Judge slaps down Florida effort to ban abortion ad: ‘It’s the first amendment, stupid’

[TemplarKormac]

What more is needed? You eked out about 12 syllables of qeak trolling you don't even bekiev3. I know you troll for attention, but how much did you expect? This is the attention you craved. Enjoy it.

You type like a drunk. And one thing that's worse than a far leftist like you is a drunk one.

 

[0311]

That's rather obvious. More insidiously, he's all in on using the government to persecute political enemies (eg Disney, etc ..)

Freedom the Press and Freedom of Speech are Constitutionally Protected Rights. Tough shit live with it..

 

[0311]

Tommy Boy enjoys killing babies.

And ounce that baby is born, you do care about it one fucking bit.

 

[TemplarKormac]

Freedom the Press and Freedom of Speech are Constitutionally Protected Rights. Tough shit live with it..

If you agreed with what Twitter and Facebook did with censoring opinions during the 2020 election, you need to swiftly shut your mouth.

 

[TemplarKormac]

And that baby is born, you do care about it one fucking bit.

If you cared about that baby, you would teach prospective parents how to be parents, and not shoveling it off on the government or the taxpayers. You would encourage the bonds of family and do things to encourage the strength of a core family.

But nope. You can't claim to care either. Besides, killing an unborn child is not caring. It is murder.

 

[konradv]

If you agreed with what Twitter and Facebook did with censoring opinions during the 2020 election, you need to swiftly shut your mouth.

What about current Twitter and the way Musk has turned it into a bastion of censorship? He throws out anyone that upsets His Eloness.

#HYPOCRITES

 

[TemplarKormac]

What about current Twitter and the way Musk has turned it into a bastion of censorship? He throws out anyone that upsets His Eloness.

#HYPOCRITES

Could you care to cite examples of that?

 

[kyzr]

Now "states rights" trump the entire Constitution? Even things clearly enshrined in the Constitution should be ignored by the states if they wish?

Thank you for clarifying.

From the OP link:
“The government cannot excuse its indirect censorship of political speech simply by declaring the disfavored speech is ‘false’,” US district judge Mark E Walker wrote in his ruling. “To keep it simple for the State of Florida: it’s the First Amendment, stupid.”

If I had to defend the FL (not necessarily Desantis) position I would appeal to the USSC on the moral grounds of the Constitution.
Its not free speech if a state decides there is a moral issue.

What Are States' Rights?

States rights are the rights and power that fall to the states, rather than to the federal government, according to the Constitution.

www.thoughtco.com

Since RvW was overturned and given to the states to regulate the USSC may agree with FL.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

You type like a drunk. And one thing that's worse than a far leftist like you is a drunk one.

You whine like a little baby. Especially when you get treated the way you treat others. The worst kind of whiny baby.

Back to DeSantis's theater:

DeSantis has a law background. He knows he is full of shit. He is putting on an act for people he thinks are stupid and ignorant and emotional.

I.E., you.

That's what he thinks of you.

Don't forget that.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Thank you for clarifying.

From the OP link:
“The government cannot excuse its indirect censorship of political speech simply by declaring the disfavored speech is ‘false’,” US district judge Mark E Walker wrote in his ruling. “To keep it simple for the State of Florida: it’s the First Amendment, stupid.”

If I had to defend the FL (not necessarily Desantis) position I would appeal to the USSC on the moral grounds of the Constitution.
Its not free speech if a state decides there is a moral issue.

What Are States' Rights?

States rights are the rights and power that fall to the states, rather than to the federal government, according to the Constitution.

www.thoughtco.com

Since RvW was overturned and given to the states to regulate the USSC may agree with FL.

Ah yes, the same old con.

You frauds say it should go to the states.

Then you stand in the way of the referendums in the states.

 

[rightwinger]

If you cared about that baby, you would teach prospective parents how to be parents, and not shoveling it off on the government or the taxpayers. You would encourage the bonds of family and do things to encourage the strength of a core family.

But nope. You can't claim to care either. Besides, killing an unborn child is not caring. It is murder.

How do you propose to do that without invoking a Nanny State?

 

[DStar777]

From the OP link:
“The government cannot excuse its indirect censorship of political speech simply by declaring the disfavored speech is ‘false’,” US district judge Mark E Walker wrote in his ruling. “To keep it simple for the State of Florida: it’s the First Amendment, stupid.”

This is the very thing that should prevents Democrats from trying to censor "misinformation". Let's see how consistent/principled they really are.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

Judge slaps down Florida effort to ban abortion ad: ‘It’s the first amendment, stupid’

State health department sent letter to stations demanding they not air TV ad backing abortion access ballot measure

www.theguardian.com

I have to say these people are absolute arses.
The same characters who defend vances lies about cats and dogs will have nothing to sat about desantis quashing first amendment rights for political opponents.

Floeida should bill the legal costs to the GOP. Absolute scum.

I was right. They dont give a fuck. Lyung shit every one of them.

 

[DStar777]

Supporting the 1st Amendment is all good. I can't help but emphasize this:

“The government cannot excuse its indirect censorship of political speech simply by declaring the disfavored speech is ‘false

.. and yet that is basis upon which many Democrats want to censor speech. See Tim Walz for the prime example:

 

[pknopp]

Thank you for clarifying.

From the OP link:
“The government cannot excuse its indirect censorship of political speech simply by declaring the disfavored speech is ‘false’,” US district judge Mark E Walker wrote in his ruling. “To keep it simple for the State of Florida: it’s the First Amendment, stupid.”

If I had to defend the FL (not necessarily Desantis) position I would appeal to the USSC on the moral grounds of the Constitution.
Its not free speech if a state decides there is a moral issue.

What Are States' Rights?

States rights are the rights and power that fall to the states, rather than to the federal government, according to the Constitution.

www.thoughtco.com

Since RvW was overturned and given to the states to regulate the USSC may agree with FL.

Speech is clearly written into the Constitution. You are arguing that the states have the right to over ride any Constitutional protection they do not like.

 

[Mashmont]

Where have I denied free speech for "pro lifers".? It is those characters denying free speech.

When you say "FO" to my post about leftists banning photos of aborted fetuses in the public.

 

[DStar777]

I believe in free speech. I dont believe in lies like you do.

As I recall, we had a bit of a tussel on this very thing in the (Zone 1) "What is free speech ?" thread:

You don't know the distinction between:
"lying is ok"
and
"lying is protected speech under the Constitution" ???
No lying is not ok. Who has said this?

Are you doubling down on the whole "lying isn't protected speech" claim?

 

[Marener]

Supporting the 1st Amendment is all good. I can't help but emphasize this:

.. and yet that is basis upon which many Democrats want to censor speech. See Tim Walz for the prime example:

Sorry, but we need an actual example of Dems trying to censor someone/anyone.

Thanks.

 

[DStar777]

Sorry, but we need an actual example of Dems trying to censor someone/anyone.

You're kidding right?
Governor Newsome censoring "hate" speech in CA:

The White House censoring "misinformation" on COVID-19

 

[Marener]

You're kidding right?
Governor Newsome censoring "hate" speech in CA:

Explain how AB 587 censors people.