trump claims the trial is keeping him off the campaign trail

How is an NDA causing “election interference“ as this case claims? NDAs are not illegal much less be counted as “election interference“.
You could, you know, watch the trial, and find out.
 
How is an NDA causing “election interference“ as this case claims? NDAs are not illegal much less be counted as “election interference“.
That's not an "NDA", it's hush money. and it's not the hush money that is the real problem, it's the purpose and the accounting.
 
1714143929155.png


Just to repost the part that some people keep leaving out either because they don't know or are leaving it out on purpose to try to spin.

NDA's are not illegal.

NDA's for a candidate are not illegal.

Attempting to influence the election enacted by unlawful means are what is illegal.

WW
 
How is an NDA causing “election interference“ as this case claims? NDAs are not illegal much less be counted as “election interference“.
The NDA, as you well know, is not the point. It's how the money was paid, out of campaign finance. That was criminal.

Since you know that, you are an accessory after the fact and can be charged as such.,
 
The NDA, as you well know, is not the point. It's how the money was paid, out of campaign finance. That was criminal.

Since you know that, you are an accessory after the fact and can be charged as such.,

This factually not correct. Using the term "campaign finance" implies that the funds came out of campaign accounts. They didn't, they came out of Trump Revocable Trust and Trump Organization (both administered by the Trump Organization). The checks were not cut from campaign accounts.

The funds paid (By AMI and the Trump Organization) were in-kind contributions to the campaign that had to be reported, true. They were not, true.

But the funds didn't come form the campaign accounts.

WW
 
Yes, it is correct. The check were refunded from the campaign. You know that and can be charged as accessory after the fact.

The funds for payment did not come from the campaign accounts, the funds came from the Trump Revocable Trust and from the Trump Organization. Not the campaign.

Did the funds need to be reported as in-kind contributions and weren't? Absolutely. But that does not mean the campaign cut the check.

You should know that and be accurate in your descriptions.

WW
 
The campaign replaced the money,

No they didn't. That has not been part of the case.

Do you have something reputable showing that (a) the campaign paid Pecker or Cohen directly, or (b) that the campaign paid FPOTUS#45 or the Trump Organization funds to pay back payments by FPOTUS#45 or the Trump Organization?

WW
 
He has to get in all the golf he can while he can. House arrest doesn’t allow for tee times. Maybe he can get one of those Golden Tee games for his room
 
Lib loons feel and wish he should be gagged from recognizing and speaking about the truthful intent
 
This is what the witch hunt is designed for. Smear him and hinder the campaign. Has Nothing to do with illegality or incarceration
 
That's not an "NDA", it's hush money. and it's not the hush money that is the real problem, it's the purpose and the accounting.
LOL “hush money” is a dumb leftwing talking point. It was an NDA she signed.
 

Forum List

Back
Top