Justices Alito and Kavanaugh Meet With Leader Of Anti-Gay Christian Hate Group

[TheProgressivePatriot]

While all Justices and Judges, indeed all people have their biases, this strikes me as different and disturbing. Justices will typically make an honest attempt to balance their ideology with a sound application of the law and the constitution, even when that ideology shapes their perception and interpretation of the law

This however shows a blatant intent and desire to bend the law to the detriment of the LGTB community. I have to wonder why they hell they were there-rubbing elbows with vicious bigots - and engaged in such a public display of support for their hatful agenda.

Yes I know, Ruth Bader Ginsburg presided over same sex wedding so don't bother in invoke that. She was performing a public service in her capacity as a Justice. Again, this is different . there was no need for it, it demeans the court and undermines any semblance of impartiality

Justices Alito and Kavanaugh Meet With Leader Of Anti-Gay Christian Hate Group

After a photo emerged of Kavanaugh and Alito meeting with Brian Brown, the president of the National Organization for Marriage (NOM) and the World Congress of Families, a Christian hate group, the justices are being asked to recuse themselves from LGBT rights cases

These people and organization are an anachronism that has outlived their uselessness

NOM advocates for what they claim is “traditional marriage,” and hope to take marriage rights away from same sex couples. The group’s president is Brian Brown, who boasted of a “great day at the US Supreme Court” when posting the contentious photo to his Twitter account on October 29.

Here is more

World Congress of Families | Right Wing Watch

The World Congress of Families mobilizes opposition to reproductive rights, LGBTQ equality, feminism and “gender ideology” in the name of the “natural family.” Participants in its global summits and regional gatherings share information and political strategies for mobilizing conservative culture warriors around the globe. WCF leaders are allied with right-wing authoritarian and nationalist leaders who promote “traditional values.”

National Organization for Marriage | Right Wing Watch

The National Organization for Marriage was launched in 2007 by Princeton University professor Robert P. George and conservative writer Maggie Gallagher to fight for Proposition 8, California’s ballot initiative banning gay marriage. It is currently led by Brian Brown, previously of the Family Institute of Connecticut. Especially under Brown’s leadership, NOM has expanded its mission beyond fighting marriage equality, working in opposition to LGBT rights abroad, transgender rights, nondiscrimination laws and adoption by same-sex couples. The Washington, D.C.-based group organizes the annual “March for Marriage” on the National Mall and coordinates an issue pledge for presidential candidates.

 

[Jitss617]

Welcome to a free country! Not everyone will agree with you

 

[Ridgerunner]

 

[mdk]

Let's be real: the only reason people wish for the Justices to recuse themselves is b/c you don't believe they will rule in their favor.

 

[JGalt]

Since when are organizations that support the biblical definition of marriage as being "one man and one woman", labeled as a "hate group"?

That's just idiotic and hateful in itself.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

Welcome to a free country! Not everyone will agree with you

I don't expect everyone to Bucky. Is that all that you have to contribute?

 

[Wyatt earp]

While all Justices and Judges, indeed all people have their biases, this strikes me as different and disturbing. Justices will typically make an honest attempt to balance their ideology with a sound application of the law and the constitution, even when that ideology shapes their perception and interpretation of the law

This however shows a blatant intent and desire to bend the law to the detriment of the LGTB community. I have to wonder why they hell they were there-rubbing elbows with vicious bigots - and engaged in such a public display of support for their hatful agenda.

Yes I know, Ruth Bader Ginsburg presided over same sex wedding so don't bother in invoke that. She was performing a public service in her capacity as a Justice. Again, this is different . there was no need for it, it demeans the court and undermines any semblance of impartiality

Justices Alito and Kavanaugh Meet With Leader Of Anti-Gay Christian Hate Group

After a photo emerged of Kavanaugh and Alito meeting with Brian Brown, the president of the National Organization for Marriage (NOM) and the World Congress of Families, a Christian hate group, the justices are being asked to recuse themselves from LGBT rights cases

These people and organization are an anachronism that has outlived their uselessness

NOM advocates for what they claim is “traditional marriage,” and hope to take marriage rights away from same sex couples. The group’s president is Brian Brown, who boasted of a “great day at the US Supreme Court” when posting the contentious photo to his Twitter account on October 29.

