Judge slaps down Florida effort to ban abortion ad: ‘It’s the first amendment, stupid’

[DStar777]

Explain how AB 587 censors people.

From the video, quoted from "The Hill" article:

" California Gov. Gavin Newsome (D) has signed into law a social media transparency measure that he says protects residents from hate and disinformation posts spread through social media platforms. "

Ok, Einstein, how do you do that without censoring these posts?

 

[Marener]

From the video, quoted from "The Hill" article:


Ok, Einstein, how do you do that without censoring these posts?

Still waiting for you to tell me what the bill actually does.

If you don’t know, just say so.

 

[kyzr]

Speech is clearly written into the Constitution. You are arguing that the states have the right to over ride any Constitutional protection they do not like.

There is NO Constitutional protection for abortion.
States regulate abortion as they see fit.
Its not about speech, its about abortion.

 

[dblack]

Freedom the Press and Freedom of Speech are Constitutionally Protected Rights. Tough shit live with it..

??? WTF does that have to do with my post?

 

[0311]

Oh dear, you do not understand the Freedom of Speech do you?

 

[dblack]

Oh dear, you do not understand the Freedom of Speech do you?

What does freedom of speech have to do with my post? Are you drunk?

 

[pknopp]

There is NO Constitutional protection for abortion.

Anything else off topic from what i said you want to bring up?

States regulate abortion as they see fit.
Its not about speech, its about abortion.

And people are free based upon the Constitution to address that.

 

[whitehall]

The key is the "Guardian"s use of the word "demanding" but it's a tricky left wing maneuver. The state in no way demanded that the stations refrain from interfering in a ballot measure. It was a technical issue involving voting rights. When is the Brit based Guardian going to lay off giving advice to the colonies?

 

[konradv]

Could you care to cite examples of that?

I could, but I won’t. I’m not playing your little games this time. Defend your support of a felon and rapist or STFU.

#THISAINT16OR20

 

[kyzr]

Anything else off topic from what i said you want to bring up?
And people are free based upon the Constitution to address that.

What part of the Constitution says that abortions can't be regulated by the states?

 

[ThisIsMe]

Works the other way too. Photos of aborted fetuses are outlawed in several jurisdictions. Would you agree those who ban are absolute scum as well?

Justices Decline Case on Graphic Abortion Images (Published 2013)

The decision lets stand a Colorado court order that bars protesters from displaying images of aborted fetuses in places where they might disturb children.

www.nytimes.com

You have a point there. If one side can air ads in support of abortion, the other side can air ads against abortion, in whatever form that entails, right ?

 

[pknopp]

What part of the Constitution says that abortions can't be regulated by the states?

enough with the strawmen.

 

[ColonelAngus]

People lie in political ads all the time. Left wing cultist make a career of lying.

The first ammendment does protect lying even if it is MISINFORMATION.

Remember this ruling, leftoids….when you accuse conservatives of lying and want legal action to follow.

YOU WILL NOT.

 

[22lcidw]

Still waiting for you to tell me what the bill actually does.

If you don’t know, just say so.

A child can get an abortion without the parents knowing.

 

[ColonelAngus]

Oh dear, you do not understand the Freedom of Speech do you?

Not in Cali.

 

[Marener]

People lie in political ads all the time. Left wing cultist make a career of lying.

The first ammendment does protect lying even if it is MISINFORMATION.

Remember this ruling, leftoids….when you accuse conservatives of lying and want legal action to follow.

YOU WILL NOT.

It’s only the right wing conservatives that want to use government to attack protected speech.

 

[ColonelAngus]

The left lies in the ad.

Florida would not force the woman to die.

I support the judge. I am saying that left wing fucks will cry if the right does the same fucking thing,

I do not think it is difficult to understand.

This ad is MISINFORMATION. I DO NOT THINK “MISINFORMATION” should be censored via court.

For example…If the right says Kamala will put Jewish people in death camps, there should be no censorship.

 

[kyzr]

enough with the strawmen.

What strawmen? The topic is:

Judge slaps down Florida effort to ban abortion ad​

So will that decision based on the 1st Amendment stand, or will higher courts uphold FL's right to regulate abortions?
You said in post #67 "And people are free based upon the Constitution to address that."

I'm not seeing any rights in the Constitution infringing on a state's right to regulate abortions, including advertisements".
Free speech may win, but FL is pushing the issue. Stay tuned.

 

[pknopp]

What strawmen? The topic is:

Judge slaps down Florida effort to ban abortion ad​

So will that decision based on the 1st Amendment stand, or will higher courts uphold FL's right to regulate abortions?

That strawman. It's a cheap tactic when unable to address the actual topic.

But par for the course.

 

[ColonelAngus]

Dont forget this “ITS THE FIRST AMENDMENT, STUPID” argument when people say things like, “Ivermectin can be effective against COVID.”

ITS THE FIRST AMENDMENT, STUPID.