MinTrut
Diamond Member
- Jun 7, 2021
- 14,327
- 7,870
- 1,938
Bad decision by CNN/WaPo from a defamation standpoint, but perhaps they considered the cost of litigation - including the inevitable revelations concerning their sleazy inner workings - and decided to make the kid go away by paying him off.Coincidentally, two sets of lawyers gave advice to some major players in the field and came to a startlingly different opinion than yours.
Just as the NFL did with Kaepernick
Sounds good.But I do agree to just disagree with you.
He would be a fool to do so as the court got it right.And I hope that Sandman appeals and gets the dismissals overturned.