Kamala Harris Wants Disaster Aid Given Based on 'Equity' (and It's Unconstitutional)

[Arlette]

When did I say that? It’s actually my THIRD priority.

Do you smack around blacks on this site who complain about racism, snidely accusing them of saying concerns of blacks should be our first priority? Of course not. That’s just reserved for the Jews you have contempt for, as indicated by your comments and cartoons.

You're still pissed about the nose thing. That was yesterday. Get over it already.

 

[WEATHER53]

Whitey.

Insurance is privilege
Just imagine the rewards of good conduct

 

[Arlette]

Nope. Just the antisemites. Horribly display of bigotry by the pro-Arab U.N.

They say Nutty Yahoo is a war criminal.

 

[Lisa558]

You're still pissed about the nose thing. That was yesterday. Get over it already.

Just pointing out your blatant antisemitism so others reading your posts know you are coming from a position of contempt for Jews.

The worst is when the Muslim terrorist was thwarted from shooting uo the NYC Jewish Center, and you, unwilling to criticize an Islamic terrorist, actually said it was the Jews’ own fault. You then bemoaned why “Jews won’t act normal.”

So, peeps reading this…..know that Arlette is a diehard antisemitic leftist, and her comments should be taken with that in mind.

 

[Lisa558]

They say Nutty Yahoo is a war criminal.

yeah, the pro-HAMAS side says that.

 

[Arlette]

Just pointing out your blatant antisemitism so others reading your posts know you are coming from a position of contempt for Jews.

The worst is when the Muslim terrorist was thwarted from shooting uo the NYC Jewish Center, and you, unwilling to criticize an Islamic terrorist, actually said it was the Jews’ own fault. You then bemoaned why “Jews won’t act normal.”

So, peeps reading this…..know that Arlette is a diehard antisemitic leftist, and her comments should be taken with that in mind.

I have contempt for YOU, you old bigot.

 

[Lisa558]

I have contempt for YOU, you old bigot.

Blah, blah, bah

Your earlier comments on Jews in general betray you.

 

[irosie91]

I have contempt for YOU, you old bigot.

good one, Arlette---now tell her that her mom wears combat
boots (I never understood that playground fart)

 

[wamose]

Fuck equity. Earn what you get and get what you earn. No free rides. MAGA

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Insurance is privilege
Just imagine the rewards of good conduct

It’s law in many circumstances.

 

[WEATHER53]

It’s law in many circumstances.

I’m whitey boy and I have all sorts of affordable insurance and That’s So Unfair

 

[Wild Bill Kelsoe]

As you might expect, Harris is babbling on about “equity” being a factor in disaster aid for the southeast after the latest hurricane.

Race-based relief programs are unconstitutional. But in the alternate reality of the Dems/ racists, “equity”, meaning race-based pandering is all that matters.

This is why her handlers don't want her going off script...lol

 

[Wild Bill Kelsoe]

Maybe they will just tote thousands of the blacks to a red state city like they did Houston after Katrinia and forever ruin it.

I remember that. Violent crime in New Orleans dropped 75%...lol

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

This is why her handlers don't want her going off script...lol

I don’t think that’s off-script. That’s textbook communist opportunism.

 

[Hollie]

Insurance is privilege
Just imagine the rewards of good conduct

Insurance is definitely a symbol of white supremacy.

 

[eagle1462010]

She's right though.....otherwise govt spending would be through the roof!

AS EXAMPLE: You're not going to give everyone $20 k to replace the roof they lost, making it equal for all....

Giving those who already have home owners insurance that covers the new roof don't need the $20 k for the new roof that govt is giving them with our tax dollars.

So blacks dont have insurance?

The HO is retarded.

We the tax payers pay for FEMA. Not to be used to Race Bait.

 

[Foxfyre]

What is unconstitutional about what she said...she said the poor, which includes every race....y'all are twisting it to say it was only for people of color?

Equity is not a curse word or bad word....it is how our Gov system has always run...

The Progressive tax code, as an example, is an equity approach, not an equality approach...

Income cut offs, for govt assistance is part of near every social net program that we have...isn't it?

