Judge blocks Trumps EO to end birthright citizenship

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

I am happy to have shut you up.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Again, I will ask you. How many cases of birth tourism do there have to be, before you will consider it a problem?

I will know it when it happens. So will you.

 

[MayorQuimby]

View attachment 1072031

If you use enough emoticons, maybe people will start to think you haven't been owned.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

If you use enough emoticons, maybe people will start to think you haven't been owned.

Hubris is your problem.

 

[MayorQuimby]

Hubris is your problem.

Why do you think a problem has to be very serious before it qualifies as a problem? Is it because you are stupid?

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Why do you think a problem has to be very serious before it qualifies as a problem? Is it because you are stupid?

Yep, you are hubris stricken.

 

[MayorQuimby]

Yep, you are hubris stricken.

At least not stupidity-stricken like you.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

At least not stupidity-stricken like you.

Keep trying, spud.

 

[MayorQuimby]

Keep trying, spud.

Keep crying, stupid.

 

[BrokeLoser]

It clearly is and has been to SCOTUS where they ruled that birthright citizenship is a constitutional right

It is because globalist America hating Libs want it to be and because like ignorant, tolerant inclusive retarded fucks we have followed some dumb as fuck TRADITION for decades or because our Framers intended to create a pathway for Mexico’s people to be able to fuck Americans blind?
Tell us, what other Amendment was framed to fuck Americans and benefit Mexico?

 

[Slade3200]

It is because globalist America hating Libs want it to be and because like ignorant, tolerant inclusive retarded fucks we have followed some dumb as fuck TRADITION for decades or because our Framers intended to create a pathway for Mexico’s people to be able to fuck Americans blind?
Tell us, what other Amendment was framed to fuck Americans and benefit Mexico?

That amendment had nothing to do with fucking America or benefiting Mexico. The concept of Human values is just something that your small mind can’t comprehend

 

[Rogue AI]

Felon47 alone cannot amend the Constitution. No such power rests in the executive branch. Way over reaching.

He isn't doing any such thing. If one was educated or even pretending to be, they would read the actual amendment and notice that Congress is supposed to do its part. Yet for almost 150 years Congress has decided not to act on the matter. The Supreme Court has no choice but to defer to the president's judgement.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

It is because globalist America hating Libs want it to be and because like ignorant, tolerant inclusive retarded fucks we have followed some dumb as fuck TRADITION for decades or because our Framers intended to create a pathway for Mexico’s people to be able to fuck Americans blind?
Tell us, what other Amendment was framed to fuck Americans and benefit Mexico?

An amendment is an amendment, and the SCOTUS decision upholding birthright is built on the 14th.

The cheap ass MAGA interpretation will not hold up.

 

[BrokeLoser]

That amendment had nothing to do with fucking America or benefiting Mexico. The concept of Human values is just something that your small mind can’t comprehend

An amendment is an amendment, and the SCOTUS decision upholding birthright is built on the 14th.

The cheap ass MAGA interpretation will not hold up.

To believe 14:1 has been properly interpreted is to believe the Framers authored it for Mexico’s people and to fuck Americans over…There’s no other way to spin it. Keep in mind, EVERY SINGLE word in the Constitution was written by Americans for Americans…every other Amendment protects and benefits Americans.
The case will be ruled on and Framer intent will be the origin for the ruling. NO Justice will render an opinion that reads…”The great Framers wrote and ratified the 14th so Mexico’s people would be incentivized to break into America against the will of the people and have a pathway to fuck Americans over.”

Trump right to end birthright citizenship abuse, says expert | Fox News Video

Hans von Spakovsky, told Fox News Digital that the birthright citizenship clause in the 14th Amendment has been abused for “birth tourism” by illegal immigrants for years posing a serious threat to national security.

www.foxnews.com

 

[Slade3200]

To believe 14:1 has been properly interpreted is to believe the Framers authored it for Mexico’s people and to fuck Americans over…There’s no other way to spin it.

Why don’t you give a detailed interpretation of what your pea brain thinks the framers meant by that amendment: what were they trying to do?

 

[BrokeLoser]

Why don’t you give a detailed interpretation of what your pea brain thinks the framers meant by that amendment: what were they trying to do?

It’s been articulated for you over and over again, you simply choose to pretend the Framers intent doesn’t make sense because you don’t want it to…“When America Wins The Left Loses…Every Single Time”

Trump right to end birthright citizenship abuse, says expert | Fox News Video

Hans von Spakovsky, told Fox News Digital that the birthright citizenship clause in the 14th Amendment has been abused for “birth tourism” by illegal immigrants for years posing a serious threat to national security.

www.foxnews.com

 

[Slade3200]

It’s been articulated for you over and over again, you simply choose to pretend the Framers intent doesn’t make sense because you don’t want it to…“When America Wins The Left Loses…Every Single Time”

Trump right to end birthright citizenship abuse, says expert | Fox News Video

Hans von Spakovsky, told Fox News Digital that the birthright citizenship clause in the 14th Amendment has been abused for “birth tourism” by illegal immigrants for years posing a serious threat to national security.

www.foxnews.com

Still waiting for you to explain the framers intent when writing the 14th.

Last time you replied with some off topic blurb about the framers wanting an all white america…. That had nothing to do with the 14th… care to try again?

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Still waiting for you to explain the framers intent when writing the 14th.

Last time you replied with some off topic blurb about the framers wanting an all white america…. That had nothing to do with the 14th… care to try again?

It has been sufficiently for 6th grade and above.

You have flunked.

 

[Slade3200]

It has been sufficiently for 6th grade and above.

You have flunked.

That’s a non answer.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

That’s a non answer.

You make as much sense as