment. In general, court scrutiny is heightened according to a sliding scale when the subject of discrimination is an arbitrary classification. Arbitrary means random and often includes characteristics an individual is born with, such as race or national origin. The most arbitrary classifications demand strict scrutiny, which means the criminal statute must be supported by a compelling government interest. Statutes containing classifications that are not arbitrary must have a rational basis and be supported by a legitimate government interest.

Criminal statutes that classify individuals based on their race must be given strict scrutiny because race is an arbitrary classification that cannot be justified. Modern courts do not uphold criminal statutes that classify based on race because there is no government interest in treating citizens of a different race more or less harshly (Loving v. Virginia, 2010).
She said low-income communities and people of color. No discrimmination found, nor can that be argued in any court. The statement was made on a level playing field/non-partisan. Nothing in that clause comes clause to any violation by Harris. You better find yourself another clause hot shot, because that one said nothing associated with her.
 
They quoted her response and the question you fucking retard

I gave you the link. Read it
I clicked your link it said broken LOL

And my clip showed her saying it, I didn't need it spun for me by leftist rag Poltifact
 
She said low-income communities and people of color. No discrimmination found, nor can that be argued in any court. The statement was made on a level playing field/non-partisan. Nothing in that clause comes clause to any violation by Harris. You better find yourself another clause hot shot, because that one said nothing associated with her.
People of color

Race is an arbitrary classification that cannot be justified

You do now what that means right
 
She said low-income communities and people of color. No discrimmination found, nor can that be argued in any court. The statement was made on a level playing field/non-partisan. Nothing in that clause comes clause to any violation by Harris. You better find yourself another clause hot shot, because that one said nothing associated with her.
And NOT in relation to Hurricane Ian but rather regarding the effects of Climate Change generally

Newsflash...Harris never said Hurrican relief for Florida was going to be based on equities.

https://www.politifact.com/factchec...arris-didnt-say-hurricane-ian-relief-wo/posed ABOUT

She said that in general terms regarding climate change (in response to a question ABOUT climate change and equities) that poorer communities and nations should not be excluded.
 
Just did. Nothing in that clause connects to any wrong doing, but we do see your desperation.
LOL we see you're stupidity. People of color is clearly about RACE and not justified under the 14th

Thanks for playing
 
And NOT in relation to Hurricane Ian but rather regarding the effects of Climate Change generally

Newsflash...Harris never said Hurrican relief for Florida was going to be based on equities.

https://www.politifact.com/factchec...arris-didnt-say-hurricane-ian-relief-wo/posed ABOUT

She said that in general terms regarding climate change (in response to a question ABOUT climate change and equities) that poorer communities and nations should not be excluded.
Your link is still broken
 
LOL we see you're stupidity. People of color is clearly about RACE and not justified under the 14th

Thanks for playing
You really are desperate to fix your own flaws aren't you? Are you blind? Low-income and Are cognoitive enough to know what that means?
 
If it was only low income she could have left it at that but instead she had to opine about Equity and People of color

You lose again
:laughing0301: 🤪:auiqs.jpg::banana2::aargh: You just blew your own cover. Dude, you aren't ready for the big leagues here. If it was only low income she could have left it at that But she didn't did she? She covered her tracks. Nice try, but you just blew your own argument out of the water.
 
You really are desperate to fix your own flaws aren't you? Are you blind? Low-income and Are cognoitive enough to know what that means?
How does a low income person need more financial assistance than someone who lost a home, boat etc low income people more likely rent so their landlord would need the assistance more than them.

AND she still said EQUITY and People of color which is about RACE and NOT JUSTIFIED under the 14th

Doesn't matter how many temper tantrums you throw bitch wigger kang
 
She said low-income communities and people of color. No discrimmination found, nor can that be argued in any court. The statement was made on a level playing field/non-partisan. Nothing in that clause comes clause to any violation by Harris. You better find yourself another clause hot shot, because that one said nothing associated with her.
The people of color comment is what got her in hot water, because the situation has nothing to do with choosing anyone of color in a bid to distribute funds or assistance along that line, otherwise when everyone is pushed into the same boats during a natural disaster that doesn't see color as it's taking away everything that a person of any color had worked for in their lives. Government is supposed to be color blind and equal in it's protection and assistance given to anyone that is in need.
 

Forum List

Back
Top