Nope, they’ll rule how ever they rule. I’ll still have to go to work tomorrow.
They will. I don't think you'll like the results.
We will see. I am content that the right way is being followed.
Just curious, where’d you get your law degree?
Judicial power can be used, and has been used, for both good and ill. However, in a basically just democratic republic, judicial power should never be exercised lawlessly--even for desirable ends. Judges are not legislators. The legitimacy of their decisions, particularly those decisions that displace legislative judgments, depends entirely on the truth of the judicial claim that the court was authorized by law to settle the matter. When this claim is false, a judicial edict is not redeemed by its good consequences, for any such edict constitutes a usurpation of the just authority of the people to govern themselves through the constitutional procedures of deliberative democracy. Decisions in which the courts usurp the authority of the people are not merely incorrect; they are themselves unconstitutional. And they are unjust.
www.heritage.org
www.city-journal.org
Yup, pretty much, along with a larger percentage of the electorate than the democrat degenerates.
That's only part true, Trump does have the authority to fire her.But have to follow a particular protocol in order to legally do so.
...and it's over.I've stated this before and I'm sure we'll see it again. Trump was granted everything he needs by the Supreme Court to do pretty much whatever he wants. But because he nor his attorneys can't be bothered to do things properly, this is the result.
Cathy Harris, the chairwoman of the Merit Systems Protection Board, successfully argued that her firing violated the Civil Service Reform Act.
Jared Serbu@jserbuWFED
February 18, 2025 5:57 pm
4 min read
Court invalidates Trump’s attempt to fire MSBP leader
A federal judge on Tuesday invalidated President Trump’s attempt to fire Cathy Harris, the chairwoman of the Merit Systems Protection Board, finding that her term in office is protected by a federal law meant to ensure the board’s independence from political considerations....A federal appeals court in Washington, D.C., cleared the way for President Trump to fire members of the National Labor Relations Board and Merit Systems Protection Board after district courts had earlier blocked their removals and ordered them reinstated.
www.cbsnews.com
No rebuttal? Figures. You’re not smart enough.
Please tell me who’s in charge of the POTUS….
Now that’s funny right there…
I don't think so. Have the plaintiff's indicated that they're foregoing any further action? My understanding is that they can ask the appellate court for a ruling by the full panel (en banc) and if they refuse then they still have the option of asking SCOTUS for a writ of certiorari....and it's over.
"A federal appeals court in Washington, D.C., cleared the way for President Trump to fire members of the National Labor Relations Board and Merit Systems Protection Board after district courts had earlier blocked their removals and ordered them reinstated."
Appeals court clears way for Trump to fire members of labor and workforce protection boards
President Trump fired Gwynne Wilcox from the National Labor Relations Board and Cathy Harris from the Merit Systems Protection Board.
And that decision can be appealed....and it's over.
"A federal appeals court in Washington, D.C., cleared the way for President Trump to fire members of the National Labor Relations Board and Merit Systems Protection Board after district courts had earlier blocked their removals and ordered them reinstated."
Appeals court clears way for Trump to fire members of labor and workforce protection boards
President Trump fired Gwynne Wilcox from the National Labor Relations Board and Cathy Harris from the Merit Systems Protection Board.