Here is more

World Congress of Families | Right Wing Watch

The World Congress of Families mobilizes opposition to reproductive rights, LGBTQ equality, feminism and “gender ideology” in the name of the “natural family.” Participants in its global summits and regional gatherings share information and political strategies for mobilizing conservative culture warriors around the globe. WCF leaders are allied with right-wing authoritarian and nationalist leaders who promote “traditional values.”

National Organization for Marriage | Right Wing Watch

The National Organization for Marriage was launched in 2007 by Princeton University professor Robert P. George and conservative writer Maggie Gallagher to fight for Proposition 8, California’s ballot initiative banning gay marriage. It is currently led by Brian Brown, previously of the Family Institute of Connecticut. Especially under Brown’s leadership, NOM has expanded its mission beyond fighting marriage equality, working in opposition to LGBT rights abroad, transgender rights, nondiscrimination laws and adoption by same-sex couples. The Washington, D.C.-based group organizes the annual “March for Marriage” on the National Mall and coordinates an issue pledge for presidential candidates.

Top right brother, three bars ..


Fix your title

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

Since when are organizations that support the biblical definition of marriage as being "one man and one woman", labeled as a "hate group"?

That's just idiotic and hateful in itself.

Since they spread lies and promote HATE. Since they work for the denial of civil rights to minorities.

 

[Jitss617]

Welcome to a free country! Not everyone will agree with you

I don't expect everyone to Bucky. Is that all that you have to contribute?

So why are you attack free people?

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

Let's be real: the only reason people wish for the Justices to recuse themselves is b/c you don't believe they will rule in their favor.

It's because I don't believe that they will be impartial.

 

[JGalt]

Since when are organizations that support the biblical definition of marriage as being "one man and one woman", labeled as a "hate group"?

That's just idiotic and hateful in itself.

Since they spread lies and promote HATE. Since they work for the denial of civil rights to minorities.

Nothing in the US constitution grants you any specific or special "right".

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

Welcome to a free country! Not everyone will agree with you

I don't expect everyone to Bucky. Is that all that you have to contribute?

So why are you attack free people?

You don't strike me as the sharpest tool in the shed. If you can't do better than that, I'm going to ignore your cryptic horseshit

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

Since when are organizations that support the biblical definition of marriage as being "one man and one woman", labeled as a "hate group"?

That's just idiotic and hateful in itself.

Since they spread lies and promote HATE. Since they work for the denial of civil rights to minorities.

Nothing in the US constitution grants you any specific or special "right".

Special rights? What special rights?. It speaks to equal protection under the law and due process. Equality is not a special right.

 

[Wyatt earp]

Let's be real: the only reason people wish for the Justices to recuse themselves is b/c you don't believe they will rule in their favor.

Since when are organizations that support the biblical definition of marriage as being "one man and one woman", labeled as a "hate group"?

That's just idiotic and hateful in itself.

Since they spread lies and promote HATE. Since they work for the denial of civil rights to minorities.

Nothing in the US constitution grants you any specific or special "right".

What?

That's not the way I read the 1st and 2nd.


.

 

[CarlinAnnArbor]

National Organization for Marriage a "hate group"

 

[Thunk]

If you don't believe in a man "marrying" another man YOU HATE GAYS.

If you don't believe in a man "marrying" a tree then YOU HATE TREES!

If you don't believe in a man "marrying" a dead woman then YOU HATE DEAD PEOPLE!

Give it up already you bunch of perverts!

 

[miketx]

Since when are organizations that support the biblical definition of marriage as being "one man and one woman", labeled as a "hate group"?

That's just idiotic and hateful in itself.

Since they spread lies and promote HATE. Since they work for the denial of civil rights to minorities.

Nothing in the US constitution grants you any specific or special "right".

Special rights? What special rights?. It speaks to equal protection under the law and due process. Equality is not a special right.

Teaching faggotism to children is not equal rights.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

Since when are organizations that support the biblical definition of marriage as being "one man and one woman", labeled as a "hate group"?

That's just idiotic and hateful in itself.

To perverted filth such as TheObsessivePervert, common sense and common decency are “hate”.

 

[Jitss617]

Welcome to a free country! Not everyone will agree with you

I don't expect everyone to Bucky. Is that all that you have to contribute?

So why are you attack free people?

You don't strike me as the sharpest tool in the shed. If you can't do better than that, I'm going to ignore your cryptic horseshit

Just a question

 

[hadit]

Let's be real: the only reason people wish for the Justices to recuse themselves is b/c you don't believe they will rule in their favor.

It's because I don't believe that they will be impartial.

Their rulings to date don't give you any reason to think that.