Judge blocks Trumps EO to end birthright citizenship

You make as much sense as


I have said anything that warrants making sense. I’ve only simply asked for an explanation of what Brokeloser thinks the framers meant when they wrote the 14th amendment. He has failed to address it. So have you. But keep posting tiktok videos cause that makes you look super smart!! 👍
 
Your cat gives birth in my fenced yard that it invaded does not make it my kitten nor my cat neither by choice nor requirement.And I Am Free to put both back in your yard.
 
I have said anything that warrants making sense. I’ve only simply asked for an explanation of what Brokeloser thinks the framers meant when they wrote the 14th amendment. He has failed to address it. So have you. But keep posting tiktok videos cause that makes you look super smart!! 👍
That has been explained to you.

You don't like it.

So what? It's over.
 
Your cat gives birth in my fenced yard that it invaded does not make it my kitten nor my cat neither by choice nor requirement.And I Am Free to put both back in your yard.
Your yard is not the same as a nation. Our nation has a constitution that lays this stuff out. Have you read it?
 
That has been explained to you.

You don't like it.

So what? It's over.
It has not been explained to me. If you disagree then reference the post or briefly explain in it your next reply..

My bet is another evasive rant about nothing is coming back. But feel free to prove me wrong
 
Slade is on Ignore for today in my threads.

Deliberate dooshery on his point, one that he will never win.
Pretty easy to win against people who can’t give direct answers to direct questions. Do better instead of running to ignore
 
Your yard is not the same as a nation. Our nation has a constitution that lays this stuff out. Have you read it?
He used the cat/yard analogy hoping to dumb it down for dumb people…What makes you believe the Framers would have authored an Amendment that would incentivize and permit Mexico’s citizens to break into our nation against the will of the people to steal citizenships for their spawn?
Does that really make sense to you? Is their any other Amendment, section or clause like that in the Constitution?
 
He used the cat/yard analogy hoping to dumb it down for dumb people…What makes you believe the Framers would have authored an Amendment that would incentivize and permit Mexico’s citizens to break into our nation against the will of the people to steal citizenships for their spawn?
Does that really make sense to you? Is their any other Amendment, section or clause like that in the Constitution?

The Framers established that their work could be amended, BrokeLoser.

Tough, the way it is, kid.
 
The Framers established that their work could be amended, BrokeLoser.

Tough, the way it is, kid.
The Framers didn’t intend for any changes…they simply created a pathway for a free people / Republic to be able to do so. There’s no need to amend 14:1…we just need to translate it properly.
 
The Framers didn’t intend for any changes…they simply created a pathway for a free people / Republic to be able to do so. There’s no need to amend 14:1…we just need to translate it properly.
Fail and you are pwnd.

They put in the Amendment clause, so, yes, they did know changes would come, like ten of them two years later.
 
What makes you believe the Framers would have authored an Amendment that would incentivize and permit Mexico’s citizens to break into our nation against the will of the people to steal citizenships for their spawn?
The framers authored the ability for the nation to create any amendment they wanted. That’s what they outlined. They made the constitution in a way where it could evolve to reflect the will of the people. How do you not know this?

Seems like you’re acknowledging that the 14th does in fact mean what it says about birthright citizenship
 
Does that really make sense to you? Is their any other Amendment, section or clause like that in the Constitution?
There doesn’t need to be another amendment about it. The one that’s there is there and it means what it says. If you dont like it then rally to change it. But dont lie about its meaning or intent
 
And in the process he made a dumb comparison of two things that are not comparable.
They’re not comparable because you don’t want them to be. Common sense is applicable in both scenarios….you should allow there to be.
 
1738203888937.webp
 
They’re not comparable because you don’t want them to be. Common sense is applicable in both scenarios….you should allow there to be.
Haha, no they aren’t comparable because of the reason I gave… a private property is not a sovereign nation governed by a constitution
 
Haha, no they aren’t comparable because of the reason I gave… a private property is not a sovereign nation governed by a constitution
You keep pretending to miss the common sense part that must be applied in both scenarios.
 
Back
Top Bottom