If anyone owns a home but still has a mortgage is required to get homeowner's insurance and flood insurance too if near the water....no?

Maybe the govt could refund the homeowners not needing the $20k grant for the roof, to reimburse them for the insurance they paid, could perhaps be more equitable....? But I dunno on that....

There is no guarantee any citizen will get the help of $20k for their roof. People will still buy insurance for their home due to the uncertainty imo.

Are you advocating even billionaires get the $20k govt assistance so everyone is EQUAL?

People should not be punished for success and the federal government should not be paying to cover roofs for anybody as it is the homeowner's responsibility to do that or purchase insurance as protection. There is nothing in the Constitution authorizing the federal government to pick and choose who should get a federally purchased roof or that anybody should get that.

I have no problem with FEMA going in or a short term basis to assist with clearing debris, helping to restore roads and services when a state is overwhelmed by a huge disaster and lives are at risk. But those who choose to live on a hurricane prone coast, in tornado/hail/wind damage areas, on flood plains, in Earthquake zones, etc. should assume their own risk to live there and not expect everybody else to cover that risk for them.

That may sound hard hearted and uncaring but it isn't. As Benjamin Franklin once wisely observed, the more provisions the government made for the poor, the less the poor did for themselves and thus became poorer. Conversely the less provisions the government made for the poor, the more the poor did for themselves and became richer.

A moral society takes care of the truly needy and can do that individually or via social contract or via those who are led to provide charity services. But it should not be done by the federal government most especially by differentiating between people of different ethnicity, skin color, political party etc. The federal government should indeed see all as equal and treat everybody absolutely the same.

And it is in my opinion highly immoral for the federal government to reward the irresponsible while punishing or denying services to the responsible.

 

[Lisa558]

People should not be punished for success and the federal government should not be paying to cover roofs for anybody as it is the homeowner's responsibility to do that or purchase insurance as protection. There is nothing in the Constitution authorizing the federal government to pick and choose who should get a federally purchased roof or that anybody should get that.

I have no problem with FEMA going in or a short term basis to assist with clearing debris, helping to restore roads and services when a state is overwhelmed by a huge disaster and lives are at risk. But those who choose to live on a hurricane prone coast, in tornado/hail/wind damage areas, on flood plains, in Earthquake zones, etc. should assume their own risk to live there and not expect everybody else to cover that risk for them.

That may sound hard hearted and uncaring but it isn't. As Benjamin Franklin once wisely observed, the more provisions the government made for the poor, the less the poor did for themselves and thus became poorer. Conversely the less provisions the government made for the poor, the more the poor did for themselves and became richer.

A moral society takes care of the truly needy and can do that individually or via social contract or via those who are led to provide charity services. But it should not be done by the federal government most especially by differentiating between people of different ethnicity, skin color, political party etc. The federal government should indeed see all as equal and treat everybody absolutely the same.

And it is in my opinion highly immoral for the federal government to reward the irresponsible while punishing or denying services to the responsible.

Bravo!

And before any leftist rushes in with how insurance is too expensive for many people, well….then those people can’t afford to buy a house.

 

[Foxfyre]

Bravo!

And before any leftist rushes in with how insurance is too expensive for many people, well….then those people can’t afford to buy a house.

Agreed. The federal government should not be funding people to own homes either but can encourage home ownership by making interest and taxes on homes tax deductible. A tax deduction takes nothing away from anybody but does promote the general welfare as home ownership, when done responsibly, does make for safer, more stable, more prosperous communities.

When done irresponsibly it only encourages people to be irresponsible, encourages defaults on loans, and does nothing to promote safer, more stable, more prosperous communities. So a pox on Kamala's house for even suggesting new home buyers should be given their down payment by the government. I can't see that as doing anything other than helping people be more irresponsible just as the government encouraging or requiring lenders to give risky loans in the late 90's and early 21st century that led to the housing collapse and deep recession of 2020.

We should learn from history and not repeat the really stupid stuff that sounds oh so compassionate and caring but in reality only creates serious problems for people

 

[Wild Bill Kelsoe]

I don’t think that’s off-script. That’s textbook communist opportunism.

But they don't want her saying it out loud.